[fedora-arm] Re: Introduction, Looking to help...

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:38 AM Peter Robinson wrote: Now Fedora Arm in a VM on an Apple M1 Mac is definitely something that > I'd love to support, and while my time to actively hack on it of late > has been limited, it's certainly something that I think is achievable > in the short term as a

[fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

On 7/19/19 1:09 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 7/4/19 6:12 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > >> I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue. >> Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my >> write-up, and we'll work with the vendor

[fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

On 7/4/19 6:12 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue. > Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my > write-up, and we'll work with the vendor on a suitable mitigation to > workaround any errata

[fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

Hi fedora-arm, I think we have identified the root cause of the 32-bit builder issue. Many thanks to Paul and Peter for assistance in debugging. Here's my write-up, and we'll work with the vendor on a suitable mitigation to workaround any errata:

[fedora-arm] Cloud image question regarding command line

Hi Folks, Any chance we can get the kernel command line for the Cloud images updated to change the explicit provision of "console=" so that the second one is "console=ttyAMA0..." and not "console=ttyS0..."? I'm not sure who owns these, so figured I'd ask here. I'm playing with F26 images under

[fedora-arm] Re: KVM on Raspi3

On 05/15/2017 11:48 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 15.05.2017 o 17:22, Jon Masters pisze: >> Hi, >> >> I haven't looked into this, but the following merge for 4.12 got flagged >> for followup: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg149582.html >

[fedora-arm] KVM on Raspi3

Hi, I haven't looked into this, but the following merge for 4.12 got flagged for followup: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg149582.html Others might find this interesting. I guess it boots at EL2 these days then - haven't played with the latest generation much - but I don't know if there

[fedora-arm] RAS userspace testing

Hi there, A whole bunch of RAS infrastructure patches recently went upstream. Can I ask that those present from the ARM server vendors (or interested other parties) assist in figuring out the userspace components so that we can get these into future Fedora? Thanks, Jon. -- Computer Architect

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

29/2017 12:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>> El sáb, 29-04-2017 a las 02:40 -0400, Jon Masters escribió: >>>> This was a different issue - mirrorlist entries don't work on the >>>> test compose but Beaker doesn't know not to create a "fedora-update

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

On 04/29/2017 02:38 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 04/28/2017 06:47 AM, bill peck wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> You may want to pull this change to your beaker instance to fix the >> anamon issue. >> >> https://gerrit.beaker-project.org/#/c/5661/ > > Thanks B

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

On 04/29/2017 12:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El sáb, 29-04-2017 a las 02:40 -0400, Jon Masters escribió: >> This was a different issue - mirrorlist entries don't work on the >> test compose but Beaker doesn't know not to create a "fedora-updates" >> repo. I turn

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

n Apr 28, 2017, at 06:36, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> On 04/28/2017 02:32 AM, Jon Masters wrote: >>>>> On 04/25/2017 12:52 PM, Paul Wh

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 04/28/2017 02:32 AM, Jon Masters wrote: >>>> On 04/25/2017 12:52 PM, Paul Whalen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

On 04/28/2017 02:32 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 04/25/2017 12:52 PM, Paul Whalen wrote: > >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/QA/Fedora-26-20170420.n.0 > > Haven't triaged this yet but my home Beaker is failing to provision (see > the

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-04-25

On 04/25/2017 12:52 PM, Paul Whalen wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/AArch64/QA/Fedora-26-20170420.n.0 Haven't triaged this yet but my home Beaker is failing to provision (see the python warning, I'll check the harness, etc. later): True+ fetch /tmp/anamon

[fedora-arm] Re: Proposal to CANCEL : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting 2017-03-28

On 03/27/2017 11:59 AM, Paul Whalen wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Proposing we cancel this week's status meeting. There is currently > nothing on the agenda, and hopefully we'll be busy with Alpha 1.3 > testing. > > If you do have something you would like to discuss and would like to > go ahead

[fedora-arm] Re: Qemu aarch64 install

Suggestion: if you're somehow able to persuade folks to do a 4K kernel in addition, retain default 64K. Packages built for 64K will mostly be on with 4K, but not the inverse. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Feb 17, 2017, at 03:31, Gerd Hoffmann

[fedora-arm] Re: Qemu aarch64 install

On 02/16/2017 12:59 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> pressure on them to clean this up. RHEL (and Cent) will use 64K no >> matter what, but there could be a (short term) case for Fedora having >> a cycle or two with a smaller size - I would prefer to avoid that. > > I think it would be more useful to

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2017-02-14

On 02/16/2017 10:36 AM, Christopher Covington wrote: > Hi Peter, Paul, Laura, > > Feel free to drop the QDF2432 system register access erratum workaround > patch at this point. Thanks for carrying it as long as you have. It has > enabled additional testing and development that would have been

[fedora-arm] Re: Qemu aarch64 install

On 02/16/2017 04:10 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > What was the reason to go 64k pages in the first place? Several reasons: 1). Some (server) implementations have higher performance under 64K. 2). VA sizes greater than 48-bit require a 64K translation granule. I can mention that one publicly

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

On 09/21/2016 02:47 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote: > On 09/15/2016 08:15 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Hello All! >> >> 2016-09-14 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Linton : >> >>> js185: >>> couchdb-0:1.6.1-16.fc25.x86_64 >> ... >>> erlang-js-0:1.3.0-7.fc25.x86_64 >> >> I've got patches

[fedora-arm] Re: 48-bit support in F26?

t;> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi Jeremy, all, >> >> I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of >> 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have >> an offici

[fedora-arm] 48-bit support in F26?

Hi Jeremy, all, I was just catching up with some folks and we discussed the status of 48-bit VA support. It seems to me that it would make most sense to have an official coordination effort between those vendors/community members who are interested, to ensure that they help with the necessary

[fedora-arm] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting

On 08/28/2016 11:00 AM, pwha...@redhat.com wrote: > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >Fedora ARM & AArch64 status meeting on 2016-08-30 from 15:00:00 to > 16:00:00 UTC >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > Fedora ARM & AArch64 weekly status

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2016-05-10

On 05/12/2016 03:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Item number 3 is the one I mentioned in reply to the beta announce mail - we > think it is now triaged to a specific broken commit in recent shim and will > be corrected by a pending update. Do we have an updated shim landing in

[fedora-arm] Re: Fedora ARM & AArch64 Status Meeting Minutes 2016-05-10

Item number 3 is the one I mentioned in reply to the beta announce mail - we think it is now triaged to a specific broken commit in recent shim and will be corrected by a pending update. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On May 10, 2016, at 13:02, Paul Whalen

[fedora-arm] Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On May 12, 2016, at 01:30, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 05/10/2016 01:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> The Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64 is here, on schedule for our planned June >> final >

[fedora-arm] Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64!

On 05/10/2016 01:09 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > The Fedora 24 Beta for aarch64 is here, on schedule for our planned June final > release. For Beta we have added Cloud and Docker base images. > Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site: > > - Get Fedora 24 Beta Server: make use of the

[fedora-arm] Re: armhf dnf is not working on aarch64 kernel

Hi Gordan, On 04/28/2016 05:00 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2016-04-28 19:49, Jon Masters wrote: > First of all, Jon, thank you for your thoughts on this matter. No problem :) >> Allow me to add a few thoughts. I have been working with the ARM vendors >> (as well as the ARM

[fedora-arm] Re: armhf dnf is not working on aarch64 kernel

Hi Gordan, Peter, all, On 04/27/2016 03:39 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 2016-04-27 19:12, John Dulaney wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:04:38PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote: >>> > >>> >Maybe that's something that CentOS have added (don't know, haven't >>> >looked), RHELSA doesn't support it that

[fedora-arm] Re: 96Boards Enterprise Edition Cello

On 03/24/2016 01:14 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 07:18:23AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> I wanted to just drop a quick note that we're making *great* progress >> toward having early 96Boards "Cello" boa

[fedora-arm] 96Boards Enterprise Edition Cello

Hi Folks, I wanted to just drop a quick note that we're making *great* progress toward having early 96Boards "Cello" boards for Fedora enablement purposes. These are (AArch64) AMD Seattle based boards: http://www.lenovator.com/product/103.html These are SBSA/SBBR compliant boards that (from a

[fedora-arm] Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR0

On 11/30/2015 02:03 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On 11/30/2015 06:04 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 11/09/2015 03:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >>> Someone I know is after an ARM 64 bit development board, and pointed >>> me at this. I'd never heard of it

[fedora-arm] Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR0

On 11/30/2015 06:04 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 03:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> Someone I know is after an ARM 64 bit development board, and pointed >> me at this. I'd never heard of it :-( >> >> http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5422#ov >> >> Has

Re: [fedora-arm] Customize Fedora 21 ISO

On 01/15/2015 10:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Brooks Hu brooks...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Dennis. I did following experiment: Mounted ISO onto a local directory, changed to the directory, did nothing, run createrepo --update ., but I found the files under

Re: [fedora-arm] gettext lock hang

Should we do a few more to prove it? -- Computer Architect | Sent from my #ARM Powered Mobile device On Oct 29, 2014 10:43 AM, Paul Whalen pwha...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - Hi Folks, A quick note that I i - Original Message - Hi Folks, A quick note

[fedora-arm] gettext lock hang

Hi Folks, A quick note that I identified an upstream futex barrier fix from Catalin that went into 3.17 late, and which might explain the problem we are seeing with gettext lock tests hanging. I've built a test kernel for the builder that was reproducing and pointed Peter and Paul at the

[fedora-arm] Meeting at Flock

Hi Folks, For those at Flock, a few of us are thinking of meeting for dinner around 7pm at the Diplomat. I will endeavor to followup with details of where we end up. Jon. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered Tablet ___ arm

Re: [fedora-arm] arm-temp.ausil.us is shutting down

On 11/22/2013 05:24 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: On 11/22/2013 02:22 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Hi everybody, Dennis's email server is currently migrating so I'm sending this for him. The system we did aarch64 bootstrap on, arm-temp.ausil.us, is shutting down. If you're currently using this

[fedora-arm] vexpress on F20

Hi Folks, Quick question. Has anyone been able to successfully boot the F20 composes on a vexpress QEMU model? I've re-tested a kernel that was listed as working, but it does not work on my local system. I am interested in getting some data. Can I confirm that everyone is experiencing a hang

[fedora-arm] Rev A4 BeagleBoneBlack

Hey Paul, FYI I tried poking at BeagleBone last night but mine is dead. I've tried a bunch of different 3.3v USB/UART adapters today and I can't get any output at all. I'm going to replace it this week (express), but sadly I can only look at vexpress over the weekend. Hope someone else has more

Re: [fedora-arm] Rev A4 BeagleBoneBlack

On 09/14/2013 11:47 PM, Jon Masters wrote: FYI I tried poking at BeagleBone last night but mine is dead. I've tried a bunch of different 3.3v USB/UART adapters today and I can't get any output at all. I'm going to replace it this week (express), but sadly I can only look at vexpress over

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 19 booted on Wandboard Quad

On 09/12/2013 04:54 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 11/09/13 14:07, Steven Falco wrote: Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 = run bootcmd mmc0 is current device Retrieving file: /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf ** File not found /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf ** Error reading config file Retrieving

[fedora-arm] F20 Alpha RC2 Partitions

Hi Dennis (in the main), The partition alignment in the Alpha seems to be off slightly, e.g.: /dev/mmcblk0p11953 1001953 50+ 83 Linux /dev/mmcblk0p2 1001954 1251953 125000 83 Linux /dev/mmcblk0p3 1251954 3986328 1367187+ 83 Linux

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 19 booted on Wandboard Quad

On 09/12/2013 07:50 AM, Steven Falco wrote: On 09/12/2013 04:54 AM, Matthias Runge wrote: On 11/09/13 14:07, Steven Falco wrote: Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 = run bootcmd mmc0 is current device Retrieving file: /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf ** File not found

Re: [fedora-arm] ARM Architecture Reference Manual availability

Thanks for the forward Andy! It's great reading :) On 09/11/2013 08:24 AM, Andrew Wafaa wrote: To all those interested, ARM have finally published the reference manual for ARMv8 \o/ You can grab a copy [0] now, you will need to accept the EULA first. Regards, Andy 0 -

Re: [fedora-arm] KVM on Samsung Chromebook A15

On 07/05/2013 05:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Jon wrote: I'm pleased to announce the availability of Fedora 19 for the 2012 Samsung Chromebook featuring ARM Exynos dual core A15 processor. Sorry to slightly hijack this thread. I will try your

[fedora-arm] PandaBoard on RC2

Hey folks, A few issues with the RC2 image running on PandaBoard (ES): 1). It doesn't boot at all. This is because the image contains a weird partition layout, not aligned, etc. MLO never has a chance. The SD Card had this as the first partition: /dev/sdb11953 1001953

Re: [fedora-arm] PandaBoard on RC2

contain boot.scr and partitioning looks more reasonable in the VFAT ones. Jon. On 06/28/2013 02:48 AM, Jon Masters wrote: Hey folks, A few issues with the RC2 image running on PandaBoard (ES): 1). It doesn't boot at all. This is because the image contains a weird partition layout

[fedora-arm] Fwd: Re: dummy_flush_tlb_a15_erratum in check_and_switch_context

Peter, Let's see what the explicit thought is here with regard to support and plan accordingly. Jon. Original Message From: Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org Sent: Fri Jun 28 08:54:41 EDT 2013 To: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org

[fedora-arm] Go-no-go meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 now

$subject ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] PandaBoard on RC2

On 06/28/2013 11:51 AM, Jeffrey Bastian wrote: I see the same problem with the Minimal VFAT RC3 images starting on sector 1953 instead of 2048. Also, shouldn't the type of the second filesystem be 82 for Linux Swap? Yes to both, but since it doesn't prevent booting I was going to mention

Re: [fedora-arm] glibc-common install error on F19 -- Anyone else hitting?

On 06/28/2013 04:47 PM, John Dulaney wrote: Is anyone else hitting an install error (1) when updating glibc and glibc-common? If it is widespread enough, I'll debug. Check your storage media :) ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org

[fedora-arm] Fwd: dummy_flush_tlb_a15_erratum in check_and_switch_context

Original Message Subject: dummy_flush_tlb_a15_erratum in check_and_switch_context Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:48:14 -0400 From: Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org Organization: World Organi{s,z}ation of Broken Dreams To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org Hi Folks, Post

Re: [fedora-arm] F19 Beta RC2 compose

On 05/17/2013 08:51 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, there is a Release Candidate compose for Beta at http://armpkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/stage/19-Beta-RC2/ there is a install tree as well as two images, the images are a minimal

Re: [fedora-arm] CONFIG_LATENCYTOP

On 05/10/2013 02:10 PM, John Brier wrote: Hi, it seems that somehow CONFIG_LATENCYTOP and CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT are not even in the /boot/config-* generated files [root@calxeda-arm-soc-02 SOURCES]# grep -i latency /boot/config-3. config-3.6.10-8.fc18.armv7l.highbank

[fedora-arm] Friday Tech Talks

Hi guys, John Dulaney gave a great talk a few weeks ago on the Chromebook. Who would like to do the next in our series of Friday Tech Talks? Perhaps a little too late for today, but plenty of time for next week! If you're interested, reply to this mail, and add here:

Re: [fedora-arm] F19: uImage load addresses with unified kernel

Hi Nico, Graeme, On 03/27/2013 11:01 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Graeme Russ wrote: Using FIT you should be able to bundle a unified uImage, initramfs and FDT. You can then edit the FDT within U-Boot for device specific parameters (like load address). IMHO this is the

Re: [fedora-arm] F19: uImage load addresses with unified kernel

On 03/27/2013 11:26 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Jon Masters wrote: Prior to Brendan sending that mail last night, we had an internal RH meeting wherein this topic came up (and precipitated the email). I explained already in that and will repeat here that the ARM kernel

Re: [fedora-arm] vexpress 3.8 update

On 02/28/2013 12:29 PM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: The highbank model is upstream but I haven't used it in a while. The midway model is being used right now and is known to work, so I suspect the highbank model is mostly working. I can fix bugs that people report to me. Like I said the other day,

[fedora-arm] vexpress 3.8 update

Hi Folks, I've done a bunch of tests against the qemu vexpress model (based upon a local backport rebuild of F18 qemu on F17 - can't be doing with the hit to upgrading to F18 on this laptop this week) with the 3.8 scratch kernel Peter built last Friday morning. The Fedora kernel as built doesn't

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.9 merge window kernels

On 02/22/2013 08:37 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On 02/22/2013 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote: Just a quick heads up that the 3.9 merge window kernels are being built in rawhide now. I've tried to at least test boot kernels on my

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.9 merge window kernels

On 02/22/2013 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com wrote: Just a quick heads up that the 3.9 merge window kernels are being built in rawhide now. I've tried to at least test boot kernels on my machine before submitting them to koji,

[fedora-arm] updated mongodb atomics patch

Hi Folks, This is a work in progress. It builds on v7, but I've not tested yet. We've a few dependency issues building this on F19 just now, but it will build for v7 against 2.2.3 on F18 as well locally. If someone with more knowledge of mongo would like to take a poke/test, cool. I have done a

Re: [fedora-arm] updated mongodb atomics patch

On 02/19/2013 11:38 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 02/19/2013 04:38 PM, Jon Masters wrote: We've a few dependency issues building this on F19 just now, but it will build for v7 against 2.2.3 on F18 as well locally. If someone with more knowledge of mongo would like to take a poke/test, cool. I

Re: [fedora-arm] Announcing: Fedora ARM Technical Talks

Hey everyone, What would you like my next talk to be on? I will do a hardware debug session soon, but meanwhile I am open to suggestions for the topic after this week - this week John Dulaney is talking about Chromebooks! Jon. ___ arm mailing list

Re: [fedora-arm] Heads up: ARM build system outage for migration

On 02/16/2013 01:19 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The migration is complete, arm.koji is back up. We're still testing and doing some clean up bits and pieces but the migration has been successful. This is epic. Note that I had a quick sync with nirik on IRC a few minutes ago with regard to e.g.

[fedora-arm] Video: Porting Fedora to 64-bit ARM systems

Hi everyone, I would like to share the video of my talk from FOSDEM: http://video.fosdem.org/2013/maintracks/K.1.105/Porting_Fedora_to_64_bit_ARM_systems.webm Jon. ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org

[fedora-arm] Announcing: Fedora ARM Technical Talks

Hi Folks, Please see the following link for further details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels running under qemu models with gdb. It will simply cover setting up a system for tracing a kernel

Re: [fedora-arm] Announcing: Fedora ARM Technical Talks

On 02/15/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote: Please see the following link for further details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels running under qemu models with gdb. It will simply cover setting

Re: [fedora-arm] Announcing: Fedora ARM Technical Talks

On 02/15/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Masters wrote: Please see the following link for further details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Talks/ARMTechTalks Today's talk is on debugging vexpress (Versatile Express) kernels running under qemu models with gdb. It will simply cover

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora Linaro Cross-Tools

On 02/12/2013 01:08 PM, Al Stone wrote: On 02/12/2013 10:58 AM, Dan Horák wrote: Al Stone píše v Út 12. 02. 2013 v 10:49 -0700: Greetings. For those that have seen or heard about some of the work going on with Fedora and Linaro [0], there are times when it makes sense to do work with the

Re: [fedora-arm] OMAP F18 RC internal image test success

Obviously I am not saying to ship the internal test image. Only that it works just fine and I consider OMAP ready for release. It is no worse than beta. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity. Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Folks, I delayed leaving and changed plans this morning

Re: [fedora-arm] OMAP F18 RC internal image test success

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonmasters/sets/72157632664725340/ -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity. Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Folks, I delayed leaving and changed plans this morning while I extensively tested OMAP. The RC image made internally within RC by David works

[fedora-arm] IRC - PandaBoard

Hello masta, I tested pkexec. It worked. Yumex will be fine. I am traveling to Brussels at this time. Jon. Masta wrote: ---begin log--- jonmasters [14:35:40] masta:#fedora-arm jonmasters: thanks for testing the panda, did you notice yumex was happy? ---end of log--- -- Sent from my phone.

[fedora-arm] IRC - PandaBoard

Hello masta, I tested pkexec. It worked. Yumex will be fine. I am traveling to Brussels at this time. Jon. Masta wrote: ---begin log--- jonmasters [14:35:40] masta:#fedora-arm jonmasters: thanks for testing the panda, did you notice yumex was happy? ---end of log--- -- Sent from my phone.

Re: [fedora-arm] arm software floating point support going forward

Derek, It is less powers that be than a collaborative effort/decision. We do not have resources to justify keeping v5 alive but you are free to coordinate with others and pick it up, in the same way that Seneca are to own v6 support (maybe Seneca can even help with build system setup if you

[fedora-arm] Photos from FUDCon - including whiteboard

Hi everyone, Here are the photos from the recent FUDCon that I uploaded: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonmasters/sets/72157632599464512/ Jon. ___ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm

Re: [fedora-arm] Distributing DTB's for Fedora 18 RC1

Note at this point it is only Tegra we need a solution for to get F18 GA. We will resolve more in F19 or even as an update but given it is just one platform (TrimSlice), and that platform has a pretty reasonable U-Boot, let's get something resolved today that works for Tegra and move on. --

Re: [fedora-arm] ARMv8 Bootstrap rootfs cannot be cloned

On 01/29/2013 05:24 PM, Al Stone wrote: Well, we now know the workaround; do the commit, then ssh into fp.o and run git update-server-info in the repo. Ugly, but it works. I'm not sure this is fixable, but I'll poke the infrastructure folks and see what we can do. Thanks Al. Jon.

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora ARM VFAD - 2013-01-23

On 01/23/2013 04:09 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On 23 Jan 2013 06:39, Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com mailto:peter...@redhat.com wrote: 3) ghc - using LLVM as compiler, as a result incorrect triplet Not sure what this is referring to: ghc ARM devel for F18 is basically done (except for a

Re: [fedora-arm] FUDCon ARM related followup

Always was done with yaboot. Do we know if OLPC will move to UEFI? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity. Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora

Re: [fedora-arm] ELF reloc type defines

Great! Thanks. I wrote up some text on relocations for an aarch64 article...need to finish that and mention 32-bit too. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse formatting and brevity. Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote: Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com writes: Upstream has one problem,

Re: [fedora-arm] Distributing DTB's for Fedora 18 RC1

On 01/22/2013 03:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: appending the dtb seems to work fine for a pandaboard, i've never personally had a pandaboard boot when loading the dtb separately Hi Dennis, Jon, others, It is good to know that the append option works, however since it is not required to use a

Re: [fedora-arm] Announcing Fedora 18 Beta for Allwinner A10 based devices

On 01/15/2013 11:43 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:50 AM, David Marlin dmar...@redhat.com wrote: Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, I'm very happy to announce the availability of Fedora 18 Beta for Allwinner A10 based devices. This release is based on the official Fedora

[fedora-arm] 3.7 kernel plan

Hi Peter, I am hoping to get time this evening to finish poking at the highbank kernel (in an all day meeting). I apologize that is dragging out. I need to figure out what's up with SATA detection. David is going to pick this up from me tomorrow and I'll hand over where I get to. Nonetheless...I

Re: [fedora-arm] 3.7 kernel plan

On 01/15/2013 05:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Peter, I am hoping to get time this evening to finish poking at the highbank kernel (in an all day meeting). I apologize that is dragging out. I need to figure out what's up

[fedora-arm] Createrepo update

. -- Sent from my iPad On Jan 14, 2013, at 9:58, Jon Masters j...@edison.jonmasters.org wrote: ---begin log--- jonmasters [17:57:06] mlangsdorf Hey, I may be running into a createrepo bug that dgilmore says you fixed a while back but that might not have gotten into the updates for f17. you

[fedora-arm] Quick update

Hey guys, I spent a bunch of time yesterday preparing for a week of travel. But I have mongo almost taken care of, and a scratch 3.7 kernel that I am testing. I will most likely need to get Mark to help diagnose a SATA issue - will followup on that after I do a bit more poking. Will send an

Re: [fedora-arm] Opera build?

On 01/10/2013 04:07 PM, jonathan chetwynd wrote: where could I request a build of Opera? Fedora X86/i386 nightly rpm builds are here: http://snapshot.opera.com/unix/latest Hi Jonathan, You'd have to ask Opera about Fedora ARM builds of their commercial products. Jon.

Re: [fedora-arm] Important for FUDCon: Airport pickup, RasPi hangout, and games

On 01/10/2013 05:12 PM, Ruth Suehle wrote: - RASPBERRY PI MEETUP - Thursday evening at 8 p.m., there is a global Raspberry Pi meetup over Google Hangout. MAKE is the host and guests are Matt Richardson and Shawn

Re: [fedora-arm] Status on Cubie/All Winner A10

On 01/09/2013 10:55 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote: P.S.: BTW I'm in china, and can use (or rather my wife can :) the taobao online shop to order boards directly in case of interest ping me if that's the case http://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=16944193746 Daniel! Thanks for the

Re: [fedora-arm] gmp issue resolution

On 01/04/2013 03:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Jon Masters j...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Peter, So the issue we have been experiencing with gmp is actually binutils related. There is a known regression in binutils wherein certain assembly is not recognized as ARM

[fedora-arm] gmp issue resolution

Hi Peter, So the issue we have been experiencing with gmp is actually binutils related. There is a known regression in binutils wherein certain assembly is not recognized as ARM if it contains extraneous space! http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2012-11/msg00104.html I'm copying

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora-ARM Team Shirts

Hi Folks, Happy New Year once again, and I hope you had a relaxing break (if you didn't get time off, I hope you nonetheless enjoyed the holidays). I have heard from ARM that we can use the Connected Community logo on a shirt, but there are some restrictions. These include needing to get their

[fedora-arm] Fedora ARM status meeting minutes for 2012-12-19

Hi everyone, I would like to share the minutes from yesterday's Fedora ARM meeting. In particular, those on devel@ might be interested in our desire to discuss PA at FUDCon. At FUDCon, we will have a 24 node Calxeda EnergyCore (highbank) server that will demonstrate various capabilities of the

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora-ARM Team Shirts

On 12/21/2012 02:53 AM, Andrew Wafaa wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:39 +, j...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/21/2012 02:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: The Fedora project has a couple of approved companies for making of t-shirts and other things and they know the logo guidelines process etc. I

Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora-ARM Team Shirts

On 12/21/2012 03:16 AM, Jon Masters wrote: On 12/21/2012 02:53 AM, Andrew Wafaa wrote: On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:39 +, j...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/21/2012 02:17 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: The Fedora project has a couple of approved companies for making of t-shirts and other things

Re: [fedora-arm] Working on Fedora-arm port for Allwinner A10 based devices

On 12/21/2012 02:57 AM, Jon Masters wrote: I have a new hire Fu Wei in Shanghai, China (fuwei on IRC). He is getting up to speed on the Fedora ARM project by using AllWinner hardware. He got a CubieBoard at my suggestion and has it running. I'd like it if you guys could co-ordinate a little

Re: [fedora-arm] F-18: sshd enabled by default + firewalld

On 12/20/2012 09:12 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 12/20/2012 01:55 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Our F-18 images have sshd enabled by default, but blocked by firewalld is this intentional? Probably not, I think

  1   2   3   4   >