Re: [aur-general] Adopting the paccheck package

On 03/27/2011 05:13 PM, Bernard Baeyens wrote: IgnorantGuru doesn't intend to continue maintaining the paccheck package, which is now broken after the pacman 3.5.1 upgrade. I wrote an updated version which can be used with the new pacman release. I agree to become the new maintainer of that pac

Re: [aur-general] Please remove firefox-bin

On 03/27/2011 01:46 PM, nimetonmaili wrote: Hey, Please remove 'firefox-bin'. It states that it uses beta versions but there's already 'firefox-beta-bin' for that - and there's also 'firefox' in [extra]. I told about it to the maintainer but he hasn't responded for 2 days (I also e-mailed him).

Re: [aur-general] TU Resignation

On 03/16/2011 01:28 AM, Brad Fanella wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, i don't have too much time left for myself and i want to cut down some duties in arch. See you guys in devland :) http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&repo=Community&q=&

[aur-general] TU Resignation

Hi, i don't have too much time left for myself and i want to cut down some duties in arch. See you guys in devland :) http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&repo=Community&q=&maintainer=ibiru&last_update=&flagged=&limit=50 From all packages that i maintain in community i only want to keep

Re: [aur-general] development version for gnome dependencies in aur

On 03/12/2011 11:39 PM, Det wrote: On 03/12/2011 11:18 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 03/12/2011 11:15 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, i've seen a lot of _new_ builds submitted in aur mostly related to gnome-shell 2.91. This is duplicating my work and makes in the same time is hard for users to

Re: [aur-general] development version for gnome dependencies in aur

On 03/12/2011 11:15 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, i've seen a lot of _new_ builds submitted in aur mostly related to gnome-shell 2.91. This is duplicating my work and makes in the same time is hard for users to test the future gnome 3 version and updating to gnome-unstable/testing/extra at

[aur-general] development version for gnome dependencies in aur

Hi, i've seen a lot of _new_ builds submitted in aur mostly related to gnome-shell 2.91. This is duplicating my work and makes in the same time is hard for users to test the future gnome 3 version and updating to gnome-unstable/testing/extra at some point. I would start deleting _all_ builds

Re: [aur-general] Please delete gnome-shell

On 03/12/2011 05:45 AM, jwbirdsong wrote: On 03/11/2011 08:06 PM, helq alluqa wrote: Hi, please delete the obsolete gnome-shell package from AUR [is in gnome-unstable]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31102 Thanks, Elkin I'd suggest to leave it there for a while longer. (ASSuming

Re: [aur-general] Gzipped kernel modules

On 03/11/2011 01:38 AM, jesse jaara wrote: 11.3.2011 0.52 "Thomas S Hatch" kirjoitti: I am the maintainer of libguestfs in the AUR, and to run it uses insmod to load kernel modules into a specialized vm. The problem I am running into is that insmod cannot load the new gz kernel modules, so I

Re: [aur-general] TU application (Kyle Keen)

On 03/02/2011 05:36 PM, keenerd wrote: Hi guys. I am Kyle Keen (keenerd) and am applying to be a TU, sponsored by Xyne. You might remember me from a past application three months ago (1). Very little has changed since then, though I do have a few more packages (2). I also started up the first

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] ncurses-5.8-1

On 02/27/2011 03:55 AM, Allan McRae wrote: On 27/02/11 10:40, Allan McRae wrote: Major upstream update. Test well. There is no soname bump, but experience tells me that some rebuilds will probably be required to fix minor issues. I have rebuilt community/stfl to fix a crash (used by newsbeut

Re: [aur-general] Blacklisted - postgresql-client

On 02/25/2011 01:17 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 25.02.2011 00:00, schrieb Phillip Smith: Well this is new "postgresql-client is on the package blacklist, please check if it's available in the official repos." postgresql-client is not in the repos, but it is 'provides' in postgresql, as per

Re: [aur-general] AUR no more extracting source tarballs ( was: Upgraded AUR to 1.8.0)

On 02/22/2011 12:35 AM, Isaac Dupree wrote: On 02/21/11 10:54, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Yes, like having two 1GB large files `tar -czf`'ed and uploading the resulting tarball to the AUR. I don't think that can be detected without being vulnerable to DoS attacks. What if the PKGBUILD itself is a

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD 'backup' function won't work

On 02/21/2011 06:54 AM, Daniel Lin wrote: I made a grub4dos-svn PKGBUILD. I want /etc/grub4dos.conf and /boot/grub/menu.lst be proper backup. But, I found it won't work. If my menu.lst exist, it won't appear menu.lst.pacnew. If I remove my package. It wont keep menu.lst.orig I wrote the follo

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 02/19/2011 10:17 PM, a...@krzd.net wrote: Hello, the following packages, currently maintained by myself, are now in [gnome-unstable] and can therefore be deleted. i suggest to keep them until all the packages are moved to testing. i don't want anyone to use gnome-unstable now because is

[aur-general] gsettings-desktop-schemas moved to gnome-unstable

Hi, i just moved that and i would like to ask you not to update the package in community to 0.1.5. I would delete it once the gnome-unstable packages are moved to public repository. Also to inform all the other trusted users about this, i'm going to CC this to aur-general. -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] aur RSS down

On 02/13/2011 06:22 PM, keenerd wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/rss.php has not updated since Feb 4. Thought someone here might want to know. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com works for me heroes-sound-tracks 02/13/2011 05:01 PM -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Standardized CPAN Package Versions

On 02/07/2011 03:36 AM, Xyne wrote: Justin Davis wrote: Could you give real-life examples? I have not seen a case where CPAN is confused by that. You seem to be saying that the packagers are at fault here but I always blamed the CPAN module authors. From what I remember, the biggest problem is

Re: [aur-general] AIDE out-of-date

On 02/10/2011 07:01 PM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:55:05AM -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote: I will email the maintainer and let him know that I will be moving it. I will get to it tonight. You probably know that Ghost1227 is an Arch dev himself, don't you? :) he resigned

[aur-general] lib32-libvdpau moved in multilib

Hi, now that adobe released as stable the flash version that supports vdpau, i needed your build to bring the support to multilib. Thanks for the build. -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Moving packages to Community

Ok, some of the messages from this thread started to became offtopic. Here is my 2 cents and consider this being my last message. We always had an unspoken rule about sending a "thank you" note but we are all humans and forgot. Have my word that I spoke with the members that forgot and this wo

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: gnome-paint

On 02/05/2011 11:49 PM, György Balló wrote: Please orphan gnome-paint package [1], because it's outdated for a while, and my e-mail to the maintainer was rejected (the address is not exists). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32487 -- City-busz done -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Moving packages to Community

On 02/05/2011 08:31 PM, Gergely Imreh wrote: Hi, Recently a couple of my packages have been moved to Community but the process feels a little uneasy to me. I moved a lot of packages from AUR in community/extra and every time i did sent a "thank you" note. From that amount of messages i sent,

Re: [aur-general] poppler rebuilds will soon move - one buggy pkg in Community

On 02/05/2011 02:50 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: On 02/05/2011 10:32 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: On 02/05/2011 10:08 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: So far I only know of one broken pkg in community where a fix is available: epdfview - https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22734. That fix you mentioned is already

Re: [aur-general] Add pyopencl to [community]

On 02/03/2011 08:49 PM, Stéphane Gaudreault wrote: Dear Tus, I would like to add pyopencl [1] to [community]. I maintain this package in AUR and it has 14 votes. Pyopencl depends, among other, on libcl (OpenCL library, provided by either nvidia-utils or amdstream [2]) and a package that provide

Re: [aur-general] Updating libevent to 2.0.10

On 01/31/2011 05:55 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Brian Troutwine wrote: Hi all, I apologize, but my package was deleted from AUR without so much as an explanation. Unless I'm very much mistaken, I broke no packaging guidelines. I'll likely not be working to update l

[aur-general] poppler 0.16 rebuild

Hi, the rebuilding is almost over and was already moved from staging to testing in the morning, the only package that doesn't build is openscenegraph and is not related to poppler api breakage. Sergej can you look at it and try to fix it? -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

On 01/22/2011 08:35 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sat 22 Jan 2011 19:03 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: Seblu wrote: It looks like a trick

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: Seblu wrote: It looks like a trick question! But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons. and **The trust does not exclude the audit.** Excuse me for asking but is there anything preventing you from moving cairo-xcb to c

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Seblu

On 01/21/2011 08:04 PM, Seblu wrote: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote: I see the point. I would contact cairo debian maintainers about that. To have their point of view. that means that you don't trust the arch maintainer judgment? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Re: [aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch: Voting period

On 01/11/2011 08:24 PM, Xyne wrote: The voting period for Thomas Hatch's application has begun: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=46 Please make your way to the AUR and vote. :) voting period has ended two days ago. The results are: yes 20 no0 abstain 8 Congratulation for o

Re: [aur-general] mtr-cli

On 01/18/2011 07:57 PM, Bartek Piotrowski wrote: I think that mlt package should be splitted too. Now it depends on GTK and Qt, what is totally stupid for me. Mlt compiles without Qt (mlt-gtk in AUR) or without GTK (mlt-qt and mlt-git) and works fine. since yesterday mtr and mtr-gtk are in ext

Re: [aur-general] Time to Step Down

On 01/15/2011 11:56 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 01/15/2011 02:06 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 08.01.2011 01:28, schrieb Aaron Bull Schaefer: Fellow Trusted Users, After almost 4 years of being a TU, I've had less and less time to dedicate toward maintaining my packages, and so I think

Re: [aur-general] Time to Step Down

On 01/15/2011 02:06 AM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 08.01.2011 01:28, schrieb Aaron Bull Schaefer: Fellow Trusted Users, After almost 4 years of being a TU, I've had less and less time to dedicate toward maintaining my packages, and so I think it's finally time for me to step down. Arch users defi

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Breaking the unspoken rule: AUR helper in [community]

On 12/30/2010 04:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/cower/ Thoughts? I was under the impression we didn't do this, and definitely on purpose, otherwise people have *no* idea the AUR is different in a lot of ways. Making people go the "hard way" to get a help

Re: [aur-general] VirtualBox in [community]

On 12/28/2010 05:40 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 13:56 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: In the [community] repo there are the following packages in addition to the package virtualbox 4.0.0-2: virtualbox-additions 4.0.0-1 (any) virtualbox-guest-additions 4.0.0-2 (i686 and x86_64) virtualb

Re: [aur-general] VirtualBox in [community]

On 12/28/2010 12:55 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:40:31 +0800 Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 13:56 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote: In the [community] repo there are the following packages in addition to the package virtualbox 4.0.0-2: virtualbox-additions 4.0.0-1 (any)

Re: [aur-general] VirtualBox in [community]

On 12/27/2010 02:56 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: In the [community] repo there are the following packages in addition to the package virtualbox 4.0.0-2: virtualbox-additions 4.0.0-1 (any) virtualbox-guest-additions 4.0.0-2 (i686 and x86_64) virtualbox-guest-modules 4.0.0-2 (i686 and x86_64) In ABS th

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request (tdfsb)

On 12/25/2010 05:45 PM, Sascha Kruse wrote: Hi, I've created http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44780 today (tdfsb). I didn't see, that it's allready in [community]. Sorry for that. Greetings, Sascha done. thanks for letting us know. -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote: $ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU applicat

Re: [aur-general] Discussion about removing ibus-table-wubi from [community]

On 12/19/2010 08:28 PM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Xyne wrote: On 2010-12-19 12:04 -0600 (50:7) Thomas Dziedzic wrote: I would like to move ibus-table-wubi [1][2] from community because it hasn't been updated since 27/12/2009 and it has been marked as deprecated

Re: [aur-general] luafilesystem

On 12/17/2010 11:33 PM, Andreas Baumann wrote: Hi, Can somebody delete 'luafilesystem' in AUR? I did something really stupid: luafilesystem exists already in community. I accidently made a package in AUR, now I have there one with 26 votes. :-) done Another interesting question is: why can

Re: [aur-general] voting period for removing Ranguvar

On 12/08/2010 10:07 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, application is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=43 Ranguvar is not allowed to vote, therefor i temporally disabled his TU access. the voting period ended. The results are: yes17 no 2 abstain 7 I'm sorry for your re

Re: [aur-general] voting period for Dave Reisner

On 12/05/2010 02:54 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:39:13AM +0100, PyroPeter wrote: On 12/04/2010 07:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, the 5 days discussion period have ended. http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42 42! Yup, that's right. 42. Vote wisely, gentlemen. W

Re: [aur-general] Arch holiday madness! nominations

On 12/11/2010 06:51 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:44:29 -0600 Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Philipp Überbacher wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Dziedzic's message of 2010-12-11 03:15:36 +0100: This is the official thread of the "Arch holiday madnes

[aur-general] voting period for removing Ranguvar

Hi, application is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=43 Ranguvar is not allowed to vote, therefor i temporally disabled his TU access. -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Some packages moved from extra/community to aur

On 12/07/2010 06:34 PM, Michael Trunner wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Michael Trunner wrote: But back to topic: it isn't funny to use a not real officially autofs package on our university network. What was or is the problem, that no TU want's to maintain these package? Basically it

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Kyle Keen

On 12/07/2010 06:19 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote: Right now I host the bugbot in #archlinux-bugs and I've got a few AUR packages(1). Of them, ScrotWM and Slurm probably deserve to be in [community]. I've written several well-liked metatools for Arch including Pacgraph, Pacmatic, and Aurphan. Aurpha

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 12/05/2010 11:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: Hello all. Hi, I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application At last you had the balls to apply :P I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/05/2010 03:48 PM, Ranguvar wrote: Hello everyone, Hi, I first must apologize. It is entirely my fault that I have been inactive as a TU. I'm something of an unorganized individual, and I never got around to picking up some packages and putting them in [community], making an account t

Re: [aur-general] Understanding the Trusted User Bylaws

On 12/05/2010 01:06 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:44 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/05/2010 12:25 AM, Loui Chang wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html I've noticed that there have been a few cases relatively recently where people don't really unde

[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar take 2

hi, because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure. Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with reasons. Here are

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/05/2010 12:32 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:15 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: maybe i lack the understanding of words and to quote from bylaws: "The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time. A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the re

Re: [aur-general] Understanding the Trusted User Bylaws

On 12/05/2010 12:25 AM, Loui Chang wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html I've noticed that there have been a few cases relatively recently where people don't really understand the bylaws. I'd like to encourage all Trusted Users to read over the bylaws periodically to make s

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/05/2010 12:07 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:59 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Chang wrote: On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: I'm waiting t

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Chang wrote: On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them. i don't see this being discuss any furth

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/04/2010 11:46 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them. i don't see this being discuss any further and all messages have been only in one dir

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them. i don't see this being discuss any further and all messages have been only in one direction. i modified his account on aur to normal user. Ranguvar, i'm sorry for this

[aur-general] voting period for Dave Reisner

Hi, the 5 days discussion period have ended. http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=42 -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: geogebra_dl

On 12/04/2010 07:53 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23281 seems to be an old version of geogebra. it is orphaned. latest package is geogebra (3.2.45.0) or even geogebra-beta. so this one, geogebra_dl stucked at 3.0.0 could be deleted. delete. thanks -- Io

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: arista-bzr

On 12/04/2010 03:52 PM, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: hi. From what I understand arista is on a git server. so arista-bzr is outdated. and could be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25876 There is currently an arista-devel package but it should be better renamed arista-git. what's

Re: [aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

On 12/03/2010 05:28 PM, Kaiting Chen wrote: On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year. This must sound stupid, but who are we talking about? Is he on this page? https://www.archlinux.org/trustedusers/ no. because

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Kyle Keen

On 12/03/2010 04:22 AM, Xyne wrote: Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, keenerd wrote: Hello all. I am applying to become a TU. My sponsor is Xyne. Hi, Kyle asked me also to sponsor him but Dave did it before him and i want to sponsor only one at a time. Definitely if i wasn&#

[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar

Hi, Ranguvar has been added in our team no more than last year. Conform bylaws a motion should be sent and two active TUs and a voting procedure should follow after 7 days of discussion. Here are my reasons: 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i asked him

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Kyle Keen

On 12/02/2010 08:20 PM, keenerd wrote: Hello all. I am applying to become a TU. My sponsor is Xyne. Hi, Kyle asked me also to sponsor him but Dave did it before him and i want to sponsor only one at a time. Definitely if i wasn't sponsored Dave, i would do it. My name is Kyle Keen, thou

[aur-general] Fwd: [arch-dev-public] Help on maintaining LXDE packages wanted

maybe this was missed. Does any TU wants to maintain this? LXDE needs a maintainer to fit together all the pieces and currently is in bad shape. I don't want to push fixes that i can't test and i don't want to touch them anymore. Original Message Subject: [arch-dev-public

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Dave Reisner

On 11/30/2010 03:01 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: Greetings! Please consider this my application to become a Trusted User. My name is Dave Reisner, and I'm 27 years old, currently residing in the New York City area. Ionut Biru has graciously offered to sponsor this application. I'm a self-taught progr

Re: [aur-general] TUs: low disk space on sigurd

On 11/22/2010 09:11 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Hi TUs, just to let you know, that sigurd's hard drive is filled up to 82%. You should look for things to be cleaned up and please be more responsible with resources. Some packages are really large. Don't forget that a single package will need up to

Re: [aur-general] AUR helpers in [community]?

On 11/18/2010 09:00 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 18.11.2010 09:30, schrieb Kaiting Chen: Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I would ask. --Kaiting. I think if we should discuss t

Re: [aur-general] AUR helpers in [community]?

On 11/18/2010 10:30 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: Can AUR helpers go into [community]? `burp` and `cower` each have over ten votes and qualify, but I never see AUR helpers in binary form so I thought I would ask. --Kaiting. no. we can't support unsupported software :P -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Various new packages in [community]

On 11/17/2010 02:22 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: Dear TUs, I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in [communi

Re: [aur-general] Various new packages in [community]

On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: Dear TUs, I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in [community] a few packages I have been maintaining on the AUR so far, but which are just a bit to

Re: [aur-general] AUR Improvement Thread

On 11/17/2010 12:13 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: 5. LDAP support because LDAP makes everything so much better no no no. please no. ldap is not pretty, and what problem are you trying to solve, anyway.. Dieter i believe that one time registration process. -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] AUR Improvement Thread

On 11/17/2010 06:17 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start: 1. Integrated distributed version control system it would be nice and often i wanted to have a history available for build. note that right now sigurd has limited resources. 2. User provided binarie

Re: [aur-general] [community] repository cleanup

On 11/16/2010 05:07 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 17/11/10 00:53, Heiko Baums wrote: Am Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:34:51 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae: There is a difference between ignorance and not giving a shit... Right, giving a shit is also arrogant. So now you are equating arrogant and ignorant? A

Re: [aur-general] github switched to SSL everywhere

On 11/06/2010 08:28 AM, Chris van Dijk wrote: Recently github switched over to using SSL for their entire website [1]. Currently wget does not accept the wildcard *.github.com in the certificate: $ wget http://github.com/ --2010-11-06 15:45:12-- http://github.com/ Resolving github.com... 207.9

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request

On 11/04/2010 11:31 PM, Aurelien DESBRIERES wrote: done enjoy freedom! since when you can orphan packages? -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Christos Nouskas wrote: Please, delete kernel26-pf-p4 which is an accidental duplicate of kernel26-pf: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42310 done. thanks -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] [google-talkplugin] How to build an older version of openssl

On 10/27/2010 09:34 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: want to paste your PKGBUILD to look at it? I did, it's in the original mail :) But here it is, to save time: http://pastebin.com/04xsippr. If you change lines 37 and 39, appe

Re: [aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer

On 10/28/2010 10:52 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: On Sunday 24 October 2010 16:04:17 Loui Chang wrote: With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Welcome aboard and sorry for the delay. BBS account updated (I cannot find your flyspray

Re: [aur-general] aur website default ssl

On 10/28/2010 03:27 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Wed 27 Oct 2010 14:14 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:40:19 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote: As i said earlier in a reply to Loui, maybe we can do it better.Having https only for login and then redirecting to http is like not having it

Re: [aur-general] [google-talkplugin] How to build an older version of openssl

On 10/27/2010 05:37 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 10/27/2010 04:47 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: Hello, guys. Google Talk Plugin for GMail is not working anymore for me (and others...) because it relies on libssl.so.0.9.8. But

Re: [aur-general] TU Application

On 10/27/2010 07:33 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote: Hi aur-general, my name is Kaiting Chen and Xyne has decided to sponsor me for my TU application. fresh blood! I would also like to work on maintain the Arch web presence. I think that a separate login is needed for each part of the site is someth

Re: [aur-general] [google-talkplugin] How to build an older version of openssl

On 10/27/2010 04:47 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: Hello, guys. Google Talk Plugin for GMail is not working anymore for me (and others...) because it relies on libssl.so.0.9.8. But for my surprise, the binary GoogletalkPlugin is a 32 bits executable, even for the 64 bits package. It comes ri

Re: [aur-general] aur website default ssl

On 10/27/2010 05:49 AM, Justin Davis wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: Hi, we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works as expected. Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur

Re: [aur-general] aur website default ssl

On 10/27/2010 03:44 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Tue 26 Oct 2010 23:50 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote: we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works as expected. Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur

[aur-general] aur website default ssl

Hi, we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works as expected. Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur development -- Ionuț

Re: [aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages

On 10/25/2010 10:34 PM, Sergej Pupykin wrote: It looks like someone cleaned up extra :) xf86-input-mutouch was removed and I can not find it in aur. yes Date: Monday, October 25, 2010 @ 13:19:02 Author: jgc Revision: 96932 Remove, no longer supported or developed upstream Deleted: x

Re: [aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages

On 10/25/2010 09:22 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: On Monday 25 October 2010 19:50:16 Ionuț Bîru wrote: here is the list http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community_cleanup I agree to remove them too. At least packages with 0% of usage can be removed. lets don't rush. first lets discuss

Re: [aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages

On 10/25/2010 08:49 PM, Ángel Velásquez wrote: Well, we can discuss the generated list of the unused packages, I'd be agree if a package that I maintain it will be removed (in fact is not remove at all, is a move to AUR) if it's unused. Cheers here is the list http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.

Re: [aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages

On 10/25/2010 01:35 PM, Christopher Brannon wrote: I've been polling regularly for several weeks, and I've noticed that roughly 50% of the packages in [community] are not installed by anyone. Can we get a list of these unused packages? Would it be a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer - Voting!

On 10/17/2010 04:02 AM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Hi! My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany, studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ. I've been

Re: [aur-general] Leaving Arch Linux (and computer world for a while) (delete AUR account)

On 10/18/2010 09:55 PM, Dany Martineau wrote: Hi! Due to new responsibilities in my life, i have to abandon all packages that i've owned in AUR (there are 150 of them). I think that the easier way to do it is to delete my AUR account. Is it possible to do it so? Maybe i'll have to work with Arch

Re: [aur-general] Changing email address for account on AUR

On 10/14/2010 05:40 PM, Magnus Therning wrote: I've just inherited the arch-haskell AUR account from Don, and yesterday I did two things: • Changed the email address associated with the account • Changed the password for the account I managed to fail with both: • I misspelt the email address,

Re: [aur-general] Libreoffice in AUR

On 10/14/2010 02:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 14.10.2010 10:24, schrieb Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD: Am 14.10.2010 09:51, schrieb Vitaliy Berdinskikh UR6LAD: Can I upload libreoffice (3.3.0-beta not 3.2.99) to AUR? Who can explain? Hello, not under that name. If you do not compile from sou

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer

On 10/11/2010 08:08 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Mon 11 Oct 2010 19:53 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 10/11/2010 03:34 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany, studying Computer Science a

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Lukas Fleischer

On 10/11/2010 03:34 PM, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany, studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ. As I read ab

Re: [aur-general] Delete broadcom-wl-patched

On 10/11/2010 10:16 AM, David Campbell wrote: Please delete [broadcom-wl-patched][1]. It does not work with the current kernel and [broadcom-wl][2] provides the correct working patch for the current kernel version. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33876 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gnome-python-desktop subpackages

On 10/05/2010 05:01 AM, SpepS wrote: Recently gnome-python-desktop splitted into subpackages, so python-metacity (mine) python-rsvg (mine) python-wnck python-gnomekeyring in AUR, are no needed anymore. Please delete. C ya done -- Ionuț

  1   2   >