Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-05 Thread Joshua Colp
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote: Ok, thank you. One final question: I see that it's possible to have multiple auth's in an endpoint. For incoming traffic to be authenticated, how does pjsip know which auth to consider? By looking at the From: address in the SIP header, and matching that up with th

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Antonio Gómez Soto
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > Antonio Gómez Soto wrote: > > > > >> I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a >> one-to-one relationship. >> >> So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but >> an aor >> can exist without an

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Joshua Colp
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote: I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a one-to-one relationship. So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but an aor can exist without an auth, why was the auth object created in the first place, instead of exten

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Antonio Gómez Soto
Joshua, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: [..snip..] > Also I notice, an AOR does seem do be directly correlated with an auth >> record, so why are >> they separate in the configuration, why not unify the aor and the auth >> objects? >> > > They aren't at all. Auth = Authent

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Joshua Colp
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote: So basically, the 'contact' in the AOR is just an ip address (or 'dynamic', in which case it accepts incoming registrations). A contact is a SIP term, it's a way of getting to something. (IP address+port) So what happens if one endpoint has multiple AOR's which ar

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Antonio Gómez Soto
Thanks for responding, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, George Joseph wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio Gómez Soto < > antonio.gomez.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. >> Especially the new (to me) objects a

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread George Joseph
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio Gómez Soto < antonio.gomez.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. > Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. > > I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration se

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Joshua Colp
Antonio Gómez Soto wrote: Hello, Kia ora, I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings on a phone. Have you looked on the wiki[1]? There's

[asterisk-users] Confused by concepts behind pjsip: endpoint, aor, contact

2015-01-04 Thread Antonio Gómez Soto
Hello, I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings on a phone. Suppose I have a phone with two line buttons, for two extension numbers. Now, I t

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused about notifyringing in sip.conf

2010-09-20 Thread unserossi
Hi! > notifyringing = no ; Control whether subscriptions already > INUSE get sent RINGING when another call is sent (default: yes) > > Does this mean that when I mark this as "yes", a phone that already has > taken a call will be send a second and third call ?! No, not directly: This

Re: [asterisk-users] Confused about notifyringing in sip.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > notifyringing = no ; Control whether subscriptions already > INUSE get sent RINGING when another call is sent (default: yes) > > Does this mean that when I mark this as "yes", a phone that already has > taken a call will be send a second and third call ?! No, not directly: This setting is

[asterisk-users] Confused about notifyringing in sip.conf

2010-09-20 Thread Jonas Kellens
Hello list, I read this in sip.conf : notifyringing = no ; Control whether subscriptions already INUSE get sent RINGING when another call is sent (default: yes) What does this mean ?! Does this mean that when I mark this as "yes", a phone that already has taken a call will be se

[asterisk-users] Confused about Asterisk 1.4 RTPQOS...

2007-09-21 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm confused about something In Asterisk 1.4 you can collect RTP QoS metrics at the end of a call with: ${CHANNEL(rtpqos,audio,all)} Now, when your using the AMI to do a callout, like this... ACTION: Originate Async: yes Timeout: 6 Exten: callback Channel: SIP/1000 Variable: callid=8491

[asterisk-users] Confused about SIP Realtime Updates

2006-10-27 Thread Douglas Garstang
I'm confused about SIP realtime updates. If I make a database change, and then do a "sip prune realtime peer ", I can see Asterisk query the database, and retrieve the updated information. However, it still uses the old values. What's up with that?   If I do a "reload", Asterisk q

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Vile
I though g723 used 5.43 KBps and g729 was 5.91 KBps On 5/16/06, Jon Weisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your restriction is what the service provider allows. Most (that I've > used) > allow g729. I know it uses more bandwidth than g723 but nothing like G711 > (ulaw or alaw) and from my experie

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-16 Thread Jon Weisman
Your restriction is what the service provider allows. Most (that I've used) allow g729. I know it uses more bandwidth than g723 but nothing like G711 (ulaw or alaw) and from my experience, the quality is quite reasonable. uh...g729 uses the least bandwidth -jon ___

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-14 Thread Mohammad Salaque
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 14:16 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused ! how to use reinvite in my asterisk setup ? thanks Salaque On 5/14/06, AR Tarzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm n

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-14 Thread AR Tarzi
the quality is quite reasonable. - Original Message - From: "Mohammad Salaque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:27 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused ! thanks for your replay, after i

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-14 Thread Mohammad Salaque
- From: "Mohammad Salaque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:27 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused ! thanks for your replay, after i disallow all codec except g723 i also confused how a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-14 Thread AR Tarzi
- Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 11:27 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused ! thanks for your replay, after i disallow all codec except g723 i also confused how a2billing is working then what i did , i removed all the codec from /usr/lib/astersik/module without codec_g

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-14 Thread Mohammad Salaque
s Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 23:36 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused ! > Install iptraf, that will allow you to check incoming and outgoing traffic > (or trafshow what do that on /host basis, but not so detailed info) > > If you choos

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-13 Thread Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling
AR Tarzi wrote: Unless "reinviting" works, wouldn't that add up to what he's experiencing ? client <-> asterisk <-> service provider.. makes that 180k each connection so 4 of them would give 800k or so. What I can't understand is: if only g723 is allowed, and Asterisk only allows it as passthr

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-13 Thread AR Tarzi
allows it as passthrough, how's the A2billing IVR working ? I have to assume G711 (ulaw or alaw) is used. - Original Message - From: "Woodoo People .pGa!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" Sent:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-13 Thread Woodoo People .pGa!
Install iptraf, that will allow you to check incoming and outgoing traffic (or trafshow what do that on /host basis, but not so detailed info) If you choose ulaw, that should take about 90kbps fullduplex traffic. > I'd like to share something u all , so that i could understand whats > going on i

[Asterisk-Users] Confused !

2006-05-13 Thread Mohammad Salaque
Hello list, I'd like to share something u all , so that i could understand whats going on into my Asterisk box. i have a setup like this client(ip phone) -ip network--- [Asterisk]ip network ---[Service provider] i have configured A2biling in my Asterisk box. so when client c

Re: [Asterisk-Users] confused about iax and voip providers termination

2006-04-22 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 21 April 2006 16:29, T. Shaw wrote: > After getting an account and following their steps, I can make calls out > using my IAX (cubix) and Sip (Xlite) phones. > However, I'm a bit confused on the purpose on how my box asterisk box is > involved. I completely turned off my Asterisk box, and

Re: [Asterisk-Users] confused about iax and voip providers termination

2006-04-21 Thread Moises Silva
The VOIP provider does not actually care if you are making your calls from a simple SoftPhone, or a complete PBX. Im not going to explain all the possible combinations of connecting, but i guess your confusion comes because you still dont get to the part where some one explains to you what "Native

[Asterisk-Users] confused about iax and voip providers termination

2006-04-21 Thread T. Shaw
Hey guys, I'm actively trying to get the "big" picture on how all this works and relates to each other. I've gone through some basic examples from the book and from the sample files just fine. Now, I've setup an account with a VOIP provider which does IAX termination (exgn.net) After getting an a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-04-06 Thread Alan Ferrency
The portion I forgot to mention: Our agent login extension checks AGENTBYCALLERID to make sure no one is already logged into the phone, before doing agentcallbacklogin. If you don't do this, then it's entirely possible for two agents to be logged into the same phone. However, only one will be show

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-04-06 Thread Matt
Very good.. I modified your things (although not much) so that if the agent is logged in it automatically logs them out.. if they aren't logged in then it prompts them to login. On 4/4/06, Alan Ferrency <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The portion I forgot to mention: > > Our agent login extension che

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-04-03 Thread Matt
> Our solution to the "agent log out" problem is admittedly imperfect in > the general case, but it works well enough if you can do without agent > passwords. > > - This only works if agents don't have passwords. You could probably > modify it to look up passwords in real time, but it wasn't impo

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-04-03 Thread Alan Ferrency
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Matt wrote: > > > However, anyone have a good way to log the agent out without having > > > them enter their agent ID and then have to hit # for the new > > > extension? > > > > > > > There are a couple of ways listed here in the Wiki: > > > > > > http://www.voip-info.org/ti

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-04-01 Thread Matt
> > > > However, anyone have a good way to log the agent out without having > > them enter their agent ID and then have to hit # for the new > > extension? > > > > There are a couple of ways listed here in the Wiki: > > > http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20cmd%20AgentCallbac

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-03-31 Thread BJ Weschke
On 3/31/06, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very good that's actually what I ended up doing. > > I think my confusion came up with "Hot Desk" use ... like where you > want the agents EXTENSION to roam with them.. and agent-IDs.. which is > what I wanted... once I figured out the difference things

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-03-31 Thread Matt
Very good that's actually what I ended up doing. I think my confusion came up with "Hot Desk" use ... like where you want the agents EXTENSION to roam with them.. and agent-IDs.. which is what I wanted... once I figured out the difference things have been going smoothly.. While I'm a long time as

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-03-31 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi Matt, We have somewhat of a similar setup here in my office. We have multiple queues to which different agents are a member to anyone of them. Basically what I chose to do was make my own custom log in script. I reference to the voicemail box and use the ID and password to authenticate our

[Asterisk-Users] Confused on Agents and Queues

2006-03-31 Thread Matt
Hi, I'm confused with agents and queues in Asterisk. If I use AddQueueMember() then "show queues" shows the agents that I have logged into the queue... however the agent ID has to be the extension the agent is sitting at ... kinda useless for stats tracking. If I use AgentCallbackLogin() then "sh

Re: [Asterisk-Users] *confused* - help needed

2005-08-15 Thread Moises Silva
you can find some resources at the end of this page: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=ISDN hope it helps. best regards On 8/14/05, Vedran Dakic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello there. > > > > What I'm trying to make is - have an asterisk server with > sccp/mgcp/sk

[Asterisk-Users] *confused* - help needed

2005-08-14 Thread Vedran Dakic
Hello there.   What I'm trying to make is - have an asterisk server with sccp/mgcp/skip/h.323 support to handle calls between various company locations. Let's say the company has five different locations, internet connections in each one of them and would like to use it via asterisk to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Dana Olson
You would need a transcoding license between the Asterisk PBX and the G711 phone... On 4/28/05, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So > > > [g729 provider] -(SIP or IAX)--- [g729 asterisk server] > > This is how I'd be setup.. actually more like this: > > [g729 provider] ---

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Rusty Shackleford
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:31 AM > To: Adam Goryachev > Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
I'll gladly pay $10 a license... I'm all for supporting digium... however, I was under the impression that there was also some huge one time fee of like $2,000 or something. I guess I was wrong... ok now bad.. So I purchase the license from digium... then what happens/what needs to be done on Ast

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 11:03 -0400, Matt wrote: > So > > > [g729 provider] -(SIP or IAX)--- [g729 asterisk server] > > This is how I'd be setup.. actually more like this: > > [g729 provider] --(sip) [g729 asterisk > server](sip)---[g711 sip phone client]. > > >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
So > [g729 provider] -(SIP or IAX)--- [g729 asterisk server] This is how I'd be setup.. actually more like this: [g729 provider] --(sip) [g729 asterisk server](sip)---[g711 sip phone client]. So... if I understand this correctly.. I *would not* for *any* reason

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Pedro
In your case, where you will need the license is on the box that your phones register to. For exampe, when someone checks voicemail, encoding takes place, therefore you need a license. Look at it this way: [g729 provider] -(SIP or IAX)--- [g729 asterisk server] - no license requ

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
For instance.. when I try to use G723.1 on my phone (and just call in from my PRI line) I get: Unable to find a path from g723 to ulaw. Unable to find a path from ulaw to g723. No path to translate from Zap/1-1(68) to Sip/201-80c7(1). Same things happens if I call in on my current provider's number

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-28 Thread Matt
: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729 > > > > My question is.. if my voip terminator supports G723 and G729 > > only, do I still need a license? > > Or is that considered > > "pass-through&qu

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-27 Thread Rusty Shackleford
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:43 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729 > > My

[Asterisk-Users] Confused on G723 and G729

2005-04-27 Thread Matt
I see that G723 and G729 require a license to be used, or can be used (in the case of G723) in pass-through mode only. My question is.. if my voip terminator supports G723 and G729 only, do I still need a license? Or is that considered "pass-through"? If so, do I need to do anything special to g

[Asterisk-Users] Confused: Qozap is on interrupt 209 alone - is this good or not ?

2005-03-30 Thread Robert Rozman
Hi, I'm confused whether I setup PC for Asterisk right or not. Module qozap is alone (yet not sharing) in interrupt 209 (isn't this too high for native interrupt). Is this good state or not? If not, how to setup better ? Thanks in advance, regards, Rob. voip:~ # cat /proc/interrupts C

[Asterisk-Users] Confused about proxying and NAT, and seeking guidance

2004-12-10 Thread Howard Lowndes
I think I have got * worked out as far as getting users on a small private network talking with each other, but when it comes to the bigger picture about talking between private networks connected by the Internet then I am getting confused about STUN, SER, SIPPROXY, RTPPROXY, etc. Before I start l

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused --> Hardware specs

2004-08-14 Thread Vasyl Rublyov
Are you going to use single E1 line? How many concurrent calls. Single Xeon 3.0 with *1 GB *ram should serve 30-32 calls with not problem, even during G729 transcoding and echo cancellation. If you are not plaining to do G729 transcoding - then I believe you can put more then 32 calls in this box

[Asterisk-Users] Confused --> Hardware specs

2004-08-07 Thread Asterisk
Having kept an Eye on hardware specs mails in the list, and having read the hardware notes on voip-info, I am still confused over the recommended hardware: We are going to have up to 100 operators and staff making calls, mostly through zap connected to TE405P through to a 32-channel E1. However, i

[Asterisk-Users] Confused.

2004-07-25 Thread Jozeph Brasil
Hi all,   I´m using X-Lite as SoftPhone in Asterisk. I have configured this:   [101] ;Turn off silence suppression in X-Lite ("Transmit Silence"=YES)! ;Note that Xlite sends NAT keep-alive packets, so qualify=yes is not needed type=friend username=jozeph callerid="Jozeph Brasil" <5

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused with CallerID when using the iax chanenls

2004-06-27 Thread Aaron J. Angel
Joe Dennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Caller Ids get set in the sip.conf file for the specific You'll note the original author stated he was using IAX clients. Caller ID is set in iax.conf, using the callerid option. Steven, is callerid set in iax.conf? Are you able to get callerid between int

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Confused with CallerID when using the iax chanenls

2004-06-27 Thread Joe Dennick
erisk-Users] Confused with CallerID when using the iax chanenls Hi, I have two * box. One is box1 and the other is box2. And I have two iax clients A and B. A is registed with box1 and B is registed with box2. If I make a call from A to B using the following method: IAX/[[:[EMAIL PROT

[Asterisk-Users] Confused with CallerID when using the iax chanenls

2004-06-27 Thread steven louse
Hi, I have two * box. One is box1 and the other is box2. And I have two iax clients A and B. A is registed with box1 and B is registed with box2. If I make a call from A to B using the following method: IAX/[[:[EMAIL PROTECTED][:][/[@][/]] The CalledID that B got is but not A's CallerID.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused about Asterisk server with regards to Linux NAT Firewall

2003-11-15 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Hi! I'm confused as to where I need to place the Asterisk server with repect to my Linux Firewall? I've read thru the message archives but have not been able to glean a clear answer. My Linux Firewall is a RH9 running IPTABLES doing NAT. The probably easiest solu

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Confused about Asterisk server with regards to Linux NAT Firewall

2003-11-15 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi! > I'm confused as to where I need to place the Asterisk server with repect > to my Linux Firewall? I've read thru the message archives but have not > been able to glean a clear answer. My Linux Firewall is a RH9 running > IPTABLES doing NAT. The probably easiest solution is to put * onto y

[Asterisk-Users] Confused about Asterisk server with regards to Linux NAT Firewall

2003-11-14 Thread Ed Rubright
Title: Confused about Asterisk server with regards to Linux NAT Firewall Hi all, I'm confused as to where I need to place the Asterisk server with repect to my Linux Firewall?  I've read thru the message archives but have not been able to glean a clear answer.  My Linux Firewall is a RH9 ru