Added 2D
Victor
On 21.02.2014 16:00, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 21/02/2014 11:43, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
"Client code" is basically anything in 2D, AWT, i18n, beans, a11y,
ImageIO, Sound, or Swing. I.e., anything related to GUI/desktop.
In this particular case Omair is changing the S
On 21/02/2014 11:43, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Andrew,
"Client code" is basically anything in 2D, AWT, i18n, beans, a11y,
ImageIO, Sound, or Swing. I.e., anything related to GUI/desktop.
In this particular case Omair is changing the SplashScreen code which
belongs to AWT, hence the choice of
Hi Andrew,
"Client code" is basically anything in 2D, AWT, i18n, beans, a11y,
ImageIO, Sound, or Swing. I.e., anything related to GUI/desktop.
In this particular case Omair is changing the SplashScreen code which
belongs to AWT, hence the choice of the client repo for integration.
--
best r
* Magnus Ihse Bursie [2014-02-20 05:35]:
> From my point of view, you can go either way. The changes are mostly
> in the build code, except for an include statement. But if the AWT
> folks feel more confident that way, sure, you can go via client.
Pushed:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/re
- Original Message -
> Hi Omair,
>
> > Should I be pushing this to jdk9/dev ? (Or to jdk9/client?)
>
> If you change client code, then the fix should go to the client repo to
> avoid merge conflicts and allow for more manual testing prior to
> integrating the changes into the master repo.
On 2014-02-20 09:47, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Omair,
Should I be pushing this to jdk9/dev ? (Or to jdk9/client?)
If you change client code, then the fix should go to the client repo
to avoid merge conflicts and allow for more manual testing prior to
integrating the changes into the master r
Hi Omair,
Should I be pushing this to jdk9/dev ? (Or to jdk9/client?)
If you change client code, then the fix should go to the client repo to
avoid merge conflicts and allow for more manual testing prior to
integrating the changes into the master repo.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 2/19/201
ponsor/
See the last sentence of step 3 and all of step 4.
Thanks,
iris
-Original Message-
From: Omair Majid [mailto:oma...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:16 AM
To: Magnus Ihse Bursie
Cc: awt-dev; build-dev; Erik Joelsson
Subject: Re: RFR: Allow using a system installed
* Magnus Ihse Bursie [2014-02-19 06:59]:
> On 2014-02-17 10:16, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> >At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew
> >have their say too.
>
> Looks good to me!
Thanks for the reviews, everyone!
I have filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035341 t
On 2014-02-17 10:16, Erik Joelsson wrote:
At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew have
their say too.
Looks good to me!
/Magnus
- Original Message -
> * Erik Joelsson [2014-02-17 04:16]:
> > At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew
> > have their say too.
>
This looks fine.
> Feedback from an AWT expert would be appreciated too!
>
I'm not sure why this is needed, given it doesn't really
* Sergey Bylokhov [2014-02-18 12:35]:
> cc 2d alias also.
>
> The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options
> in README-builds.html?
One thing I have always loved about autotools is self documentation.
With this patch, for example, ./configure --help gives me the new option
cc 2d alias also.
The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options in
README-builds.html?
On 14.02.2014 21:27, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-13 23:59]:
As I said in the previous e-mail, the minimum I'd be happy with is if
the current patch was updated so sett
* Erik Joelsson [2014-02-17 04:16]:
> At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew
> have their say too.
Feedback from an AWT expert would be appreciated too!
Thanks,
Omair
--
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 664
At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew have
their say too.
/Erik
On 2014-02-14 18:27, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-13 23:59]:
As I said in the previous e-mail, the minimum I'd be happy with is if
the current patch was updated so settings weren't being
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-13 23:59]:
> As I said in the previous e-mail, the minimum I'd be happy with is if
> the current patch was updated so settings weren't being hardcoded into
> the makefiles. Passing them from configure would be sufficient for now,
> then it can be replaced by PKG_CONFIG.
H
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> * Magnus Ihse Bursie [2014-02-12 17:49]:
> >
> > On 2014-02-12 18:47, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > >>To be extremely clear: Andrew, do you object to bringing Omairs patch,
> > >>as it is, into OpenJDK?
> > >>
> > >Yes.
> >
> > Okay then.
> >
> > I'll put a
- Original Message -
>
> On 2014-02-12 18:47, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >> To be extremely clear: Andrew, do you object to bringing Omairs patch,
> >> as it is, into OpenJDK?
> >>
> > Yes.
>
> Okay then.
>
> I'll put a mental note to revisit libpng when cleaning up libraries.m4.
> Are we
Hi,
* Magnus Ihse Bursie [2014-02-12 17:49]:
>
> On 2014-02-12 18:47, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>To be extremely clear: Andrew, do you object to bringing Omairs patch,
> >>as it is, into OpenJDK?
> >>
> >Yes.
>
> Okay then.
>
> I'll put a mental note to revisit libpng when cleaning up
> librarie
On 2014-02-12 18:47, Andrew Hughes wrote:
To be extremely clear: Andrew, do you object to bringing Omairs patch,
as it is, into OpenJDK?
Yes.
Okay then.
I'll put a mental note to revisit libpng when cleaning up libraries.m4.
Are we in agreement that it should to the following:
--with-libp
- Original Message -
> On 2014-02-10 18:43, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > You're already using it:
> >
> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBFFI], [libffi])
> >
> > Why that's in LIB_SETUP_STATIC_LINK_LIBSTDCPP, I have no idea.
> Because libraries.m4 is in need of a long overdue cleanup. :-(
> >
> >> * Seco
On 2014-02-10 18:43, Andrew Hughes wrote:
You're already using it:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBFFI], [libffi])
Why that's in LIB_SETUP_STATIC_LINK_LIBSTDCPP, I have no idea.
Because libraries.m4 is in need of a long overdue cleanup. :-(
* Second, I believe the original intention was to allow for
- Original Message -
> On 2014-02-05 16:15, Omair Majid wrote:
> > * Andrew Hughes [2014-02-04 19:26]:
> >>> On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
> The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
> the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using
On 2014-02-05 16:15, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-04 19:26]:
On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
libpng
ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.j
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2014-02-04 19:26]:
> > > On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
> > > > The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
> > > > the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy
> > > > of
> > > > libpng
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-04 19:26]:
> > On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
> > > The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
> > > the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
> > > libpng
> > >
> > > ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~om
- Original Message -
>
> On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
> > the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
> > libpng
> >
> > ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omaji
On 4/02/2014 7:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2014-02-03 21:44, Omair Majid wrote:
Whoops. Updated webrevs:
root: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/02/
jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/02-jdk/
Due to this, I'd like to ask you to please
On 2014-02-03 21:44, Omair Majid wrote:
Whoops. Updated webrevs:
root: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/02/
jdk: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/02-jdk/
Due to this, I'd like to ask you to please double check that
--with-libpng=system | bundled
* Magnus Ihse Bursie [2014-02-03 14:42]:
>
> On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
> >the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
> >libpng
> >
> >ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
On 2014-02-03 18:43, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
libpng
ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/01/
JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Hi,
The following webrevs modify the build system to allow building against
the system-installed copy of libpng as well as using the bundled copy of
libpng
ROOT: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/01/
JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/system-libpng/01-jdk/
A n
32 matches
Mail list logo
