Ilnar Salimzyan
ilnar.salimz...@gmail.com writes:
This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat / Kaz-Tat from March 26].
Having discussed the problem of monodixes/lexc-files copied in many
pairs (and in more and more pairs) with
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am wondering
if it is
possible to use the apertium tagger as a standalone application, without
creating all
the resources used by the MT system.
It's possible to use it by
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
Ilnar Salimzyan
ilnar.salimz...@gmail.com writes:
This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat / Kaz-Tat from March 26].
Having discussed the problem
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.orgwrote:
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking your help, hope someone can clarify these thigs: I am
wondering if it is
possible to use the apertium tagger as a
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 10:20 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
Hi,
thanks for helping.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:25, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
Orosz György oros...@itk.ppke.hu writes:
Dear All,
I am asking
El dt 27 de 03 de 2012 a les 19:25 +, en/na ASKINS, ANDREW va
escriure:
I'm interested in applying to the Google Summer of Code program, but I
don't have any prior experience working with open source, so to get
adjusted and to prove that I can learn as I go I wanted to try to find
a minor
Ilnar Salimzyan
ilnar.salimz...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
unham...@fsfe.org wrote:
Ilnar Salimzyan
ilnar.salimz...@gmail.com writes:
This thread grew out of the discussion of my proposal draft [see
GSoC: Adopting a language pair: Tur-Tat /
2012/3/28 Mikel Artetxe artet...@gmail.com
If you really really want to make a GUI on this, fine, OK. But I'd
expect it to not been usen very often and I'd only spend limited time on
it. And as command line script for group 1) I think a makefile/shell script
is more adequate.
Now I
Thanks, for clarifying things.
It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training: is it
possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner) without creating
all the lexical resources used by the MT system? What is
not obvious for me, that why are these parameters needed:
El dc 28 de 03 de 2012 a les 12:43 +0200, en/na Orosz György va
escriure:
Thanks, for clarifying things.
It is clear. I am wondering about the supervised training:
is it
possible to train the tagger (in a supervised manner)
without creating
all
On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote:
Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
The short answer is, it can't be.
The long answer is, it would require every major contributor of every
component that would be distributed to agree to a
2012/3/28 Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com:
It isn't used for morphological analysis, the morphological analyser is
used for that. I believe that the expansion is used, along with the TSX
file, for calculating the ambiguity classes. But someone else might know
better.
It's the analysis of
2012/3/28 Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com
What!?
2012/3/28 Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com
On 28 March 2012 11:33, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote:
Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
The short answer is, it can't be.
The long
On 28 March 2012 13:24, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote:
What!?
The App Store usage agreement has improved a little:
You may not copy (except as expressly permitted by this license and
the Usage Rules), decompile, reverse-engineer, disassemble, attempt to
derive the source code
If you really really want to make a GUI on this, fine, OK. But I'd
expect it to not been usen very often and I'd only spend limited time on
it. And as command line script for group 1) I think a makefile/shell script
is more adequate.
Now I really understand you and you have definitely
Just mention that the main problem that I found when working on the iOS
prototype was the fact that there were several duplicated symbols. For
instance, each program (ltproc, interchunk, postchunk and so on) has
logically a main function but, since iOS apps must consist of a single
2012/3/28 Mikel Artetxe artet...@gmail.com
Overall, make sure that your port can be published in Apples store.
As it has been said, the main problem to publish in the app store would be
the GPL license: Apple doesn't currently allow apps licensed under GPL
In any case, I think that
On 28 March 2012 23:30, Ryan Johnson ryan.txan...@gmail.com wrote:
Pardon if I missed somewhere in the thread, but why even go through the app
store?
You did, but it was another thread (actually, a couple of other
threads), so we won't tar and feather you for it :)
If the point is to have
El dt 27 de 03 de 2012 a les 06:37 +0530, en/na Sambhav Jain va
escriure:
Hi,
I have shaped the idea for the Corpus-based lexicalised feature
transfer. Feedback is welcome.
http://apertium.codepad.org/F9AlEyZS (better formatted text)
Apertium
Corpus-based lexicalised
Hello,
While going through the Apertium_New_Language_Pair_HOWTO I came across what
seems to be an incomplete rule. Or at least it didn't work in my case :).
In the section dealing with verbs, the complete rule would be in my opinion:
rule
pattern
pattern-item n=vrb/
/pattern
action
Hello,
When matching a pattern and outputting an LU you have to exactly add all
the morphological tags as they are in your monodix, otherwise you'll get an
# error. If you are matching an entry different from the one in the
example, with different tags, you need to output them all in the
On 27 March 2012 02:07, Sambhav Jain sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have shaped the idea for the Corpus-based lexicalised feature
transfer. Feedback is welcome.
DEFINITENESS
Proposing a module Definiteness Adapter which will lie just before
morphological generation in
22 matches
Mail list logo
