[asterisk-users] SLA, SPA942, Asterisk 11.7.0

2015-05-20 Thread Dennison Williams
Fellow asterisk users, I am trying to get Single Line Appearance functionality working on a set of Linksys SPA942 phones and have not been successful. It looks like sla.conf is not getting read, only one phone reads as registered for the shared line, and a busy tone every time the shared extensio

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA (Shared Line Appearance) and realtime

2015-02-13 Thread Joe Mordica
Leandro Dardini gmail.com> writes: > > Hello,do you know if it is possible to define the SLA configuration in the database for realtime usage with asterisk? > > Leandro > > Are there any updates here? This would be a great to implement. -- __

[asterisk-users] SLA (Shared Line Appearance) and realtime

2014-11-14 Thread Leandro Dardini
Hello, do you know if it is possible to define the SLA configuration in the database for realtime usage with asterisk? Leandro -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us fo

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-15 Thread Leif Madsen
On 10/05/12 10:45 AM, eherr wrote: Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom phones. I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out. Everything I tried so far is just not working together. Yes, I have managed to get everything workin

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:55 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Cor

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Would those be the shared lines? Continuing with the assumption they are, I need to set them up in stations in the SLA.conf file? From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Since you are doing all SIP, you would want something like this: exten => 1000,hint,SIP/100 exten => 2000,hint,SIP/200 exten => 3000,hint,SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
s.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of eherr Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:40 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Unfortunately I am still a sit

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:34 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom I was able to do it with 1.4 and an IP501. You just get your hints set up cor

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
10, 2012 1:31 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Yes but I am not able to follow it to completion. I think the guide is quite incomplete. I am also trying to follow another g

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Danny Nicholas Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:18 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom You

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
- Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Oh yeah, damn small things. Asterisk 1.8.7.1 Polycom IP650 Thanks, --E From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Dann

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
rcial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Which flavor of Asterisk and what model Polycom? Both are factors in the possible success of the task. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com]

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread Danny Nicholas
Subject: [asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom phones. I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out. Everything I tried so far is just not working together. Thanks

[asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom phones. I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out. Everything I tried so far is just not working together. Thanks, --E -- ___

[asterisk-users] SLA - Shared Line Appearance - Polycom

2012-05-10 Thread eherr
Has anyone been able to get SLA ( Shared Line Appearance ) to work with Polycom phones. I want to be able to emulate a key system but I cannot figure it out. Everything I tried so far is just not working together. Thanks, --E --

[asterisk-users] SLA and call transfer

2012-03-09 Thread Matt Hamilton
Hi, Is it possible to transfer a call in Asterisk SLA (shared line appearance) e.g., call comes in via SLATrunk, it's answered, and transferred to an outside number? Thanks, Matt -- _

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread bakko
Hi For this scenario you can use the group and group_count functions and create a hint dialplan like this: exten => trunkname,hint,custom:trunkname When you reach the maximum number of available channels set the hint in use: Set(DEVICE_STATE(Custom:confcorso)=INUSE) To remove: Set(DEVICE_STA

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 18:21 +0100, Patrick Lists wrote: > On 26-01-12 18:08, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > [snip] > > > > I'm also very interested in working examples, especially if someone has > > set it up for SIP termination "trunks" rather than Dahdi. > > Maybe I am missing something here but why

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Danny Nicholas
January 26, 2012 11:21 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality On 26-01-12 18:08, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: [snip] > > I'm also very interested in working examples, especially if someone

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Patrick Lists
On 26-01-12 18:08, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: [snip] I'm also very interested in working examples, especially if someone has set it up for SIP termination "trunks" rather than Dahdi. Maybe I am missing something here but why would you want to emulate a keysystem with analog (thus single call) li

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Jeff LaCoursiere
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 10:48 -0600, Tim Nelson wrote: > - Original Message - > > On 01/26/2012 09:46 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > > > Greetings- > > > > > > I currently have a customer that *requires* key-system functionality > > > in an Asterisk PBX. On a SIP phone, the BLF keys need to show the

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Tim Nelson
- Original Message - > On 01/26/2012 09:46 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > > Greetings- > > > > I currently have a customer that *requires* key-system functionality > > in an Asterisk PBX. On a SIP phone, the BLF keys need to show the > > current state of the analog lines attached to the system (DA

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 01/26/2012 09:46 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: Greetings- I currently have a customer that *requires* key-system functionality in an Asterisk PBX. On a SIP phone, the BLF keys need to show the current state of the analog lines attached to the system (DAHDI FXO). By pressing one of these keys (for

[asterisk-users] SLA for DAHDI FXO - Emulating Key System Functionality

2012-01-26 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings- I currently have a customer that *requires* key-system functionality in an Asterisk PBX. On a SIP phone, the BLF keys need to show the current state of the analog lines attached to the system (DAHDI FXO). By pressing one of these keys (for line 1 for example), the dialed number needs

[asterisk-users] SLA and polycom

2011-11-29 Thread Carlos Rojas
Hello, every body Anyone set up, the sla sharing line appearances, in asterisk, I'm setting, tha but, don't, work, I change the sla.conf, extensions.conf, and sip.cfg, but don't work fine. Any one, could setup, tha? Regards Carlos Rojas -- _

[asterisk-users] SLA and Flashing BLF

2009-02-18 Thread Muiz Motani
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Muiz Motani wrote: > > I understand that the Asterisk SLA implementation is somewhat different > > from most key systems and PBX systems. I also understand that in > > Asterisk, one does not put an SLA line on hold since it is just a MeetMe > > conference. However, is ther

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Flashing BLF

2009-02-17 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Muiz Motani wrote: > I understand that the Asterisk SLA implementation is somewhat different > from most key systems and PBX systems. I also understand that in > Asterisk, one does not put an SLA line on hold since it is just a MeetMe > conference. However, is there any way to make the BLF flash wh

[asterisk-users] SLA and Flashing BLF

2009-02-17 Thread Muiz Motani
I understand that the Asterisk SLA implementation is somewhat different from most key systems and PBX systems. I also understand that in Asterisk, one does not put an SLA line on hold since it is just a MeetMe conference. However, is there any way to make the BLF flash when the answering party on t

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 23:39, Noah Miller wrote: > Hi Mark - > >>> You really want to do SLA with all 23 lines of the PRI? That's a >>> lotta lines to be shared. You'd need two sidecars for each phone >>> (Cisco or Polycom). >>> >> Actually there will be multiple PRI's :) >> >> This customer is

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Danny Nicholas
, 2009 3:53 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom Noah Miller wrote: >>> I don't believe that Polycom's version of SLA does anything with >>> Asterisk. You have to use asterisk's SLA implementation

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Mark Willis
Noah Miller wrote: >>> I don't believe that Polycom's version of SLA does anything with >>> Asterisk. You have to use asterisk's SLA implementation >>> (http://www.asterisk.org/node/48342). >>> >>> >> So asterisk can't do SLA with Polycom phones? >> > > Asterisk can do SLA with Polycom

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Yehavi Bourvine
I also need SLA for hundreds of phones. Looking at Asterisk's way of doing it I got cold legs... I am now playing with OpenSIPS; didn't manage to make it working there, but it should be much simpler. And no, I am not telling you to drop Asterisk - it is good for other things, and even some things

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Noah Miller
>> I don't believe that Polycom's version of SLA does anything with >> Asterisk. You have to use asterisk's SLA implementation >> (http://www.asterisk.org/node/48342). >> > So asterisk can't do SLA with Polycom phones? Asterisk can do SLA with Polycom, just not using Polycom's SLA implementation

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-08 Thread Mark Willis
Noah Miller wrote: > I don't believe that Polycom's version of SLA does anything with > Asterisk. You have to use asterisk's SLA implementation > (http://www.asterisk.org/node/48342). > > > - Noah > So asterisk can't do SLA with Polycom phones? mark _

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-07 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Mark - >> You really want to do SLA with all 23 lines of the PRI? That's a >> lotta lines to be shared. You'd need two sidecars for each phone >> (Cisco or Polycom). >> > Actually there will be multiple PRI's :) > > This customer is a multi-tenant situation so each tenant will have a few > tr

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-07 Thread Mark Willis
>> Has anyone done SLA with Polycom phones? I've got a large project coming >> up where the customer is keen on SLA for trunks and extensions. Trunks >> will be on a PRI. >> We may do this with Cisco phones if they work better. >> > > You really want to do SLA with all 23 lines of the PRI? T

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-07 Thread Noah Miller
Hi Mark - > Has anyone done SLA with Polycom phones? I've got a large project coming > up where the customer is keen on SLA for trunks and extensions. Trunks > will be on a PRI. > We may do this with Cisco phones if they work better. You really want to do SLA with all 23 lines of the PRI? That's

[asterisk-users] SLA and Polycom

2009-01-07 Thread Mark Willis
Has anyone done SLA with Polycom phones? I've got a large project coming up where the customer is keen on SLA for trunks and extensions. Trunks will be on a PRI. We may do this with Cisco phones if they work better. Mark Willis ___ -- Bandwidth and

[asterisk-users] SLA in 1.4.18: i'm going crazy.

2008-05-07 Thread Vinz486
Hi all, i'm trying from several days to setup a SLA on my machine with some THOMSON 2030. My goal is to bind every F key to an extension (NOT a trunk). So, F1 = 201, F2 = 202, F3 = 203, and so on... I'm googled thousand of pages and many more confusing concepts are in my mind. My server uses e

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA: Handling of errors in outgoing call

2007-12-03 Thread Steve Langstaff
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Russell Bryant > Sent: 01 December 2007 00:08 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA: Handling of errors in out

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA: Handling of errors in outgoing call

2007-11-30 Thread Russell Bryant
Steve Langstaff wrote: > [line1_outbound] > exten => disa,1,Disa(no-password|line1_outbound) > exten => _,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > exten => _,2,Hangup > So to summarise: > if I seize the line and dial a number known at vsp5000 then I > get ringing etc - good. > if I seiz

[asterisk-users] SLA: Handling of errors in outgoing call

2007-11-29 Thread Steve Langstaff
Hi All. I've been experimenting with SLA on Asterisk 1.4.13 (patched up to 1.4.14). I am using a SIP channel for my "trunk" line. On the whole things are good, but I have noticed that if I misdial an outgoing call, i.e. I get 404 "Not Found" in the SIP trace, then the trunk line just drops, rath

[asterisk-users] SLA with SIP-only environment

2007-05-24 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello, All the examples of SLA talk about Zap channels from one side and SIP on the other side, while my system is a pure SIP one. I would like to have two phones having extensions 1 & 2 defined on them, and when someone calls extension 1 it rings on both, each one can see its status, and when

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-06 Thread shadowym
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? SLA requires meetme which requires at a minimum ztdummy. So, you must compile and install zaptel, then compile and install

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-06 Thread David W. Rice
nt: Sunday, May 06, 2007 2:11 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? Doh, I didn't compile meetme support into this install because it said it required a zaptel card for the hardware timers. I have a spare zapte

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-05 Thread Jay Austad
ith *. I've done it successfully and have the configs. I'm going to put them on the web some time soon. -Original Message- From: Jay Austad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:48 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-05 Thread David W. Rice
nfigs. I'm going to put them on the web some time soon. -Original Message- From: Jay Austad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:48 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3? I configured my sla.c

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-04 Thread Stephen Bosch
Jay Austad wrote: > I configured my sla.conf to use with a Polycom phone. I have no idea if > I did it right, however, none of the console "sla" commands exist. Do I > have to something special to compile in this support, or should it just > work out of the box? It sounds like you're missing a m

[asterisk-users] SLA broken in 1.4.3?

2007-05-04 Thread Jay Austad
I configured my sla.conf to use with a Polycom phone. I have no idea if I did it right, however, none of the console "sla" commands exist. Do I have to something special to compile in this support, or should it just work out of the box? ~jay ___

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-26 Thread Jason Howk
friendly these days. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Howk Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 7:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-26 Thread Aaron Daniel
ist - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP) From reading the SLA docs, SIP hints are use to get the lights on the phone to show the "correct state". I was under the impression that the SIP firmware on the 7960's didn

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Jason Howk
: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP) From reading the SLA docs, SIP hints are use to get the lights on the phone to show the "correct state". I was under the impression that the SIP firmware on the 7960's didn't support the SIP hints prope

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Brad Sumrall
007 7:32 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP) >From reading the SLA docs, SIP hints are use to get the lights on the phone to show the "correct state". I was under the impression t

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Jason Howk
>From reading the SLA docs, SIP hints are use to get the lights on the phone to show the "correct state". I was under the impression that the SIP firmware on the 7960's didn't support the SIP hints properly (or at all), which means that SLA won't work properly on a 7960. If anyone has gotten this

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Aaron Daniel
Russell Bryant wrote: John C. Wolosuk Jr. wrote: Has anyone had any success with getting SLA going between 2 SIP phones? (Particularly a set of Cisco 79xx's) The SLA document that comes with the asterisk source is about as clear as mud. Mud, huh? I guess I should work on that at some point

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Russell Bryant
John C. Wolosuk Jr. wrote: Has anyone had any success with getting SLA going between 2 SIP phones? (Particularly a set of Cisco 79xx's) The SLA document that comes with the asterisk source is about as clear as mud. Mud, huh? I guess I should work on that at some point, then ... You say two p

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread John C. Wolosuk Jr.
The zaptel stuff compiles fine, just need to know how to properly configure SLA for the SIP world. Stephen Bosch wrote: John C. Wolosuk Jr. wrote: Also I'm somewhat annoyed that I have to compile zaptel drivers that I don't use in order to compile the app_meetme.so module so I can have the

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread Stephen Bosch
John C. Wolosuk Jr. wrote: > Also I'm somewhat annoyed that I have to compile zaptel drivers that I > don't use in order to compile the app_meetme.so module so I can have the > SLA functions available to the dialplan... If you're using SLA, you're using zaptel drivers, yes -- without the timing so

[asterisk-users] SLA Appearance between 2 Cisco 7960's (SIP)

2007-04-25 Thread John C. Wolosuk Jr.
Has anyone had any success with getting SLA going between 2 SIP phones? (Particularly a set of Cisco 79xx's) The SLA document that comes with the asterisk source is about as clear as mud. Does anyone have a working sip.conf, sla.conf, and extensions.conf that I can use for reference? The par

[asterisk-users] SLA with SIP only configuration

2007-04-19 Thread Yehavi Bourvine +972-8-9489444
Hello, I would like to understand how SLA is working, but all the examples are using trunk of ZAP type and stations of SIP. However, in my case the stations are SIP and the outgoing connection to PSTN is SIP also (link to a Cisco gateway). can anyone send me a simple configuration of how to m

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA more than 100% ?

2007-02-23 Thread Andrew Furey
On 24/02/07, Tim Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How does one answer more than 100% of the calls in less than 60 seconds? techsupp has 0 calls (max 20) in 'leastrecent' strategy (104s holdtime), W:0, C:3, A:2, SL:166.7% within 60s Probably talking out of my hat (I've never particularl

[asterisk-users] SLA more than 100% ?

2007-02-23 Thread Tim Connolly
How does one answer more than 100% of the calls in less than 60 seconds? techsupp has 0 calls (max 20) in 'leastrecent' strategy (104s holdtime), W:0, C:3, A:2, SL:166.7% within 60s ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- aste

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA

2007-01-14 Thread Thomas Kenyon
Chris Bullock wrote: Hi. I've been researching very deep into SLA in Asterisk 1.4, and am unclear as to if the feature exist. I know the commands and configs are available, but there is no documentation, and I've heard that it will not be supported until 1.4.1. Does anyone have a definitive answ

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA

2007-01-12 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
Yes, search. www.voip-info.org ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] SLA

2007-01-12 Thread Chris Bullock
Hi. I've been researching very deep into SLA in Asterisk 1.4, and am unclear as to if the feature exist. I know the commands and configs are available, but there is no documentation, and I've heard that it will not be supported until 1.4.1. Does anyone have a definitive answer on this? If it is a

RE: [asterisk-users] SLA Doc

2006-08-19 Thread David Gagnon
CTED] De la part de Russell Bryant Envoyé : 19 août 2006 00:17 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Doc On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 19:17 -0400, David Gagnon wrote: > I just saw there is a branch in the SVN that support SLA. The latest > trun

Re: [asterisk-users] SLA Doc

2006-08-18 Thread Russell Bryant
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 19:17 -0400, David Gagnon wrote: > I just saw there is a branch in the SVN that support SLA. The latest > trunk also seems to have some kind of SLA support. Is there any doc > about how to setup a shared line or any docs concerning this feature? It is pretty straight forward

[asterisk-users] SLA Doc

2006-08-18 Thread David Gagnon
Hi,   I just saw there is a branch in the SVN that support SLA. The latest trunk also seems to have some kind of SLA support. Is there any doc about how to setup a shared line or any docs concerning this feature?   Thx   David   ___ -