On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:41:37PM +0100, Knaupp, Thomas wrote:
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> maybe a stupid question:
> can I patch backuppc (3.1.0) that is already patched with your first
> version?
No, Nicholas' patch is not compatible with mine. You have to undo the
1st patch (patch -r) and apply Nich
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Knaupp, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello Ludovic,
>
> > I've updated the patch with a new DS to hold and graph
> > the value of the pool size prior to pooling and compression.
> > Attached is the patch and a sample image. You will need
> > to delete the
Hi Nicholas,
sorry .. that one should go to you :)
> I've updated the patch with a new DS to hold and graph
> the value of the pool size prior to pooling and compression.
> Attached is the patch and a sample image. You will need
> to delete the existing RRD file ($LogDir/pool.rrd)
> as the scrip
Hello Ludovic,
> I've updated the patch with a new DS to hold and graph
> the value of the pool size prior to pooling and compression.
> Attached is the patch and a sample image. You will need
> to delete the existing RRD file ($LogDir/pool.rrd)
> as the script creates a new one with an additiona
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rOn Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:43AM -0700, Kimball Larsen wrote:
> > but the images appear as busted images on the status page.
>
> (With the patch :-D )
>
> Hi !
>
> This new patch should fix this bug. Anyway the graphs
Simone Marzona wrote:
>
> can this patch be modified for showing the percentage of cpool space
> sorted by host in some kind of stacked graph?
>
> I thing that cound be usefull to know how much of the pool storage is
> used by host A and how much by host B and so on. I'm not interested in
> the s
Hi all
can this patch be modified for showing the percentage of cpool space
sorted by host in some kind of stacked graph?
I thing that cound be usefull to know how much of the pool storage is
used by host A and how much by host B and so on. I'm not interested in
the size of the backup for each ho
Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> Le jeudi 28 février 2008 18:50, vous avez écrit :
>> I have an idea. It would be cool if the graphs also showed the total size
>> prior to pooling/compression as a line overlayed on the existing graphs.
>>
>> I think this data is exposed as $fullSizeTot and $incrSizeTot. I'
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 18:50, vous avez écrit :
> I have an idea. It would be cool if the graphs also showed the total size
> prior to pooling/compression as a line overlayed on the existing graphs.
>
> I think this data is exposed as $fullSizeTot and $incrSizeTot. I'll see if
> I can figure it
Nils wrote:
| I like to keep things separated. BackupPC does backups,
| my monitoring software does the monitoring.
| Also keeps upgrades simple.
| But yeah, I can see others might like this.
I agree, but as a compromise - it would be a nice option
to ./configure --with-graphs :)
So, every
Thanks that fixed the display for me on Centos 5
John Rouillard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:51:46AM +0100, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:43AM -0700, Kimball Larsen wrote:
>>
>>> but the images appear as busted images on the status page.
>>>
>> (Wit
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:51:46AM +0100, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:43AM -0700, Kimball Larsen wrote:
> > but the images appear as busted images on the status page.
>
> (With the patch :-D )
>
> Hi !
>
> This new patch should fix this bug. Anyway the graphs will appear
Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> I've also fixed another problem, which comes from the fact that I
> assumed
> that the CGI was index.cgi (only true for Debian users ?).
It's called BackupPC_Admin in the official distribution.
Nils Breunese.
rOn Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:43AM -0700, Kimball Larsen wrote:
> but the images appear as busted images on the status page.
(With the patch :-D )
Hi !
This new patch should fix this bug. Anyway the graphs will appear
after "backuppc nightly" has run.
I've also fixed another problem, which com
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:17:43AM -0700, Kimball Larsen wrote:
> but the images appear as busted images on the status page.
Hi !
This new patch should fix this bug. Anyway the graphs will appear
after "backuppc nightly" has run.
I've also fixed another problem, which comes from the fact that I
dan wrote:
> this is interesting! what file does this diff apply to? can you
> give the command to patch the file please? and possibly put that in
> the wiki OR i will put it in the wiki if you put it here. thanks
I like to keep things separated. BackupPC does backups, my monitoring
softw
nice job Kimball. Big thanks to Ludovic!
has this been submitted to the devel mailing list for inclusion?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Kimball Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is to confirm that this patch works on 3.0.0 as well!
> Thanks!
>
> -- Kimball
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 1
This is to confirm that this patch works on 3.0.0 as well!
Thanks!
-- Kimball
On Feb 28, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Kimball Larsen wrote:
On Feb 28, 2008, at 10:37 AM, dan wrote:
please inform us if it works on 3.0! this is a great little add.
very nice
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, N
On Feb 28, 2008, at 10:37 AM, dan wrote:
please inform us if it works on 3.0! this is a great little add.
very nice
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Nicholas Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ludovic - freaking sweet man. I just applied that patch.
Kimball - I believe the images are ge
I have an idea. It would be cool if the graphs also showed the total size
prior to pooling/compression as a line overlayed on the existing graphs.
I think this data is exposed as $fullSizeTot and $incrSizeTot. I'll see if
I can figure it out sometime today.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Ludo
please inform us if it works on 3.0! this is a great little add. very nice
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Nicholas Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludovic - freaking sweet man. I just applied that patch.
>
> Kimball - I believe the images are generated during the backuppc nightly
> run.
Ludovic - freaking sweet man. I just applied that patch.
Kimball - I believe the images are generated during the backuppc nightly
run. (mine also shows broken images on 3.1). Can't wait to check it
tomorrow morning and show my boss who already is in love with BackupPC.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at
On Feb 28, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> dan gmail.com> writes:
>> this is interesting! what file does this diff apply to?
>
> You can 'cd' to the original source directory, or to your installation
> directory (maybe /usr/share/backuppc) and then run:
>
> patch -p1
> Oh yes, I've f
dan gmail.com> writes:
> this is interesting! what file does this diff apply to?
You can 'cd' to the original source directory, or to your installation
directory (maybe /usr/share/backuppc) and then run:
patch -p1 http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
this is interesting! what file does this diff apply to? can you give the
command to patch the file please? and possibly put that in the wiki OR i
will put it in the wiki if you put it here. thanks
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I've made a
25 matches
Mail list logo
