This one went up this morning, and has 315 comments by noon.
Please excuse my shameless plug...I'm just happy and want to share
with my pals.
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/21/tdeseno_1021/
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web,
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one went up this morning, and has 315 comments by noon.
Please excuse my shameless plug...I'm just happy and want to share
with my pals.
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/10/21/tdeseno_1021/
Congrats
Very Funny! Did you post that over there?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
justifiedright@ wrote:
This one went up this morning, and has 315 comments by noon.
Please excuse my shameless
That made my day, especially the part about the good pot
Awesome
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
justifiedright@ wrote:
This one went up this morning, and has 315 comments by noon.
Please excuse
Ottimo! Grazie!
In a message dated 10/21/2008 1:34:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's my message
Dear Red States:
We've decided we're leaving. We intend to form our own country, and
we're taking the other Blue States with us. In case you aren't aware,
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, my chicken soup wound up on my desk.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
* Your email settings:
All the talk about low income, the poor , the middle class, upper and
the rich and I've been trying to calculate at the end of the year,
where does each wind up if it (the household) were a business.
I need some expert midns on this and writers...
For exmaple, my wife and I go to work everyday
Found out info on the bailout today for a client...turns out it
won't help people after all.
Say you have a 400K mortgage you are in default on.
Assume the house is now worth 350K.
Under the Bailout the FHA will give you a morgtgage for 90% of the
350K, or $315K.
Your bank will therefore
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Politicians are such phonies. Why isn't the bank veto power in the
news?
It absolutely was and is if you read enough. Pick up today's WSJ and
read about Volcker and Obama. We needed to follow the Brits. Prop up
the
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your bank will therefore lose the other $85K.
If the bak beleives the area can support a $400k foreclosure and
their mortgage is clean, they took a decent downpayment and it's a
couple years in - they may be ok to
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the talk about low income, the poor , the middle class, upper and
the rich and I've been trying to calculate at the end of the year,
where does each wind up if it (the household) were a business.
I need some expert
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are handouts all around the table, not just the poor or
minorities. The deductibility of mortgage insurance is one of the
largest refundables or subsidies.
Better accountants.
I read what I wrote again.
Granted,
now we bail out mutual funds because they more or less put money in
what was supposed to be safe investments.
I called it the great ponzi scheme for years.
It's legal because the fed backs it and ensures it doesn't completely
fail.
Meanwhile, the schmucks who invested in regular stocks, bonds
First off, I believe the selling point was that we will be bailing
out people, not just banks.
Think even further in the bank's position. Why do it all? Why not
take the homes and let the market rebound?
If you think I'm off base, remember that's not a hypo. It's real
life. The bank I
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, I believe the selling point was that we will be bailing
out people, not just banks.
Was it a local bank holding the mortgage or regional / national?
We vote with the banks by placing our money in them.
In a message dated 10/21/2008 4:27:28 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com,
justifiedright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Politicians are such phonies. Why isn't the
bank veto power in the news?
It absolutely was and is if you read enough. Pick up
I hope this gets a wider read. super funny.
however, if i were a red state republican i would shoot back that
republicans supposedly have better and more sex...interesting right?
playboy and some abc poll. but i think they are also more likely to be
involved in scandals...
Here's my message
Especially since The Red States have been completely realigned from
the Disaster of The Bush Years and this barely applies anymore, we
should all know, this letter started circulating somewhere around
June of 2005, at least.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:09 PM, Gabrielle Obre wrote:
I hope this
Maureen...I can't thank you enough for the work you do on this. I have
a couple of questions, answer if you can or are up to it.
Is the 5+ Mil a currently existing debt or funds that the city needs
for future expenses? I think its the existing debt, so the new bond
would be sort of a refinance?
Thanks for posting these links, Mario.
I'm probably going to get my neck cut, but I've been struggling
with this whole notion that the mortgages caused this thing, since it
was the investment banks that started falling before the commercial
lenders did.
Also, these credit derivatives,
I don't mind at all, Gabrielle. Check between the --- below...
Maureen
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Gabrielle Obre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maureen...I can't thank you enough for the work you do on this.
You're very welcome - I'm very pleased to have the feedback. ---
I have
a
In a message dated 10/21/2008 11:05:53 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for posting these links, Mario. I'm probably going to get my neck
cut, but I've been struggling with this whole notion that the mortgages caused
this thing, since it was the investment
Mario these links don't address what I'm talking about.
The first column wasn't even addressing the 700 billion bailout until
the last line. The column was about the recent infusion of money
directly to the banks for lending. Different dollars.
Sheila was talking about the banks relieving
23 matches
Mail list logo
