can't leave this *(&^&% list

2002-12-07 Thread anarkissed
No matter what I do it won't go away. I can't filter it to trash, somehow every filter I create is bypassed and trust me, I've created a LOT covering every damn variation I could think of short of filtering the members of the list as well. I can't get any answer from a listowner or find anythin

can't leave this *(&^&% list

2002-12-07 Thread anarkissed
No matter what I do it won't go away. I can't filter it to trash, somehow every filter I create is bypassed and trust me, I've created a LOT covering every damn variation I could think of short of filtering the members of the list as well. I can't get any answer from a listowner or find anythin

how to unsub?

2002-10-10 Thread anarkissed
Didn't see a footer with unsub instructions and couldn't find anything at the website. I just don't read this list anymore, am not using arachne at this time and think that maybe it's time to just quit recieving the list. Anyone wanna give me instructions pls? I wish I were a glow worm, 'Ca

Re: Back to same old ... Re: Google

2002-08-18 Thread anarkissed
At 02:43 PM 8/18/2002, you wrote: >but I got it in >safely, found a place to put it once all the cleaning and moving and >rearranging of the rest of the house was done, and played piano for the >first time in six years two nights ago. If you see typos, it's cuz my >hands are a bit stiff, sore, sw

Re: about floods in Czech Republic...

2002-08-17 Thread anarkissed
At 07:53 AM 8/17/2002, you wrote: >I am just trying tu figure out why I am not receiving arachne-digest, >although I am still subscribed. > >xCh. Got your flood report and thankyou, it was very informative and interesting. Sorry about the mud, that won't be fun to do but at least you won't b

Re: KLEZ.H and Outlook

2002-06-26 Thread anarkisseD
At 06:08 AM 6/26/2002, you wrote: >After spending a whole day disinfecting several computers, we've decided >to remove Outlook (if this is possible) and to use some other mailer. The >choices are between Eudora and Pegasus Mail. The 32 bit Foxmail >unfortunately uses MSIE to render the HTML messa

Re: KLEZ.H and Outlook

2002-06-24 Thread anarkisseD
At 01:35 PM 6/24/2002, you wrote: >This bug existed since v4. There were issued patches inside service >packs for every version since. What is really weird is that it >prob'ly continues to exist today inside v6. > >No further comments. > > >Cristian Burneci I've dealt with it on some of my frie

Re: OT: Crazy weather

2002-04-28 Thread anarkisseD
At 01:32 PM 4/28/2002, you wrote: > As an individual, what actions should I >take to forestall the great global warming? Failing in my >assigned task to turn back such warming, then what do I, as >an individual, do to prepare for it? Reduce your individual burden as a human. Reduce your consu

browser archive

2002-04-28 Thread anarkisseD
Lotsa browser choices and yes, arachne is there :-) http://browsers.evolt.org/ I wish I were a glow worm, 'Cause a glow worm's never glum. How can you be unhappy When the sun shines out your bum? http://anarkissed.myip.org end transmission [o^o]

Re: OT: Crazy weather

2002-04-27 Thread anarkisseD
At 03:37 PM 4/27/2002, you wrote: > I could >do with some warmer weather, so if the earth really is in a >warming phase, I say bring it on! ;-) > > However, come 2012, I do expect some interesting things. >We'll see. > >-- >Steve Ackman Global warming isn't so much about warmer weather as ab

Re: OT: Crazy weather

2002-04-27 Thread anarkisseD
At 12:38 PM 4/27/2002, you wrote: >Strafford, NH >17 April 2002: 93 F. (34 C) >26 April 2002: http://twoloonscoffee.com/DCP00544.JPG > > Someone forgot to activate the sanity cycle on the >weather machine. Welcome to the reality of Global Warming. this is only the beginning. I wish I wer

Re: Why M$? [was Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-11 Thread anarkisseD
At 09:29 PM 4/10/2002, you wrote: >Why on earth a 60yo dame who can't hold a job >feels the need to learn a new OS may be a valid question ... but I want >to learn it. For one thing, I want to set up a better network here >than the "hub to cable modem, no proxy" setup I'll have to begin with. >A

Re: Against M$ {Re: Some of you might be interested

2002-04-10 Thread anarkisseD
At 02:06 PM 4/10/2002, you wrote: >I want to protect it against itself! I want to boot to DOS without >having to use F8. I want to make certain any "messaging" software >doesn't open up a back door that others can send files through. etc etc > > >I hate M$ ... I really REALLY hate Microsoft. >

*OT* firewall and AV for win systems (was Re: Some of you might be interested)

2002-04-09 Thread anarkisseD
At 04:38 PM 4/9/2002, you wrote: >I'm >still in the process of figuring out how I'll protect my Win98SE >machine once I get it up on line. it's not the best firewall but it's the free one, www.zonelabs.com and there's lovely AVG free antivirus www.grisoft.com I'm currently running outpost firewal

Re: Free web based email and POP3 service that still works with Arachne

2002-03-25 Thread anarkissed
At 10:24 AM 3/25/02, you wrote: >Hi folks, > >just tested pop3 with my old account at Yahoo.de and it still works. >They also didn't send me a message that this service is to be cancelled. > >Regards Joerg yahoo.ca is still working fine and no messages about things either. Perhaps the US is the

Re: Free web based email and POP3 service that still works with Arachne

2002-03-24 Thread anarkissed
At 09:53 PM 3/24/02, you wrote: > POP3 works at mail.myrealbox.com but can't get SMTP > > to work. > > > Ross Virgin > > Toronto, Canada > > > PS. yes, this is on topic, since the above are for users > > of Arachne. > >Did you happen to try. > >Yes, you guessed it already. > >sm

Re: Who is at the very top?

2002-03-23 Thread anarkissed
At 12:48 PM 3/23/02, you wrote: >However, isn't there something called a "root" server that sits at >the very top of some gigantesque pyramidal structure constructed >from all the building blocks of the various "domains"? Would not >this so-called "root" server ultimately have the power to contr

Re: an example of JS masquerade engine

2002-02-02 Thread anarkissed
At 01:40 PM 2/2/02, you wrote: >Flash is a very bloated plugin distributed by Macromedia. I think >it works only with Windows browsers. You have to keep upgrading >to the latest and greatest version of the plugin so that it will >slow your system down to the point where the typical Windows >dum

Re: Diving into DOSemu

2002-01-31 Thread anarkissed
At 02:38 PM 1/31/02, you wrote: > > Installation: > > 1. make a DOS boot diskette with SYS.COM and FDISK.EXE (probably > >with some editor or Volkov Commander too) > > 2. install this package > > 3. login as root > > 4. check /etc/dosemu.conf (only if your diskette drive A: i

Re: JS masquerade engine

2002-01-31 Thread anarkissed
At 04:54 PM 1/31/02, you wrote: > > Entry is denied because Arachne cannot handle frames... they say. > >They lie. > >Maybe Mithgol will set me straight, but as far as I can see they are >only checking cookies, browser versions, flash capability and Windows. I thought it said, "Loading Flash, Pl

Re: basiclinux and X

2002-01-31 Thread anarkissed
At 05:12 PM 1/31/02, you wrote: >If it causes problems for Netscape then I don't see much point >in that method. Seems like most people would want to run >Netscape. > >What good is X without Netscape? I guess it would be educational >to get something up and running as a learning experience, but >

Re: Knock knock

2002-01-30 Thread anarkissed
At 01:29 AM 1/30/02, you wrote: >Are we back yet ?? No, we're still front. Go back to bed. I wish I were a glow worm, 'Cause a glow worm's never glum. How can you be unhappy When the sun shines out your bum? http://anarkissed.myip.org end transmission [o^o]

Re: Miracles (OT)

2001-12-13 Thread anarkissed
At 07:16 PM 12/12/01, you wrote: >We had a very nice commercial on Dutch TV called "The miracle from the >tap"... showing a small child discovering the beauty and miracle of the >water from a garden tap. It is cool, splattering in the sunlight and you >cann't cath it. Running away from your hands

Miracles (OT)

2001-12-11 Thread anarkissed
Miracles. That first long swallow of clean fresh water when you wake in the morning. Is anything more sublime? Crisp and cool and clear, it is a miracle to turn a knob and see it flow without restriction, without flaw, perfect into a clean glass. To lift it to your lips and taste it's brigh

Re: How do I get rid of all this wincrap?

2001-12-10 Thread anarkissed
At 01:26 PM 12/10/01, you wrote: >That's a new one on me .. > >On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:54:36 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > > > My system does not allow booting to the CD-ROM drive. > >I've never seen a system that could recognize the CD-ROM but couldn't >boot from it. I take it that you doubl

Re: How do I get rid of all this wincrap?

2001-12-10 Thread anarkissed
At 09:21 AM 12/10/01, you wrote: >That's good to know. Thanks. I will learn more about it. I am very >new to Linux and I don't know about how to mount drives and look at >their files. BTW, my DOS and Windows files are on Drive C. My Linux >installation is also on the same hard drive but the l

Re: How do I get rid of all this wincrap?

2001-12-10 Thread anarkissed
At 09:54 AM 12/10/01, you wrote: > The book says I >should use a Windows program named Partition Magic which was on the >CD-ROM drive. I had to install Windows in order to install Partition >Magic. If there were a DOS program on the CD-ROM drive for partitioning >the hard drive for Linux I woul

Re: How do I get rid of all this wincrap?

2001-12-10 Thread anarkissed
At 01:22 AM 12/10/01, you wrote: >How do I get rid of all this wincrap? Please don't tell me that I >will have to re-format my hard drive and take a different approach >for installing OpenLinux all over again. Please don't tell me that >unless it is the only answer. > >Sam Heywood Why not boot

Re: OT: XP & DOS [was Re: crap]

2001-12-09 Thread anarkissed
At 05:53 PM 12/9/01, you wrote: >Most computers sold at retail just come set up with Microsoft. The >advertising is just frosting on a cake that has already been sold. > >It reinforces the inevitable and makes it seem like the only "choice". > >It's just easier to go with the flow because it "come

Re: winmodems

2001-12-09 Thread anarkissed
At 10:40 AM 12/8/01, you wrote: > >How are the rest of you doing at survival plans for the holidays? What's to survive? It's winter, I keep warm. Holidays are irrelevant as I'm not regularily employed, not christian, don't have a family. I put up lights for my neighborhood to enjoy. It is

Re: winmodems

2001-12-08 Thread anarkissed
At 07:02 AM 12/8/01, you wrote: >I told you that winmodems are not even modems! just interfaces to the phone >line! the modem is software emulated and in that case anything is possible And he's been explaining that if you are using a DOS box in Windows you can use a winmodem with DOS software.

Re: no shit man!

2001-12-06 Thread anarkissed
At 01:57 PM 12/5/01, you wrote: >I'm refering to the stuff that you're sending to the mailing list >itself. Don't forget that at some point your complaining to these juveniles becomes troll feeding and trolls when fed get bigger. Like an errant child having a tantrum, the only solution if you

...

2001-11-30 Thread anarkissed
Goodbye George, and thankyou for the sunshine. -- For a country to be free it's citizens must have a way to defy unjust laws. The new electronic snooping devices are a step in the direction of fascism. Consequently I am appending the following Carnivore Confusion noise to all outgoing emai

Re: Big disks & BIOS

2001-11-21 Thread anarkissed
At 08:45 AM 11/21/01 +, you wrote: >Can anyone set me straight on the situation regarding large HDs and >(early) BIOS limitations? I seem to remember a limit of 8.4Gb for 486 >and early 586 BIOSes, but does that mean that HDs > 8.4Gb won't work at >all on these motherboards, or will the space

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-15 Thread anarkissed
At 03:02 AM 11/15/01 -0500, you wrote: >SVGA monitors and SVGA video cards support all the standard VGA modes in >addition to some SVGA modes, so the SVGA monitor should work with VGA >albeit not >to the best of its capabilities. > >Isn't there a configuration program in Linux to help you detect

Re: patience with Arachne

2001-11-14 Thread anarkissed
At 08:03 AM 11/14/01 +, you wrote: > I >apologize for any brevity towards you. No problem, I appreciate the efforts to help and thank you. -- For a country to be free it's citizens must have a way to defy unjust laws. The new electronic snooping devices are a step in the direction of f

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-14 Thread anarkissed
At 08:22 PM 11/14/01 +, you wrote: >What paring did you do? don't remember, had excellent advice guiding me on it from the web. > Did you stop unnecessary services? yup >Did you have a KDE or Gnome desktop? Both > Which window manager? Not sure, several >I assure you that this will

Re: Linux is now "the" threat to M$ according to M$

2001-11-14 Thread anarkissed
At 01:47 AM 11/14/01 -0500, you wrote: >IMHO, Linux will never become a very formidable threat to M$ until >computer newbies start talking about how easy it is to learn to use. > >I certainly will appreciate any advice I can get on this matter. > >All the best, > >Sam Heywood A noble effort. Wo

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-13 Thread anarkissed
At 09:10 AM 11/14/01 +, you wrote: > > The systems I've had that ran the GUIs at all were > > so slow I couldn't wait. > >486 systems? How much RAM? I had it running briefly on a 486dx66 with 32MB RAM and even pared down and doing nothing I had to wait for the cursor to catch up to the mou

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-13 Thread anarkissed
At 07:13 AM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote: > Is there a LUG (Linux User's Group) in your city? >There are always knowledgeable and helpful people >there, and in person they can *show* you things in a >way not possible over e-mail. I tried that one year. They said they didn't have time. No intere

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-12 Thread anarkissed
At 08:22 PM 11/12/01 -0500, you wrote: > If you work at learning Linux for 1 minute each day >for 4 years, then you'll likely forget more than you'll >retain. If you work at learning Linux in a systematic >manner for 15 minutes each day for 4 years, you should >be able to pass any Linux certifi

Re: x#@%#$*

2001-11-12 Thread anarkissed
At 08:18 AM 11/13/01 +, you wrote: > back in the "80's" when I discovered how dos was like a file > > cabinet,with drawers and folders and papaers (files) ,it all > > suddenly made sense to me. does anyone know any basic things > > about linux that would relate an understanding in linux as w

Re: Unofficial Arachne Buglist updated

2001-10-30 Thread anarkissed
At 04:03 PM 10/31/01 +0800, you wrote: >anarkissed wrote: > > >I see I should insert the !doc type header > >Just use it when validating, then delete it. >There are documented instances of the biggest >baddest browser tripping up when it's included, >but not otherw

Re: OT: HAMS

2001-10-30 Thread anarkissed
I'm just glad folks are keeping this tech alive. It has lasting value. Thanks! (wish i could play with it without learning all that mumbo jumbo) -- For a country to be free it's citizens must have a way to defy unjust laws. The new electronic snooping devices are a step in the direction

Re: Unofficial Arachne Buglist updated

2001-10-29 Thread anarkissed
At 11:30 PM 10/29/01 +0200, you wrote: >5)And finally: Concider this. You attempt to enter a site, and the >site warn you that you cant access it because you need "a better >browser". The site supply you a link and expect you to download >and replace your browser right away. > >When was the last

Re: Unofficial Arachne Buglist updated

2001-10-29 Thread anarkissed
At 09:15 PM 10/29/01 -0500, you wrote: > Hmmm, but what about my nifty neato IRC chat channel integrated seamlessly > > via java applet into my website so that even my technically clueless mother > > can enter into live IRC chat with me using only her java enabled browser? > >Q.E.D. >Unless, of c

Re: Unofficial Arachne Buglist updated

2001-10-29 Thread anarkissed
At 06:59 PM 10/29/01 -0500, you wrote: >I have exactly the same opinion of javascript - it is exceedingly wasteful >of bandwidth for no profit except for expansion of the page designer's ego - Hmmm, but what about my nifty neato IRC chat channel integrated seamlessly via java applet into my webs

Re: (OT) Windows XP

2001-10-29 Thread anarkissed
At 02:40 PM 10/29/01 -0500, you wrote: > Seriously, there is a lot to be said for people >getting comfortable with what they first learn, and >wanting to stay with it. Microsoft probably will >win many followers this way. :-/ > > - Steve > Just for the record, the Pirates have had and been pl

Re: (OT) Windows XP

2001-10-28 Thread anarkissed
At 01:32 AM 10/30/01 +0800, you wrote: >The system promises fewer computer crashes and will allow >users to delete data from their hard drive." Well now, seems I've been performing miracles all these years. I've been running reasonably stable systems and deleting data at will! sheesh. -- For

Re: DOS question - bit off the track!

2001-10-27 Thread anarkissed
At 10:52 AM 10/27/01 +, you wrote: >Well - this has certainly put us straight. I always thought that >AutoCAD was some sort of shareware, rather than a serious or >'proprietary' programme. Cancel all requests!! > > Gerald. Huh, a friend of mine spent 4 years in tech school learning to b

Re: DOS question - bit off the track!

2001-10-26 Thread anarkissed
At 09:46 AM 10/26/01 +, you wrote: >Does anyone happen to know whether I could download >a working AutoCAD R12 from anywhere? > >Thanks for any clues! > > Gerald. Methinks it most inappropriate to go about asking for Warez on a list of this sort. There are all kinds of Usenet plac

Re: ipw

2001-10-26 Thread anarkissed
At 09:53 AM 10/26/01 +, you wrote: >On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:50:21 -0600, anarkissed wrote: > > > i have a little freeware utility called "BounceSpam v1.8" which is > > lovely. It creates a fake "bounce" message complaining that the address is > >

Re: ipw

2001-10-25 Thread anarkissed
At 09:07 PM 10/25/01 -0500, you wrote: >Thanks for the suggestion. It is certainly worth a thought. >Before trying out the program I think I should first look into >the legality of using such a program in my state. > >Sam Heywood Keep in mind that the law doesn't apply till someone actually bot

Re: arachne crashes

2001-10-25 Thread anarkissed
At 07:39 PM 10/25/01 -0400, you wrote: > No need if you don't want to... ;-) > >NS.QUIK.COM 205.162.86.17 >NS2.QUIK.COM 209.213.143.253 > > > - Steve Great, thanks. The ISP is being a dick and not returning calls and I did try a lookup without succe

Re: ipw

2001-10-25 Thread anarkissed
At 04:04 PM 10/25/01 -0500, you wrote: >Maybe if I just ignored my spams the spammers would get the idea >that they aren't getting through to me and they would take me off >their mailing lists. I know it isn't going to do me any good >to "click here to unsubscribe". i have a little freeware uti

Re: arachne crashes

2001-10-25 Thread anarkissed
At 09:03 AM 10/25/01 -0400, you wrote: > Assuming the ISP you need the dns numbers for is the >same as the one you're posting from... Alas no, that is just a pop mail service I am using. My isp is quik.com I oughtta try what you just did tho. Yeah, after I nap away my head cold Thankyou.

Re: arachne crashes

2001-10-25 Thread anarkissed
At 04:29 AM 10/25/01 -0400, you wrote: >3. Use the lsppp packet driver instead of epppd. The former supports >server assigned DNS. Once you get the numbers, you can always switch >back. > >Howard E. I am novice enough to not know how to do this, although this might be easier than getting

Re: arachne crashes

2001-10-24 Thread anarkissed
At 07:03 PM 10/24/01 -0600, you wrote: >So I click on the icon for the drive and arachne starts spitting out "file >creation error" and it'll pause when the pause button is depressed, but no >way to make it quit except hit the reset button on my box. >What can I do to fix this? >Also, I put in

arachne crashes

2001-10-24 Thread anarkissed
I just loaded it and am playing with it's various interesting features. One of which is the "my computer" icon on the "desktop". Nifty thinks I, I can look at my drives maybe, I wonder how it displays them? Maybe this is a good shell to use for this computer! the computer is a 586/133 overdr