It is a memory test but it is testing a specific aural memory pathway.
This is relevant when A/B-ing audio. I'd hypothesize that anyone
scoring 15 could not reliably choose between the same tune played on
wildly different gear.
It would be interesting to test this hypothesis.
--
Phil Leigh
Phil Leigh;339895 Wrote:
It is a memory test but it is testing a specific aural memory pathway.
This is relevant when A/B-ing audio. I'd hypothesize that anyone
scoring 15 could not reliably choose between the same tune played on
wildly different gear.
It would be interesting to test this
Don't use the microwave for Pizza. Bad for the crust. Next time use a
heat lamp if you must use a light bulb. The oven might be a better
way. These are bad examples and misleading our young cooks out there.
:)
--
Nonreality
-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE
EnochLight;339645 Wrote:
I wouldn't begin to pretend, Nonreality - I'll completely stand by my
original statement that mp3 compression craptizes audio and recommend
FLAC to any audiophile worth their weight in salt for better sound.
Archiving is just a nice addition, which is why I
Nonreality;339915 Wrote:
I'm game here, does anyone else want to take bets on this, that
Enochlight can tell the difference between a 320 mp3 and a flac file on
a sony shelf system. I wouldn't bet. I'm almost sure of failing myself on
such a setup... On
the other hand, if you're used to
Nonreality;339910 Wrote:
How about 16 or 17? What is the breakthrough number?
Well, 15 is equivalent to randomly choosing. I don't know what the
magic number would be but the higher the better!
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what
Nonreality;339913 Wrote:
Don't use the microwave for Pizza. Bad for the crust. Next time use a
heat lamp if you must use a light bulb. The oven might be a better
way. These are bad examples and misleading our young cooks out there.
:)
I don't rate microwaved porridge, baked potatoes,
Nonreality;339910 Wrote:
Phil Leigh;339895 Wrote:
It is a memory test but it is testing a specific aural memory pathway.
This is relevant when A/B-ing audio. I'd hypothesize that anyone
scoring 15 could not reliably choose between the same tune played on
wildly different gear.
It
Nonreality;339915 Wrote:
you think it's shocking that I would recommend a proper archival format
as opposed to a lossy one? So which is it? Archive or sound quality?
Archive was your response this time. I also recommend Flac for the
reason of archival. Plus the sound is great.
You
darrenyeats;339935 Wrote:
I imagine it depends on how wildly different the gear is. :^)
Darren
:o) - yeah... say like some electrostatics vs 'Bariks... or vinyl vs
CD
wonder if people who score 15 would be sensitive to the unmatched
levels problem?
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal
Phil Leigh;339947 Wrote:
wonder if people who score 15 would be sensitive to the unmatched levels
problem?These who compare audio equipment in A/B mode in the same way as
making
this test (looking for differences in sounds they don't know in
advance), they certainly will be sensitive... ;)
I am successfully using Mirage Omnisats in a very problematic listening
room. I use 5 of them in a home theater system (along with 2 subs).
These speakers can solve a lot of problems with oddly-shaped or sized
rooms. They are the original Omnisats with the resin cabinet instead
of the current
Phil Leigh;339895 Wrote:
It is a memory test but it is testing a specific aural memory pathway.
This is relevant when A/B-ing audio. I'd hypothesize that anyone
scoring 15 could not reliably choose between the same tune played on
wildly different gear.
It would be interesting to test this
Nonreality wrote:
These are bad examples and misleading our young cooks out there.
Put quary tiles or granite, or even bricks in oven. Preheat for a long
time. Then cook pizza. All else is snake oil or $4000 interconnects
___
audiophiles mailing list
Hi i hope when you visit these exiting site you say all your friends
and family members pls Leave Me Alone i m busy to watch this great
site:)
http://www.healthfitnessgateway.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
EnochLight;339941 Wrote:
Your own posts seems to be laced with the same amount of sarcasm, which
is the only reason I dished it back at you. I would agree that it has
become tiresome.
Would there be a challenge in telling the difference between a 320kbps
encoded mp3 and FLAC on a Sony
Jim,i wonder what qualifies YOU to be a Jaded Audiophile?.
glad that you like the Transporter,no more angst about value for money
there then?.
i too have a Transporter and used with the Duet controller it's a good
combo.
to my ears the audio from the black box is first class,but the primary
Hi,
Pls Check my property listing
*JBR, Sadaf 1*, 4 B/R + Maid, 32 floor, Area- 2497 sft, Partial Sea view
from all the bed rooms and living room,
Vacant and viewable,Selling Price- 5 million net to owner
*Full Building, International City*,Greece Cluster K, 27 Units of 1 B/R,
33
Hi everyone
a friend has managed to put the pulse transformer mod
(http://au.farnell.com/1087809/electrical/product.us0?sku=MURATA-POWER-SOLUTIONS-76601-3C_requestid=196962)into
an inline adapter for the SB3. Costs about A$60 to make up.
It works a treat - clearly audible improvement with an
Let's aside for a moment the debate of what the best s/pdif output
circuit is.
If you're doing this because you think the SB3's output circuit is
inferior to a transformer coupled output, wouldn't you want to bypass
the internal circuit? Or can a transformer somehow repair whatever is
wrong with
20 matches
Mail list logo
