On Wed 14 Oct 2020 21:13 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
> On 14/10/2020 21:09, t...@tswartz.net wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:03:26PM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
> > > On 14/10/2020 17:16, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
> > > > Hi Bruno,
> > > Top-posting, do you know what
On Sun 13 Sep 2020 19:03 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> Perhaps there should be a general discussion about how to handle the
> proliferation of suckless.org software forks, and what constitutes
> uniqueness.
My wild idea is that maybe each package could enable their own mini-aur
On Fri 03 Apr 2020 23:24 +0400, Nick Shvelidze wrote:
> Hello everyone, as you know, some packages on AUR take many minutes to
> build on all but very powerful machines. I think it would be helpful to
> have an optional bit of metadata that will mark these packages, or possibly
> even a general
Replying on the most relevant mailing list.
On Tue 29 Oct 2019 02:49 +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Since publishing to the AUR is something that all packagers do quite
> frequently, I have developed a software that reduces the related operations
> to the bare minimum, making publishing
On Fri 01 Jun 2012 20:28 +, Xyne wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
It may be a bit of chicken-and-egg, though. The ppc/arm userbase might
grow if arch is seen stable enough and seems to have sufficient
packages, possibly making it worth being supported, but the lack of
infrastructure
On Thu 31 May 2012 09:56 -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 2012-05-31 08:10, Phillip Smith wrote:
On 31 May 2012 17:38, Jelle van der Waa je...@vdwaa.nl wrote:
When I first though about it, I wanted to say why not, it doesn't hurt
the functioning of the normal i686,x86_64 packages.
On Thu 19 Apr 2012 20:55 +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 04/19/2012 08:10 PM, Filipe Pinheiro wrote:
*How can I get it back?*
*The email is : filipe.cantare...@gmail.com*
user is LipeCantarelli
Hmm. Maybe this should be a feature in the AUR?
On Fri 02 Mar 2012 00:49 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:21:33 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
You do realize who first came up with the workaround for adding split
packages to the AUR... Because from memory it was figured out in the
TU IRC channel.
I
On Fri 02 Dec 2011 14:02 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/12/11 12:37, Loui Chang wrote:
Let Ionut be the first to provide
enough personal information to satisfy naysayers. I've never met him, so
I have my doubts. :P
Such as
Is that supposed to be a question?
gpg --list-sigs Ionut
On Fri 02 Dec 2011 01:23 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Ionut Biru wrote:
why are you so sure that I'll sign it?
I no longer am, but until you replied I never had any reason to doubt it.
As for the discussion about my name:
I could easily claim a fake name to make you happy and you would never
know
Hello everyone!
I haven't been very involved with the AUR for a long while, and I don't
really see that changing much. Since I only have a few packages I think
it's time for me to resign as a TU. I may still throw a few patches
around if I find the time. I've asked Lukas Fleischer to assume my
On Sat 06 Aug 2011 13:25 +0200, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 06.08.2011 13:13, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:02:03PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 05.08.2011 23:54, schrieb Lukas Fleischer:
[1] http://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/commit/?id=1e7b9d57
[2]
On Sat 06 Aug 2011 11:21 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:22:21 -0400, Loui Chang wrote:
If I recall correctly some time after that debate/argument there was a
problem with certificates and wget
Wget was broken, yes. But this is fixed by now.
- a problem
On Sat 06 Aug 2011 13:39 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Alternatively: Do not display a login form on http, instead display a
link If you want to login, switch to a secure connection first.. This
way, the user verifies the certificate and URL first (by looking at the
URL bar), then enters his
On Sat 06 Aug 2011 02:18 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 01:16:45AM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 08/06/2011 12:54 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
To prevent session hijacking, mtm attacks or whatnot I'd recommend the
following:
* Redirect all http traffic to https by
On Sat 30 Apr 2011 09:39 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
On Fri 29 Apr 2011 21:49 -0400, keenerd wrote:
I would like to move Aurphan into community. I've added a number of
features to it lately, and it has become an automated means of
answering what can I do to help
On Sat 30 Apr 2011 16:12 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 30/04/11 12:25, Loui Chang wrote:
On Fri 29 Apr 2011 21:49 -0400, keenerd wrote:
I would like to move Aurphan into community. I've added a number of
features to it lately, and it has become an automated means of
answering what can I do
On Fri 29 Apr 2011 21:49 -0400, keenerd wrote:
I would like to move Aurphan into community. I've added a number of
features to it lately, and it has become an automated means of
answering what can I do to help Arch, parsing and summarizing the
todo list, the bugtracker and the orphans. The
On Tue 05 Apr 2011 18:00 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
Gmail's web interface has THE best approach to threading. Ever. If you
have any other suggestion (web client or linux desktop client) which
comes anywhere close please let me know. Evolution's threading just
doesn't cut it, thunderbird's new one
On Sun 03 Apr 2011 23:16 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 11:00:24PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:36:03PM +0200, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 22:30, Baptiste zersto...@free.fr wrote:
I know there is a way to get an email
On Sun 03 Apr 2011 23:16 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Nah, I sent a patch fixing that to aur-dev a long time ago [1] - Loui
rejected it back then for some reason tho. I'll probably just push it
now...
[1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2010-September/001260.html
On Mon 14 Mar 2011 03:44 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:20:04 -0700
schrieb Tony C crt@gmail.com:
pkgname=lft
pkgver=3.31
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=A layer four traceroute implementing numerous other features
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
license=('custom')
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 20:19 -0700, Tony C wrote:
On 03/13/2011 06:47 PM, Tony C wrote:
Prior to AUR 1.8.1 being deployed, I could upload a *.tar.gz
containing my PKGBUILD to AUR. Now with AUR 1.8.1, here I am trying to
upload an updated PKGBUILD which I have verified does exist within my
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 20:44 -0700, Tony C wrote:
Apologies for the noise. AUR does not reject my package now after first
creating the directory name for the package I have. I do not ever
remember needing to create a special directory before. So I simply did
mkdir package-name and tar'd that up
On Mon 14 Mar 2011 05:08 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:59:38 +0800
schrieb Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org:
On 14 March 2011 10:32, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Could the reason be some syntax errors?
There are a lot of quotation marks too much. And the
On Fri 25 Feb 2011 16:31 +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
The package minecraft-data [1] is supposed to provide game data for
Minecraft. This package is outdated, orphaned and does not comply with the
game license [2] (hosting of original game content).
Please delete it. Thanks.
[1]
On Mon 21 Feb 2011 16:35 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
The only issue that might affect the end users as well is ZIP bombs.
Most
On Mon 21 Feb 2011 16:42 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:35:33 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:46:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:50:39 +0100
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de
On Tue 22 Feb 2011 00:51 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 02/22/2011 12:35 AM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 02/21/11 10:54, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Yes, like having two 1GB large files `tar -czf`'ed and uploading the
resulting tarball to the AUR. I don't think that can be detected without
being
On Mon 07 Feb 2011 09:21 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
Well, whatever the case, I stayed up a while working on finishing this
new version of the system.
The new version syncs only the .tar.gz files, which makes it less
resource hungry, and this also adds a natural ability to commit per
On Sun 06 Feb 2011 14:34 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
2011/2/6 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
2011/2/6 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com:
What's this?
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD
It seems there's more:
apercu.tgz
Since this clean up is more of an
On Sun 06 Feb 2011 17:52 -0600, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:58 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/6/11, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
You probably want to grab the tarballs, and extract what's in those.
The next release of the AUR will only have tarballs
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:23 PM, keenerd keen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. I am now mirroring the AUR continuously, and am starting to
open it up to public access. It is not a perfect byte-for-byte clone,
as I felt like adding a few features :-)
For now, there is an enhanced RPC database.
On Wed 26 Jan 2011 20:36 -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
So, on the subject of cleanup, I've come across a list of 530 packages
on sigurd that aren't accessible from the web interface. Judging from
some of the names, I'd wager that these are packages which were deleted
but something went wrong, etc
On Sun 23 Jan 2011 11:53 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 01/22/2011 08:35 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 22 Jan 2011 19:03 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
Seriously? Since when is adding a package that is already in the repos
with a different configure flag a good idea? We don't even allow
On Sat 15 Jan 2011 20:10 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Christopher Brannon wrote:
Shouldn't this be:
the number of no votes is greater than or equal to half the number of
active TUs?
Yes it should. Here's a corrected patch:
http://aur.pastebin.com/dBdinYb9
Thank you. I've applied the patch. See
On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Seblu wrote:
It looks like a trick question!
But if I want to be a good maintainer, I do understand the reasons.
and **The trust does not exclude the audit.**
Excuse me for asking but is
On Sat 22 Jan 2011 19:03 +0100, Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri 21 Jan 2011 21:38 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 01/21/2011 09:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
Seblu wrote:
It looks like a trick question!
But if I want
Recently I've had the idea that I should move the 'main' AUR git repo,
which I have been the caretaker of to the community server where all
other community and AUR development is done. This would also mean we
would have to run a git daemon, and should also install a web interface
like cgit to
On Mon 17 Jan 2011 09:40 +0800, Gergely Imreh wrote:
I know I'm an outsider (no TU, only did a bit of AUR developement
before), so I just have a question:
On 17 January 2011 09:19, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
Here are the reasons I have for moving the repo:
* We don't need
On 12/30/2010 12:36 AM, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Dec 30, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Nathan Owens ndowens@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/29/2010 08:56 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
I know I am not a TU, though I figured I would put in my two-cents. I
agree it may be bad for first time users to have an AUR
On Thu 30 Dec 2010 14:26 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/30/2010 04:16 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/cower/
Thoughts? I was under the impression we didn't do this, and definitely
on purpose, otherwise people have *no* idea the AUR is different in a
lot
On Thu 30 Dec 2010 03:56 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:43:46 +0200
schrieb Evangelos Foutras foutre...@gmail.com:
Personally, I don't feel strong either way. As it was explained to me
on IRC, cower doesn't include any building or installation
functionality, it only
On Sun 19 Dec 2010 16:55 +0100, Seblu wrote:
2010/12/13 Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de
There is a similar case with packages like steinberg-vst [1]. The package
just assumes the source are already downloaded
On Sun 19 Dec 2010 17:58 +0200, cantabile wrote:
Le 19/12/2010 17:55, Seblu a écrit :
2010/12/13 Cédric Girardgirard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Stefan Husmannstefan-husm...@t-online.de
There is a similar case with packages like steinberg-vst [1]. The package
just
On Sun 19 Dec 2010 17:15 +0100, Seblu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:58 PM, cantabile cantabile.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 19/12/2010 17:55, Seblu a écrit :
2010/12/13 Cédric Girardgirard.ced...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Stefan
Husmannstefan-husm...@t-online.de
On Thu 16 Dec 2010 01:32 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed
On Tue 14 Dec 2010 01:57 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/08/2010 10:07 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
application is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=43
Ranguvar is not allowed to vote, therefor i temporally disabled his TU
access.
the voting period ended. The results are:
yes17
no
On Mon 13 Dec 2010 00:14 +0100, Seblu wrote:
Delete package : oracle 11gR1-1
(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23730O=L=C=K=SB=SO=PP=do_Orphans=SeB=)
Because, it's orphan, it's out-of-date, source link is broken
(==cannot be built).
Well, I must have deleted the source file in a
On Fri 10 Dec 2010 15:15 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Loui Chang wrote:
If the patch is large then what's the problem with compressing it?
I would argue that we should not have large patches applied to Arch, or
AUR packages at all. If there is enough patching, that constitues a
fork, and we
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these
On Thu 09 Dec 2010 09:54 -0500, keenerd wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
The issue as I see it is that you presented the idea on this list for
discussion but didn't care to follow that discussion until a conclusion was
reached.
It seemed discussion had
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 16:49 +0100, Xyne wrote:
keenerd wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Nicky726 nicky...@gmail.com wrote:
been told by the bot, that selinux-flex has a binary
(selinux-flex/flex- arch.patch.gz), which is a gziped patch. Guess
I can ungzip it, though as this
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 15:27 -0500, Ranguvar wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 15:07, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
application is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=43
Ranguvar is not allowed to vote, therefor i temporally disabled his TU
access.
Just referring to my response, as
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 16:23 +0100, Xyne wrote:
I think the passage concerning similar proposals is too vague. There
is no way to define those terms in a way that is unambiguous in all
cases and trying to do so is futile and condemned to a pedantic
spiral.
I trust the human factor to handle
On Wed 08 Dec 2010 11:59 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Let's wait another day to get some more comments and incorporate any
last changes. If it changes during the discussion period without
unanimous consent then we would end up
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 16:44 -0500, keenerd wrote:
After much heavy thought, I withdraw my application. My apologies for
the trouble.
N. I was interested in your analysis of the AUR and I think we could
make good use of it. I kind of wish I could spam users about their bad
packages. I have
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 22:50 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hello all.
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for
my TU application
I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have
experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 20:27 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2010 19:02:59 Xyne wrote:
Peter Lewis wrote:
This means that we cannot override (A) in the rest of the byelaws. I can
imagine that we might want to create something requiring (say) a 2/3rds
majority for some
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 17:31 +0100, Thorsten Töpper wrote:
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:13:55 -0500 Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com
wrote:
This proposal clarifies the Standard Voting Procedure, and allows
another condition for passing a motion.
Signed-off-by: Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com
On Tue 07 Dec 2010 03:58 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 6 December 2010 22:47, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 03:20:06PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
In most cases there's a reason for having binaries, icons and the like
in a package. And whether such a package
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 10:59 +0100, Nicky726 wrote:
been told by the bot, that selinux-flex has a binary (selinux-flex/flex-
arch.patch.gz), which is a gziped patch. Guess I can ungzip it, though as
this
package is just a copy of a [core] package from some time ago, I guess the
original
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 23:08 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Thorsten Töpper
atsut...@freethoughts.dewrote:
So far it is mostly fine for me, however from this paragraph it is not
clear if the vote is still open when the quorum was reached and the
application
On Mon 06 Dec 2010 23:42 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
I've read through this a couple more times and I'm little concerned about
the particular wording. Unfortunately I don't know how to make this any
clearer so I
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 03:35 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Sorry for all the mail regarding the bylaws but let me take a quick moment
to go through one extremely broken case of the current procedure.
Let's take falconindy's vote as an example; at the moment he has seventeen
votes for, one vote
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 08:19 -0500, Shacristo wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is sort of what I was talking about in my previous mail about
the refinement of the bylaws. Thirteen hours have passed since the
beginning of the voting period and
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 11:53 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shacristo shacri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the stated purposes of the quorum is to ensure that TUs remain
active in the job
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 14:23 -0500, Shacristo wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
See attachment :P
Trying again...
?
Are attachments disabled or is there something wrong on my end?
Here's the script in-line. Sorry for
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 13:47 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:42 PM, PyroPeter abi1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 12/05/2010 03:11 AM, Xyne wrote:
I'm halfway tempted to create the flowchart but I just don't have the
time. If
someone wants to adapt the dot file from the
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 19:55 +0100, Xyne wrote:
On 2010-12-05 12:20 -0500 (48:7)
Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 11:53 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shacristo shacri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 16:19 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
This proposal clarifies the Standard Voting Procedure, and allows
another condition for passing a motion.
address
Trusted
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 23:23 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
On Sunday 05 December 2010 23:14:14 Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 22:52 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
I'd support some kind of reworking of the quorum for TU votes, since as
Kaitling points out, missing a meeting due to weather, car
On Fri 03 Dec 2010 16:54 -0500, David Campbell wrote:
Excerpts from keenerd's message of 2010-12-03 13:46:10 -0500:
If no one can think of a better way to deal with the nonconforming
packages, I'll write a bot to post insulting comments. Personally, I
really like this solution. The AUR
On Thu 02 Dec 2010 13:20 -0500, keenerd wrote:
Hello all. I am applying to become a TU. My sponsor is Xyne.
My name is Kyle Keen, though my handle for irc/bbs/the-last-12-years
has been Keenerd. I've been using Arch for a while now, from back
when it was still known for refusing to
On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
I'm waiting to see your replies and then act based on them.
i don't see this being discuss any further and all messages have been only
in one direction.
i modified his account on aur to normal
On Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:59 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Changlouipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/03/2010 12:06 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
I'm waiting to see your replies and then
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:15 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/05/2010 12:07 AM, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sat 04 Dec 2010 23:59 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/04/2010 11:53 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 5 December 2010 05:46, Loui Changlouipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat 04 Dec 2010 22:19 +0200, Ionuț Bîru
http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
I've noticed that there have been a few cases relatively recently where
people don't really understand the bylaws.
I'd like to encourage all Trusted Users to read over the bylaws
periodically to make sure that they fully understand the
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:15 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
maybe i lack the understanding of words and to quote from bylaws:
The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time.
A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the removal
of a Trusted User. (THIS IS ME)
I also
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 00:44 +0200, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/05/2010 12:25 AM, Loui Chang wrote:
http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
I've noticed that there have been a few cases relatively recently where
people don't really understand the bylaws.
I'd like to encourage all
On Thu 02 Dec 2010 10:39 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
My original view had been that a package would be simply called 'package'
regardless of whether or not a source tarball was offered. Then if someone
makes a version that
On Mon 22 Nov 2010 20:17 +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 22.11.2010 20:16, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
can we buy a new hard drive for that server?
The server is a donation so no.
Who said no? It really wouldn't make any sense for them to refuse money
if offered, or would it?
On Wed 17 Nov 2010 22:22 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 17/11/10 21:59, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 11/17/2010 03:03 AM, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
Dear TUs,
I'm Gaetan, a (discreet) junior dev, mentored by Allan. I recently got
access to sigurd and thought I would use that opportunity to maintain in
On Tue 16 Nov 2010 23:17 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
How can we make the AUR even better? I'll start:
1. Integrated distributed version control system
2. User provided binaries (if case anyone wants to volunteer) (this should
probably be carefully controlled)
3. Time-adjusted 'relevance'
On Tue 16 Nov 2010 13:06 +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:54:23 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
It is true as long as the developers say it is true. Just because I
tell GM their car is an aeroplane does not mean they will start
flying.
Wrong. It is
On Tue 16 Nov 2010 21:21 -0600, Brad Fanella wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly if it were up to me I would remove half of the packages from the
official repositories and stick them in the AUR because past 40 your
packages start to
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 21:27 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 10/11/10 21:15, Xyne wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Ok, 5 days have passed. TUs, please cast your votes:
http://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=41
The voting period is over. (Sorry for the delayed announcement.)
Yes: 12
No: 5
Abstain: 6
On Wed 10 Nov 2010 14:05 +, Christopher Brannon wrote:
Hi all,
I'll start this discussion with an example of the problem.
I notice that python-sqlalchemy is about to change in [community].
Most of the packages which depend on it will need to change their
dependency to
On Mon 18 Oct 2010 17:38 +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber:
On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote:
In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period,
I'm posting the full text of the
On Thu 28 Oct 2010 18:03 +0200, Xyne wrote:
On 2010-10-27 00:33 -0400 (43:3)
Kaiting Chen wrote:
Hi aur-general, my name is Kaiting Chen and Xyne has decided to sponsor me
for my TU application.
/snip
Hi all,
I confirm that I have agreed to sponsor Kaiting. He has the skills and
On Thu 28 Oct 2010 18:01 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 10/28/2010 03:27 AM, Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed 27 Oct 2010 14:14 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:40:19 +0300, Ionuț Bîruib...@archlinux.org
wrote:
As i said earlier in a reply to Loui, maybe we can do it
better.Having
On Wed 27 Oct 2010 14:14 +0200, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:40:19 +0300, Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org
wrote:
As i said earlier in a reply to Loui, maybe we can do it
better.Having https only for login and then redirecting to http is
like not having it at all.
Simply
On Wed 27 Oct 2010 08:35 -0700, Aaron Bull Schaefer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't say that. I would say that the only users who matter are the
ones that participate. For example you can't justly complain about the
results
On Tue 26 Oct 2010 23:50 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur
helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works
as expected.
Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur development
Hmm. How did you go about doing
On Tue 26 Oct 2010 16:36 +0200, Xyne wrote:
On 2010-10-26 08:20 +0800 (43:2) Ray Rashif wrote:
I take back part of what I mentioned earlier. There are indeed some
packages that I believe no one uses. The best way to handle this is to
selectively remove each package that we still want to
On Mon 25 Oct 2010 19:46 +0200, Xyne wrote:
Brieuc ROBLIN wrote:
On 25 October 2010 15:06, Florian Pritz bluew...@server-speed.net wrote:
On 25.10.2010 12:35, Christopher Brannon wrote:
I've been polling https://archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics
regularly for several weeks,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon 25 Oct 2010 19:46 +0200, Xyne wrote:
Not all users submit stats so unless Arch installs spyware on
everyone's system or pools download stats from the mirrors, those
states are not sufficient to motivate
Hello TUs
With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we
have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User!
Lukas please follow the steps described in the Trusted User Guidelines
for new members.
On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Hi!
My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany,
studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance
web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ.
I've been using GNU/Linux for about three years
On Sun 10 Oct 2010 21:27 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
My name is Lukas Fleischer, I'm a 20-year-old student from Germany,
studying Computer Science at the University of Stuttgart, freelance
web-developper, IT consultant and hobbyist DJ.
As I read about Loui looking for help with the AUR
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
