[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] AX2009 Purchase invoice matching

2009-04-09 Thread varsityblews
Hi there Our client only invoices on purchase orders what has been Received by selection the Quantity = Delivery note option when posting the invoice. This is the prevent them from invoicing stock that hasn't been received. On AX2009 when selecting Post quantity = Delivery note, there is an

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Lock item per bin location not per warehouse

2008-05-12 Thread varsityblews
Good day Does anyone know whether it is possible on standard AX to lock an item per bin location during counting instead of per warehouse? Reason being the client would like to perform cycle counts on certain aisles/bins and only want these locked during count, but the item in the rest of the

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Transfer order receiving location

2008-05-12 Thread varsityblews
. You will have to either use the default receipt and issue location of the Warehouse or customize the transfer order. Hopefully this gets rectified in the forthcoming service packs On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:57 PM, varsityblews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am processing a transfer order

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Transfer order receiving location

2008-04-08 Thread varsityblews
I am processing a transfer order in which I want to specify the receiving location of the receiving warehouse. I found that there is no place on the order to select the location of receiving the stock into. The only other place is a default receipt location setup on the warehouse, which I dont

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Location Wizard

2007-07-23 Thread varsityblews
Good morning Does anyone know why the location wizard can only create up to 5 bins? Is there a setting somewhere where I can increase the number of bins its automatically creates? My problem is that I have to create 20 bins per shelf on 10 aisles per warehouse, and since the bins can only go

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Reuse Pallet IDs

2007-07-16 Thread varsityblews
Good day all We are considering using Warehousing II for one of our clients. We need the functionality offered in Pallet transports, but have a finite number of pallets and would like to reuse them instead of creating a new palletid each time stock comes in. Is there some way of setting the

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Shared Tables in Virtual Company for new Company Account

2007-05-28 Thread varsityblews
Good day We have a client on V3 SP3 that has been live for the past couple of years, and would now like to go live with a new company account for a new Country. Between the company accounts they would like to have intercompany setup. The result of this requirement is that more tables will now

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Item master - measurement for height, width and depth

2007-03-14 Thread varsityblews
Hi Maverick These dimensions are those of the inventory unit and are transferred to the BOM lines when the item is used, and can be used to calculate consumption per unit based on the Formula selected in the BOM line. Hope this helps. Regards Pragashnee --- In

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Posting AP Invoices that have been Received only

2007-03-12 Thread varsityblews
Hi all Many of our clients have requested this but to date I havent seen standard Axapta do this. The client only wants to be allowed to invoice stock that has been packing slip updated (received). Currently they are making many errors where they are mistakely invoicing orders that have not

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Inventdim is not transferred during firming planned order?

2007-02-14 Thread varsityblews
Hi Hardi You have to activate coverage plan by dimension on the active line on your dimension setup for all the dimensions you wish to be planned for. In this case where the warehouse is ticked as active you must also tick coverage by dimension as well. If not you will get a blank warehouse

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Master Planning Requirement

2007-02-02 Thread varsityblews
Hi all One of our clients requires the following. For the first half of the month they want the master planning to plan a purchase order using the min/max levels ie. create a requirement for the maximum quantity if stock goes below minimum, which is fine. But what they also want is in the

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Master planning still shows a demand for item who's forecast was deleted

2007-01-29 Thread varsityblews
Hi Everytime you run the Master Plan it looks at the already existing forecast plan so even though you deleted your forecast, the plan is still there. You can either rerun the forecast plan before running the Master plan, or delete the forecast plan and then run the master plan. The demand

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Invent Trans splitting problem

2007-01-16 Thread varsityblews
Hi Vijay I'm not sure if you have invoiced the received quantity but what I have noticed is when physical update is done (packing slip quantity of 50) it creates one inventory transaction. Then when invoicing this quantity it splits the 50 according to quantities invoiced, so if partial

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Master Planning Query

2007-01-12 Thread varsityblews
Hi Anisha Yes Master Planning is date dependent. You have loaded a Sales order for 12/12/2006 which means you have to have the stock available for sale by that date. Your Purchase order however is for 20/02/2007 (after the sale) meaning you will still have to purchase stock for the original

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Physical On Hand Error

2006-01-17 Thread varsityblews
We have recently experienced a strange problem on on of our clients. In the Inventory Module, when doing a stock transfer via a Transfer Journal, within the same warehouse but from location A to location B, it gives an error saying 2 cannot be picked as only 2 is available in stock. It only

[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Intercompany Consistency Error

2005-05-12 Thread varsityblews
We currently have intercompany transactions activated. The problem is, when I run consistency checks, errors are displayed for each of the Purchase Order lines saying that the Lot ID 'number' does not exist. When going into this record the lot ID is a totally different number and the 'number'