Re: [Bacula-users] Backup + technical support expertise ?

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Nice to see these kinds of requests. I'm forwarding this to the bacula-devel list. Good luck in finding candidates ... On Wednesday 05 April 2006 03:16, RAM TK wrote: Hi Looking to hire people with Linux administration and backup skills for providing customer support. The company is

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with 1.38.6 under Fedora Core 5 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 00:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hello, is anybody running Bacula 1.38.6 (28 March 2006) under Fedora Core 5? I am not running it under FC5, but I have tested it under FC5, but not in a production environment. Since updating from FC4 to FC5 and from Bacula 1.38.5 to

Re: [Bacula-users] HEADS UP: 1.38.6 bacula-sd issues

2006-04-05 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Dan Langille schrieb: Folks: If you happen to upgrade to 1.38.6 and you start getting permission errors on your tape drive, when it worked in previous versions, a work around may be changing the group for bacula-sd. For me, in FreeBSD, I add this to /etc/rc.conf: bacula_sd_flags= -u

[Bacula-users] Bacula with multiple storages

2006-04-05 Thread Alexander Nolte
Hi everybody! We (the chair for Informations- and Engineering-Management at the Ruhr-University of Bochum) are using bacula as our main backup system for our Linux servers for about 4 months now and we are very confident with the system. Since I am searching for a way to backup our workstations

Re: [Bacula-users] HEADS UP: 1.38.6 bacula-sd issues

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 31 March 2006 21:13, Dimitri Puzin wrote: Dan Langille schrieb: Folks: If you happen to upgrade to 1.38.6 and you start getting permission errors on your tape drive, when it worked in previous versions, a work around may be changing the group for bacula-sd. For me, in

[Bacula-users] GFS rotating howto

2006-04-05 Thread Georg Lutz
Hi, I have created a small howto covering GFS rotation scheme and bacula together with some supplemental scripts. The GFS rotation scheme might not be useful for all scenarios (personally I think its only applicable in small environments), but I use it since over 10 years for a site, first with

Re: [Bacula-users] HEADS UP: 1.38.6 bacula-sd issues

2006-04-05 Thread Dan Langille
On 31 Mar 2006 at 21:13, Dimitri Puzin wrote: Dan Langille schrieb: Folks: If you happen to upgrade to 1.38.6 and you start getting permission errors on your tape drive, when it worked in previous versions, a work around may be changing the group for bacula-sd. For me, in

[Bacula-users] Bacula version 1.38.6 one Windows 2003

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, For those of you who have experienced failures of Bacula 1.38.6 on Windows 2003, I would appreciate it if you would download and test a version that I believe has the problem corrected. Feedback as soon as possible would be appreciated. You can find this version at:

[Bacula-users] (no subject)

2006-04-05 Thread Bart Schelstraete
Hi,I have another question.I want to use Bacula so that it writes the backup to a file, which isn't a problem.But the file should have a maximum of 70G, which is also not a problem :)But what I want is that Bacula keeps re-using the file. So : Take backups till the 70 G is full - remove the older

[Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread John Kodis
There's a brief review of Bacula at: http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as being far from intuitive. -- John Kodis. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling volumes

2006-04-05 Thread Bill Moran
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 16:37:30 +0200 Bart Schelstraete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have another question. I want to use Bacula so that it writes the backup to a file, which isn't a problem. But the file should have a maximum of 70G, which is also not a problem :) But what I want is that Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject)

2006-04-05 Thread Florian Schnabel
Bart Schelstraete wrote: Hi, I have another question. I want to use Bacula so that it writes the backup to a file, which isn't a problem. But the file should have a maximum of 70G, which is also not a problem :) But what I want is that Bacula keeps re-using the file. So : Take backups till the

[Bacula-users] Catalog_Backup not performed

2006-04-05 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
I'm having strange happenings recently on a working bacula installation.Since a couple of weeks, the last Backup_catalog job is randomly not performed (some days it runs, some days it does not).All the previous jobs are performed correctly.If I look at the job queue when the first job starts

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula version 1.38.6 one Windows 2003

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 16:09, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, For those of you who have experienced failures of Bacula 1.38.6 on Windows 2003, I would appreciate it if you would download and test a version that I believe has the problem corrected. Feedback as soon as possible would be

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with 1.38.6 under Fedora Core 5 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Steve Ellis
Dan Langille wrote: On 5 Apr 2006 at 0:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hello, is anybody running Bacula 1.38.6 (28 March 2006) under Fedora Core 5? Since updating from FC4 to FC5 and from Bacula 1.38.5 to 1.38.6 (in one step, probably this was not a good idea), each run of our nightly backup

Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Mike Reinehr
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 09:36 am, John Kodis wrote: There's a brief review of Bacula at: http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as being far from intuitive. No argument there. In the short time that I've

Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Dan Langille
On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:36, John Kodis wrote: There's a brief review of Bacula at: http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as being far from intuitive. Any publicity is good publicity. :) Tape changing is NOT

[Bacula-users] Bacula FD on Macintosh

2006-04-05 Thread Bill Moran
I've been deploying Bacula here for a few weeks now. All servers are being backed up from three locations. Very nice. Now it's time to start on the mobile machines. The one that has me concerned is the one Macintosh laptop that we have. Anyone running a Bacula FD on a Macintosh? Is it

Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 16:50, Dan Langille wrote: On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:36, John Kodis wrote: There's a brief review of Bacula at: http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as being far from intuitive. Any

[Bacula-users] Restore Error

2006-04-05 Thread Brennon Church
Hello, In the following example, I'd like to determine exactly which files caused the FD Errors listed. I looked through the full restore report but didn't see anything that indicated a failure until the end of the report (and it didn't specify the specific files). Perhaps I'm simply

[Bacula-users] Windows Backups

2006-04-05 Thread Ryan Sizemore
I am sure this topic has been covered in a previous thread or in the manual, but my cursory searches have produced no results. So here is the problem: I recently added added a Win2k3 server to by list of clients that I am backing up. That night, I did a Full Backup, while completed successfully.

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with 1.38.6 under Fedora Core 5 ?

2006-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Steve, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I just switched to FC5 too, only I did not change my bacula version at the same time. The problem shows up on FC5 with 1.38.5 too. And to answer the question Kern raised about old mysql versions or old RPM--I installed FC5 from scratch

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula FD on Macintosh

2006-04-05 Thread Dan Rich
Bill Moran wrote: I've been deploying Bacula here for a few weeks now. All servers are being backed up from three locations. Very nice. Now it's time to start on the mobile machines. The one that has me concerned is the one Macintosh laptop that we have. Anyone running a Bacula FD on a

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Error

2006-04-05 Thread Brennon Church
Yup. The btape tests worked perfectly when I did them. I should also mention that this doesn't always (or at least hasn't always) happen(ed). A full restore of a Windows system earlier this week succeeded. Also, full restores of the system shown below worked perfectly during an earlier

[Bacula-users] Issue with restoring using WX-Console on Windows

2006-04-05 Thread Tristram Cheer
Hi guys, I'm using the latest build of WX-Console on windows XP from SF.net (1.38.6) When i try to enter restore mode i select the client etc etc and i'm presented with the selection screen, trouble is i can only select the entire backup, there is no list of files or anything. when i try and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula FD on Macintosh

2006-04-05 Thread Erich Prinz
Bill, I've built the FD from source on 10.4.x with the 1.3.5 version and have run it continuously with no issues. You are welcome to the executable if you'd like - though you'll need to noodle through the docs as there are a few working directories that need to be manually created - no

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with restoring using WX-Console on Windows

2006-04-05 Thread Ger Apeldoorn
Did you by any chance back it up with backslashes instead of forward slashes? e.g. File = C:\temp is wrong, it should be C:/temp You'll only notice that when you are selecting files to restore. Ger. Op donderdag 6 april 2006 02:42, schreef Tristram Cheer: Hi guys, I'm using the latest build