Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-30 Thread Mark Lanctot
Robin Bowes;246214 Wrote: Inguz is not a DAC - it's DSP, offering room correction and other signal filters. I did know that - this is what I get for not quoting posts! Sorry. Personally I'd much rather use Inguz if I wanted a certain tone rather than force a DAC to do it. Square peg, round

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-30 Thread Robin Bowes
Mark Lanctot wrote: Now I'm not trying to be confrontational here, but do people really use DACs as tone controls? Really? Isn't that like using a wrench to hammer a nail? Are people afraid of tone controls in preamps that much? I know that tone controls in preamps (and indeed, preamps

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-29 Thread david68
sosleepy;245532 Wrote: Thanks for the suggestions so far. I'll give the preamp suggestion a try when I get some free time in the next couple of days. My CD source isn't anything to write home about- a Marantz DV7600 DVD/CD/SACD player. It has more oomph than the squeezebox, but I know it

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-27 Thread iPhone
sosleepy;245532 Wrote: Thanks for the suggestions so far.I use the squeezebox way more than the CD player, and generally use FLAC as my chosen source, though I don't discriminate against MP3. Nice way to put it SoSleepy. I have not heard that term used with MP3s! Hope you don't mind but

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread vrobin
If I were you, I would look at an external DAC. If SB output sounds less detailed, less brilliant... less like what you expect it to be and if your CD player seems much better. Be sure you play FLAC or other lossless format, make sure you compare CD and SB with the same interconnect cable and

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread amcluesent
Maybe a Transporter is a better match your system? That said, it's also got a neutral, analytic sound which you're coupling with the usual 'accurate' BW characteristics. -- amcluesent amcluesent's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread cliveb
sosleepy;245263 Wrote: I've recently purchased the squeezebox, which I am really enjoying. However, I don't seem to be getting the oomph that I hope that I would when using it. My system is pretty simple- McIntosh MA6500 integrated amp and BW 804 Nautilus speakers. The squeezebox is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread ErikM
Ahh let's see you're using a $3000. amp to drive a $3500. pair of speakers and then hook up a $299.00 SB3 as a front end and you wonder why it's sounds lacking? Got to be a Troll... -- ErikM ErikM's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread opaqueice
sosleepy;245263 Wrote: I've recently purchased the squeezebox, which I am really enjoying. However, I don't seem to be getting the oomph that I hope that I would when using it. My system is pretty simple- McIntosh MA6500 integrated amp and BW 804 Nautilus speakers. The squeezebox is

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread iPhone
sosleepy;245263 Wrote: I've recently purchased the squeezebox, which I am really enjoying. However, I don't seem to be getting the oomph that I hope that I would when using it. Sorry about the vague language. Has anyone had a similar impression of the squeezebox and if so, what steps did

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread Phil Leigh
ErikM;245398 Wrote: Ahh let's see you're using a $3000. amp to drive a $3500. pair of speakers and then hook up a $299.00 SB3 as a front end and you wonder why it's sounds lacking? Got to be a Troll... ? - I'm using a $30k active system on the back of an SB3 (OK + $2-3k Dac)... and your

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread Mark Lanctot
vrobin;245285 Wrote: using ethernet instead of wifi can also help getting more of your SB without costing too much... If you mean avoiding dropouts, interference and general wireless hell then yes. If you mean it will yield subtle sonic improvements dem's fightin' words... :-) -- Mark

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread haunyack
Mark Lanctot;245524 Wrote: sonic improvements dem's fightin' words... :-) I hope all of you newbies have the flamethrowers charged up. This is the SD flame forum after all. . -- haunyack Transporter - BK R200.2 - Vandersteen 3A Signature. (Listening room) SB3 (RWA analog) - Rotel RB1070 -

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-26 Thread sosleepy
Thanks for the suggestions so far. I'll give the preamp suggestion a try when I get some free time in the next couple of days. My CD source isn't anything to write home about- a Marantz DV7600 DVD/CD/SACD player. It has more oomph than the squeezebox, but I know it isn't top of the line either.

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-25 Thread sosleepy
I've recently purchased the squeezebox, which I am really enjoying. However, I don't seem to be getting the oomph that I hope that I would when using it. My system is pretty simple- McIntosh MA6500 integrated amp and BW 804 Nautilus speakers. The squeezebox is hooked up through the analog

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Missing the oomph

2007-11-25 Thread SuperQ
Rather than distort things greatly, I would start with the Inguz room correction system. It's less of an EQ, and more of a room repair setup. -- SuperQ SuperQ's Profile: