Klaas writes:
> Here I am again with another tiny problem.
>
> Lately I changed a host its owner by altering the host file. What I
> noticed now is that, when I look at the host itself, it does not show
> the line
> "This PC is used by "
>
> Is there a way this can be explained? I'm using 3.
Hello!
I'm trying to gain a better understanding of the physics behind backups,
as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different transfer
methods, particularly to support large hosts (500GB of data, with
50-100GB of deltas every day), as well as remote hosts. To do this, I'm
going ove
Holger writes:
> 1.) Full backups go to more trouble to determine which files have changed and
> which haven't.
> tar/smb: all files are transfered, BackupPC checks (full) vs.
> only newer files (based on timestamp) transfered (incremental)
> rsync(d): block checksum com
Holger writes:
> I like the idea of taking *any* identical file from the pool as reference
> though. I don't know if it is possible (i.e. whether the remote rsync will
> transfer one checksum covering the whole file before the local part needs to
> commit to selecting one file), but it certainly w
Travis Fraser wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 13:09 -0700, Brien Dieterle wrote:
>
>> Most NFS servers are pitifully slow compared to a local filesystem,
>> particularly when dealing with many small files. It pains me to think
>> about how slow that might get-- is anyone else using a non-local
>
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 13:09 -0700, Brien Dieterle wrote:
> Most NFS servers are pitifully slow compared to a local filesystem,
> particularly when dealing with many small files. It pains me to think
> about how slow that might get-- is anyone else using a non-local
> filesystem?
I use a Linux-base
If I'm using BackupPC with a local directory the web interface is fast. But
shell commands on the NFS Share are also fast. Only when I use the web
interface with the NFS Share it is slow.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dan Pritts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Januar
I don't know if the backup server is configured with mod_perl. I installed
BackupPC with a package under Kubuntu. I think it won't be configured with
mod_perl then.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jason Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 21:05
An: Simon
Most NFS servers are pitifully slow compared to a local filesystem,
particularly when dealing with many small files. It pains me to think
about how slow that might get-- is anyone else using a non-local
filesystem?
brien
Simon Köstlin wrote:
I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:58:17PM +0100, Simon Köstlin wrote:
> I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that none rolls?
on local networks with little or no packet loss, UDP is a better choice
than TCP for NFS. TCP will probably actually slow NFS down a little.
If you have packet loss, i'd su
Simon Köstlin wrote:
> I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that none rolls?
> Also when I click on a PC in the web interface it takes around 20-30 seconds
> until the web page appears with the backups which were made. I thought that
> would be better with an other connection. But that time i
I think TCP is a safer connection or plays that none rolls?
Also when I click on a PC in the web interface it takes around 20-30 seconds
until the web page appears with the backups which were made. I thought that
would be better with an other connection. But that time is not dependent on
the size o
Rob Shepherd wrote:
> Hi BackupPC users,
>
> Just to bolster my understanding of BackupPC's behaviour
>
> How are incrementals performed when using rsync?
>
> Rsync has it's own method of transferring 'increments' back to the
> server. I assume these are exploited and not ignored by BackupPC.
Le Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:29:05 +0100,
Simon Köstlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to have the Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage (NAS)
> and not on the BackupPC Server. The NAS supports NFS, SMB, FTP, CIFS
> and SSH. I tried to mount an NFS Share on the NAS and tha
nilesh vaghela wrote:
> I need to set backup of My Document folder.
>
> It seems some time working and some times not.
>
> It is working fine for few pc and not working for few other pc.
>
> What could be check??
The first place to look is the log files. Go to the host's page and
look at the
LOG
Simon Köstlin wrote:
>
>
>
> I want to have the Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage (NAS)
> and not on the BackupPC Server. The NAS supports NFS, SMB, FTP, CIFS
> and SSH. I tried to mount an NFS Share on the NAS and that works well.
> So I can use the Data Directory in this Share. Bu
Hi,
I want to have the Data Directory on a Network Attached Storage (NAS) and
not on the BackupPC Server. The NAS supports NFS, SMB, FTP, CIFS and SSH. I
tried to mount an NFS Share on the NAS and that works well. So I can use the
Data Directory in this Share. But the NAS supports only a UDP co
Oh that's the stuff guys :D Was to busy looking for a way to pass it to the
command line, didn't cross my mind to change the command line!
Thanks for all the help.
Nick
On 1/25/07, Holger Parplies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Torsten Sadowski wrote on 25.01.2007 at 11:46:32 [Re: [BackupPC
I need to set backup of My Document folder.
It seems some time working and some times not.
It is working fine for few pc and not working for few other pc.
What could be check??
--
Nilesh Vaghela
ElectroMech
Redhat Channel Partner and Training Partner
74, Nalanda Complex, Satellite Rd, Ahmedaba
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:27:20AM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> This is strange. The code should send admin messages without
> caring about the value of $Conf{EMailNotifyMinDays}. You should
> get one every night if something needs attention. The cache of
> email sending times to users is only
Hi BackupPC users,
Just to bolster my understanding of BackupPC's behaviour
How are incrementals performed when using rsync?
Rsync has it's own method of transferring 'increments' back to the
server. I assume these are exploited and not ignored by BackupPC.
Could somebody explain to me ro
Hi,
Torsten Sadowski wrote on 25.01.2007 at 11:46:32 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Change
port for backup over SSH]:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 11:42 schrieb Nick:
> > I am backing up a large number of hosts using RSync over SSH. A number of
> > these hosts are running on non standard ssh ports.
>
Hello,
man ssh says:
[-p port] as an option.
Cheers, Torsten
Am Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2007 11:42 schrieb Nick:
> I am backing up a large number of hosts using RSync over SSH. A number of
> these hosts are running on non standard ssh ports.
>
> Is there a way I can specify the port to use for
I am backing up a large number of hosts using RSync over SSH. A number of
these hosts are running on non standard ssh ports.
Is there a way I can specify the port to use for each individual host? I
have played around with passing it via the via each machines config file,
but I'm not really having
Filipe wrote:
I am running 2.1.1 with no major problems with 12 hosts for about 6
months.
It is on a debian sarge system, what is the best procedure to
update to
last 2.1.3 version?
Did you install using apt or using the archive directly from the
BackupPC website? I you used apt (install
Hi
I am running 2.1.1 with no major problems with 12 hosts for about 6 months.
It is on a debian sarge system, what is the best procedure to update to
last 2.1.3 version?
Thanks
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Futur
Hi,
Here I am again with another tiny problem.
Lately I changed a host its owner by altering the host file. What I
noticed now is that, when I look at the host itself, it does not show
the line
"This PC is used by "
Is there a way this can be explained? I'm using 3.0.0beta3
Thanks again for
27 matches
Mail list logo
