roid-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Elsdörfer
Sent: 13 April 2009 22:16
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
> it would be done on a discussion list, which would fit in with many >
open source
lto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dianne Hackborn
Sent: 13 April 2009 22:51
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Cc: Xavier Ducrohet
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Al Sutton wrote:
We're 6 month
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Al Sutton wrote:
> We're 6 months in and on the 3rd firmware release, lessons should have been
> learnt already.
We had the first preview SDK for the 1.0 release out almost a year before
that release, so clearly that one doesn't count as the kind of thing we are
> it would be done on a discussion list, which would fit in with many
> open source projects I've worked on where pre-release versions are
> circulated and then developers say "Yay" or "Nay" to whether it's good
> enough to call a production release,
I'm not sure what Open Source projects wor
Xav,
We're 6 months in and on the 3rd firmware release, lessons should have been
learnt already.
Personally I don't care whether it's intentional or not. The end result is the
same for me in that Google are once again involved in the release of some new
Android related functionality and once a
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
> Are you really expect that one or two weeks is enough for every app written
> to go through a testing procedure to check for problems?
Of course not. We know that the current situation is far from perfect,
but we aren't making it hard on you o
android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton wrote:
Dave,
I'm not after G1 device images, I would be happy if I could get access to a
fully working cupcake emulator, but no one in the publ
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Al Sutton wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> I'm not after G1 device images, I would be happy if I could get access to a
> fully working cupcake emulator, but no one in the public development
> community can. I said before the G1 launch I see Android as the platform,
> not the
om] On Behalf Of David Turner
Sent: 13 April 2009 11:14
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
>
> Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt the
> normal
> "But Android is open source." response by saying lets be honest and
> admit it as it stands Android is not an open source project because the
> public "open s
:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dianne Hackborn
Sent: 13 April 2009 04:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
Which are exactly what Ralf is saying. You can build an SDK out of some
random change # of the tree, and
t; From: android-developers@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ralf
> Sent: 12 April 2009 03:04
> To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1
ndroid-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ralf
Sent: 12 April 2009 03:04
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
>
> Now
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
>
> Now before I start on the iPhone comparison I'm going to pre-empt the normal
> "But Android is open source." response by saying lets be honest and
> admit it as it stands Android is not an open source project because the
> public "open so
If its any consolation you are not alone in this. We have all been
sucked in by Google. I just get the feeling we have already been spat out!
While Google continue to make billions of $$$ what they need is
additional resource to test their code, the grunt work. That is where
we come in. If
09
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: SDKs & comparison with the iPhone
Hi Al,
I think my response might best have been posted to android-discuss, but I'll
reply here anyway.
Pre-empting a debate about whether Android is open source with the argum
Al, I hope it's not that bad and that over time things will get better and
more open. Look at the sorry state of the Android Market. I am not being
polemic here when I say that this cannot be so bad on purpose. So there is
hope.
On the other hand, the issues of Android moving to open source and/or
Hi Al,
I think my response might best have been posted to android-discuss, but I'll
reply here anyway.
Pre-empting a debate about whether Android is open source with the argument
"...let's be honest..." isn't adequate. I don't know whether there are
established metrics for measuring a degree to wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
