Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-06 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 21:19 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Indeed, these changes help a lot, I don't see > > power calibration timeouts anymore. > > > > Yet, card managed to lockup in different way: > > > > "failed to wakeup th

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-06 Thread RHS Linux User
Hi All, HAL code a mess Hmmm explains a LOT of things to me. My brand new EeePC associates with the open-mesh.com Meraki Mini node but sometimes won't connect. On some powerups it does 'work', but it dies after a while. And nothing I can do on either end seems to help??!! So Realtek d

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 02:50 +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > 2009/1/6 Maxim Levitsky : > > > > Glad to hear that. > > > > That what I meant btw, that this is related to phy (or radio as they > > call it) > > > > > > The chip that is on aspire one seems to be AR5007EG > > which consist of AR5212 (mac

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Nick Kossifidis
2009/1/6 Maxim Levitsky : > > Glad to hear that. > > That what I meant btw, that this is related to phy (or radio as they > call it) > > > The chip that is on aspire one seems to be AR5007EG > which consist of AR5212 (mac) and AR2425 (phy,radio,analog part..) > I have such a chip from an eeepc and

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 01:49 +0200, Nick Kossifidis wrote: > 2009/1/5 Maxim Levitsky : > > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:39 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Levitsky > >> wrote: > >> > Yes, with your 4 patches applied. > >> > It seems even worse now, as this happene

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Nick Kossifidis
2009/1/5 Maxim Levitsky : > On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:39 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Levitsky >> wrote: >> > Yes, with your 4 patches applied. >> > It seems even worse now, as this happened twice already. >> >> Can you try with just patch #4 applied (continu

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:39 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Levitsky > wrote: > > Yes, with your 4 patches applied. > > It seems even worse now, as this happened twice already. > > Can you try with just patch #4 applied (continue in case of gain failure). > I'd

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Bob Copeland
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Yes, with your 4 patches applied. > It seems even worse now, as this happened twice already. Can you try with just patch #4 applied (continue in case of gain failure). I'd be interested to know how much/if the frequency of MAC lockup changes

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-05 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 21:19 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Indeed, these changes help a lot, I don't see > > power calibration timeouts anymore. > > > > Yet, card managed to lockup in different way: > > > > "failed to wakeup th

Re: [ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-04 Thread Bob Copeland
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Hi, > > Indeed, these changes help a lot, I don't see > power calibration timeouts anymore. > > Yet, card managed to lockup in different way: > > "failed to wakeup the MAC Chip" Just to be clear, this was with the four patches I posted to th

[ath5k-devel] Few notes about ath5k

2009-01-04 Thread Maxim Levitsky
Hi, Indeed, these changes help a lot, I don't see power calibration timeouts anymore. Yet, card managed to lockup in different way: "failed to wakeup the MAC Chip" was seen in kernel log after resume. Also, it is clear that all rates about 18M doesn't work at all. As I see in the code, rate n