> Among others, there's a SourceForge project called BIND-DLZ in which BIND
> serves records directly from a database, without needing zone files, and
> without having to declare all your zones in a config file prior to
startup,
> so you can add zones just by updating the database. This would pr
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Mayoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Root-server switches from BIND to NSD.
> +-- On Feb 25, Patrick Spence said:
> > I'd certai
On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Rob Mayoff wrote:
+-- On Feb 25, Dossy said:
Added bonus would be a web interface for viewing zones and editing
them, which would persist changes back down to the DBMS.
Note that a web interface to your DNS data doesn't require that
AOLserver res
+-- On Feb 25, Patrick Spence said:
> I'd certainly be willing to use it here :) it would be a lot easier to
> administer than bind is for me..
There are alternatives to BIND that many consider easier to administer.
I. To remove yourself from this list:
Send a message to "[EMAIL PROTE
+-- On Feb 25, Dossy said:
> Added bonus would be a web interface for viewing zones and editing
> them, which would persist changes back down to the DBMS.
Note that a web interface to your DNS data doesn't require that
AOLserver respond to DNS requests.
I. To remove yourself from this l
- Original Message -
From: "Dossy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] Root-server switches from BIND to NSD.
> On 2003.02.25, Jerry Asher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 2003.02.25, Rob Mayoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +-- On Feb 25, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo said:
> > Really cool, in fact! If it were efficient enough, it would save the
> > trouble of generating BIND zone files from an RDBMS;
>
> There are already servers available that can serve DNS direct
Rob Mayoff wrote:
+-- On Feb 25, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo said:
Really cool, in fact! If it were efficient enough, it would save the
trouble of generating BIND zone files from an RDBMS;
There are already servers available that can serve DNS directly from
MySQL or Postgres. They are not nearl
+-- On Feb 25, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo said:
> Really cool, in fact! If it were efficient enough, it would save the
> trouble of generating BIND zone files from an RDBMS;
There are already servers available that can serve DNS directly from
MySQL or Postgres. They are not nearly as fast as a de
Dossy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there was an nsudp socket, we could implement a DNS server that
> runs out of AOLserver that could use any nsdb to store zone data in
> a DBMS ... that might be mildly interesting.
Really cool, in fact! If it were efficient enough, it would save the
trouble
Dossy wrote:
On 2003.02.25, Jerry Asher wrote:
>The nsd in this case is not the naviserver daemon we all enjoy but a
>nameserver daemon written at "NLnet Labs in cooperation with RIPE."
Should we add to the confusion and start coding up an nsdns module so
one could use AOLserver to serve DNS? :
On 2003.02.25, Jerry Asher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The nsd in this case is not the naviserver daemon we all enjoy but a
> nameserver daemon written at "NLnet Labs in cooperation with RIPE."
Should we add to the confusion and start coding up an nsdns module so
one could use AOLserver to serv
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=55040&threshold=-1&commentsort=3&tid=185&mode=thread&pid=5379648
Well this isn't really as true or good as I wish it was.
The nsd in this case is not the naviserver daemon we all enjoy but a
nameserver daemon written at "NLnet Labs in cooperation with RIPE."
ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
