RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Alexander Lopez
This may or may not work due to timings slips that you may experiance with the Digium Cards.  Your are correct in assuming this scenaro.   I did the same (pre-asterisk) with an Adtran Atlas.  It is rock solid and works great.  What modem access bank are you using, there has been some talk ab

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Dustin Wildes
Adam Vocks wrote: In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet times, we are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I would throw

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks
We’re still using Lucent PM3’s   Adam   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:24 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through   This may

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Dave Weis
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Dustin Wildes wrote: Adam Vocks wrote: > In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we have > going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During > business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet > times, we are closed. Sounds

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:24 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through   We’re still using Lucent PM3’s   Adam   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Alexander Lopez
TED] On Behalf Of Adam VocksSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:02 PMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through Would something as simple as this work?   [InFromZap1]    ;Context for incoming telco calls exten => 1234567890, 1, Di

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread BJ Weschke
It is likely possible. It's going to depend on getting * and your modem bank to play nice together. If your modem bank is collecting ANI or any kind of other carrier signaling info for normal operation, you might have an easier time doing E&M wink between * and the modem bank if your modem bank su

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks
: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through It is likely possible. It's going to depend on getting * and your modem bank to play nice together. If your modem bank is collecting ANI or any kind of other carrier signaling info for normal operation, you might have an easier time doing E&M wink betw

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-10 Thread Carlos Rojas
Hi You could use kamailio +asterisk On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 9:25 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > I need to create a SIP proxy to be placed in front of a legacy PBX. When > a phone registers with the proxy, I would like Asterisk to register with > the PBX behind it. (To tell the PBX to send

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Telium Technical Support
:30 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy Hi You could use kamailio +asterisk On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 9:25 PM Telium Technical Support mailto:supp...@telium.ca> > wrote: I need to create a SIP

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Joshua Colp
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Telium Technical Support wrote: > I’ve been tasked with building the whole thing in just Asterisk (as an > exercise). Trying to figure out how/if Asterisk alone can do thi. Asterisk is not a proxy, so it doesn't have functionality like this built in. There may

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Barry Flanagan
0, 2018 9:30 PM > *To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion < > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy > > > > Hi > > > > You could use kamailio +asterisk > > > > On Tue

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:22:02PM -0400, Telium Technical Support wrote: > I need to create a SIP proxy to be placed in front of a legacy PBX. When a > phone registers with the proxy, I would like Asterisk to register with the > PBX behind it. (To tell the PBX to send calls to the proxy and then

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Telium Technical Support
ium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Tryba Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 9:27 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:22:02PM -0400, Telium Techni

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-11 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:04:18PM -0400, Telium Technical Support wrote: > Maybe proxy is the wrong word I chose. Asterisk is something like a peer to > the legacy PBX. I thought about setting up individual SIP accounts on the > Asterisk box to connect to the legacy PBX, or maybe a SIP trunk to

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy

2018-04-12 Thread TSG
, April 11, 2018 4:26 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Pass through registration / proxy On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:04:18PM -0400, Telium Technical Support wrote: > Maybe proxy is the wrong word I chose. Asterisk is something l

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass through of T.38

2005-09-10 Thread Matthew Boehm
Roger Schreiter wrote: Hi, I found some contradicting infos about pass through of T.38 data. I almost had to change my pants when I saw a CVS update this morning adding T38 frame recognition to asterisk. I kept looking for the code that complimented this but haven't seen it yet. And there w

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass through of T.38

2005-09-11 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Matthew Boehm wrote: I almost had to change my pants when I saw a CVS update this morning adding T38 frame recognition to asterisk. I kept looking for the code that complimented this but haven't seen it yet. And there was no bug reference so I can't help test. Interested parties can easi

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass through of T.38

2005-09-12 Thread Carlos Alperin
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 10:51 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass through of T.38 Matthew Boehm wrote: > I almost had to change my pants when I saw a CVS update this morning > adding T38 frame recognition to asterisk. I k

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass through of T.38

2005-09-13 Thread Matthew Boehm
Carlos Alperin wrote: I don't get this? Is included on 1.0.9 or is not? I know that a lot of people was trying it, but just to be clear, is T.38 passthrough included on 1.0.9? Thanks, Carlos Alperin No. We are not even sure at this point if T38 will make it into 1.2. -Matthew _

Re: [asterisk-users] Pass-through Call Recording Transfer Information

2010-01-20 Thread Glen Ganderton
> > I am currently using asterisk to record all incoming calls. My setup is as > follows, the asterisk server has a two TE120P cards one of which > sends/receives calls from the carrier and the other is connected to a > Siemens HiPath 3000. All calls that come into asterisk use MixMonitor to > reco