Hi Axel,
I saw you put opengroupware in the testing repository (fc5), but only the
64bit version.
Any chance that there will be a 32bit version available also ?
Regards,
Marcel Janssen
___
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lis
Hi,
I installed opengroupware from the Atrpms repository and wonder how I can
start the services.
The packages states that it contains :
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-nhsd
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-webui
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-xmlrpcd
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-zidestore
But these do not exist.
How can I start open
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:28:28PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> I saw you put opengroupware in the testing repository (fc5), but only the
> 64bit version.
>
> Any chance that there will be a 32bit version available also ?
There is a bug in gcc/i386 that triggers for ogo:
ht
On Sunday 09 April 2006 23:39, Axel Thimm wrote:
> There is a bug in gcc/i386 that triggers for ogo:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185398
>
> It has been fixed in rahwide, but when I tried to rebuild gcc from
> rawhide I hit another bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bu
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 12:15:25AM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> On Sunday 09 April 2006 23:39, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > There is a bug in gcc/i386 that triggers for ogo:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185398
> >
> > It has been fixed in rahwide, but when I tried to rebu
On Monday 10 April 2006 00:33, Axel Thimm wrote:
> FWIW I think ogo has the same issues under FC4 as under FC5.
I used rpms form opengroupware.org before. They worked well for me.
Now they're still on my system, but they cause an error with apache. I'll look
into that tomorrow. Perhaps there's a
Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving
the following
error: Failed Dependencies:
libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by .
But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 is the library on
my system - this shouldn't matter should it?
the library is
Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving
the following
error: Failed Dependencies:
libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by .
But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 is the library on
my system - this shouldn't matter should it?
the library i
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed opengroupware from the Atrpms repository and wonder how I can
> start the services.
> The packages states that it contains :
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-nhsd
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-webui
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-x
Hi Axel,
> But there is RHEL/Fedora support with rpms directly from ogo - maybe
> that would help for now? Although I'm very interested in getting those
> packages better, so if you do invest some time I'd love to play back
> any patches/improvements etc you'll come along. :)
> (but that's probabl
Hi Axel,
I managed to get opengroupware to work on FC5-386 but I'm still using the RPMS
from opengroupware.org from their FC4 repository.
What I did is described in the following two mails :
http://mail.opengroupware.org/pipermail/users/2006-March/015993.html
http://mail.opengroupware.org/piperm
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote:
> Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving
> the following
>
> error: Failed Dependencies:
>libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by .
>
> But Pilot Link is already installed?? libpisock.so.9 i
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:13:33AM -0700, Peter J. Duda wrote:
>> Trying to install opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at.x86_64.rpm and receiving
>> the following
>>
>> error: Failed Dependencies:
>>libpisock.so.8 () (64bit) is required by .
>>
>> But Pilot Link is already in
Hi Axel,
I installed opengroupware-1.1.5-4.fc5.at, but it seems I miss some files :
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-nhsd
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-webui
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-xmlrpcd
/etc/rc.d/init.d/ogo-zidestore
Is the package really missing these or something else wrong on my system ?
regards,
Marcel
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:34:08PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> I managed to get opengroupware to work on FC5-386 but I'm still using the
> RPMS
> from opengroupware.org from their FC4 repository.
>
> What I did is described in the following two mails :
> http://mail.opengroupwar
On Friday 14 April 2006 22:03, Axel Thimm wrote:
> The FC4 bits didn't work for me and when I checked the packages they
> were partly built with FC3 rpms (it isn't possible to use FC4's
> objc). I think there were also no x86_64 packages available. I decided
> to try to get it done properly.
OK, c
I'm trying to install Opengroupware on an existing Fedora Core 5 64
bit (x86_64) system. I tried installing the packages here. They
installed fine with yum (had a couple of dependencies that were
easily resolved), but it didn't run at all. There was nothing
installed in etc/init.d and the p
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:13:15PM -0400, Eric Klopfer wrote:
> I'm trying to install Opengroupware on an existing Fedora Core 5 64
> bit (x86_64) system. I tried installing the packages here. They
> installed fine with yum (had a couple of dependencies that were
> easily resolved), but it di
18 matches
Mail list logo
