Hi,
See below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 23:07, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dg 16 de 12 de 2012 a les 14:21 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
I consider info on primarily domain and secondly style useful for
disambiguation. As a first step it would be very nice to be
Per Tunedal per.tune...@operamail.com
writes:
Hi,
See below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 23:07, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dg 16 de 12 de 2012 a les 14:21 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
I consider info on primarily domain and secondly style useful for
Hi again,
see below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012, at 16:00, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
Per Tunedal per.tune...@operamail.com
writes:
Hi,
See below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012, at 23:07, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dg 16 de 12 de 2012 a les 14:21 +0100,
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 17:19 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
... snip ...
Hmm, I thought that some training might cover up what wasn't manually
added, somehow.
Anyhow, what if I skip the training? Can manually added domain-info be
used by Apertium?
Yes, like we suggested. You
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:19:31PM +0100, Per Tunedal wrote:
Hi again,
see below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012, at 16:00, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
Per Tunedal per.tune...@operamail.com
writes:
Hi,
See below.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012,
Hi,
I've already added some info on style in the comments, according to your
prior suggestions, Francis, like this:
e lm=dagis c=fam a=PT
Now you suggest adding info on domain like this:
e c=domain:foo
May I, using a similar approach for style, suggest something
like this:
e lm=dagis c=style:fam
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 19:22 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
I've already added some info on style in the comments, according to your
prior suggestions, Francis, like this:
e lm=dagis c=fam a=PT
Now you suggest adding info on domain like this:
e c=domain:foo
May I, using
To me, those examples have nothing to do with domain or style. They can be
solved in better general ways with a mix of CG, semantics, and lexical
selection. And I know this, 'cause it's what our non-Apertium closed-source
translation engine uses.
For example, the English text
The key to the
Hi,
Fine. I'll try that. I hope to be able to do some work by the end of
this week.
Yours,
Per Tunedal
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012, at 19:26, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 19:22 +0100, en/na Per Tunedal va escriure:
Hi,
--snip--
e lm=dagis c=domain:family style:fam a=PT
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 19:30 +0100, en/na Tino Didriksen va
escriure:
To me, those examples have nothing to do with domain or style. They
can be solved in better general ways with a mix of CG, semantics, and
lexical selection. And I know this, 'cause it's what our non-Apertium
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:59:29PM +0100, Per Tunedal wrote:
Hi Keld,
yes, your suggestion is very interesting. Meaning is a very important
aspect of a word! Have you done any work on it?
I have only discussed it on the mailing list, as I don't think I can get
anywhere without
some consent of
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 23:04 +0100, en/na k...@keldix.com va
escriure:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:59:29PM +0100, Per Tunedal wrote:
Hi Keld,
yes, your suggestion is very interesting. Meaning is a very important
aspect of a word! Have you done any work on it?
I have only discussed
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:30:39PM +0100, Tino Didriksen wrote:
To me, those examples have nothing to do with domain or style. They can be
solved in better general ways with a mix of CG, semantics, and lexical
selection. And I know this, 'cause it's what our non-Apertium closed-source
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:07:05PM +, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 23:04 +0100, en/na k...@keldix.com va
escriure:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:59:29PM +0100, Per Tunedal wrote:
Hi Keld,
yes, your suggestion is very interesting. Meaning is a very important
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 23:25 +0100, en/na k...@keldix.com va
escriure:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 08:07:05PM +, Francis Tyers wrote:
El dl 17 de 12 de 2012 a les 23:04 +0100, en/na k...@keldix.com va
escriure:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:59:29PM +0100, Per Tunedal wrote:
Hi Keld,
2012/12/17 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org
What will work with the java-version? And what will not? What's the
problem?
No one has re-implemented the apertium-lex-tools package in Java yet.
But the more languages that are depended on this feature the more likely
it'd get
16 matches
Mail list logo
