Pat,
I am not sure I agree on jitter. My simplistic view of a digital audio
stream is that if plotted on a graph, the 'y' coordinates are provided
by the digital amplitude of the sample, the 'x' coordinates are implied
by the (assumed) regular sample period. So to plot a point on the graph
jh901;480081 Wrote:
Hi
I have SqueezeBox Duet that I set to max volume and then use my Cary
Pre-amp analog volume. Should I do the same with a Transporter which I
expect in the next week or so? And if that is NOT the case and I should
use the Transporter volume, where do I set the
Andy8421 wrote:
I am not sure I agree on jitter. My simplistic view of a digital audio
stream is that if plotted on a graph, the 'y' coordinates are provided
by the digital amplitude of the sample, the 'x' coordinates are implied
by the (assumed) regular sample period. So to plot a point on
There's nothing new in what Naim are doing...
http://www.scalatech.co.uk/papers/aes93.pdf
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
SB Touch Beta (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W -
MF
Phil Leigh;479949 Wrote:
I could be wrong, but I'm not sure Sean has commented on the Touch in
this respect. I must say that I find the Touch definitely superior to
the SB3 in this regard. I'm not convinced that a TP is really noticeably
better than the Touch when used as a digital
Themis;479827 Wrote:
It means 17 picoseconds. The consensus is declaring the total jitter :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jitter
I am pretty sure 27 is the answer to everything.
Pat, if you don't think jitter is relevant, then you haven't been
listening hard enough.
--
Patrick Dixon
Patrick Dixon wrote:
Pat, if you don't think jitter is relevant, then you haven't been
listening hard enough.
I do serious listening through my Transporter.
I clock all of the ADC and DAC to a common clock in my studio.
I don't care about serious listening with my Boom, Duet or ancient SB1.
Patrick Dixon;480362 Wrote:
I am pretty sure 27 is the answer to everything.
If it is a joke, then the answer should be 42. ;)
If it is not, you need to be more explicit : do you insinuate that the
technical specification given by Slimdevices for the TP are
intentionally false, incomplete or
Until recently I've used my Rotel transport direct via analog out, but
lately have been more impressed with my CI Audio DAC. The DAC allows
one optical-in and one coax-in. My older transport has only coax-out,
so naturally I'm going to be using my SB3's optical out.
I have a few optical
pfarrell;479697 Wrote:
Phil Leigh wrote:
The entire thread is useless as there will never be a Transporter
II.
Never say never.
But that said, I agree, that a TP 2 is unlikely anytime soon.
I don't see a market for cheaper Audiophile items, and I expect it
will
be a decade before
I have been using a Changzhou Yafei cable. $6.99 but it's very well
made. s/pdif is all digital so as long as the connection is good you
will get good sound. You don't really need to be to picky.
--
agillis
rip, tag, get cover artÂ… All you do is insert the CD!
http://vortexbox.org
agillis
agillis;480518 Wrote:
I have been using a Changzhou Yafei cable. $6.99 but it's very well
made. s/pdif is all digital so as long as the connection is good you
will get good sound. You don't really need to be to picky.
What about long term transmission? Don't non-glass cables degrade over
12 matches
Mail list logo
