gharris999 wrote:
> My original Transporter's ethernet seems to be failing. It has suddenly
> started losing network connectivity after a seemingly random amount of
> time after being powered up. Since my "knobless" backup-transporter has
> no problem staying connected using the same cabling,
My original Transporter's ethernet seems to be failing. It has suddenly
started losing network connectivity after a seemingly random amount of
time after being powered up. Since my "knobless" backup-transporter has
no problem staying connected using the same cabling, switch ports, etc,
I'm thin
Thank you for your reply :-)
sgmlaw wrote:
> As to the reduced volume output on the TP, check the internal
> attenuation jumpers. I know on our TP, I have to attenuate down quite a
> bit to accommodate a vintage preamp, and that would certainly cause some
> volume range issues with more modern
Deaf Cat wrote:
> Yes re-erecting a nice old thread :-)
>
> Not long purchased what looks like a nice example of a Transporter :-)
>
> However -Plugged it in for a quick test, Transporter unbalanced
> outputs -> Behringer X-air (basically a pre amp with eq) -> Mackie
> powered speakers
Yes re-erecting a nice old thread :-)
Not long purchased what looks like a nice example of a Transporter :-)
However -Plugged it in for a quick test, Transporter unbalanced
outputs -> Behringer X-air (basically a pre amp with eq) -> Mackie
powered speakers
All sounds good, Transporter
No.
Zombie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25009
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=114668
___
audiophiles mailing list
I've never heard of turning off only DAC being possible. I use the
BLANK SAVER plugin to turn off display.
*Home:* Pi4B-8GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(all ethernet)
*Cottage:* rPi4B-4GB/pCP7.x/4TB>LMS 8.1.x>Touch>Benchmark DAC I, Boom,
Radio w/Battery (Radio WIFI)
*
We use Transporter to stream digital direct to digital amp and use
mobile app to control. The Transporter DAC and screen are therefore
never used.
Would turning off these circuits improve anything?
If so is there an easy way of doing this e.g. removing internal fuse? We
currenly dim by screen via
chill wrote:
> He's a man of wealth and taste.
Nice!
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul to waste
An oldie, but a goodie. You can add this to your catchy tunes thread!
Main system - Rock Solid with LMS 7.9.1 Official on WHS 2011 - 2 Duets
and Squeeseslave
Cabin sy
Julf wrote:
> I am sorry, but I am not at liberty to discuss the nature of my client.
Socratic Trolls, Inc.
--
4 TB Drobo-->FW 800-->mac mini-->Ethernet
Transporter--> Wireworld Eclipse 6 coax-->Meridian G61
G61--> Nordost Red Dawn-->Primare 30.3
Primare-->Ocos--Vienna Acoustics Beethoven/Ma
netchord wrote:
> pleased to meet you, i think we've guessed your name; but what's
> puzzling me is the nature of your game?
I am sorry, but I am not at liberty to discuss the nature of my client.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
He's a man of wealth and taste.
chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110942
__
Julf wrote:
> Can you remind me, and explain what specific aspects of audio quality
> they affect, and how?
pleased to meet you, i think we've guessed your name; but what's
puzzling me is the nature of your game?
--
4 TB Drobo-->FW 800-->mac mini-->Ethernet
Transporter--> Wireworld Eclipse 6
garym wrote:
> I used fixed output from the Benchmark and use SB (and ipeng, etc.) to
> control volume.
I use the variable output out of the DAC2HGC to the power amp. The DAC2
colume is around 12oclock as a rule (the Toslink audio out of the TV is
fixed, so I need the DAC2 as a volume control,
callesoroe wrote:
> Hi Gary!
>
> I have Just purchased a used Benchmark DAC1 and a Touch to powered
> Active Studio Monitors for my little office setup. Do you use the
> variable output of the balanced XLR outputs ?? Or do you use fixed
> output and use SB to
> control volume ??
>
> Cheers Mic
garym wrote:
>
> p.s. At my weekend cottage I have a TOUCH feeding an original Benchmark
> I DAC. I use the Benchmark because I had it before I ever had a
> squeezebox and it allows me to use balanced connectors on the analog
> side. I very much like the way this sounds as well.
Hi Gary!
I h
sgmlaw wrote:
> I think I gave you a clue why. And I think I also identified
> specifically where in the TP corners were cut.
Can you remind me, and explain what specific aspects of audio quality
they affect, and how?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fas
Fizbin wrote:
> I used to be a "measurements is everything" kind of person. Then I
> started listening to some of the best measured DAC's on Audio Science
> Review and I was surprised to not only hear level matched differences
> with bass/treble, etc, but also soundstage as well. The RME ADI-2
>
Julf wrote:
> To the same input on the DAC?
>
> Yes
>
>
> The jitter from a Touch is below audible levels.
That may be true. I make no claims to the contrary, although some
research indicates that very low levels of jitter can affect sound
quality; I simply enjoy the combination of TP and ex
Julf wrote:
> In what way?
>
>
>
> In what way would a $4,000 DAC be audibly better than a $250-500 DAC?
I think I gave you a clue why. And I think I also identified
specifically where in the TP corners were cut.
If you connect the dots, the answer should be obvious.
---
I used to be a "measurements is everything" kind of person. Then I
started listening to some of the best measured DAC's on Audio Science
Review and I was surprised to not only hear level matched differences
with bass/treble, etc, but also soundstage as well. The RME ADI-2
DAC/PRO for example has
iwalker wrote:
> I have no idea! I expected the Touch and TP to produce identical results
> when their digital outputs were connected to the same DAC.
> They certainly don't and I can very easily tell the difference.
To the same input on the DAC?
> Transformer coupled outputs? Lower jitter? I
cfuttrup wrote:
> Measurements isn't everything, but here's some independent measurements
> of the Yggdrasil:
>
> https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/measurements-and-review-of-schiit-yggdrasil-dac.2358/
>
> Best regards,
> Claus
Thanks Claus.
I have seen that review.
I
Julf wrote:
> What actual properties of the digital output of the TP do you think
> would be better?
I have no idea! I expected the Touch and TP to produce identical results
when their digital outputs were connected to the same DAC.
They certainly don't and I can very easily tell the difference
iwalker wrote:
> This suggests that the digital output stage of the TP has been better
> engineered than the Touch, which is hardly a surprise give the price
> differential!
What actual properties of the digital output of the TP do you think
would be better?
"To try to judge the real from t
iwalker wrote:
> I recently bought a Schiit Yggdrasil DAC ( approx £2200) having
> auditioned several other DACs ranging in price from £500 to £3000,
> none of which sounded any better than the TP's own DAC.
>
> The combination of the TP and the Schiit DAC is, to my ears,
> outstanding. I ce
Fizbin wrote:
> The mid range/bass of the Transporter blows away the Touch.
>
>
>
> A TP with a $2000 DAC can be a downgrade as well. The RME ADI-2 PRO, the
> Benchmark DAC3 pale by comparison.
I have both a Touch and a TP ( as well as a Squeezebox Classic and Boom
...)
For many years I use
sgmlaw wrote:
> If you are using either as a digital head end, the TP is a bit better in
> that role than the Touch.
In what way?
> For instance, a TP on a $250-500 DAC is likely a downgrade. But the TP
> soars to another level with a $4,000 one.
In what way would a $4,000 DAC be audibly b
The mid range/bass of the Transporter blows away the Touch.
"For instance, a TP on a $250-500 DAC is likely a downgrade. "
A TP with a $2000 DAC can be a downgrade as well. The RME ADI-2 PRO, the
Benchmark DAC3 pale by comparison.
--
If you are using either as a digital head end, the TP is a bit better in
that role than the Touch. But both are very good.
The TP is a superior implementation than the Touch going through to the
output stage. So in some respects, the Touch is more responsive to an
outboard DAC than a TP is.
B
Apesbrain wrote:
> Wow, it's been a while. Where's @soundcheck when you need him?
THE GURU OF THE SLIMDEVICES HAVE SPEAK!!!
AMEN!
the best option fior you IS = SUICIDE
core's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/mem
mherger wrote:
> Hey core,
>
> I know, I shall not feed the troll. But really... why do you keep coming
> back, just to insult people? Over and over again? Even on my personal
> email address? Why? You have nothing to share but hatred. It's sad.
>
> Bon rétablissement!
>
> Michael
let somebod
Ok man, relax. As @garym said, we don't take kindly to unsubstantiated
claims around here. Each of us is different in what we perceive to be
the "best". I'm glad you're happy with the solution you've found.
Apesbrain's
5 minutes and all MONKEY'S reply IRRELEVANT THINGS
is this really a slimdevices forum??
do you care about extract the best of slimdevices
core's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php
Hey core,
I know, I shall not feed the troll. But really... why do you keep coming
back, just to insult people? Over and over again? Even on my personal
email address? Why? You have nothing to share but hatred. It's sad.
Bon rétablissement!
Michael
Michael
http://www.herger.net/slim-plugins
Wow, it's been a while. Where's @soundcheck when you need him?
Apesbrain's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=738
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110310
do you a favor, buy you a new pair of ears
core's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=69455
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110310
core wrote:
> really? every os sound different as every hdd or ssd sound diferent,
> ram, file system too, try refs for ex..
thanks. I needed a good laugh.
p.s. this is not a good forum for placebophiles. You may have more fun
at a forum that supports such ideas. Regards.
*Home:* VBA 4TB (2
garym wrote:
> There is no difference. The server is sending the digital music via WiFi
> or Ethernet to the transporter. So OS of server is not relevant at all.
> use latest LMS 7.9. This used to be called slimserver, now LMS.[/QUOTE
>
> you need new ears then
---
core wrote:
> FOR TRANSPORTER
> and which os gives bes sound quality (less digital)?
> slimserver 6.5.0?
> firmware 18?
> Windows server 2012 core fully optimized?
There is no difference. The server is sending the digital music via WiFi
or Ethernet to the transporter. So OS of server is not rel
FOR TRANSPORTER
and which os gives bes sound quality (less digital)?
core's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=69455
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110310
__
I use an external DAC with a Touch,
...pablo
Server: Virtual Machine (on VMware Workstation 14 Pro) running Ubuntu
18.04 + LMS 7.9.1
System: SB Touch --optical->- Benchmark DAC2HGC --AnalysisPlus Oval
Copper XLR->- NAD M22 Power Amp --AnalysisPlus Black Mesh Oval->- Totem
Element Fire
Other Ro
I might be able to tell you soon as I'm going to dig out my Transporter
again (have been using a Touch for some time as it sits nicely on my
desk).
R.
Net-UDAP is free software - you do not have to pay for it.
However, if you found it useful, please consider donating:
https://paypal.me/RobinB
Paul Webster wrote:
> Jivelite - via SQPOS (SqueezePlay Operating System) via
> https://birdslikewires.net/
Thanks - I'll give it a whirl.
R.
Net-UDAP is free software - you do not have to pay for it.
However, if you found it useful, please consider donating:
https://paypal.me/RobinBowes
--
Jivelite - via SQPOS (SqueezePlay Operating System) via
https://birdslikewires.net/
Paul Webster
http://dabdig.blogspot.com
Author Radio France (FIP etc) plugin
Paul Webster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member
Paul Webster wrote:
> Joggler is also my primary control for the most used player in the house
> (although I do it via wifi).
>
> Squeezebox Touch or any small PC (given that you require ethernet).
>
> Squeezebox Controller (remote control from Duet) ... but I suspect you
> would find it frust
Paul Webster wrote:
>
>
> Squeezebox Controller (remote control from Duet) ... but I suspect you
> would find it frustrating if it was the only control device ... assuming
> it can do it via IR (I have not checked).
I think it can work without wifi/network with the DUET, but not sure it
would
Apesbrain wrote:
> I don't think the Joggler will work as a controller if not on a network.
They have Ethernet support so will work fine.
Paul Webster
http://dabdig.blogspot.com
Author Radio France (FIP etc) plugin
Paul
toolapcblack wrote:
> 02 Joggler still the best non phone/tablet way of controlling
> Transporter? I only have an old phone and no home wifi.
>
> is there any other bluetooth or remote control option (non wifi way) of
> controlling it with a screen on said device
I don't think the Joggler will
Joggler is also my primary control for the most used player in the house
(although I do it via wifi).
Squeezebox Touch or any small PC (given that you require ethernet).
Squeezebox Controller (remote control from Duet) ... but I suspect you
would find it frustrating if it was the only control d
w3wilkes wrote:
> So a fun experiment would be to do a double blind - set up by @Archimago
> - comparing the Touch to the Transporter. That "extremely cool" look
> could make the Transporter sound better. ;) Not saying there's anything
> wrong with an "extremely cool" look!
valid point and good
02 Joggler still the best non phone/tablet way of controlling
Transporter? I only have an old phone and no home wifi.
is there any other bluetooth or remote control option (non wifi way) of
controlling it with a screen on said device
garym wrote:
> So I have no shortage of squeezebox hardware units. So my actual
> behavior suggests that I really, really like my Transporter.
So a fun experiment would be to do a double blind - set up by @Archimago
- comparing the Touch to the Transporter. That "extremely cool" look
could make
garym wrote:
> No. And there is only one transporter. The later production doesnt have
> the transknob, but the insides are identical.
I should add to my previous response. I really like my transporter.
It's in my main system. And I bought a second "new in box" Transporter a
couple of years ag
Zombie wrote:
> Do I get a jaw dropping improvement with a Transporter? Which
> Transporter model is regarded as the best?
Jaw dropping? Perhaps not, but IMO the Transporter is a big step up from
the Touch as far as sound quality is concerned and I'm not a Transporter
fanatic. In fact, I've bee
Zombie wrote:
> Do I get a jaw dropping improvement with a Transporter? Which
> Transporter model is regarded as the best?
No. And there is only one transporter. The later production doesnt have
the transknob, but the insides are identical.
*Home:* VBA 4TB (2.5)>LMS 7.9.2>Transporter, Touch,
Do I get a jaw dropping improvement with a Transporter? Which
Transporter model is regarded as the best?
Zombie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25009
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.c
thanks
yes
under the plugin i get
Mixcloud API key (which i have filled in)
and
Stream Format
=( use mp3 if available or always use mp4) ive tried both to no avail
never needed to mess with this on the Touch it just worked.
the error message i get is "UNABLE TO PLAY FILE TYPE FOR "
toolapcblack wrote:
> Any ideas how to get Mixcloud working on the Transporter? works fine
> fine on my Touch
What error are you getting? There's a mixcloud plugin for LMS. I assume
you've installed this as it's working on the TOUCH. I don't use, but
are there settings within the mixcloud plug
Any ideas how to get Mixcloud working on the Transporter? works fine
fine on my Touch
toolapcblack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63326
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread
RonM wrote:
> The Controller from the Duet pair is very dated hardware -- takes a long
> time to boot up, has a battery that doesn't last forever and doesn't
> have a great deal of flexibility. While it works to control the
> Transporter, I found it not very usable for that purpose.
>
> There a
garym wrote:
> You can use the digital out of the Transporter (S/PDIF or Optical)
> direct to your preamp and then it will avoid the analog>digital>analog
> transformation. HOWEVER, this will not use the Transporter's DAC which
> is one of the main reasons I like the Transporter.
>
> Personall
The Controller from the Duet pair is very dated hardware -- takes a long
time to boot up, has a battery that doesn't last forever and doesn't
have a great deal of flexibility. While it works to control the
Transporter, I found it not very usable for that purpose.
There are several third-party ap
toolapcblack wrote:
> Hi I'm picking up a transporter this week is the duet still the
> best/cheapest way to control the transporter?
>
> Any other tips welcome thanks
> J
If you mean the controller part of duet, yes it works well. But plenty
of quality control apps for smart phones and tablet
Hi I'm picking up a transporter this week is the duet still the
best/cheapest way to control the transporter?
Any other tips welcome thanks
J
toolapcblack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=63326
V
cliveb wrote:
> I've had a Transporter since 2006, and in all that time I think I may
> have used the knob perhaps half a dozen times, and then only out of idle
> curiosity.
It depends a bit on your setup though... Like yourself, I have an early
release transporter, and didn't use the knob at a
cliveb wrote:
> I've had a Transporter since 2006, and in all that time I think I may
> have used the knob perhaps half a dozen times, and then only out of idle
> curiosity.
>
>
> As well as the spare display you say you've already bought, it might be
> sensible to have a spare of one of the i
user181 wrote:
> I somewhat wish I had bought a unit with the TransNav knob, but I don't
> know that I'll miss it that much
I've had a Transporter since 2006, and in all that time I think I may
have used the knob perhaps half a dozen times, and then only out of idle
curiosity.
user181 wrote:
>
Agreed with garyM although I have never heard of the displays outright
breaking, but they can fade over time. Also, I personally use brightness
level 2.
Fizbin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=587
user181 wrote:
> I too am a new owner of a Transporter SE as of last week. I bought a
> new-old-stock unit and am very happy with it; I have used a SlimP3
> player since 2003, so the upgrade feels like jumping from a tricycle to
> a Ferarri. I'm using the analog output, and the sonic quality is
wl1 wrote:
> Are you trying to save power or the Display life?
>
> 27015
>
> 27016
>
> 27017
>
> Have you seen the Turn Audio Off option?
>
> You must be aware of the sleep timer too? And the Display setting can
> just be set to OFF when the Player is OFF. This is best for saving the
>
jstraw wrote:
> Thank you.
Are you trying to save power or the Display life?
27015
27016
27017
Have you seen the Turn Audio Off option?
You must be aware of the sleep timer too? And the Display setting ca
just be set to OFF when the Player is OFF. This is best for saving the
display, thoug
garym wrote:
> not needed because squeezeboxes are never really OFF. When not playing
> they are in basically standby mode but not truly off. This said, it is
> good to not use the displays when not needed. I use a plugin called
> "BLANK SAVER" and set that as the screensaver when OFF or NOT PL
jstraw wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is any kind of a server plugin that would
> power down a Transporter either after so much idle time, or on a
> schedule? I don't mind if it's good for other devices as well, but I'm
> specifically interested in not having the Transporter powered up for
>
Does anyone know if there is any kind of a server plugin that would
power down a Transporter either after so much idle time, or on a
schedule? I don't mind if it's good for other devices as well, but I'm
specifically interested in not having the Transporter powered up for
days on end. I don't min
jstraw wrote:
> I too am about to take possession of a Transporter. It's going into my
> main, living room system which is amplified by a Rogue Audio Cronus
> Magnum. This amplifier does not have XLR inputs. Is my best bet to go
> XLR-out on the Transporter to RCA-in on the Rogue, or is there no
garym wrote:
> just go RCA to RCA.
Thanks.
jstraw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17008
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=110310
I too am about to take possession of a Transporter. It's going into my
main, living room system which is amplified by a Rogue Audio Cronus
Magnum. This amplifier does not have XLR inputs. Is my best bet to go
XLR-out on the Transporter to RCA-in on the Rogue, or is there no
advantage to this, ove
the feet are large rubber feetabout 1 1/4 inch wide. Seem hard
rubber not too soft. can't recall about the remote. I've never actually
used my remotes. I use other means of controlling (ipeng on ios smart
things or laptop).
*Home:* VBA 4TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio (
I picked it up ok, all seems fine.
Does the Transporter have squishy rubber feet? Im not sure these ones
are original as they look poor quality. And the Remote that came with
it wasnt backlit.
Still happy with it though. Got it wired in and working. Just need to
play with the various ways
Transporter is fine, Duet remote needs a new battery
I throw in a nice vintage Microlite as used by sound engineers.
I am in Montreal 514 943 3032
or email me lmich...@lmsoft.com for photo.
Lucmichaud's Profile: http:/
Plus dBpoweramp has a great user forum if you ever need any help with
great support from the development team. Plus dBPoweramp runs on MacOS
and Windows.
I think it's worth the very low cost.
nicholasg's Profile: http://f
I have and use both. Both are good. XLD iis not always as good at tag
preservation as dbpoweramp is, especially during format conversions.
With XLD, I find myself having to use Kid3 more often to clean up tags.
Thats why I recommend dbpoweramp first. As always, you get what you
pay for. But
OP could try XLD (X Lossless Decoder) for Mac - its free and has all
the transcoding options one may need.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/xld/
No need to buy dbpoweramp
pufnstuf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
If you buy from HDTracks, it is worth the money to buy DBPoweramp.
Everytime my Transporter chokes on a 24-bit stream, it is one from
HDTracks. Incompatible FLAC format and/or compression rate. Re-encode
it through DBPoweramp and problem solved.
It will also downsample a 192 khz purchase down
For future reference, synchronous/asynchronous sounds more like a
description for whether the SRC occurs in real-time or is done
beforehand.
I believe you're referring to is an integer or non-integer
"up/down-sampling factor" or "sampling rate conversion factor".
Cheers, Darren
Check it, add
TNX for your help
Squeezebox Duet, Squeezebox Boom, Transporter, Squeezebox Classic,
Squeezebox Radio, Grace Mondo
golddustpeak's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29012
View this thread: http://for
Glad you got it sorted.
*Home:* VBA 4TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(ethernet)
*Cottage:* VBA 3TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Touch> Benchmark DAC I, Boom, Radio
w/Battery (ethernet except Radio)
*Office:* Win8(64) > LMS 7.9.1>Squeezelite
*Wilderness: *PiCorePlayer 4.0 on rPi 3B+, hifi
W E L L S L A P M Y H E A D ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
Having run the network analyzer all afternoon and seeing no glitches,
and having no LONG Ethernet cables on hand I decided to have a CLOSE
look at my system wiring.
Silly me I found a BAD BNC to phono adapter in the digital circuit.
If the Transporter output buffer runs out of data (e.g. due to network
issue) then there will be a buffer underrun signalled.
Are there any messages in the server.log ?
Can you attach a DAC to digital output to test to see if the problem is
in the analog output stage ?
--
golddustpeak wrote:
> I am getting the dropouts on my server as well as internet radio.
>
> BTW I replaced the power supply around Feb. 0f 2017 with the suggested
> unit as in the link posted above.
>
> I just downloaded a WiFi analyzer and ran it for about 10 minutes and
> saw no dropouts.
>
garym wrote:
> correct. this is normal. Do you get dropouts with both local music
> files and streaming (internet radio or spotify, etc.)?
I am getting the dropouts on my server as well as internet radio.
BTW I replaced the power supply around Feb. 0f 2017 with the suggested
unit as in the l
bpa wrote:
> Clicking is probably the demagnetising of the force feedback knob.
> Normal.
correct. this is normal. Do you get dropouts with both local music
files and streaming (internet radio or spotify, etc.)?
*Home:* VBA 4TB (2.4)>LMS 7.9.1>Transporter, Touch, Boom, Radio
(ethernet)
*Co
golddustpeak wrote:
>
Clicking is probably the demagnetising of the force feedback knob.
Normal.
bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth
garym wrote:
> If the transporter is randomly rebooting there is an easy, cheap fix.
> Read the first 20 or so posts at this thread. '
>
> https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?105822-Fix-for-spuriously-rebooting-Transporter/page2&highlight=Transporter+power+supply'
> (https://forums.sl
If the transporter is randomly rebooting there is an easy, cheap fix.
Read the first 20 or so posts at this thread. '
https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?105822-Fix-for-spuriously-rebooting-Transporter/page2&highlight=Transporter+power+supply'
(https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread
I've just started to experience drop outs or cut outs with my
transporter.
I also experience glitches when some power (AC) switches are operated in
the area.
I have power cycled the transporter.
I'm using WiFi on a channel which has little to no use.
I have other WiFi music players that don't
I think you'll have a hard time finding a DAC that sounds as good as the
Transporter. Even finding one that's a minuscule better will cost a lot
of money. And no, I don't infer that all pricey equipment necessarily
sounds better or even good at all. I know people who have compared the
Transporter
philippe_44 wrote:
> synchronous vs asynchronous upsampling does not mean anything. it's a
> transformation in the digital domain and only the precision of the
> arithmetic use could make a difference which is far below anything you
> will hear. Assuming the same precision, you can do it in the
posnos wrote:
> hmm... didnt think I was spouting foofoo here... just asking if I would
> lose any SQ doing upsampling with SOX inside LMS verses an external
> DAC.
>
> Unless you think upsampling is foofoo...or even extermal DAC's
>
> Thanks for the comment anyways.
>
> Peter
synchronous vs
1 - 100 of 3762 matches
Mail list logo
