Hamish Guthrie writes:
> I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. I have done
> some memory requirement analysis of a raw rsync ba
Carl,
I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl. I have done
some memory requirement analysis of a raw rsync backup of a large
filesys
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:07:11 -0700
Craig Barratt wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
>
> > On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> > > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> > > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> > >
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
> On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> > I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> > rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> > an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
>
> You
On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
> I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
> rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
> an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
Your point is well-taken and I'm willing to acce
On 09/02 05:09 , David Relson wrote:
> For the curious, the locate command indicates I have 2927627 files
> using 46 GB of the single partition HD.
that's a healthy number. the box I have with the most files, only has 3/4
million (developer's workstation). that will likely change as I'm now
backin
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:46:06 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:29, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>
> > > I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> > > triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> > > impossible to backup my
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:29, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> > triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> > impossible to backup my main machine.
> >
> > At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump proces
On 09/01 07:24 , David Relson wrote:
> I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
> triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
> impossible to backup my main machine.
>
> At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump processes are at 527m and 425m and
> rsy
