Hi guys.
After a bit of testing. I'm more confused then before:
When it comes to sox resampling parameters I'd say that below lines
can do. It's not that far away form the inital post of the thread.
I do output 24bit and a fixed 96khz.
I left out gain adjust. Dithering is gone since I got
soundcheck;626763 Wrote:
Hi guys.
After a bit of testing. I'm more confused then before:
When it comes to sox resampling parameters I'd say that below lines
can do. It's not that far away form the inital post of the thread.
I do output 24bit and a fixed 96khz.
I left out gain adjust.
Phil Leigh;626785 Wrote:
Gain adjust is critical - without it you will get clipping on upsampling
Most of the modern style high-gain recordings are driven into
clipping.
They give a sh.. about that.
I tried and without gain adjust. I liked without gain adjust best (for
now).
I'm not really
soundcheck;626763 Wrote:
Hi guys.
After a bit of testing. I'm more confused then before:
When it comes to sox resampling parameters I'd say that below lines
can do. It's not that far away form the inital post of the thread.
I do output 24bit and a fixed 96khz.
I left out gain adjust.
Correct - there is no best - there is only different.
Personally I like SOX.
Use rate -D to avoid additional dither. Dither should only ever be used
when reducing bit depth (e.g. when going from 24 to 16 bit... not
something we are doing here!)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path
Wombat;626790 Wrote:
I´m really interested how you rate your resampling and why clipping is
a non-issue suddenly. Do you allow aliasing and how much aliasing? If
no aliasing, why not? What bandwith? Steep or slow Filter? What phase
response 10, 25, 30 or even 50? Dither yes or no and what
Phil Leigh;626798 Wrote:
Correct - there is no best - there is only different.
Did you try iZotope lately?
--
soundcheck
::: ' Touch Toolbox 2.0'
(http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com/2011/01/soundchecks-squeezebox-touch-toolbox-20.html)
::: by soundcheck
soundcheck;626799 Wrote:
My post starts with I'm more confused then before
No doubt
--
Wombat
Transporter (modded) - RG142 - Avantgarde Acoustic based 500VA
monoblocks - Sommer SPK240 - self-made speakers
Wombat's
soundcheck;626800 Wrote:
Did you try iZotope lately?
Not in the last 12 months. However, it will not change my comment that
there is only different - there is no correct algorithm here.
I will take another look to see how CURRENT iZotope resampling compares
with the latest SOX algorithm.
--
soundcheck;626763 Wrote:
Hi guys.
After a bit of testing. I'm more confused then before:
Lots of room for expectation bias here. Thats ok! We are human after
all.
I was shaking my head at myself last night as I started to
re-resample - once again. I have been listening to soX SRC - 24/96
Nothing new...
http://audiofest.net/2011/video_player.php?video_id=10Sid=80efee7d4d6e9f305219e75b346fdafa
You need bionic ears to hear the difference...
--
MediaCenter
Source Device: Transporter
Amplifiers: Tri-Amped NAD C272 x 3
Speakers: x-Statik Passive Crossover Removed
Crossover:
Analyzed: Eddie Jobson / Theme Of Secrets
DR Peak RMS Duration Track
pski;626843 Wrote:
Analyzed: Eddie Jobson / Theme Of SecretsOn Amazon I see a 1990 pressing and
a 2008 remaster. Which do you have?
--
Henry66
Henry66's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38863
Analyzed: Emmylou Harris / White Shoes
DR Peak RMS Duration Track
I assume you guys have seen this?
http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=87106
Still holds up nicely:
Analyzed: Ry Cooder / Bop Till You Drop
DR Peak RMS Duration Track
andyg;626848 Wrote:
I assume you guys have seen this?
http://www.dr.loudness-war.info/
Not much green there, Andy. More's the pity the Foobar add-in doesn't
have a submit button, eh? Their form is quite a deterrent.
P
--
pski
real stereo doesn't just wake the neighbors, it -enrages-
Yeah there is some command-line tool you can use but it's not
user-friendly. Foobar plugin could certainly use some integration
there.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View
rgro;626730 Wrote:
This study details some measurement techniques that seem to confirm the
theory that some accessories (power cords, conditioners, etc.)
actually do make a difference...
http://www.vertexaq.com/images/stories/pdfs/ka%20paper%20-%20feb%202011%20v%201.3%20vertex%20only.pdf
earwaxer9;626833 Wrote:
Lots of room for expectation bias here. Thats ok! We are human after
all.
I was shaking my head at myself last night as I started to
re-resample - once again. I have been listening to soX SRC - 24/96
VHQ linear for some months now. Previous to that I used SSRC
seanadams;254037 Wrote:
I think so too. There are some intermittent issues going on. Also from
achri-d's symptoms it seems there were things inconsistent from one run
to the next.
It is possibly related to this bug, although it may have nothing to do
with word clock input per se:
Ah, yes. Unverifiable narrative presented as true story. A classic
urban myth, with (sadly) no relevance to the present discussion.
Weak.
R.
--
RonM
RonM's Profile:
22 matches
Mail list logo
