On Friday 02 September 2005 11:38, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 12:57, Martin wrote:
> > I would be really curious if anyone else has the capability (digital
> > multimeter) and enough knowledge to test their incoming CO (Central
> > Office line) and board outputs.
>
> I wi
On Friday 02 September 2005 12:57, Martin wrote:
> I would be really curious if anyone else has the capability (digital
> multimeter) and enough knowledge to test their incoming CO (Central Office
> line) and board outputs.
I will test mine at lunchtime today.
-A.
On Friday 02 September 2005 10:51, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 12:31, Martin wrote:
> > Port #1
> > Standing voltage = -48.4 VDC
> > Ringing voltage = 42.7 VAC
> >
> > Port #2
> > Standing voltage = -48.2 VDC
> > Ringing voltage = 42.7 VAC
> >
> > Port #4
> > Standing volt
On Friday 02 September 2005 12:31, Martin wrote:
> Port #1
> Standing voltage = -48.4 VDC
> Ringing voltage = 42.7 VAC
>
> Port #2
> Standing voltage = -48.2 VDC
> Ringing voltage = 42.7 VAC
>
> Port #4
> Standing voltage = -44.4 VDC
> Ringing voltage = 43.5 VAC
Sounds like you have defective modu
On Friday 02 September 2005 10:43, Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:
> Probably already been covered but you do have the power connector on the
> board connected right?
>
> -Jonathan
Yes, from my earlier email
"Yes, the 4-pin power connector from the 400W PS is plugged in and there is
only one H/D and
Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P problems
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:33, Martin wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 07:47, Alex Ongena wrote:
> > > > This is a well-known issue with the current drivers, although
> > > > nobody's really stepped
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:33, Martin wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 07:47, Alex Ongena wrote:
> > > > This is a well-known issue with the current drivers, although
> > > > nobody's really stepped up to identify when exactly this started
> > > > happenning (as the driver code was changed)
On Friday 02 September 2005 07:47, Alex Ongena wrote:
> > > This is a well-known issue with the current drivers, although nobody's
> > > really stepped up to identify when exactly this started happenning (as
> > > the driver code was changed) or why.
> >
> > Do I understand that this would not be a
> > This is a well-known issue with the current drivers, although nobody's
> > really
> > stepped up to identify when exactly this started happenning (as the driver
> > code was changed) or why.
>
> Do I understand that this would not be a problem with an 'older' version
> of Asterisk ? If so,
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:12 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> On Thursday 01 September 2005 06:35, Alex Ongena wrote:
> > I encounter 2 major problems:
> > 1) Transmitting and receiving van Fax is very unreliable (on the CLI I see
> >a Native bridging (seems to be 911.ulaw, 64 kbit high quality)
On Thursday 01 September 2005 06:35, Alex Ongena wrote:
> I encounter 2 major problems:
> 1) Transmitting and receiving van Fax is very unreliable (on the CLI I see
>a Native bridging (seems to be 911.ulaw, 64 kbit high quality).
> Sometimes the Fax is Ok, sometimes I miss a few lines, sometime
Hello,
We recently bought 2 TDM400P Rev I boards with in total 8 FXS ports to be
used with Asterisk. I use Asterisk CVS Head (version around 15 aug 2005).
I have an ISDN Quad boards towards the national Telco. The TDM400P has
his own Interrupt line.
I encounter 2 major problems:
1) Transmitting a
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 11:15 -0300, CÃsar Davi Ãvila do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've bought a TDM400P and need some help with configuration. Can you
> tell me what to do ?
>
> I've tried to install and the message below has appeared:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe zaptel
> [E
César Davi Ávila do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've bought a TDM400P and need some help with configuration. Can you
> tell me what to do ?
>
> I've tried to install and the message below has appeared:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe zaptel
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe w
Hi All
I've bought a TDM400P and need some help with configuration. Can you tell me
what to do ?
I've tried to install and the message below has appeared:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe zaptel[EMAIL PROTECTED] asterisk]# modprobe
wcfxo/lib/modules/2.4.22-1.2115.nptl/misc/wcfxo.o
rs Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: X-SBClass: Spam ( Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems)
> I have a problem in that the pci card is not detected at all. Other pci
> cards are detected fine but not the
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: X-SBClass: Spam ( Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems)
> Have you checked to see if there is a newer bios for t
On 27/08/2004, at 12:59 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
Have you checked that your motherboard supports the correct PCI
version.
From memory the digium cards require PCI 2.2 support...
Yes the mobo has pci 2.2.
Check the digium website for the exact hardware requirements, and then
check your motherboar
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg Hulands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P P
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 8:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems
> >
> >
> >> When I did the lspci
f my guess is right.
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Hulands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Hulands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems
> When I did the lsp
emory
addresses.
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Hulands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems
Hi,
I have just started to setup and configure my asterisk box and am
havin
lspci -v should show more helpfull info, including I/O memory addresses.
Lyle
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Hulands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 7:11 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Problems
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I have just started to setup and configure my asterisk box and am
having trouble with it. I have a dlink nic in the box as well as the
digium card. When the nic is in there by itself it works, but when I
put the tdm400p in, there seems to be some sort of conflict with the
network card. The
David,
Not sure if you already got a reply or not - but it looks to me like
your FXO module is on port 3 - not 2 (see the dmesg output). Give that
a try.
HTH- Ben
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, at 12:51 PM, David Creemer wrote:
Hi-
I'm totally stumped configuring my TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO
Following up with a thought experiment. If I start with one TDM400P,
FXS module in slot 1, FXO module in slot 3, my zaptel.conf file looks
like this:
fxoks=1
fxsks=3
If I were to put an X101P in this machine, and load the wcfxo module
*first*, what would the zaptel.conf channel list look like?
Looks to me like you have 1 and 3 installed, not 1 and 2. Look
close at your dmesg output.
> Hi-
>
> I'm totally stumped configuring my TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO
> module. Before I got the FXO module, I used to have an X101P, and
> everything was working very wel
Problem fixed. Here's the solutions for those who care:
- TDM400P has slots 1,2,3,4
- "channel" in the zaptel.conf must match the slot the card is in.
I have the daughter cards in slot 1 and 3.
BUT here's the kicker: if the zaptel.conf configures channel 1 and 2
(not 3). No error is reported, and
I am getting a similar problem with a TDM400P with 4 FXO ports,
Module 1 not working properly, IE not picking up the calls at all.
I have 3 TDM400P cards, 1 loaded with 4 FXO ports, 2 loaded with 4 FXS ports.
Does anyone know if this problem with port 1 is only with the FXO modules
or if it's als
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 14:51, David Creemer wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I'm totally stumped configuring my TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO
> module. Before I got the FXO module, I used to have an X101P, and
> everything was working very well. Now * doesn't seem to recognize the
> FXO channel. I've se
There is a known problem with the first port on the TDM400P. For me, the
problem resulted in randomly dropped calls on the FXO port, which was
plugged into position 1. Since you only have two daughterboards, try
using positions 2-3-4 and don't use position 1, and see of that solves
your problem.
Hi-
I'm totally stumped configuring my TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO
module. Before I got the FXO module, I used to have an X101P, and
everything was working very well. Now * doesn't seem to recognize the
FXO channel. I've searched the wiki and the list archives. Stock Debian
3.0 stable inst
33 matches
Mail list logo
