On 27 March 2012 02:07, Sambhav Jain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have shaped the idea for the "Corpus-based lexicalised feature
> transfer". Feedback is welcome.
>
> DEFINITENESS
>
>
> Proposing a module "Definiteness Adapter" which will lie just before
> morphological generation in the
Hello,
When matching a pattern and outputting an LU you have to exactly add all
the morphological tags as they are in your monodix, otherwise you'll get an
"#" error. If you are matching an entry different from the one in the
example, with different tags, you need to output them all in the transfe
Hello,
While going through the Apertium_New_Language_Pair_HOWTO I came across what
seems to be an incomplete rule. Or at least it didn't work in my case :).
In the section dealing with verbs, the complete rule would be in my opinion:
El dt 27 de 03 de 2012 a les 06:37 +0530, en/na Sambhav Jain va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
> I have shaped the idea for the "Corpus-based lexicalised feature
> transfer". Feedback is welcome.
>
> http://apertium.codepad.org/F9AlEyZS (better formatted text)
>
> Apertium
>
>
> Corpus-based l
On 28 March 2012 23:13, Bernard Chardonneau wrote:
> So, if I follow :
>
> Preliminary question : What about Apertium on Android ?
>
This is a follow-up to another thread that was discussing exactly that.
> Second questions : What is interesting for Apertium team to develop
> Apertium aplication
On 28 March 2012 23:30, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> Pardon if I missed somewhere in the thread, but why even go through the app
> store?
You did, but it was another thread (actually, a couple of other
threads), so we won't tar and feather you for it :)
> If the point is to have ssomething that works o
On Mar 28, 2012 6:20 AM, "Jacob Nordfalk" wrote:
>
>
>
> 2012/3/28 Jacob Nordfalk
>>
>> What!?
>>
>>
>> 2012/3/28 Jimmy O'Regan
>>>
>>> On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
>>> > Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
>>> >
>>>
>>> The short answer is, it c
El dj 29 de 03 de 2012 a les 00:13 +0200, en/na Bernard Chardonneau va
escriure:
> > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:27:24 +0100
> > From: "Jimmy O'Regan"
> > To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC: Embedding Ape
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:27:24 +0100
> From: "Jimmy O'Regan"
> To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] GSoC: Embedding Apertium in iPhone is a no-go.
> On 28 March 2012 14:19, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
> > 2012/3/28
2012/3/28 Mikel Artetxe
>> Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
>>
>
>
> As it has been said, the main problem to publish in the app store would be
> the GPL license: Apple doesn't currently allow apps licensed under GPL
>
> In any case, I think that working for
> > Just mention that the main problem that I found when working on the iOS
> > prototype was the fact that there were several duplicated symbols. For
> > instance, each program (ltproc, interchunk, postchunk and so on) has
> > logically a main function but, since iOS apps must consist of a single
>
> If you really really want to make a GUI on this, fine, OK. But I'd
>>> expect it to not been usen very often and I'd only spend limited time on
>>> it. And as command line script for group 1) I think a makefile/shell script
>>> is more adequate.
>>>
>>
>> Now I really understand you and you ha
On 28 March 2012 14:19, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
> 2012/3/28 Jacob Nordfalk
>> What!?
>> 2012/3/28 Jimmy O'Regan
>>>
>>> On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
>>> > Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
>>> >
>>>
>>> The short answer is, it can't be.
>>>
>>> T
On 28 March 2012 13:24, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
> What!?
The App Store usage agreement has improved a little:
You may not copy (except as expressly permitted by this license and
the Usage Rules), decompile, reverse-engineer, disassemble, attempt to
derive the source code of, modify, or create deri
Thanks for the help,
Gyorgy
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 14:43, Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
> 2012/3/28 Francis Tyers :
> > It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
> > used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
> > file, for calculating the ambigu
2012/3/28 Jacob Nordfalk
> What!?
>
>
> 2012/3/28 Jimmy O'Regan
>
>> On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
>> > Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
>> >
>>
>> The short answer is, it can't be.
>>
>> The long answer is, it would require every major contrib
2012/3/28 Francis Tyers :
> It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
> used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
> file, for calculating the ambiguity classes. But someone else might know
> better.
It's the analysis of the expansion. Con
What!?
2012/3/28 Jimmy O'Regan
> On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
> > Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
> >
>
> The short answer is, it can't be.
>
> The long answer is, it would require every major contributor of every
> component that would be di
On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk wrote:
> Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
>
The short answer is, it can't be.
The long answer is, it would require every major contributor of every
component that would be distributed to agree to a set of exceptions to
the
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 12:43 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
> Thanks, for clarifying things.
>
> > It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training:
> is it
> > possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner)
> without creating
>
Thanks, for clarifying things.
> It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training: is it
> > possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner) without creating
> > all the lexical resources used by the MT system? What is
> > not obvious for me, that why are these parameters needed:
>
2012/3/28 Mikel Artetxe
>
>> If you really really want to make a GUI on this, fine, OK. But I'd
>> expect it to not been usen very often and I'd only spend limited time on
>> it. And as command line script for group 1) I think a makefile/shell script
>> is more adequate.
>>
>
> Now I really unde
Ilnar Salimzyan
writes:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> wrote:
>> Ilnar Salimzyan
>> writes:
>>
>>> This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
>>> "GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat / Kaz-Tat" from March 26].
>>>
>>> Having discussed the
El dt 27 de 03 de 2012 a les 19:25 +, en/na ASKINS, ANDREW va
escriure:
> I'm interested in applying to the Google Summer of Code program, but I
> don't have any prior experience working with open source, so to get
> adjusted and to prove that I can learn as I go I wanted to try to find
> a min
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 10:20 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
>
> thanks for helping.
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
> wrote:
> Orosz György writes:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am asking your help, hope someo
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> Orosz György writes:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am
> wondering if it is
> > possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
wrote:
> Ilnar Salimzyan
> writes:
>
>> This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
>> "GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat / Kaz-Tat" from March 26].
>>
>> Having discussed the problem of monodixes/lexc-files copie
Orosz György writes:
> Dear All,
>
> I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
> if it is
> possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
> creating all
> the resources used by the MT system.
It's possible to use it by itself, like
Ilnar Salimzyan
writes:
> This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
> "GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat / Kaz-Tat" from March 26].
>
> Having discussed the problem of monodixes/lexc-files copied in many
> pairs (and in more and more pairs) with Jonathan and seeing th
29 matches
Mail list logo
