Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-23 Thread Attila
On Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 21:40 JJDaNiMoTh wrote: First i have to say, i'm a KDE user and i'm not really sure if compiz* will be anything for me at this moment because some things as seeing 1 desktop in kde and 4 desktops in compiz is a little bit strange. I hope kde4 and apps as at example kspl

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-23 Thread Thomas Bächler
JJDaNiMoTh schrieb: >> 2) because I placed [danimoth] at the end - emerald was pulled from >> Extra - and thus didn't work. > We'll see if brain0 will take emerald in [extra], or I take it in community. > For now, we must control the version of emerald. When you provide community packages for com

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-23 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/10/22, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:31:53 +0300 > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm interested what the following menu of fusion-icon means: > > Compiz Options: > > Looze Binding > > Indirect Rendering > > > > ? > > Should I enable Indirect Ren

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-22 Thread JJDaNiMoTh
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:31:53 +0300 "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:29:28 +0300 > > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:1

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-22 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:29:28 +0300 > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:18:55 +0300 > > > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > [cu

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread JJDaNiMoTh
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:29:28 +0300 "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:18:55 +0300 > > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > [cut] > Here is some more output: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ compiz-m

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Graziano Giuliani
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 18:18 +0300, Roman Kyrylych wrote: [...] > > Does anyone have beryl/compiz/compiz-fusion working with Gnome 2.20? > Here compiz-fusion works with Radeon 9600 and radeon driver with GNOME 2.20 on my toshiba. I have testing enabled, but I did need to recompile ALL compiz-fus

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Mezoko
Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:18:55 +0300 >> "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and >>> compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread _saiko
Hm regarding the topic... i noticed some issues on my beryl install can't stretch (resize) windows, only works correctly in the upper left corner next issue, window decorator icons for maximizing, x-ing etc have a strange shift when i want to click the x button, the maximize button gets clicked

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/10/21, JJDaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:18:55 +0300 > "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and > > compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl247's repo - none run > > with Xorg 7.3

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread JJDaNiMoTh
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:18:55 +0300 "Roman Kyrylych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and > compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl247's repo - none run > with Xorg 7.3 (but not xorg-server 1.4 and libx11 from testing) and > Gn

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread JJDaNiMoTh
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:39:12 -0400 Mezoko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > 2007/10/21, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Well correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that beryl and compiz are > considered dead projects. Compiz-fusion is the merge between t

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Mezoko
Roman Kyrylych wrote: > 2007/10/21, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hi! >> >> Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and >> compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl247's repo - none run >> with Xorg 7.3 (but not xorg-server 1.4 and libx11 from testing) and >>

Re: [arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/10/21, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi! > > Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and > compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl247's repo - none run > with Xorg 7.3 (but not xorg-server 1.4 and libx11 from testing) and > Gnome 2.20. > I get black desktop,

[arch] composite things are broken?

2007-10-21 Thread Roman Kyrylych
Hi! Yesterday I've tried beryl from extra, compiz from community and compiz-fusion and compiz-fusion-git from nesl247's repo - none run with Xorg 7.3 (but not xorg-server 1.4 and libx11 from testing) and Gnome 2.20. I get black desktop, no window manager and decorator working, though gnome panel,