;t mean that
> everything should go to the users list.
Agreed, but perhaps this particular topic is interesting for users.
If we do not hear any scream from them I think we should assume github is OK.
> Regards,
> Adam
Regards
Mauro
---
lease note this is a question for a lawyer.
It's well known that "rule of thumb" and "law" do not mix (that's true in all
Countries,
not only in the States, who have a record on litigation).
Otherwise I propose to ask FSF for advise.
Regards
Mauro
-
nitial question remains: "Should we be concerned"?
This might be sheer paranoia, but I'm to ignorant in the subject to discern it.
If someone has a positive answer please elaborate.
Regards
Mauro
Il 19/05/2016 09:04, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting ha scritto:
> On 19/05/16 08:3
ll be echoed also here.
At that point we will be using mainly github facilities for development, while
this list
will be retained for user help and communications of general interest.
Thanks to everybody.
Mauro
Il 18/05/2016 20:26, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom ha scritto:
> On 05/18 11:08 , David Cramble
.
I'll follow there, but mixing everything together doesn't seem a bright idea ;)
Thanks
Mauro
Il 18/05/2016 20:19, Richard Alloway ha scritto:
> Anyone have any thoughts about using buildbot? http://buildbot.net/
>
> Looks like a pretty straightforward CI and testing tool t
Hi Kenneth,
We started here partly by chance and partly because we wanted to give this the
most publicity,
but You are right: it's time to move to the devel list.
I urge anyone interested to move there and to join #backuppc channel on
freenode.
Regards
Mauro
Il 18/05/2016 18:59, Ke
.
Regards
Mauro
Il 18/05/2016 18:31, Les Mikesell ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>> it occurred to me there may be legal pitfalls (particularly in the States,
>> but not only) concerning "Intellectual Property" of
Thanks Les,
comments below.
Il 18/05/2016 18:31, Les Mikesell ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>> it occurred to me there may be legal pitfalls (particularly in the States,
>> but not only) concerning "Int
re making
many "attorneys" rich).
Is there someone knowledgeable here on the list?
Should we seek advice? (where? github? FSF?)
We should fix this ASAP, before the coder base enlarges.
Please give advice.
Regards
Mauro
-
veral issues reported.
Feel free to pick one.
We also need someone willing to review patches before they are actually
applied, are you interested?
>
> Thanks!
Thanks to You!
>
> -Rich
>
>
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Adam Goryachev
mailto:mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.
omment (and set priorities) to workpackages ("issues", in case we
move to GH)
- whatever he would like to indicate as a priority
> Cheers,
> Stephen
Thanks a lot Stephen and
Regards to Craig
Mauro
--
Mobile s
Hi Juerghen,
comments below.
Il 17/05/2016 13:15, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> On 05/17/2016 12:41 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Who should that be? Lars? Juergen?
> Not Juergen - that is against my mid-range "retiring-from-retirement"
> strategy (where BackupPC has alrea
should that be? Lars? Juergen?
Regards
Mauro
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Man
riate changes into config.pl, much in the same spirit as configure.pl,
but broken down into smaller pieces that can be reused after initial
configuration.
This could be architected together with Alexander's work.
first step would be definition of use-cases we want to cover.
What do You think
Hi Juergen,
comments inline.
Il 17/05/2016 09:33, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> Mauro and Lars - can you aim at summing up what is emerging to be
> "software management procedures and policies" into a short summary paper?
This is a very good idea.
Lars, please share Your proposal.
Thanks Lars,
comments below.
Il 16/05/2016 23:11, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting ha scritto:
> On 16/05/16 17:57, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>
>>> So, I feel that we would like to enforce some peer review. Perhaps the
>>> solution is to require 2 maintainers to approve
Thanks Alexander,
comments below.
Il 16/05/2016 20:37, Alexander Moisseev ha scritto:
> On 16.05.16 20:20, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> I would add "packaging" as today it's rather hard to install in non-standard
>> places.
> As FreeBSD sysutils/backuppc port main
I suspect this https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/issues/14 is relevant.
Can You check, please?
Regards
Mauro
Il 16/05/2016 18:22, David Williams ha scritto:
> Hi,
> I am still getting this issue daily. Can anyone provide any ideas as to what
> is happening or how I can hunt
Hi Norm,
comments inline.
Il 16/05/2016 18:46, Norm Legare ha scritto:
> Can I assume that github is very similar to Clearcase?
>
Not really.
Github is built around git, which is philosophically different from Clearcase,
even if there are some similarities.
Please see:https://danielmiessler.com/
Hi,
I am Mauro Condarelli, I am a freelance regularly involved in architecting and
implementing embedded systems.
I have a strong background in C/C++ and java, but I can program in several
other languages including Perl.
I also have experience as project leader for medium sized development teams
ue: stabilize
> BackupPC and establish a solid base for continuing - but I think this
> kind of tour-d'horizon to get a general idea of the outstanding issues
> is a good thing to do in the present situation; "for future action" is
> always a valid reply.
Agreed.
Giv
Hi Adam,
comments inline.
Il 16/05/2016 17:24, Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
> Thank you for taking the time to explain, but it doesn't (well,
> partially) explain how to solve my "concern". We ideally want a larger
> number of "maintainers" available to share the burden of developing
> backuppc, an
y easing the work.
h) there is no need to give every contributor write access to central
repository.
i) there is no need for maintainers to manually incorporate patches.
All this may seem overcomplex, but it's actually longer to explain than to do.
It is important people is aware about what th
Thanks Lars.
Il 16/05/2016 13:35, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting ha scritto:
> On 16/05/16 13:23, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> My current plans are:
>>
>> 1) bring github up to date.
> I have now finished bringing it up to date and have published it on github:
>
> https:
Hi Stephen,
comments inline below.
Il 16/05/2016 14:05, Stephen Joyce ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Lars and Mauro. It's great that you've taken this on.
>
> FWIW, I contacted Craig directly last week and received a reply over the
> weekend. It sounds like h
ial any more, and between Mauro and Lars there are now two
> persons who can actively pursue infrastructure issues - split the load
> and assure "redundancy" - I agree with Adam, that is important.
I would really like to have You on-board, if You feel like.
I know You are not a git-gu
Thanks Lars,
comments inline.
Il 16/05/2016 10:04, Lars Tobias Skjong-Børsting ha scritto:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Yes, I created the backuppc/backuppc for exactly this reason, so I'm all
> too happy to use this for the project.
Glad to hear that, THANKS.
> I planned for it to be
people to contribute, but
> clearly can't manage much, otherwise I would have already done it.
Thanks.
Regards
Mauro
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own device
o all who expressed appreciation for the initiative.
Regards
Mauro
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictio
Il 14/05/2016 22:19, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>>> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't
>>> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just
&
project continuation).
For the same reasons I am prompting *this* list to express an opinion.
I will not push in any direction.
Regards
Mauro
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
brin
ertainly the highest priority is to stabilize the situation, to get the
> software management issue under control to at least avoid loss of speed.
> Mauro, if you have the necessary skills, can you, at least at an interim
> basis, try to get things started? - if you want to delegate spec
gt; patching from interested parties via pull request, forking for those who need
> a custom version for their special situation, etc.
IMHO github is a very good choice.
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Mauro Condarelli <mailto:mc5...@mclink.it>> wrote:
>
>
Il 13/05/2016 17:44, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> On 05/13/2016 03:04 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> We*NEED* to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate
>> this nice Project.
> "Bitrot": I agree - the only question is whether in n or in n+5 ye
oblem
>
> Juergen
Thanks Juergen, but Your useful patch will soon be lost if it remains here as
an attachment to a mail with a non-related Subject!
We *NEED* to move beyond v3.3.1/4.0.0pre, otherwise bitrot will disgregate this
nice Project.
Regards
Mauro
-
Il 10/05/2016 16:53, terryls ha scritto:
> I have tried making the suggested changes to these files:
>
>> $Conf{SmbClientFullCmd} = '$smbClientPath $host\\$shareName
>> $I_option -U $userName -E -N -d 1 -c tarmode\\ full\\ verbose -Tc$X_option
>> -
>> $fileList';
>>
>> {SmbClientIncrCmd} = '$
ce as an answer.
Sadly
Mauro
Il 21/04/2016 13:24, Sorin Srbu ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed a new BPC-server yesterday and noticed on
> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/, that the version 4 is still alpha and has
> been so since 2013.
>
> Might I inquire on how the
Il 22/03/2016 16:28, Nicholas Hall ha scritto:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:31 AM Mauro Condarelli mailto:mc5...@mclink.it>> wrote:
Hi,
this question has been asked before and I know I might be beating a dead
horse.
Hopefully the horse is not quite dead... yet ;)
Questio
m included
into the standard version?
Is this list the "right place" to discuss enhancements?
Is v3.3.1 a good starting point or should I jump to the (apparently unfinished)
v4.0.0.beta3?
Also documentation seems to be unmaintained s
pointer welcome.
Regards
Mauro
Il 17/03/2016 17:15, Dan Pritts ha scritto:
I know nothing about a synology nas, but i found this in the source:
Lib.pm:return "No language setting" if (
!defined($bpc->{Conf}{Language}) );
My config.pl file has
$Conf{Language} = 'en
ethod, RsyncShareName and RsyncClientPath (the
latter because rsync is in a non-standard location on client)
What should I check?
Thanks in Advance
Mauro
Il 18/03/2016 03:07, Mauro Condarelli ha scritto:
Thanks Dan,
after fiddling a bit with strace (available as option on my synology) I found
the problem
ot;$topDir/conf" (see: Lib.pm#126).
I see this as a bug.
Same behavior seems present in LogDir definition (next line).
Did I miss something?
What is the right way to report such bugs? (if this indeed is a bug).
Thanks
Mauro
Il 17/03/2016 17:54, Dan Pritts ha scritto:
if your synology has st
Mar 13 12:31 Zip
Also the "No language setting" bit is strange, since I have:
backuppc@syno0:~/BackupPC/lib/BackupPC$ echo $LANG
en_US.UTF-8
I also did some other checks, but nothing looked wrong (to me).
Can s
dable does *not* cure the problem.
TiA
Mauro
Il 18/03/2016 15:50, Dan Pritts ha scritto:
probably the web server doesn't have the right permissions. see what user each
is running under. For simplest case, just make them both run under the same
user id. However, depending on what else y
Sorry, I already sent this from a wrong account.
Please disregard the other copy (waiting for moderator approval).
Tkx
Mauro
===
Hi, I am trying to install BackupPC-3.3.1 (the latest, AFAIK) on a Synology NAS.
Obviously I have no way to use pre-packaged distributions and thus I resorted
to
itten ;)
Two questions:
1) should I care about something specific?
2) is there some way to trigger an alert if a large part of some host backup
change (i.e.: if someThing starts systematically to encrypt all files)?
TiA
Changelog for latest rsync release
(https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.1.2-NEWS) states:
...
- Added a few extra long-option names to rrsync script, which will make
BackupPC happier.
...
Does anyone know what does it really mean?
TiA
Mauro
AFAIK answer is "no and no".
Reasonably sure about first one.
Second one could be possible via crypted filesystem, if that is ok with You.
Il 02/09/2015 15:35, Jan Novak ha scritto:
> Hi there,
>
> two questions:
> Is it possible to switch the destination directory of the backup for
> each host
>
configuration, you need to run:
service apache2 restart
root@bkpc:/etc/apache2/mods-enabled# service apache2 restart
but, as You see, apache2 insists in using cgid.
What am
nology NAS.
Any comment welcome.
Regards
Mauro
--
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/back
est Practices in this usage case?
NOTE: I know I will lose deduplication across different "sections", but the
effect can be lessened by thoughtful partitioning and I can live with that.
TiA
Mauro
--
Dive int
tioning and I can live with that.
TiA
Mauro
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things para
Hi,
for a new installation is v3.3.0 (getting somewhat oldish) still the version of
choice?
Is there anything new in the pipeline? (i.e.: should I wait a bit?)
In general: is there some new about 4.0.0 timeline?
TiA
Mauro
!
Have a look at:
http://web.archive.org/web/20131222191813/http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/backuppc/index.php?title=Main_Page
looks pretty complete (and seems the last snapshot taken.
HiH!
Mauro
Nella citazione in data giovedì 13 novembre 2014 17:31:00, Holger
Parplies ha scritto:
>
User backuppc, by default, has the home directory in the same place
where the files will be saved, or, if you prefer, files get saved into
user backuppc HOME.
You relocated the save space (how? if You installed from source it's
ok, but otherwise there are a number of problems there), but I gue
Il 08/11/2014 17:20, Holger Parplies ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Mauro Condarelli wrote on 2014-11-07 22:45:53 +0100 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> Unable to read 4 bytes]:
>> [...]
>> What follows is what I use to setup a key exchange,
> I don't believe that's completely
irmation either.
*This* is how it *should* be.
If You can't manually login with a simple ssh command BackupPC file
transfer won't work.
Repeat the above procedure
You can just comment it out.
Keeping it as reference is, most likely, useless though.
If You reinstalled or, somehow, You regenerated the "host keys" in the
"server" (actually that's the BackupPC *client*) the old ones are lost
for good.
I strongly urge You to make pretty sure (testing by hand)
give us a bit more info we will try to help.
Regards
Mauro
Il 04/11/2014 14:33, tschmid4 ha scritto:
Greetings,
I've read, read, Googled, fiddled, and cannot figure this out.
I tried to add a server to Backuppc and the only way it would show up on the
list is by
SSH into it from the Bac
.conf (usually in
/etc/rsyncd.conf, unless relocated).
Most likely You were looking for mistakes at the wrong end of the pipe ;)
You can also try to rsync manually from BackupPC server using directly:
rsync -av server::home /some/local/place/
You should be able to debug connection this way.
HiH
Maur
It is difficult to help you if we can't see what you're trying to do.
Please post BackupPC transfer configuration of failing and non failing
share.
Also client setup for failing and working shares would be useful.
From what You post it seems client refuses communication for the
failing share.
I
ld be nearly wasted on a dwindling product.
Current tests tell me bottleneck in my setup is CPU.
I am trying now to ease the problem by using less compression and rsync
checksum caching.
Is there some utility to uncompress cpool to pool and contextually compute
rsync checksums and caching them?
TiA
THANKS Tomsaz!
I'm playing now with an oldish DS209, I'll have some fun with the DS414j ;)
Mauro
Il 10/10/2014 10:25, Tomasz Pawlik ha scritto:
> Hello Mauro,
>
> I have some very old notes I can share with You. I have no idea if all
> of them are current and some are
the
new NAS.
Regards
Mauro
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Downl
For DumpPreUserCmd I've set $sshPath -p 2322 -q -x -l user $host,
/home/user/file.sh.
It return DumpPreUserCmd returned error status 65280... exiting.
Why?
I've tried the command and it works but set in DumpPreUserCmd it don't.
--
Cody Dunne wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for Your efforts.
>>
>> I *tried* to follow Your instructions about how to set up rsyncd for
>> wiVista backup...
>> but I failed miserably.
>>
>> Somethin
Cody Dunne wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I managed to have my backups working for my Linux machines.
>> Now I need to add a Win Vista machine as client.
>> I browsed the wiki, but I didn't find anything specific and the
&g
ine?
I have one share plus the User settings to backup.
Any pointers welcome.
TiA
Mauro
--
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
)
--
I also have another strange problem: The "BackupPC Pool Size" graphs are
missing; I mean: I see the grid and the labels, but not the actual graph.
I do not want to send an excessive amount of data, but I'm obviously
ready to se
fails.
I do *not* want to have LVM, since that would mean a big hassle using
removable drives!
What is the "recommended" way to achieve this?
TiA
Mauro
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Develo
Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
> Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have two problems:
>
>> 1) I have to backup multiple servers and their composed storage exceeds
>> the capacity of my current backup media (500Gb SATA disk); I will add a
>> second one and that
edule configuration. What I would
like to achieve is just a single backup cycle: Full backup once a week
and daily Incremental ones; as soon as I have a complete new Full I want
to discard all old ones (Full & Incremental). What is the right setting
to achieve this?
Many Thanks in Adva
Adam Goryachev ha scritto:
> Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> sorry for the apparently obvious question, but I couldn't find a good
>> answer...
>> I have BackupPC installed and working to backup the localhost (which is
>> also a file server) and two other
for directory /srv
2008-05-13 20:59:17 incr backup 10 complete, 8936 files, bytes, xferErrs (
bad files, bad shares, 0 other)
2008-05-13 20:59:17 removing incr backup 3
2008-05-29 01:00:02 full backup started for directory /etc
2008-05-29 01:00:21 full backup started for d
p things so
backuppc gets enough privileges to read whatever?
Thanks in Advance
Mauro
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's sti
Mauro Condarelli ha scritto:
> Hi,
> I see a hint in the docs saying it might be possible to rotate the
> backup storage.
> I am currently backing up to an external USB drive.
> I would like to keep at least two sets of backups on two distinct
> (possibly identical) USB drives.
would like someone to confirm this.
Thanks in Advance
Mauro
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Us
:) ).
TiA
Mauro
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net
Tony Schreiner ha scritto:
> Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to setup BackupPC to serve my small net.
>> The server is on an ubuntu/Linux machine.
>> I installed via synaptic.
>>
>> I did a couple of successful backups from localhost and fro
branch of the LAN.
This means that the server can initiate the ssh connection ok, but the
client cannot initiate a communication to the server by it's own accord.
I do not *think* this should be a problem, since the ssh tunnel is
working and should be used for rsync communication.
Can someone
s from CGI
interface ?
Thank you very much in advance for your help!
Ciao
--
mauro majeroni
Gestiware S.r.l. - http://www.gestiware.it
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visu
81 matches
Mail list logo
