Hamish Guthrie writes:
> I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. I have done
> some memory requirement analysis of a raw rsync ba
Carl,
I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. I have done
some memory requirement analysis of a raw rsync backup of a large
filesys
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:07:11 -0700
Craig Barratt wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
>
> > On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> > > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> > > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> > >
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
> On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> > an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
>
> You
On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
Your point is well-taken and I'm willing to acce
On 09/02 05:09 , David Relson wrote:
> For the curious, the locate command indicates I have 2927627 files
> using 46 GB of the single partition HD.
that's a healthy number. the box I have with the most files, only has 3/4
million (developer's workstation). that will likely change as I'm now
backin
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:46:06 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:29, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>
> > > I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> > > triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> > > impossible to backup my
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:29, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> > triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> > impossible to backup my main machine.
> >
> > At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump proces
On 09/01 07:24 , David Relson wrote:
> I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> impossible to backup my main machine.
>
> At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump processes are at 527m and 425m and
> rsy
Hi,
I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
impossible to backup my main machine.
At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump processes are at 527m and 425m and
rsync is at 256m (see below). How can I reduce
10 matches
Mail list logo
