On 3/29/07, Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didnt blame anybody, just said BackupPC is working slow and it was working
slow, very slow indeed. checksum-seeds option seems to be doing it's trick
though.
How long are full and incremental backups taking now?
I am thankful to people
Stupid of me, I had not define the d: drive in the rsync.conf file in the
computer to be backed-up, sorry for that!
Last log shows both c: and d: drive were properly backed-up yesterday,
although the exclude are still not considered.
I then need to fix how to exclude these directories. What could
Hi,
I'm using BackupPC 2.1.3 and am mostly very happy with it. But now I'm
running into the too many links problem with large subversion
directories. Please see
http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.backuppc.general/2005-03/msg00145.html
and related messages for background
David Rees wrote:
On 3/29/07, Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didnt blame anybody, just said BackupPC is working slow and it was working
slow, very slow indeed. checksum-seeds option seems to be doing it's trick
though.
How long are full and incremental backups taking now?
In
Thanx for your answer,
The windows pc the size of backup is not more than 200MB.
This observed in 20% to 25% pc only. Other pc are working on quite
acceptable speed.
Again I am taking backup with rsync method.
What should be check ??
On 3/28/07, Jason Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nilesh
Gregor Schmid wrote:
The solution of excluding .svn directories from backups, as
mentioned in the previous discussion, is not acceptable for me as SVN
working copies are among the most valuable stuff we're backing up...
If your work is committed (which is kind of the point of using svn...)
I'm wondering about this as well, as DLT-V4 only holds 160 gig of
backups.. when you're backing up full systems without the benefits of
hardlinks, that doesn't hold much.
I assume you're looking for something you can use as an emergency restore
in case the backuppc server dies or is otherwise
Gregor writes:
and related messages for background information. In his final mail on
that thread, Craig said
Upon further inspection, it turns out the rsync XferMethod
doesn't check the hardlink limit when it is linking to
an identical file. So there are two cases you have found
Dear all,
The real questions are at the bottom, the rest is just a nice intro
which introduces you to the nature of the questions.
Two days ago, we had a power outage in our department which caused a
rather brutal shutdown of the computers. All of the computers survived,
which is a good
It sounds very much like a hardware problem, perhaps slightly toasted
ide controllers? It sounds like a commodity box, can you move all the
disks to another machine and fire it up? Oh and go get a decent UPS! :-)
brien
Klaas Vantournhout wrote:
Dear all,
The real questions are at the
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Sylvain MAURIN wrote:
MaxLine III 300 (7200 rpm, ATA, 8 meg cache), ext3 w/noatime. I'd change
it to XFS, but backing up 1.7TB would take weeks/months because of the
hardlinks.
Hi,
I use your hardware clone except for HDs (which
are seagate 750GB) and maybe for
I have a machine in my office which has been backed up with BackupPC.
The owner of the machine has rebuilt it with the same name, but a
different os. I want to keep the old backups while still continuing to
make backups of the new machine.
Can I change the name of the old backup sets so that
On 3/30/07, Evren Yurtesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Rees wrote:
How long are full and incremental backups taking now?
In one machine it went down from 900 minutes to 175 minutes. I expect better
performance
when more memory is added (today or tomorrow they will add it) and I dont
To not answer your question; why don't you just let the new machine use
the existing configs, assuming you keep a few fulls you'll still have
access to the old files just the same. You could also archive it if you
really wanted to preserve it as-is. Basically, what I'm saying is OS
changes
Brien Dieterle wrote:
To try to answer it; yes I think you can add another host and just
rename the folder under pc to match the name, but I'm not positive
about that :-)
For the record I am positive out that. I've done exactly this and
it does work =)
- Chris
I want to keep the full backup records of the machine available via
BackupPC for longer than the backup schedule would allow. This is so
that I can recover files if they were lost in the rebuild process. I
have made a tar archive of the last backup, but it is much easier to
restore from BackupPC
Chris Ernst wrote:
Brien Dieterle wrote:
To try to answer it; yes I think you can add another host and just
rename the folder under pc to match the name, but I'm not positive
about that :-)
For the record I am positive out that. I've done exactly this and
it does work =)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:28:25 +0200
From: Holger Parplies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Unable to connect to BackupPC server
error
To: Winston Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
18 matches
Mail list logo
