Kern,
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:13:45 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > PS: Does this affect spooled simultaneous jobs, or only simultaneous
> > jobs that are simultaneously writing to storage?
>
> Please re-read item 1 of my announcement (above).
Sorry to say that but since more than one person (t
>
> I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch
without
> having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not
what I
> consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not
"officially"
> released but are attached to an open bug report.
Understood.
> Can
Hello,
For your information.
Until we figure out exactly how to resolve old releases containing the restore
bug, I have "hidden" most all of the files that we have released on Source
Forge. That means that they still exist (are not deleted), but cannot be
accessed through the normal download
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:47, James Harper wrote:
> > At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
>
> there
>
> > is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not --
>
> it
>
> > would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would
>
> requir
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in
> > Bacula.
> >
> > Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files
> > are missing and thus not restored. T
On Monday 10 September 2007 00:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kern,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I have uploaded patches to bug #935 (bugs.bacula.org) that will correct
> > version 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2. The patch has been tested only on
> > version 2.2.2 and passes all reg
Hello,
In Chapter 6.3.4 of the Bacula User's Guide, with regard to naming
resources, the Guide states that:
Each of your Bacula components must have a unique name.
>
This is especially necessary when backing up a fleet machines.
I didn't see any similar requirements that the Address fields of r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
>
> Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
> missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surpris
On 10 Sep 2007 at 4:18, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Monday, September 10, 2007, 2:15:15 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> DL> On 10 Sep 2007 at 1:10, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
> >>
>
> DL> Well, that's certainly
Hello,
Monday, September 10, 2007, 2:15:15 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
DL> On 10 Sep 2007 at 1:10, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
>>
DL> Well, that's certainly one way to get people to help you.
DL> The rest of your post was well natur
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:01:19 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 10.09.2007 00:40,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since the amount of data on our servers increased lately, I am thinking
> > about upgrading our hardware. We currently run Qualstar RLS-4445
> > autochanger with a s
Arno,
On Sunday 09 September 2007 08:07:42 pm Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> ...
>
> > On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
> > answer.
> >
> > Documentation states (from Data Spooling article):
> >
> > "While the spooled
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:51,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
...
> On a related issue: I have asked this question before but never get any
> answer.
>
> Documentation states (from Data Spooling article):
>
> "While the spooled data is being written to the tape, the despooling process
> has exclusive use of th
Hi,
10.09.2007 00:40,, Ivan Adzhubey wrote::
> Hi,
>
> Since the amount of data on our servers increased lately, I am thinking about
> upgrading our hardware. We currently run Qualstar RLS-4445 autochanger with a
> single Sony SDX-700C (AIT-3) drive installed. Autochanger has 4 vacant drive
>
>
> At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there
> is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not --
it
> would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would
require
> rather extensive testing.
The only issue I can see with this is that
On 9/9/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 09.09.2007 22:32,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
> > As a followup to this message, I retraced my notes with regard to the
> > configuration options that I passed to ./configure and was reminded that
> > I had explicitly set the user and groups
On Sunday 09 September 2007 06:27:50 pm Ivan Adzhubey wrote:
> Hi Kern,
>
> First of all thank you for your efforts on confirming and fixing this nasty
> bug! Now at least I know it was not something I did wrong in my
> configuration (I have struggled with multiple simultaneous jobs spanning
> seve
Hi,
Since the amount of data on our servers increased lately, I am thinking about
upgrading our hardware. We currently run Qualstar RLS-4445 autochanger with a
single Sony SDX-700C (AIT-3) drive installed. Autochanger has 4 vacant drive
slots and according to manufacturer supports AIT-3, AIT-4
Hi,
06.09.2007 17:16,, David Michal wrote::
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I had to use bextract. I’ve used this syntax:
>
> /usr/sbin/bextract -i include-list -V volume-file client-device
> /home/dmichal/
>
> Everything went fine, but after recovery process I’ve found all the
> files corrupted. Every of th
Hi Kern,
First of all thank you for your efforts on confirming and fixing this nasty
bug! Now at least I know it was not something I did wrong in my configuration
(I have struggled with multiple simultaneous jobs spanning several volumes
for quite some time, as you can see from my earlier posts
Hi,
09.09.2007 22:32,, Hydro Meteor wrote::
> As a followup to this message, I retraced my notes with regard to the
> configuration options that I passed to ./configure and was reminded that
> I had explicitly set the user and groups to the appropriate non-root
> user and non-root group on my s
Hello,
thank you that you finally admit there is a bug.
As when we first discovered the bug, we could reproduce it almost on
every test. I will provide feedback if this is fixed in 2.2.3 once it
is released.
Just one question - is the bug in dir or sd?
I am asking that to know what to update an
Dear Kern,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I have uploaded patches to bug #935 (bugs.bacula.org) that will correct
> version 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2. The patch has been tested only on version
> 2.2.2 and passes all regression tests as well as the specific test that
> reproduced
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that explicitly t
As a followup to this message, I retraced my notes with regard to the
configuration options that I passed to ./configure and was reminded that I
had explicitly set the user and groups to the appropriate non-root user and
non-root group on my system:
--with-dir-user=admini
--with-dir-group=staff
Hi,
I've installed Bacula 2.2.1 on an Apple Intel Xserve running Mac OS X Server
10.4.10
I am in the process of moving through the Tutorial (Chapter 9 in the User's
Guide) -- I have not touched / edited / modify the default configuration
files. This is a fresh install!
I had hoped to be able to
The openSuSE *10.1* x86_64 version of Bacula 2.2.1 has been released to
Sourceforge (rpms-contrib-psheaffer)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt
27 matches
Mail list logo
