Yahoo group apthehardtalk is another Asbury group. It was started a
few months ago but doesn't have any activity. I think you can put it
in that groups file. Membership is instant yahoo has everyones info
so its just a couple of clicks. ]:~)
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL
In the words of that great poet, Rage Against the Machine:
They don't gotta burn the books they just remove 'em
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dan, I was attempting to clarify the
Geez, was the BlindBishop serious; I already miss his old time religion.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM
Gary (Lightly) was kind enough to offer space on Asburymusic.com to
host the waterfront redevelopment plan. Here is the link. I suggest
those interested download the files just in case they put out a hit
squad on them.
http://www.asburymusic.com/plan/
Yahoo! Groups
Gary (Lightly) was kind enough to offer space on Asburymusic.com to
host the waterfront redevelopment plan. Here is the link. I suggest
those interested download the files just in case they put out a hit
squad on them.
http://www.asburymusic.com/plan/
Yahoo! Groups
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yahoo group apthehardtalk is another Asbury group. It was started a
few months ago but doesn't have any activity. I think you can put
it
in that groups file. Membership is instant yahoo has everyones
info
so its just a
Was that property taken by ED or did partners buy it?
And I may be wrong but I thought I read that any property taken by ED must be developed within 1 year according to the agreement. Is this true?wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today the demolition of the former Ambassador Hotel was
Who's gonna make the developer honor their
agreement?
- Original Message -
From:
Allan
Peterson
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:51
AM
Subject: Re: [AsburyPark] Another AP Icon
Demolished
Was that property taken by ED
I asked the city why the Plan was removed from its website. The
answer I received raises more questions in my mind (which I posed to
them), as I am sure it will in yours. It appears that when I cited
pages from the Plan (which I obtained from the city website)
relating to the C-8 site, the
If the actual official Official Adopted Plan (whatever that is and
if ever it is found) differs drastically from what was represented as
being the Adopted Plan, then there are more serious questions about
what is actually going on in this city with regard to the waterfront
development.
It is
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Sharon G. Boone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...Just WHO
is this city geared, to? Not me! I am one of those people this
City, puts up with, cause they don't know what else to do
with me! Werner, you can have your website back, brother, since
you own it! Stat,
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Was that property taken by ED or did partners buy it?
ED was excercised but the Partners may have purchased it privately.
Still gathering info on the ownership.
Another silly loss for the City. This building could
It would have been a higher density than permitted under the
adopted plan. But that's OK it would have pulled density out of the
beachfront area which is a good thing.
Not so fast re pulled density out of the beachfront, now that we
know that there is no adopted or `Official Plan' plan, there
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ED was excercised but the Partners may have purchased it privately.
Still gathering info on the ownership.
OOps, Should read : ED was NOT exercised...
Werner
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that we
know that there is no adopted or `Official Plan' plan, there would
have been no necessity to pull or reduce anything; the Fish may have
inadvertently missed squeezing a few more big bucks from Asbury.
There
The Clerks Office is, by law, the official keeper of the City Record.
One should (assuming the Clerks Office is functioning properly) get a
copy of the Adopted Plan which was officially logged and filed.
where this goes.
Where we go is to `never never land'; that official anythings remain
The Asbury Park city clerk is a man who is unsure of what he is
doing. It took me over a week to get info from him that should have
taken only a day. Don't get me wrong, he is a nice guy but he is a
couple of Buds short of a six-pack. He is definately not controlling
the strings in that
Greetings:
I am looking for up to 4 individuals who would be interested in doing
commentary on the live broadcast tomorrow night.
The Electric News will tune in the debate of the Assembly Candidates
which will be aired on radio. We will video cast the table of guests
commentators.
When a
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the waterfront redevelopment plan is no longer available on the
City's website, I wanted to upload the (9) files comprising the
waterfront redevelopment plan to the Files section of the forum,
however, there is a
On 10/5/05 9:48 PM, noblarneyzone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the waterfront redevelopment plan is no longer available on the
City's website, I wanted to upload the (9) files comprising the
waterfront redevelopment plan
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the files are already online. Anyone can view or download
them at:
http://www.asburymusic.com/plan
Gary, There's a broken link on the page and the formating is screwy,
the first column wraps lines.
Werner
On 10/5/05 10:19 PM, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of the files are already online. Anyone can view or download
them at:
http://www.asburymusic.com/plan
Gary, There's a broken link on the page and the formating
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There certainly is an adopted plan. The process was followed
(assuming for the moment it was the correct process) and resolutiond
were passed.
The Offical Adopted Plan is the one on file at the City Clerks
Office.
There is no discussion that it was amended from some date before
1/16/2002 (given to PB) to 3/15/2002. That's it. The only dates are
1/16/2002 and 4/26/2002. Where did this 3/15/2002 plan come from? That
is not what the ordinance adopted. It adopted whatever plan was given
to the PB on 1/16/2002,
This is why Jime Keady was voted in. Where are his comments?Skip Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"If the actual official "Official Adopted Plan" (whatever that is andif ever it is found) differs drastically from what was represented asbeing the Adopted Plan, then there are more serious
-Sign me up for the recall petition! ]:~)
-- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There certainly is an adopted plan. The process was followed
(assuming for the moment it was the correct
26 matches
Mail list logo
