On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 18:18 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote:
> However, it's still taking somewhere between 5-10 minutes to rip most
> of my CDs. I've got hundreds of CDs, so it's a major undertaking.
>
> Question: What am I losing by not running EAC in secure mode? Doing
> so substantially cuts dow
OK, well I set up EAC/FLAC on my PC according to all the instructions,
and it seems to be running OK.
However, it's still taking somewhere between 5-10 minutes to rip most
of my CDs. I've got hundreds of CDs, so it's a major undertaking.
Question: What am I losing by not running EAC in secure
Something like a '*PIMETA*' (http://tangentsoft.net/audio/pimeta/)
should be more than sufficient. I understand it grew out from the
Apheared design (in fact, I further understand that the A in PIMETA is
for Apheared). '*JMT Audio*' (http://www.jmtaudio.com/) builds PIMETA
amps in Transportable, P
1. The RCA -> miniplug cable is what you need. Quality should be OK.
2. There is only one aux input on the Model Two.
3. I don't think so.
The Tivoli is great!
/Munge
--
Munge
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lis
> But the technology hasn't changed any at all that I can see.
> Except that there were no small, in ear systems 30 years ago.
> And there were no ear-bud styles earlier than about 15 or so years ago.
I suppose you've partly answered your own question, but aside of the
miniaturisation that allows
Sorry, I wasn't meaning to insinuate there would be anything wrong with
spending crazy amounts of cash :-)
I can see how it came out wrong.
Anyway, I'll explore the other options as well. I appreciate
everyone's feedback.
Thanks,
Nick
--
x94blair3
__
Tommy(pet cat) can even hear when his dinner is being served when he has
the best listening seat and the stereo is near full vol!
May be more selective hearing. (than not hearing).
Not bad tracks either.
Cheers
--
Deaf Cat
___
audiophiles mai
I can get the sine wave tone, but how do I adjust the volume on it?
--
Mike Anderson
___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:51 -0700, Fifer wrote:
> 'headphone technology and quality have come a long way in 30 years'.
> The point I was trying to make was that 30 years ago, the choice of
> high quality headphones was fairly limited and what was available was
> fairly expensive. There is a much wi
> What part is unrecognizable?
It's a fair cop, my choice of words was poor. I should have said
'headphone technology and quality have come a long way in 30 years'.
The point I was trying to make was that 30 years ago, the choice of
high quality headphones was fairly limited and what was availabl
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 06:22 -0700, Fifer wrote:
> > . I know I haven't used headphones for serious listening in
> > at least thirty years.
> >
> Pat, I think that disqualifies you from comment. ;) Headphone
> technology and quality today is unrecognisable from that of 30 years
> ago. It's a common
> Second, I think most of the folks on this list have mid-level
> or higher speakers, so they are not likely to think of headphone
> amps. I know I haven't used headphones for serious listening in
> at least thirty years.
>
Pat, I think that disqualifies you from comment. ;) Headphone
technology
12 matches
Mail list logo
