Hi
On 2/3/14, 9:29 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
My name is Anatol
Dave Reisner wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
I do not mind to change it to the longer version $srcdir/foo if this
is a recommended way to do, but first I want to know why it is recommended.
Although it's not strictly recommended (we lack of official
recommendation?), this way works in all cases. I have to
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 at 00:12:49, Xyne wrote:
Dave Reisner wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Technically, that is correct. However, I am sure there are many other
TUs volunteering to be the sponsor after having read the application and
the discussion (me, for example). So I don't think it is a problem. If
it makes feel anyone better, please run
sed 's/David
On 05/02/2014 00:34, Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Technically, that is correct. However, I am sure there are many other
TUs volunteering to be the sponsor after having read the application and
the discussion (me, for example). So I don't think it is a problem. If
it makes feel anyone
Hi
On 2/4/14, 5:27 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 05/02/2014 00:34, Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Technically, that is correct. However, I am sure there are many other
TUs volunteering to be the sponsor after having read the application and
the discussion (me, for example). So I
Hi
On 2/4/14, 5:27 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On 05/02/2014 00:34, Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Technically, that is correct. However, I am sure there are many other
TUs volunteering to be the sponsor after having read the application and
the discussion (me, for example). So I
On 5 February 2014 12:57, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
I still need to understand why Arch community is split into two groups
'developers' and 'trusted users'. They seems have similar
responsibilities: maintaining packages and developing Arch toolset.
For historical reasons:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
My name is Anatol Pomozov, I grew up in Belarus but live in USA now. I
am an open-source enthusiast who uses Linux since about 2005. I've
been using several
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
- add android-sdk-* packages. Current AUR packages download binaries
and install binaries to /opt/bin. The binaries are 32-bit. Instead we
should build SDK from sources and provide proper 64/32-bit binaries.
This
On 03.02.2014 20:29, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
- add android-sdk-* packages. Current AUR packages download binaries
and install binaries to /opt/bin. The binaries are 32-bit. Instead we
should build SDK from sources and
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
My name is Dave and I approve this message.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
At my day job I work on Linux kernel development/support at a large
server farm. My daily activity includes a lot of debugging,
performance profiling, code archaeology both for linux kernel and
in-house userspace code. Some of my
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Daniel Micay wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:26:22AM -0800, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
My name is Dave and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I would like to apply for a Arch Trusted User position. It is
sponsored by my co-worker and bright engineer David Reisner.
My name is Anatol
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 00:32:08, Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
package
On 2014-01-24 19:53 +0100
carstene1ns wrote:
*snip*
several good points
*snip*
Becoming a TU is not like joining Cosa Nostra... it's not always for life. Some
TUs inevitably find that real-life obligations eliminate the free time they
once had to maintain packages and so the quality drops. We
I think it is a wrong assumption to say that having bad packages at time
of application as no different that having those as an established user.
Amount of attention spent to such stuff inevitably goes down as amount of
load increases (and it stops being interesting/satisfying) so if there are
On 01-22 21:59, Xyne wrote:
[...]
There are some nice PKGBUILDs there but so far the majority of what I
have seen has been of poor quality. Most of us (the TUs) probably have at
least
one or two sub-standard PKGBUILDs lying around waiting to get flagged and
updated, but overall there should
Am 22.01.2014 23:56, schrieb Balló György:
[...]
2014/1/22 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
I don't want to discourage you from further contribution but I do not think
that you are ready to be a TU. You should take some time to address the
issues
raised in this thread and then spend at least a few
On 25 January 2014 02:53, carstene1ns a...@carsten-teibes.de wrote:
closing words:
I know this reads in parts like a rant, but it is just to show you that
also current TUs are not better in some aspects.
Again it is not meant to blame speps (but seriously, just orphan some
packages! :P) or
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
From: a...@carsten-teibes.de
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer
Am 22.01.2014 23:56, schrieb Balló György:
[...]
2014/1/22 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca
On 2014-01-21 02:31 -0600
Doug Newgard wrote:
Most of the packages get better over time and in my case, it's not
possible to have 140 packages in perfect state at once. So I can perfectly
update or fix 4 packages/day (sometimes more if I automatically scan for new
releases
with pkgcheck
2014/1/22 Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
On 2014-01-21 02:31 -0600
Doug Newgard wrote:
Most of the packages get better over time and in my case, it's not
possible to have 140 packages in perfect state at once. So I can perfectly
update or fix 4 packages/day (sometimes more if I automatically scan
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:38:25 +
From: o...@project-insanity.org
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer
On 01-20 17:55, Doug Newgard wrote
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 00:32:08, Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
package
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 at 09:31:41, Doug Newgard wrote:
[...]
Ok, so let's look at just that one.
I must admit that I only had a look at very few packages before agreeing
to the sponsorship. However I did advice Jonas to have a look at his
packages and update the one's that are flagged
Hi,
On Monday 20 January 2014 23:32:08 Jonas Heinrich wrote:
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka CryptoCrack),
since my passion and work for ArchLinux continues since half a decade
and I really would like to get more involved into development and
package maintaining.
My name is Jonas (my public key [1]), I'm 23
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:32:08 +
From: o...@project-insanity.org
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] TU application, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like to apply as TU, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer (aka
On 01-20 17:55, Doug Newgard wrote:
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 23:32:08 +
From: o...@project-insanity.org
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] TU application, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer
Hi ArchLinux community,
I like
Welcome, congrats, merry Christmas and a happy New Year. :)
- Alexander / xyproto
Thanks for your contributions to Arch Linux and best of luck to you!
--
Sincerely,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
On 23/12/2013 22:41, Martin Wimpress wrote:
Hi,
That's great news :-)
I've got a lot on until December 29th but after that I will be able to
complete the initial TU tasks.
Looking forward to working with you all soon.
Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote is over and
On Monday, December 23, 2013 21:41:59 Martin Wimpress wrote:
Hi,
That's great news :-)
I've got a lot on until December 29th but after that I will be able to
complete the initial TU tasks.
Looking forward to working with you all soon.
Welcome and Merry Christmas :)
Regards,
Felix Yan
The vote is over and the results are:
Yes: 26
No: 2
Abstain: 1
This means that Martin is now a TU!
Martin, welcome to the team, and happy holidays! :)
--
György Balló
Trusted User
Hi,
That's great news :-)
I've got a lot on until December 29th but after that I will be able to complete
the initial TU tasks.
Looking forward to working with you all soon.
Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
The vote is over and the results are:
Yes: 26
No: 2
Abstain: 1
This means
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Martin Wimpress
martin+a...@flexion.orgwrote:
Hi,
That's great news :-)
I've got a lot on until December 29th but after that I will be able to
complete the initial TU tasks.
Looking forward to working with you all soon.
Balló György ballog...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 09:21:58AM +1300, Jonathan Conder wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been pretty busy lately and haven't been able to find the time to fix
bugs and keep my packages up-to-date. Lately I haven't actually been using
any of the packages I maintain, so I think the time has come to
On 12/21/2013 01:12 PM, Balló György wrote:
Sad news. You did a great job on maintaining PackageKit's alpm backend
in the recent years. Thanks for your work, and good luck!
If nobody step up porting the alpm backend to PackageKit version 0.8
(huge work!), I'll drop the following packages from
On 12/22/2013 03:15 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:12:10PM +0100, Balló György wrote:
Sad news. You did a great job on maintaining PackageKit's alpm backend
in the recent years. Thanks for your work, and good luck!
If nobody step up porting the alpm backend to PackageKit
2013/12/23 Dustin Falgout dus...@falgout.us:
On 12/22/2013 03:15 PM, Ike Devolder wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 08:12:10PM +0100, Balló György wrote:
Sad news. You did a great job on maintaining PackageKit's alpm backend
in the recent years. Thanks for your work, and good luck!
If nobody
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 05:32:19PM -0600, Dustin Falgout wrote:
On 12/21/2013 01:12 PM, Balló György wrote:
Sad news. You did a great job on maintaining PackageKit's alpm backend
in the recent years. Thanks for your work, and good luck!
If nobody step up porting the alpm backend to
Sad news. You did a great job on maintaining PackageKit's alpm backend
in the recent years. Thanks for your work, and good luck!
If nobody step up porting the alpm backend to PackageKit version 0.8
(huge work!), I'll drop the following packages from the [community]
repository in the next days:
-
Hi everyone,
I've been pretty busy lately and haven't been able to find the time to fix
bugs and keep my packages up-to-date. Lately I haven't actually been using
any of the packages I maintain, so I think the time has come to pass them
on to someone with the time and motivation to maintain them.
Thanks for all you did and all the best for whatever you do now.
PS: I've created a ticket for key revocation and disabled the ssh account.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2013/12/15 Martin Wimpress martin+a...@flexion.org:
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 02:16 +0100, Balló György wrote:
I'm confirming my sponsorship. I think that the MATE desktop environment
will be a great addition for Arch Linux, and Martin will be a great
addition for the team. :)
A
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 02:16 +0100, Balló György wrote:
I'm confirming my sponsorship. I think that the MATE desktop environment
will be a great addition for Arch Linux, and Martin will be a great
addition for the team. :)
A discussion period of 5 days has been started now.
I've
Hi,
Every package I maintain has been updated today taking into to account
the feedback that has been provided in this discussion and the feedback
Balló has sent to me directly.
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 23:18 +, Martin Wimpress wrote:
Your PKGBUILDs look good overall but I noticed two
Hi Martin,
Thanks for applying! I think it's positive that you've got some
experience under your belt. The randomly chosen AUR packages you
maintain that I inspected looks well crafted, sound and healthy to me.
Just from quickly browsing the Arch Installer on github, it looks
promising too.
I
Hi,
I am fond of all the `git` commands mentioned in my blog about migrating
Bazaar to Git.
* http://flexion.org/posts/2012-10-migrating-bzr-to-git.html
If I had to pick an absolute favourite `git` command then `git commit`
but `git stash` is pretty handy.
--
Regards, Martin.
On Tue,
git commit sounds like a fine choice of to me. :)
But what's with the top posting? Is it a statement, or due to the
choice of email client? I know some mobile email clients makes it hard
not to top post.
In any case, I think you have a fine application and wish you the best
of luck in the rest
On 2013-12-10 18:27 +
Martin Wimpress wrote:
a great application
Regards, Martin.
Hi,
That is a very nice application. It leaves no doubt concerning your skill and
dedication (assuming that it's all true... Balló left carrying rubber gloves,
so I expect that he was thorough in vetting
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 23:10 +0100, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
git commit sounds like a fine choice of to me. :)
But what's with the top posting? Is it a statement, or due to the
choice of email client? I know some mobile email clients makes it hard
not to top post.
Not a statement. It
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 22:14 +, Xyne wrote:
That is a very nice application. It leaves no doubt concerning your skill and
dedication (assuming that it's all true... Balló left carrying rubber gloves,
so I expect that he was thorough in vetting you). Having someone from upstream
2013. 12. 10, kedd keltezéssel 18.27-kor Martin Wimpress ezt írta:
Hi,
I'd like to submit my application to become a Trusted User. I've been
sponsored by Balló György (aka City-busz). You can find my public key
here:
*
The proposed changes have been accepted. Final tally:
yes: 27
no: 0
abstain: 4
On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5
days,
+a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days.
Use the same formulation as the Removal of a TU section:
Following the motion, standard voting procedure commences
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:07:47PM +, Xyne wrote:
On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5
days,
+a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days.
Use the same formulation as the Removal of a TU
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:45:50PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:07:47PM +, Xyne wrote:
On 2013-08-20 18:14 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+SVP is commenced at the time of the motion, with a discussion period of 5
days,
+a quorum of 75%, and a voting
Ok, sending this before the voting period for Xyne's proposal is over
since it is already clear that it will be accepted. More than 65% of all
TUs voted yes and there are zero no votes so far :)
The first patch is a follow-up to Xyne's proposal and is something he
simply forgot when writing the
* Mention the tu-bylaws.git repository.
* Mention Git-formatted patches and subject keywords.
* Promote `git send-email`.
* Add note on submitting several patches at once.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de
---
tu-bylaws.txt | 23 +++
1 file changed, 19
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:15:27PM +, Xyne wrote:
Hi,
The discussion period has ended. Please cast your votes:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=70
I know that it is a bit late for comments on the proposal but I just
noticed that your patch doesn't seem to change the sentence mentioning
On 16.08.2013 11:00, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Also, I just wondered whether it is okay to accept a proposal before the
voting period ends? Currently, there are 19 yes votes, 37 TUs and there
is no way the number of TUs can increase until the end of the proposal.
No, people should be allowed to
On 2013-08-16 11:00 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:15:27PM +, Xyne wrote:
Hi,
The discussion period has ended. Please cast your votes:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=70
I know that it is a bit late for comments on the proposal but I just
noticed that your
Hi,
The discussion period has ended. Please cast your votes:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=70
Regards,
Xyne
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:29:42AM +, Xyne wrote:
[...]
Patch follows:
I put that patch on a separate branch (proposal-70) in the official TU
bylaws repository [1], so that it is easier for people to extract the
actual commit and review the changes in the way they prefer.
I think it is a
Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
I can't obviously comment on grammar as I'm not a native speaker, so I
have just a single comment. I think it may be better to split this
into two commits, one containing the little changes like referring to
trusted users as TUs or explicitly mentioning the aur-general and
Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 9 August 2013 19:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
...
* remove distinction between active and inactive TUs
So now what happens when so-called active or inactive TUs do not vote
and prevent quorum from being established? No action is taken? I see
these changes cover
On 11 August 2013 18:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
The current by-laws try to automate a process that requires human discretion.
This version retains automation for extreme cases and relies on human
discretion for the rest.
Alright, this justifies those changes. Good to go on the rest,
On 9 August 2013 13:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Hi,
Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous
thread:
I can't obviously comment on grammar as I'm not a native speaker, so I
have just a single comment. I think it may be better to split this
into two
Xyne wrote:
done
In case anyone is wondering, the message seems to still be awaiting moderation.
I had attached the resulting docs for those who like to read plaintext. My
system reported them as under 40k so I thought it would go through, but the
encoding bumped it up to 42k. Sorry for the
Hi,
Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous
thread:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html
I hope this is in the correct format. I haven't used git send-email because I
still haven't configured it and didn't want to
On 08/10/2013 09:15 AM, Xyne wrote:
In case anyone is wondering, the message seems to still be awaiting
moderation.
This list is not activly moderated afaik. I'm just letting through your
messages whenever you post about them so this discussion can go on. I'm
not going to do any more
On 9 August 2013 19:29, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca wrote:
...
* remove distinction between active and inactive TUs
So now what happens when so-called active or inactive TUs do not vote
and prevent quorum from being established? No action is taken? I see
these changes cover disappearing TUs, but not
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 02:16:56PM +, Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
Ok. The first idea is simple to implement: When a new proposal (the
proposal type doesn't really matter) is created, generate a list of
current TUs and save it. If an applicant/TU is added to the proposal,
this user
On 2013-08-09 10:26 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+1 from me. I think you should start a new proposal. Please send this as
an inline patch, adding [tu-bylaws] to the subject line -- like I did.
People usually do not want to re-read the whole bylaws and exporting the
attached file just to create a
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 06:50:36PM +, Xyne wrote:
[...]
The distinction between active and inactive TUs is meaningless and should
be removed from the bylaws, including the definition of quorum. Quorum will
therefore be some fixed percent of all TUs. As stated in this thread, up to 1
in 3
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[...]
It's a German idiom. http://www.dict.cc/?s=nicht+so+hei%C3%9F+gegessen
A recent research I made on this topic made it pretty clear to me that the
German idiom is a well-integrated Hungarian import.
cheers!
mar77i
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
+1. However, I would like to retain the repeated quorum offense
condition. If there are a couple of TUs that work on the AUR (as in
uploading, updating and deleting packages) and do not participate in
SVPs, they might block decisions. I think that it is important to make
Xyne wrote:
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
The clause should probably also specify that removal votes take precedence
over
any other pending votes except removal votes.
What does this mean in practice? :)
Let's say that the discussion period for a TU application begins and the vote
is scheduled to
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:54:41AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 6 August 2013 20:19, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:12:32PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On
Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
The question we have to answer is : How many TU are necessary to have
a motion pass.
Set the quorum to this value and _stop_ cheating by :
- creating more valid voters than others (the active)
- find ways to ignore the quorum is not reach (so the vote has no meaning)
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:20AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 6 August 2013 05:53, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Instead of counting the number of active TUs when a vote begins, update
the number whenever a TU becomes active/inactive during a voting period.
What
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:20AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 6 August 2013 05:53, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Any other opinions?
Yes, we should drop completely the active statement.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:12:32PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:20AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 6 August 2013 05:53, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On 6 August 2013 20:19, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:12:32PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 08:24:20AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 7 August 2013 04:54, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
I think we need more opinions. Xyne? Anyway, if anyone's looking for
some bylaw amendment history:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2007-December/000127.html
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 04:54:41AM +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 6 August 2013 20:19, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:12:32PM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Instead of counting the number of active TUs when a vote begins, update
the number whenever a TU becomes active/inactive during a voting period.
This is a more accurate measure since everyone who is active at some
point in time during the voting period is (technically) able to vote.
On 6 August 2013 05:53, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Instead of counting the number of active TUs when a vote begins, update
the number whenever a TU becomes active/inactive during a voting period.
What happens when a TU becomes inactive after casting a vote? Would
her vote
Hi,
I sneak-voted with a mobile phone while temporarily inactive and on vacation.
- Alexander / xyproto
Martti Kühne wrote:
things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
you're from?
Regards,
Xyne
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 07:04 +, Xyne wrote:
Martti Kühne wrote:
things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
you're from?
It's a German idiom. http://www.dict.cc/?s=nicht+so+hei%C3%9F+gegessen
On 2013-07-27 09:33 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 07:04 +, Xyne wrote:
Martti Kühne wrote:
things won't be eaten as hot as they were cooked here.
Off-topic: I thought that was a really nice expression. Is it idiomatic where
you're from?
It's a German idiom.
On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
[IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
Hello,
Long story short - I am insterested in becoming a Trusted User
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 18:31:23 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account : https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dicebot]
[IRC : Dicebot @ irc.freenode.net]
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 18:31:23 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 20.07.2013 15:48, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 15.07.2013 22:31, Dicebot wrote:
[sponsor : Sven-Hendrik Haase]
[AUR account :
801 - 900 of 2288 matches
Mail list logo
