RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-13 Thread Kittel, Stephen W \(ETSA\)
  Regards SWK   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff KiddSent: Tuesday, 13 December 2005 5:01 PMTo: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2 Early December Mark Newton wrote:

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-12 Thread Geoff Kidd
: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2 mark king wrote:> One recent article in the magazine asks the question re is there a large > pool of pilots out there current and possible who want to fly for > recreational purpo

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-09 Thread Penedo
On 12/8/05, Scott Penrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One product already exists. No good for Australia because it uses GSM > - and it needs to use CDMA (probably) and SMS, rather than constant > GPRS over GSM. > We do have a problem in Australia though - GSM is not spread out > enough and will ne

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread RF Developments Pty Ltd
notify the sender immediately and delete it from your computer system network. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:34 AM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring inAustralia. Subject: Re: [Aus-so

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
No and No - but he has had two hip replacements -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Ruddock Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2005 12:44 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Derek Ruddock
I bet he's fat & bald... Cheers Derek T: +61 2 9342 8241 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete > Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2005 11:09 AM > To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > Sub

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Pete
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:45:50 +1100 "Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I chap I work with who is 50+ has an $80k + Monaro and a $30k + Harley > Davidson (according to him) and thinks Gliding is for tossers. Thank you. You've skewered him beautifully. That made my morning :)

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Newton
Mark Newton wrote: So they're not exactly equivalent, but they're close enough for the points I was trying to get across in my email message. The difference between the cost of a glider and the cost of a house is a multiplication factor less than 2 (and quite close to 1). The difference betwee

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Scott Penrose
On 08/12/2005, at 9:43, Robert Hart wrote: Ken Dawber wrote: I'm sure that changing gliding competitions towards or creating technology towards making gliding competitions more of a spectator spectacle would be a great help to the sport. Since the new FLARM units are consistently output

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Stuart & Kerri FERGUSON
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Newton Sent: Thursday, 8 December 2005 9:41 AM To: Derek Ruddock Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2 Derek Ruddock wrote: > All very pertinent observations Mark, bu

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread John Wharington
I have sucessfully tested in XCSoar, driving a mobile phone via bluetooth to send and receive SMS messages. This works fine. The catch: CDMA, which is really most useful for longer distance glider flights, is being phased out by Telstra and the 3G technology is NOT nearly as good in remote area

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 08:43 AM 8/12/05 +1000, you wrote: >However, something like FLARM could be created (Nigel suggested maybe >using CDMA phones as the comms mechanism - although the in glider unit >only needs to Tx and not Rx) to do just what you suggest. I wouldn't get too excited about CDMA pjones. Solstra is

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Robert Hart
Ken Dawber wrote: I'm sure that changing gliding competitions towards or creating technology towards making gliding competitions more of a spectator spectacle would be a great help to the sport. Since the new FLARM units are consistently outputting each FLARM equipped gliders height, positi

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Newton
Derek Ruddock wrote: All very pertinent observations Mark, but I couldn't let this one go :) Although gliders are expensive, the recent climb of the Australian Peso vs the Euro have made gliders affordable again: We have bought 2 gliders recently, and neither was within cooee of the price of a h

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Mark Fisher
$80K for a holden ?...you can buy a brandnew V8 SS commodore for $40K at the moment..ask you local dealer!! Mark Fisher Sports Technologist School of Exercise Science Southern Cross University www.scu.edu.au Ph: +61 2 66203655 Fax +61 2 66203880 ___

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Derek Ruddock
en or Ford, gliders seem cheap -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Newton Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:23 AM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2 Big

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-07 Thread Kittel, Stephen W \(ETSA\)
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of David Conway Snipped a lot of other stuff... >The 1974 World Comps at Waikerie created huge interest in >gliding in Australia at the time, the peak of the GFA >membership and clubs, large numbers

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-06 Thread Ken Dawber
rs. Cheers David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Newton Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 10:48 PM To: Robert Hart Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-06 Thread David Conway
y, 6 December 2005 10:48 PM To: Robert Hart Cc: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2 Robert Hart wrote: >> I think the population of people like that is understated. Terry >> Cubley is promoting the sports side of

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-06 Thread Mark Newton
David Boulter wrote: Being a person who has lived quite a long time in USA, Americans do not value training that they dont pay for, they believe it is lesser quality. That is why most of their training operations are professional. Another point about gliding in the US: Almost nobody learns t

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-06 Thread Mark Newton
Robert Hart wrote: I think the population of people like that is understated. Terry Cubley is promoting the sports side of gliding quite a bit, but only about 2% of GFA members seem to front-up to competitions, so I reckon his priorities are a tad misguided there. I think the other 98% of GFA

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-06 Thread David Boulter
Being a person who has lived quite a long time in USA, Americans do not value training that they dont pay for, they believe it is lesser quality. That is why most of their training operations are professional. /daveb > I'm not interested in hearing about how it works in the US, for two > reason

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-05 Thread Robert Hart
Mark Newton wrote: I think the population of people like that is understated. Terry Cubley is promoting the sports side of gliding quite a bit, but only about 2% of GFA members seem to front-up to competitions, so I reckon his priorities are a tad misguided there. I think the other 98% of GFA

RE: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-05 Thread Kittel, Stephen W \(ETSA\)
>-Original Message- >From: mark king (I started writing this last night but then Saw Mark Ns reply this morning, so it is a bit of a hodge podge, sorry) Mark (King) has made some interesting and far ranging points on gliding and its future. I am only going to dip into a few of them (cos

Re: [Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-05 Thread Mark Newton
mark king wrote: One recent article in the magazine asks the question re is there a large pool of pilots out there current and possible who want to fly for recreational purposes as distinct from competition or long distance flights? I think the population of people like that is understated.

[Aus-soaring] The Future of Gliding Part 2

2005-12-05 Thread mark king
I posted some thoughts on the future of gliding a week or so ago and have been a little surprised at the low number of responses, Two were quite hostile, another one came today quoting a favourable USA experience with a commercial operation and its convenience and cost versus a club operation

RE: [Aus-soaring] the future of gliding

2005-11-27 Thread Derek Ruddock
DG303)   Derek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mark king Sent: Sunday, 27 November 2005 9:14 PM To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net Subject: [Aus-soaring] the future of gliding   The future of gliding   On this forum someone recently

Re: [Aus-soaring] the future of gliding

2005-11-27 Thread Mark Newton
mark king wrote: What I am suggesting is that the GFA consider investigating the feasibility of establishing a “Sports Aviation Centre” near a capital city like Sydney. This centre could be multi use eg ultralights and gliders/self launchers. Funded and owned by private investors and perhaps par

[Aus-soaring] the future of gliding

2005-11-27 Thread mark king
The future of gliding   On this forum someone recently lamented there were no controversial posts. Perhaps I can help here.   I learnt to fly gliders many years ago through the club system and at the same time obtained a PPL, flew tugs and generally enjoyed both types of flying for a number of ye

[aus-soaring] The future of gliding [was Rec License]

2002-06-30 Thread Peter Rundle
> > >I strongly disagree that the GFA is anything to do with pilots leaving >gliding > Then you need to get out more. Met yet another two ex-glider pilots on the weekend, same old story... >I would doubt more than 10% left to take up another form of aviation. > No a whole bunch more of them have