> Right, and the same goes for some other lists contained in that 96 lists
file and... using a script to purge it wasn't needed...
I didn't write a script to purge a dnsbl list. I used that list to test my
script.
The script is to supposed to be used with a good dnsbl. If one of those
DNSBL's fa
> dig +short 2.0.0.127.relays.osirusoft.com. TXT
;-)
> so you'll get a 3rd party opinion about the idea of checking such lists
and about the "good contents" of the list you are using to run those checks
I am not using that DNSBL at all.
You are totally not getting it. We have bots and viruses to
> This will be fixed in the next release.
It's probably a %40 in that mail.
When developing this script: http://pastebin.com/FLB3kkLs
I discovered a few things:
* Many DNSBL's don't work anymore, and this can easily be tested.
* zen.spamhaus.org doesn't accept queries from 8.8.8.8
* My dnsmasq
In the log of an Internet caching DNS-server on which I have adminastrative
rights, I'm seeing these requests coming from my private connection:
Dec 28 07:53:09 ns-cache-01 named[1928]: client 80.170.0.230#39784: query:
40hetemail.com.multi.surbl.org IN A +
Dec 28 07:53:09 ns-cache-01 named[1928]:
lates with
triggers / graphs or any other useful feedback.
I wrote some scripts so I can monitor sendmail, exim and postfix.
If anyone is interested I can post them too (postfix is already on the
zabbix forum)
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: JP [mailto:j...@dsdeurne.nl]
Verzonden: vrijdag
perl, but alas... I
don't speak perl that well.
In this thread a perl script is posted.
http://www.zabbix.com/forum/showthread.php?p=66339
JP
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R)
A start and stop script for Linux already comes with ASSP and in most
configurations (single ASSP on 1 server) they are sufficient.
On my setup I have a watchdog for all the ASSP processes I'm running and
they rely on the start and stop script.
In the past I have had some ASSP's running simultane
ought down by this at all it for sure doesn't make any
difference if this extra piece of code was in it or not.
JP
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer ev
Hi,
No-one knows why this doesn't turn up in ASSP's log?
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jean-Pierre van Melis [mailto:j...@mirmana.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 15 oktober 2009 15:47
Aan: 'ASSP development mailing list'
Onderwerp: [Assp-test] Bare LF's rejected b
l too
Just need a bump in the right direction (or 2?)
JP
_
Van: Thomas Eckardt/eck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 27 oktober 2008 15:08
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re-sending .eml
If you are running 2.0.0 just look in GU
Hi all,
I would like to know the most efficient way to send an eml-file that has
been saved by ASSP as spam to the intended recipient.
Preferably from command-line.
Thanks in advance,
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the
I guess nothing came out of it, thus far???
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Fritz Borgstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 21 oktober 2008 11:12
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] Antwort: Re: ASSP crashing caused
byemailserver3.com
ASSP developme
> ASSP only checks that the modules are loadable on startup (location and
dependencies), not that all parts are runable (this is not possible)!
Everything is possible
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move D
> Does anyone who is using ASSP 2.0.0 having this problem. It would be much
more easy to investigate this problem with this version, because - if such a
email is crashing Perl, only the thread will die and we'll have the chance
to see something more in the maillog.
> Thomas
I'm only running it
Was this issue ever resolved?
I was having crashes on proxies where I forgot to blacklist this domain.
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens JP van Melis
Verzonden: woensdag 11 juni 2008 15:05
Aan: 'ASSP development mailing list'
suggestion hasn't got anything to do with it.
One could call it 'EnvelopeStrict'
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Daniel L. Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 6 oktober 2008 23:14
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] Feature requ
There's something strange with midsValencePB.
Even after deleting it in assp.cfg it appears twice afterwards and I can't
change its value using the webinterface...
I have currently no time to investigate any further
midmValencePB:=10
midsValencePB:=25
midiValencePB:=15
midsValencePB:=25
---
I am still investigating the problem, but this mail never made an entry in
the mailserver's log:
cat maillog.txt | grep id-49186-08175
Sep-25-08 15:26:26 id-49186-08175 195.73.166.61 <> message proxied without
processing - message size (3316536) is above 50 (npSize).
Sep-25-08 15:26:26 id-49
>> When I think of it... I'm not going to do anything.
>> I'm not getting any spam at all anyhow
>> So, there's no real need to implement another feature
>*and the drum plays* Bada.badum.ps
I'm testing ASSP on my home-connection to see how it's behaving there
;-)
---
>> In my case I prefer to make some routing rules in my
>> firewall and turn ASSP into a transparent proxy for
>> outgoing mail.
>hmm... not a good idea imVHo, you'll loose flexibility
>and may face some issues
When I think of it... I'm not going to do anything.
I'm not getting any spam at all
> Just put an additional small SMTP daemon after ASSP for outgoing mails -
that's it!
Does such a mail-relay exist?
I mean.. one that tries to send directly and if it fails it sends it to the
smart-host.
In my case I prefer to make some routing rules in my firewall and turn ASSP
into a tran
proxy directly or through my ISP's smart-host I
can have the best of both worlds. Personally, I prefer "fallback smart host"
over BATV.
JP
_
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Thomas Eckardt/eck
Verzonden: donderdag 10 juli 2008 8:45
Aan: ASSP developme
route outgoing
SMTP back to my ASSP which will then output the mail.
JP
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a health
ll it just accept the bounce message from the fallback-server but not pass
on?
Is the 'send250OKISP' involved with this behaviour?
JP
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have sh
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 14:53:54 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsdeurne ([82.150.129.5] helo=dsdeurne) by
assp-fallback1.dsdeurne.nl;
7 Jul 2008 14:53:54 +0200
I changed
while ( $this->{header} =~ /Received: from (.{1,50})?.\($this->{cip}/gi
rd voor
Marktplaats nl]
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Thomas Eckardt/eck
Verzonden: donderdag 3 juli 2008 17:31
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: [Assp-test] Antwort: SPF softfail while it should pass (only when
mail comes from ISPIP)
If you enable
TECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] PB-IP-Score for '195.78.85.0' is
40, added 5 for SPFsoftfail
Jul-3-08 12:09:42 id-79781-08908 [SPF] 213.105.192.141 <
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPF: pass ip=213.105.192.14
he most logical place to do it. But that's not an
argument. ASSP is already doing a lot of things that don't even have
anything to do with fighting Spam (Charset conversion).
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Charles Marcus
Ve
if it would accept such a recipient.
The only thing it needs is the IP (or fqdn) of the end-user MTA. I now have
a file called files/localdomains.txt. In it can be the IP of the end-user
MTA.
Anyhow...
If no-one wants to write code for it anyhow, there's n
Jun-8-08 00:09:12 [Main_Thread] admin connection from 192.168.10.120:1818;
page:/
Jun-8-08 00:10:07 [startup] ASSP version 2.0.0(2.0) (Perl 5.008008) (on
linux) initializing
When searching in the log for the reason why ASSP has (re)started it would
be helpful if an entry was written in the log tha
bombre.txt
What's the deal here?
Is this a deliberate attack on ASSP or is it still under investigation?
Shouldn't "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" be changed into "@emailserver3.com" ?
JP
-
Check out the n
e such a subnet can be listed on 1
or 2 providers before it is counted.
Something like:
80.126.0.0/15 1
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exci
Is there a way to let ASSP do some domainname translations on incoming mail?
If not, this could be a valuable enhancement for Exchange-servers which
can't do that natively.
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the
I wrote:
> Last week I had an outage from March 22nd 11:00 CET until March 26th 00:10
CET.
> I send them a mail but didn't get an answer (yet?).
I ment to say THEY had an outage... Every domain returned an answer that it
was blacklisted.
But Fritz, which tests are you talking
ome
interesting changes
JP
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http:
cate using SMTP AUTH, so they shouldn't get
blacklisted for these reasons...
JP
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http
Searching the taillog with the webinterface doesn't always give the expected
result.
Never had problems before.
Now I don't get any results, but sometimes I do
I can't really tell what is going on. It behaves a bit like a woman.
--
Not every MTA can do this...
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Micheal Espinola Jr
Verzonden: donderdag 13 maart 2008 15:52
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] Changing HELO answer
JP van Melis wrote:
>
I once had a mod that changed my Apache server's answer, so it would seem I
was running IIS. This to masquerade which HTTP-server you're running.
Potential hackers running automated scripts could then be using the wrong
hacks.
I'd love to have ASSP change the "220 " g
Fritz changed the code in 1.3.16
Please test as I can't reproduce it...
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/
BTW the one having problems here is running Exchange as well not Qmail
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/d
pass";
6125 $received_rbl="Received-DNSBL: pass";
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Hill, Brett
Verzonden: woensdag 5 maart 2008 16:06
Aan: ASSP development mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] header overflow into body (1.3
jects (Qmail)?
The body says:
X-Assp- Received-DNSBL: pass
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012
I can confirm this is happening up to version 15.28
Not every server suffers from it.
I haven't seen it on my mDaemon-server nor on a sendmail-server.
The one having the problem is running QMAIL
Does yours (Michael Espinola)?
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
ode. One
> might call it a concurrent versioning system.
I think this is of later concern.
The site says version 1.3.5.15.1
assp.pl is version 1.3.5.15.0
in the zip is an assp.pl that says 1.3.5.15.0 but is different t
> To prevent this "exploit" (it is not a bug, it's a rarely used feature,
which you
> decided not to disable), you have to follow the tips from JP:
Thanks,
But we're both the same person ;-)
I'll let him know...
To make things clear:
UUCP-support wasn't givi
I have disabled UUCP on my sendmail, so it will not relay to another domain,
but it will accept it as mail for itself.
http://safari.oreilly.com/1565928393/sendmail3-CHP-4-SECT-7
Don't assume UUCP support and UUCP relaying are turned off by default.
Always use the nouucp feature (FEATURE(nouucp))
To make things clear!
To prevent this exploit from happening I need to ENABLE "EnableBangPath"?
What will happen when support is dropped in a future release?
Will it then still translate or will it refuse the mail?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi again,
Sendmail is relaying mail because it thinks it's coming from its own IP.
This happens when the proxy is in between.
Here are 3 telnet SMTP-sessions.
The 2nd one is able to do an open relay.
They are all talking to the same sendmail.
Sendmail listens on: 82.150.128.198:225
ASSP liste
09 Message accepted for delivery
quit
Does anyone have any info on this open-relay exploit and how to prevent
sendmail from relaying?
Thanks in advance,
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challe
Hi Fritz,
I didn't get a reaction on the double entry in the header of the
fallback-server.
It should take the one that's last
I hope I'm not annoying you ;-)
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
esting "89.250.176.7" while it should test "85.191.0.241"
I think we're there if this anomaly is cracked too.
JP
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:16:27 +0100
Received: from mail by www.ocserver5.net w
d: from mail.hetemail.com ([85.191.0.241]
helo=mail.mirmana.com) by
fallback1.dsdeurne.nl;
I now have this expression:
Received: from.*?([\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+].*?)
by.*?fallback1.dsdeurne.nl
Yours is:
Received: from.*?(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+).*?by f
t
is 5 minutes.'],
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
__
: from mail.hetemail.com ([85.191.0.241]
helo=mail.mirmana.com) by
fallback.deurne.nl;
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT
The interface says that Default is 5 minutes.
"Non-default Settings" says it has to be 1 minute
Embargo Time (DelayEmbargoTime)
Enter the number of minutes for which delivery, related with new 'triplet'
(IP address of the sending host + mail from + rcpt to), is refused with a
temporary failure.
available)
- run ASSP 3x for each MTA
- Listen to port 125 and let iptables translate port 25 to it for 3
IP's.
I preferred to have it this way.
- run ASSP 1x and listen on 3 IP's and route it to 3 MTA's
We also have ASSP with a r
Hi Fritz,
It is working
Thanks,
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01
Hey Fritz,
Thanks, I'll try and implement it immediately..
I'll let you know
Interested in the code as well.
I took a look and wondered if I could do it myself..
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsof
I'm not a programmer anymore and never looked into modern languages like
Perl or Python.
A shame really.
I can't implement it, but behind the else, the code should look for
stmpDestinationRT and if it exists only bind to the interfaces that are
listed there.
A piece of cake for an experienced pro
> What am I missing?
I want to use the routing table.
This means it will connect to the appropriate MTA depending on the IP the
data is coming in.
One proxy -> 3 MTA -> 1 configuration.
JP
-
This SF.net
Daniel,
I had some typos in the first posts
The last one is alright.
Yes, it now turns out it isn't able to listen on specified IP's
This will have to go to another server or I have to run 3 perl sc
It would work if ASSP only listens to the IP's that are configured in
smtpDestinationRT.
listenPort:=25
smtpDestination:=INBOUND:25
smtpDestinationRT:=89.250.176.217=>89.250.176.32:25|89.250.176.218=>89.250.1
76.40:25|89.250.176.219=>89.250.1
- though another question might be why you have multiple programs listening
to port 25.
I'm working for an ISP and we have more services than computers.
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all chall
76.219=>89.250.176.72:25
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
_
r the ports to listen to?
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/dire
I want to run ASSP on a server that's already running ASSP and I want it to
listen to 3 IP-addresses on port 25 and send it to 3 others.
Is this even possible?
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Def
I'm having problems using ASSP using multiple IP's
Maybe it only works if the script has exclusive access to one port.
smtpDestination:=INBOUND:25
smtpDestinationRT:=89.250.176.217=>89.250.176.32:25|89.250.176.218=>89.250.1
76.40:25|89.250.176.218=>89.250.176.72:2589.250.176.218=>89.250.176.72:25
>I think it's something to do with Fritz's server caching things.
>Just try again in a few hours normally fixes things I find.
>James.
That's 2 version further ;-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all cha
be offended, but I never get a reaction when I post here that
the version is the same and when I try it a bit later it's corrected.
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visua
.226.0 TotalScore is -25, added -25 for MessageOK
This gives me the impression that -25 is added for 81.23.226.0/24
I assume this entry is the subtotal thus far.
An entry in the log that says it has added nothing for 81.23.226.0/24 ma
the IP of 193.172.235.90 matches the MX-record of
Lorentzlyceum.nl
JP
# cat maillog.txt | grep id-9652-137
Jan-22-08 14:47:32 id-9652-137 193.172.235.90 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
renewing tuplet: (193.172.235.0,lorentzlyceum.nl) age: 3d 17h 18m 16s
Jan-22-08 14:47:32 id-9652-137 193.172.235.90 &
>>Isn't turning a final negative value into 0 sufficient or better?
>this piece of code got omitted the last days, but it is now in it
>again: negative or 0 will delete the entry in the blackbox altogether.
Can the logging be changed to reflect what's happened?
>>Is it now getting a "-10" for that IP?
>>If so, does that IP build up credit for having passed a message?
>>
>>I changed the -25 bonus for "MessageOK" to 0.
> Do to your liking.
> Actually the logging here is not so beautiful but, yes , an IP get
> credit for passing with "message ok".
> This re
This is part of the maillog of an obvious spam-message.
It already received a "neutral" flag for appearing on
"blackholes.five-ten-sg.com".
Is it now getting a "-10" for that IP?
If so, does that IP build up credit for having passed a message?
I changed the -25 b
Fritz,
It might be 'nicer', but if you double-click it in Putty, it will not become
selected as a whole.. :-(
What are the advantages?
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. M
Is the double colon in message-ID intentional?
Jan-21-08 16:34:20 id-9660:1450 85.84.180.7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PB: 85.84.180.0 TotalScore is 10, added 10 for InvalidAddress
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponso
mail if the IP would match "v=spf1
a/24 mx/4 -all".
Or do you mean that "v=spf1 a/24 mx/4 -all" is already used for non-SPF'd
domains?
If not, that might be a good idea as well.
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens F
It's a bit of a wild idea, but what about testing a missing PTR against the
SPF-expression "v=spf1 a/24 mx/4 -all" and only score if it fails.
It would be something I should do manually if I'm investigating if a mail is
spam or not.
JP
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
V
>>Differentiating between "invalid for sure", "suspicious" and missing
>>(as
>>well in the Penalty-score) would leave enough room for customizing.
>
> in (11.6) it is split it into "missing" and "invalid".
>
>Thanks for that, Fritz, I had been having the same issue with occasional
>misfires on PT
ifferentiating between "invalid for sure", "suspicious" and missing (as
well in the Penalty-score) would leave enough room for customizing.
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Def
to work on my
Linux system at home.
To prevent this version from crashing immediately after start-up, I had to
install "DBI" in CPAN. Maybe it's better that ASSP tests for availability of
these modules and add them in the info page?
What's the story behind the opt
> 10.5,10.6,10.7 were running fine on other servers including mine.
> Fritz
There might be something wrong with this machine.
But do take in mind that I've thrown about every (sub)version of ASSP at
this machine and this is the first time it choked on subsequent versi
10.7 refuses connections after 2 tries.
This version is working fine on another server.
I was wondering if the absence of ClamAV can be the cause.
The perl-module is installed, but ClamAV scanning is turned off in ASSP.
I'm running Fedore Core 8
16-2008 12:14:01.784 Griplist download complete
Jan-16-2008 12:15:11.060 Connected: 41.244.15.12:49103 -> 192.168.10.130:25
-> mail.hetemail.com:25
JP
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challen
There's a cache for DNSBL-hits with a timeout, but shouldn't there be a
separate cache for DNSBL-fail?
Using different timeout values for these 2 caches can be used to influence
the character of ASSP.
With "hits" I mean an IP that is O
e, but it just didn't accept any mail.
When I saw all the code change (big maintenance), I decided to go back to
version 10.4.(1) and skip a few versions.
Anyone else experiencing this?
JP
-
This SF.net email is s
The 10.4 I downloaded was buggy...
It was replaced by a working version a bit later.
It is working now.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Marrco
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 januari 2008 16:45
Aan: 'ASSP development mailing list'
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp
Did you download the "latest" 1.3.5.10.4?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens _larsneo_
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 januari 2008 16:12
Aan: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Assp-test] [1.3.5(10.0)] feedback
_larsneo_ wrote:
>
> not
n on one system and not on another system. It's just NOT DONE to keep
version numbers the same.
If I weren't running a compare, I would still be trying to find out why 10.4
runs fine on system x and not on y.
You should consider that we are being put on a wild chase
Fritz,
Please; If you post a buggy version, don't update it with the same version
number.
The 10.4 I downloaded at 9:40 this morning was significantly different than
the 10.4 I can download now.
Please take us testers seriously.
10.4$newscore=0 if newscore < 0 ;
10.4$new
I haven't experimented enough to find out why...
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;135030
Ok, I didn't realise there were 2 total scores.
But it was my intention to treat "Home Country ISP's" less harsh than
foreign.
So, this ISP should get away with this "misdemeanour".
Don't you agree?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Fritz Bo
Please don't get me wrong.
Negative numbers for scoring was even my feature request.
But in the end you'll get a totalscore and I don't think it's wise to build
up a negative score.
So, I'm specifically talking about "totalscore" not "score".
JP
PFsoftfail for"
I assume this has to be:
"Message-Score: total for this message is -10, added -10 for SPF
softfail"
".0.0.0 TotalScore is -10, added -10 for SPFsoftfail"
Besides this awkward logging. Is it wise to add a negative number for the
totals
Can someone change ASSP's log output regarding Message-score.
# cat maillog.txt | grep id-5605c10919
Jan-14-08 16:46:57 id-5605c10919 82.150.128.198 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scoring Home Country Bonus NL - DSD Automatisering B.V. xDSL
and hosting
Jan-14-08 16:46:57 id-5605c10919
ive the message (softfail).
Maybe something like:
"Although paypal.com is using "softfail", we have chosen to block mails that
are not within the scope of their SPF"
JP
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net M
Fritz,
I have tested the "Strict" feature with SPF2 and it still works...
JP
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Op
se domains use a softfail and I prefer a hard fail for those kind of
domains.
I assume these function don't work when I use SPF2.
Is this correct?
If so, isn't it better to use SPF1 by default?
JP
-
Check out the ne
Fribo,
Sometimes one of the SMTP-AUTH clients get kicked of the whitelist.
This is giving us a lot of helpdesk-questions, because mail is getting
refused and IP's are getting blocked because of that.
Could you make it possible that this doesn't happen?
T
100 matches
Mail list logo
