Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread drewe181
i can highly recommend the sonic impact super t-amp. i just purchased one of them and also a moodlab concept dac to use with my squeezebox. i'm surprised at the change they made to the sound of the squeezebox. unfortunately, now, some of my more poorly recorded cd's don't sound so good. both of

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread russj1975
I finally ditched cd's and all other sources last year. I found that plugging the squeezebox directly into a power amplifier (or a pair of mono's) gave me the tidiest setup, as i was using the SB's preamp. Ok if you have other sources you cant really do that, but i always think that the sound

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Robin Bowes
Hypnotoad wrote: harmonic;213464 Wrote: Its funny how people act on this forum in real life hifi gathrings its like going to a te party when people are discussing I suppose that is what I was trying to point out with my above post. I am interested in getting a slimdevice of some sort

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Should I replace my cables every 1000 hours

2007-07-11 Thread russj1975
Like everything audiophile there is a certain amount of placebo effect going on. Yes they say that cables need to break in, amps need to warm up, etc, but in years of listening to audiophile kit in various guises, i have to say that i now beleive that its a human syndrome - we are made to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread harmonic
Hypnotoad;213614 Wrote: I suppose that is what I was trying to point out with my above post. I am interested in getting a slimdevice of some sort and I find the forum here actively unpleasant. That is really unfortunate. It makes me not want to come here, which in turn makes it less likely

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread Skunk
drewe181;213652 Wrote: i can highly recommend the sonic impact super t-amp. i just purchased one of them and also a moodlab concept dac to use with my squeezebox. i'm surprised at the change they made to the sound of the squeezebox. unfortunately, now, some of my more poorly recorded cd's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread flatface
Thanks for the feedback! Sonic T-amp: I have seen the reviews and threads on the sonic t-amp and it does look interesting but I am only concerned about the number of inputs and outputs. I would like to use the squeezebox, a cd-player/DVD, and have an Ipod dock I may chuck in too. Also I would

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Phil Leigh
harmonic;213686 Wrote: (but be carefull when you say that you have found a way to make it sound better for some its like challengeing there religion.) :o) I guess the problem is that as a pure 24/44.1 digital transport both the SB and TP are pretty much as good as it gets...and can be

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Should I replace my cables every 1000 hours

2007-07-11 Thread Videodrome
mswlogo;213610 Wrote: Do you think high tension wires from power stations have to clean the oxidation off the wires every so often? I'm not sure that's an apples to apples comparison. You're talking about delivering raw voltage -- it's either on or off. Presuming of course you're in

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Should I replace my cables every 1000 hours

2007-07-11 Thread Videodrome
russj1975;213681 Wrote: Like everything audiophile there is a certain amount of placebo effect going on. Yes they say that cables need to break in, amps need to warm up, etc, but in years of listening to audiophile kit in various guises, i have to say that i now beleive that its a human

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread Craig
Omega, you mentioned using an Inguz pink noise source, are you using the Inguz DSP plugin too? Craig -- Craig MC2Slim - Windows Shell and J River Media Center Integration for Squeezebox. http://www.duff-zapp.co.uk

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] rolling back slimserver

2007-07-11 Thread parrydave
If you have other sources, you could use the Inguz DRC plugin. It can be configured to invert absolute polarity. You don't need to make any measurements or anything, just follow the installation instructions, then select the Invert Polarity room correction filter that is provided. Works for

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] rolling back slimserver

2007-07-11 Thread ratso
yes the bolder analog mod removes the analog op-amp which effectively reverses the phase of the unit. thus they recommend rolling back to firmware 15 which as i see it can't be done on a mac. as for whether or not you can hear it is up for some debate i guess. wayne from bolder said he can easily

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread PhilNYC
flatface;213701 Wrote: Arcam solo: This is a good option. The arcam solo movie is way to expensive though. Also if it mostly acting as an amp to the SB is it not a waste? Can you plug DVD players in too? The Solo has a built-in DVD player. It has additional inputs if you want to plug

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread darrenyeats
Phil Leigh;213708 Wrote: :o) I guess the problem is that as a pure 24/44.1 digital transport both the SB and TP are pretty much as good as it gets...and can be scientifically proven to be so. And then we have to add a SPDIF cable and an external DAC and all bets are off. However the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread haunyack
Phil Leigh;213708 Wrote: :o) all Fender lovers are deaf... Huh??? . -- haunyack Transporter - BK Reference 200.2 - Vandersteen 3A Signature. RWA (Analog) SB3 - Rotel RB 1070 - BW Matrix 805. Fridgidare - Mirror Pond pale ale - easy chair w/remote - irritated neighbors.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] rolling back slimserver

2007-07-11 Thread snarlydwarf
ratso;213733 Wrote: yes the bolder analog mod removes the analog op-amp which effectively reverses the phase of the unit. thus they recommend rolling back to firmware 15 which as i see it can't be done on a mac. as for whether or not you can hear it is up for some debate i guess. wayne from

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread signor_rossi
Regarding the multi room setup you would like to have. The Cambridge Audio azur 540A v2 amp I recently bought is already fit for it. Additionally to ordinary outs for a second set of speakers it includes inkognito. http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/content.php?COID=88Title=Incognito+Brochures Bye,

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] rolling back slimserver

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
snarlydwarf;213742 Wrote: And that change is on the analog outs. So you can reverse the wiring of your analog cables between the SB and the amp/preamp/receiver/whatever. $10 worth of parts at Radio Shack and you can dereverse (yes, I made that word up) phase in hardware. No active

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
Hi Craig! We only used Inguz pink noise source during the measure. I am not using Inguz DSP plugin. I got the result from the measurement, but this shows nothing. This measure not measuring Phase etc. I and Hammer65 will continue investigate this, And post if we found something. Best

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread flatface
The Solo has a built-in DVD player. I believe there are 2 different products the arcam solo (audio only) and the arcam solo movie (with dvd player) and the solo movie is €1000 more expensive and has 5.1 etc which I don't require. will check out the inkognito. have you got it working? --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread Craig
oh well, there goes my theory!! Craig -- Craig MC2Slim - Windows Shell and J River Media Center Integration for Squeezebox. http://www.duff-zapp.co.uk Craig's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=96

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread S-Man
harmonic;213686 Wrote: Infact here in my comunity most people still use there fully moddified sb3´s with special powersupplys and special dac´s Hi Harmonic, Please could you provide a link for your community. I would be very interested to read and learn. Thanks. -- S-Man

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread signor_rossi
No, since I don't need it atm. (I lack the additional rooms ;) ). I just bought the CA amp because it was the best offer (nice sound/good price) I could get at a local dealer where I could actually listen to what I would get. I got the ordinary 400 € price for 2 Mordaunt Short 904i speakers and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Phil Leigh
haunyack;213739 Wrote: Huh??? Actually, I have found that thin-skin types can benefit from the more aggressive aspects of these forum. If you don't believe me, just ask me. Harmonic - As you say TP direct to a [quality balanced amp, matched with appropriate speakers] is the only way to

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
Triode;213519 Wrote: Anyone wanting to understand the slim architecture more and the impact of powering off and on the player could try turning on the d_slimproto_v debugging and looking at the lines which starts sending. This shows all the control frames sent from the server the player.

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
AndyC_772;213523 Wrote: I've read lots of unlikely things about how to make equipment sound better. Some of the more entertaining ones are at http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/Free_Techniques/Free_Techniques.html :) Fun reading ! :-) A found out a other thing, with my Xbox360 if Restart my OLD

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
omega;213804 Wrote: This nothing special Just a few grfe minimal could affect things? Yes, that must be it. Different pictures on the screen. -- seanadams seanadams's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
Anyway from one thing to another.. I Have seen on many of my OLD cd from mid 80´s If i look through the sun or a bright light, on Some CD´s there are many tiny holes in the aluminium surface! But some CD from the same period is perfect. Is this Ageing or just a bad pressing? Someone know?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
SoftwireEngineer;213574 Wrote: I have thought that the Squeezebox sounded better after a restart !!! But I never tried hard to confirm this. Why not give it try? /Mats :-) -- omega omega's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread cliveb
omega;213812 Wrote: I Have seen on many of my OLD cd from mid 80´s If i look through the sun or a bright light, on Some CD´s there are many tiny holes in the aluminium surface! But some CD from the same period is perfect. Is this Ageing or just a bad pressing? Pinholes in the

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
cliveb;213817 Wrote: Pinholes in the aluminium coating on CDs was pretty common back then. They were there from the start - it's not an ageing thing. I'd guess that perhaps the sputtering technology used wasn't quite perfected at the time. But they are nothing to worry about. The CD spec

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread omega
seanadams;213810 Wrote: Yes, that must be it. Different pictures on the screen. Hi Seanadams! Are you up for a bet? If someone or Hammer65 and I really founds out and can provide with all the technical facts, that this thing realy is something and not placebo are you upp for a reward then?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread harmonic
S-Man;213782 Wrote: Hi Harmonic, Please could you provide a link for your community. I would be very interested to read and learn. Thanks. Community = Hifi friends here in denmark i have found along the way we do not have a internet site if that´s what your asking for . Im a

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
omega;213828 Wrote: Are you up for a bet? How exactly do you suggest we bet on something if you won't accept simple empirical evidence that you are wrong? Will the winner be whoever can yell I AM RIGHT the loudest? Or whoever can get the most friends to come post on this forum? No, I am

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams;213228 Wrote: Nope. It's already as good as I can make it. I could swap out a bunch of random parts for you, but that'll make it sound worse. All the mods for Transporter that I have heard of appear to be, IMHO, complete BS. One modder even claimed improvements after doing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread haunyack
Phil Leigh;213791 Wrote: (rising to bait...) Oh no it isn't. A good preamp can add value. For example, my preamp gives me a .1 sub out... You have to get over this less is more thing. It is NOT an absolute truth. bait? C'mon Phil. I did not say anything about less is more or absolute

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Here is why no FF/RW

2007-07-11 Thread amey01
Thanks and I will be trying the SongSkipper plugin - I have downloaded it - all I need is some time to install it on my SlimServer. -- amey01 amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274 View

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
truckfighters;213231 Wrote: @sean: some audio devices sound different when turning the 230V power plug via 180 degrees (change phase). does this also apply to transporter? Yes it is true. Even with 120v. You want your gear to run In the same Phase as the rest of your gear. Anthony --

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread haunyack
Phil Leigh;213791 Wrote: (rising to bait...) Oh no it isn't. A good preamp can add value. For example, my preamp gives me a .1 sub out... You have to get over this less is more thing. It is NOT an absolute truth. To each his own. So your saying that by agreeing with Harmonic about no

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213836 Wrote: Sean, Why did you omit the 2 Critical LINE FILTERS in the FINAL DESIGN of the Transporter? WAS they B.S? Or a DESIGN FLAW? ;c) Anthony BS MODS Why do you say they are Critical? What specific issue do you believe you are addressing? Are you equipped

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213842 Wrote: You want your gear to run In the same Phase as the rest of your gear. And which phase is that?!? -- seanadams seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Design miss in SB3 digital output? or Slimserver problem ?

2007-07-11 Thread snarlydwarf
cliveb;213817 Wrote: Pinholes in the aluminium coating on CDs was pretty common back then. They were there from the start - it's not an ageing thing. I'd guess that perhaps the sputtering technology used wasn't quite perfected at the time. Although there is also the phenomena of disc rot

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams;213847 Wrote: Why do you say they are Critical? What specific issue do you believe you are addressing? Are you equipped to make your own conducted EMI measurements? Or can you feel the RF energy in the hairs on the back of your neck or something? Did you spend many

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams;213848 Wrote: And how exactly do you tell if they are In the same Phase? SEAN, Did you ever hear of POLARIZED AC PLUGS? -- aberdeencomponents aberdeencomponents's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
Sean, For a person who has a special section on thier Forum Called DYI, and has to do with Mods. And now your saying Mods are BS. Maybe you should rename that DIY section, the B.S for idiot's forum! Anthony -- aberdeencomponents

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Hypnotoad
I have been on many forums -- both audio and non-audio -- and this is the most unpleasant. Although I am quite sure there are much more unpleasant ones out there. Robin Bowes;213672 Wrote: Hypnotoad wrote: harmonic;213464 Wrote: Its funny how people act on this forum in real life hifi

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Pat Farrell
Hypnotoad wrote: I have been on many forums -- both audio and non-audio -- and this is the most unpleasant. Although I am quite sure there are much more unpleasant ones out there. Yes, this is too unpleasent. Time to lock the thread. -- Pat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213851 Wrote: Sean, ASK YOURSELF THAT QUESTION. YOU DESIGNED it. Right? Why was the TRANSPORTER PC BOARD DESIGNED TO HAVE THEM? BUT THE PARTS was OMITTED? Do you have the Foggiest IDEA WHY? Do you think I forgot to tell my guys to solder them in there or something?

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213853 Wrote: Did you ever hear of POLARIZED AC PLUGS? Of course, and I even know _why_ they're polarized! But how do you know which way around the transformer in there is wired? Why exactly would the polarity matter? How do you know if they're all the same? Before you

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams;213860 Wrote: Do you think I forgot to tell my guys to solder them in there or something? Although I'm sure you are an expert in RF and have designed many products of your own for worldwide compliance, I will explain anyway for the benefit of our other readers. When designing

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
seanadams;213861 Wrote: Of course, and I even know _why_ they're polarized! But how do you know which way around the transformer in there is wired? Why exactly would the polarity matter? How do you know if they're all the same? Before you answer, please consider checking out the following

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread aberdeencomponents
Pat Farrell;213858 Wrote: Hypnotoad wrote: I have been on many forums -- both audio and non-audio -- and this is the most unpleasant. Although I am quite sure there are much more unpleasant ones out there. Yes, this is too unpleasent. Time to lock the thread. -- Pat

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread Pat Farrell
aberdeencomponents wrote: Pat Farrell;213858 Wrote: Yes, this is too unpleasent. Time to lock the thread. If you don#8217;t like it, don#8217;t read it. Slim Devices believes in letting people voicing their own opinions on their forums.AP You speak for LogiTech/SD? Au Contraire, they lock

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213868 Wrote: Sean, I do not need to refrence pencil neck geek websites. Wow. Of course you don't. What do us pencil necks know about anything? If you look on a transformer, notice there is a paint mark on them, or a dot? Now, in a component, wire 2

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
aberdeencomponents;213865 Wrote: Without realizing, I had a noise sniffer plugged in the same power bar….. Do need I say more? Yes, yes you really do. What kind of noise sniffer was this? And what did it tell you? Did it give you a detailed spectral plot of some kind? And what was the result

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] budget system help

2007-07-11 Thread swhite58
I recently compared the CA Azur 540 v2 with a NAD c320BEE and didn't find much difference between them. The NAD sounded a bit more forward, and the CA had a bit more detail in the bass. I ended up with the NAD. I'd love to hear a T-amp sometime - I'm curious. -- swhite58 Clark Connect

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread jhm731
Sean- If you were concerned with EMI/RF energy during the design of the Transporter, why do you still have an smps with no shielding inside the unit? Why not a linear PSU for all voltage rails? -- jhm731 jhm731's

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Any good mods for Transporter out there? Validated?

2007-07-11 Thread seanadams
jhm731;213879 Wrote: Sean- If you were concerned with EMI/RF energy during the design of the Transporter, why do you still have an smps with no shielding inside the unit? Why not a linear PSU for all voltage rails? I did in fact test both of those ideas and there was no significant