On 15/10/2019 5:09 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Well that is interesting Narelle, however, if it's anticompetitive to
> discriminately
> treat packet based VOIP traffic, then it is likewise anticompetetive to cross
> subsidise your circuit based business by shunting traffic over a competitors'
>
On 15/10/2019 2:33 pm, Mark Smith wrote:
> I recently bought an IPv6 enabled Wifi printer. As it is attached to
> my single Wifi SSID it is configuring itself with IPv6 global
> addresses, even though I don't need it to be reachable from the
> Internet or able to reach the Internet. (It would be
On 14/05/2019 2:42 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> No experience, but this doesn't sound right. The building manager's view and
> body
> corporate, presumably, is that the MDF is private property on private
> property. I
> think this is wrong headed. The function of the MDF is to provide a utility,
>
And now for some new ammunition for the PJCIS - they've just opened the review
of the
Data Retention program.
Submissions are due 1st July so we can put in a thoughtful submissions - note
this
will probably survive the election period and continue on the other side, so
worth
considering
On 28/03/2019 5:29 pm, Peter Fern wrote:
> On 28/3/19 12:33 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>> The silence on the Assistance and Access Act since it passed in December has
>> been
>> deafening. It was firmly understood, on representations by the Liberal
>> Government,
>> that the bill passed was passed
On 26/02/2019 4:48 pm, Troy Kelly wrote:
> My understanding (which could well be misguided) was that not only would you
> have to move offshore - but you would also have to employ no Australian's at
> any point of your technical production line.
>
> The law an instruct any Australian national,
On 9/01/2019 11:18 am, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Obviously this has been in limbo over the Christmas break. There's 2 really
> important issues, on hold because of this.
>
> 1 - When or if the PJCIS will call for public comment on the Act as passed.
PJCIS called for further comments on the Act as
Consider that all Perth-Singapore cables pass within 10 - 30 km of the currently
erupting Anak Krakatau volcano, and through the Sunda strait where the undersea
landslides caused by said volcano's eruption last month caused a tsunami and
significant destruction.
If only one of the three cables is
, Paul Wilkins <mailto:paulwilkins...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r6195_amend_96ffec08-558c-4ff9-9448-0a18c21cf1c7/upload_pdf/8627%20CW%20Telecommunications%20and%20Other%20Legislation%20Amendment%20(Assistance%20and%20
133 299 m...@spectrum.com.au
> <mailto:m...@spectrum.com.au>
> Fax 1300 133 255 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
> SIP 1300137...@sip.spectrum.com.au
> <mailto:1300137...@sip.spectrum.com.au>
> Google Talk mattaperk...@gm
On 12/12/2018 3:54 am, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> -
> The Bill was passed on Thursday
> -
>
>
> Damn, I'm gonna need a bigger bag of popcorn!
> Wy bigger. I can't wait to see how this
> plays out.
We'll probably never know how this plays out, unless one of the
While everyone is thinking of taking a break from the decryption bill, there
are two
other reviews under way, each on largely similar topics, namely wholesale
performance
standards of NBN and other wholesale network providers, and retail rebates to
customers.
These may have a more immediate
This.
The Bill was passed on Thursday, with the coalition's 173-odd amendments
created as a
result of the PJCIS report agreed to.
It achieved Royal Assent on 8th Dec (Saturday!), and is now law, and the
agencies can
be commencing issuing TARs, TANs and TCNs to us all his week.
This is
On 28/11/2018 3:42 pm, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> I'm less concerned that the State may ask a judge for a computer warrant,
> than I am
> the Attorney General issuing TCNs to access carrier metadata datastreams and
> using
> that for mass surveillance, or law enforcement then forcing patches on
On 23/11/2018 11:37 AM, Alex Samad wrote:
> Wondering what the implications of this bill and the recent China was
> stealing our
> traffic
>
> So in theory could china steal / sniff our traffic and because of these
> weakening of
> encryption allow china to snope on our stuff
>
> A
In
as
'if thats what you're trying to achieve, doing like that won't work or is very
risky
because...'
Paul.
>
> If anyone wants a scanned copy (could be useful for determining a point of
> weakness
> in the argument he and DOHA are pushing, I'm happy to share.
>
> On Wed, 21 No
On 21/11/2018 5:42 PM, Grahame Lynch wrote:
> How much of this is "hijacking" and how much is just "least cost routing"? It
> is
> really hard to tell.
Its not 'least cost routing', BGP doesn't work like that, unless the target
networks
really were customers of China Telecom, or
sition. Macquarie Radio news at 8am ran a story on it this morning, and it
> was all
> about Dutton saying he wants the legislation passed quickly so they can catch
> more
> terrorists.
>
> Other than the point well made by Paul Brooks that the only criminals who
> will
I had a fairly long session in front of the PJCIS hearing on Friday afternoon.
The
audio stream isn't up on APH yet, but theres been a few articles in the IT
media.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/no-need-to-keep-encryption-busting-capabilities-secret-internet-australia/
The meetings (now 4 in total) have been listed on the Committee website for
several weeks.
We (IA) were notified of our invitation to appear and speak two weeks ago while
they
were putting together the detailed runsheet.
FWIW tomorrow I'll be appearing for Internet Australia at 2:30pm, and
Chris - the White Pages directory is built out of the IPND
(https://www.acma.gov.au/Industry/Telco/Numbering/IPND/integrated-public-number-database-numbering-i-acma)
The update needs to be made by the end customer through their telephony service
provider, who should have systems-access to update
PJCIS has confirmed extra public consultation days have been scheduled -
webpage now
says " An initial Public Hearing is expected to be held on Friday, 19 October
2018.
Further Public Hearings will be scheduled for late October or early November
2018."
Contact suggests at least one extra,
I've heard the PJCIS process will also be rushed. Calls for 'intentions to
submit/reqests to appear' are open now for a few weeks only.
*They are planning precisely 1 single day for public hearings. No more.*
There are three sitting weeks left in the year. There is an election to be
called next
On 12/09/2018 11:43 AM, Robert Hudson wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Happy to have you link to our submission. I've thrown it up as an item on
> our website:
>
> https://www.itpa.org.au/news/itpa-submission-assistance-and-access-bill-2018-australian-government-department-home-affairs/
>
> Regards,
>
>
nfeasible. ITPA
> would be more than willing to be part of a consultation process to resolve
> issues
> with the currently proposed legislation, or for any other legislation which
> requires
> technical expertise to achieve success."
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 13:48, Robert
On 4/09/2018 6:17 PM, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> I'd encourage others making submissions to raise the same point. Government
> has
> clearly not considered this dimension, otherwise the first cab off the rank
> in the
> bill's phrasing would be to create a new agency, or identifying a single
>
I'll support this - join a group that can represent your interests in a combined
submissions that carries weight from the number of people/organisations/members
behind
it. It can be the ITPA, or Internet Australia (we have a dedicated ISP SIG for
industry things, which did make an effective
On 15/08/2018 2:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> We really should encourage more use of DNSSEC and TLSA records which are
> designed to all MITM attacks like this to be detected. Australia has
> abysmally small DNSSEC take up.
AusNOG lightning talk, right there.
Thanks Aftab for the plug - this is something that IA has been tracking and
meeting in
Canberra with various Minister-types down over the past 6-9 months, trying to
determine what they were looking to do, and educate them on the concerns.
This is data retention all over again. On one hand, as an
They don't need a root certificate - the Bill gives them rights to 'request
assistance' from any device manufacturer or part supplier to backdoor the whole
phone
OS, or your VDSL modem, or your Amazon Alexa/Google Home, or the Snapchat app
itself.
Or the embedded OS in your harddrives.
On
TC2 and TC1 can be very sensitive to arguably overzealous policing, requiring
tight
shaping at the NNI (POI) and attention to Ethernet buffering, burst limits and
inter-packet gaps or packets will be dropped.
Usually voice traffic on TC1 doesn't tickle the policing though as the VoIP
CODEC
Gavin - would be illuminating if you could repeat this against the IPv6
addresses
instead of the IPv4 addresses of each of these resolver services.
Sure, many of the probes won't have IPv6 connectivity and won't get through at
all
(shame, Australian ISPs, shame!). But of those that do get
Ken - for a single house on a single block of land, she'll probably get
whichever
technology the neighbours are allocated, which you can find out from the NBN
website
lookup tool by moving the red pin around. If the block is in a FTTN area, then
there's
likely to already be a copper trunk cable
On 22/03/2018 1:02 PM, Chad Kelly wrote:
> On 3/22/2018 12:00 PM, ausnog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net wrote:
>
>> ??
>> My daughter is looking to buy a vacant block
>> of land in Foster Victoria and build a house on it. Foster is pretty
>> strange in that large parts of the town seem to be on NBN
On 20/03/2018 6:41 AM, Mark Delany wrote:
>> The whole NBN debate has always confused me. Without offsetting the cost
>> how would either Government have afforded the NBN? The bill shock from $300
>> NDF is annoying to say the least but I've spent >$300 on some pretty stupid
>> things in my life
On 19/03/2018 9:59 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
> On 19Mar18, George Fong allegedly wrote:
>> So embarrassment. I should have known about this. Thanks for the responses
>> ppl.
> A point that may not be obvious is that this newish fee is part of the
> policy change that came with Turnbull's MTM. The
Adding to the earlier responses - yes, the cable generally has a copper tube as
a
power conductor, which also act as a little bit of protection for the fibres
which run
in the centre of the tube/cable.
Pump one shore-end to +3000 - 5000V, the other shore-end to -3000 - 5000V
(depends on
number
Back in the day*, one of the considerations in designing the NBN was avoiding
the
costs of putting in a mother-of-all traffic monitoring and measurement system
that
would retrieve and store usage data on all the 10+million endpoints. By keeping
the
product suite a set of one-time-charge and
38 matches
Mail list logo
