Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-12 Thread marc . smith
>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >>> If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, >>> which >>> might give us a clue where the error occurs. >> >> So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does >> fail if I don't specify a debug level. Ma

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-08 Thread marc . smith
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which >> might give us a clue where the error occurs. > > So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does > fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-08 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which > might give us a clue where the error occurs. So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there is a timi

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:46:26 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: >> They are all the same at 2.2.4. It happens even in the case where >> bacula-dir, bacula-fd and bacula-sd are running on the same machine. >> Everything was rebuilt from source by mysel

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:46:26 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Dan Langille wrote: > > > My first idea: different versions of SD and FD, with one trying to use a > > command the other does not recognize. > > What version is each of: bacula-dir, bacula-fd, bacula-sd >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Dan Langille wrote: > My first idea: different versions of SD and FD, with one trying to use a > command the other does not recognize. > What version is each of: bacula-dir, bacula-fd, bacula-sd They are all the same at 2.2.4. It happens even in the case where bacula-dir, ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: I see this very often as well, and I am using disk exclusively. It also happens about 40% of the time, and has done since I sta

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Dan Langille
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: >>> I see this very often as well, and I am using disk exclusively. It also >>> happens about 40% of the time, and has done since I started

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: >> I see this very often as well, and I am using disk exclusively. It also >> happens about 40% of the time, and has done since I started with bacula at >> 1.38 (now on 2.2.4). I'd like t

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: > > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job > > does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. > > [...] > > 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job >> does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. >> [...] >> 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219: Fatal error: job.c:1811 Bad response >> to Append Data command. Wanted 3000

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job > does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. > [...] > 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219: Fatal error: job.c:1811 Bad response > to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK dat

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. I cleaned both of my tape drives last night, but I still get the fatal errors. Here is another example: 05-Dec 03:32 escabot-dir JobId 8219: BeforeJob: run command "/usr/local/s

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-11-28 Thread marc . smith
Hi, I am using Bacula 2.2.6 with a Spectra Logic T50 tape library (with 2 LTO3 drives). I have about 20 jobs that are run nightly, allowing Bacula to run multiple jobs at once (one on each drive). Here are my configuration files & log: http://esweb.mcc.edu/~marc.smith/bacula/ This seems to happ

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Note for Arno: 1.39.26+ does a better job of helping one diagnose these problems by printing the full output from mtx when a failure occurs. On Friday 10 November 2006 00:46, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > > I've gotten this one... I'd love

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I've gotten this one... I'd love to know what it is too. :) Dat's an error ;-) > > Jake Goerzen wrote: > >>What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? >> >> >>07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, >>Job=Back

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Ryan Novosielski
I've gotten this one... I'd love to know what it is too. :) Jake Goerzen wrote: > What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? > > > 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, > Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 > 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger "load

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Jake Goerzen
What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded drive 0" command. 07-Nov 08:41 adam-sd: 3991 Bad autochanger "loaded drive 0" command: ER

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Jake Goerzen
What does it mean when this happens? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded drive 0" command. 07-Nov 08:41 adam-sd: 3991 Bad autochanger "loaded drive 0" command: ERR=Child exited with code 1. 07-

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-10 Thread Robert Keidel
Hello, I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to add another client and change what has to be backe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 October 2006 20:53, Robert Keidel wrote: > Hello, > > I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 > autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work > fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test > run, I changed my bacula-

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Michael Brennen
On Monday 09 October 2006 13:53, Robert Keidel wrote: > I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 > autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work > fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test > run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Robert Keidel
Hello, I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to add another client and change what has to be backed up

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2006-10-03 Thread Keith Phipps
I seem to be past the Appendable media issue I've been having - now I'm getting something totally different when I try and run this backup: You have messages. * * * *messages 02-Oct 13:59 bacula-atl2-sd: 3302 Autochanger "loaded drive 0", result is Slot 8. 02-Oct 13:59 bacula-atl2-sd: taurus.200

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Jaime Ventura wrote: > Although I made a kernel update, i checked the the data cable. Is was > slightly disconnected. Probably that was the problem. very likely. > Now I have a tape with volStatus =Error. > What now? What you recommend? delete the jobs associated with that ta

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Jaime Ventura
Thank you Alan and Arno, for your help. Although I made a kernel update, i checked the the data cable. Is was slightly disconnected. Probably that was the problem. Now those dmesg messages are gone. Now I have a tape with volStatus =Error. What now? What you recommend? delete the jobs associated

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Arno Lehmann wrote: >> I get several messages like these on dmesg: >> (scsi2:A:15:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x3. >> (scsi2:A:15:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 50. NumSGs = 1. >> sg[0] - Addr 0x11c3b8000 : Length 50 > > These are SCSI errors and i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
PROTECTED]> > url: www.isep.ipp.pt <http://www.isep.ipp.pt> > > > > > > > > Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > >>On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:59:57PM +0100, Jaime Ventura wrote: >> >> >>>From: Jaime Ventura <[EMAI

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
ECTED]>, >> Bacula Users >> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:57 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command >> >> Thanks for your reply. >>I've already installer and heavily tested the tapeloader with bacula. >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:59:57PM +0100, Jaime Ventura wrote: > From: Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Uwe Schuerkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Bacula Users > Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:57 +0100 > Subject

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
06 10:54:43 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command >> >> Arno Lehmann, >> Thanks for you reply. >> Im using RHEL 4 x86_64 with a dell powervault 124T. >> Im using bacula for some time backing up to disk. >> No

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:54:43AM +0100, Jaime Ventura wrote: > From: Jaime Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Bacula Users > Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 10:54:43 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Dat

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
Arno Lehmann, Thanks for you reply. Im using RHEL 4 x86_64 with a dell powervault 124T. Im using bacula for some time backing up to disk. Now i bought a a dell powervault 124T so i can make backups to tape. So, im newbe to tape issues. Im on a test environment... making test

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 9/5/2006 10:44 AM, Jaime Ventura wrote: > Hello, > Im backing up data to tape using a tapeloader, and im experiencing > the following problem: > > 05-Sep 09:38 isep-dir: Start Backup JobId 498, > Job=jtgv-gsi.2006-09-05_09.38.17 > 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3301 Issuing autochange

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
Hello, Im backing up data to tape using a tapeloader, and im experiencing the following problem: 05-Sep 09:38 isep-dir: Start Backup JobId 498, Job=jtgv-gsi.2006-09-05_09.38.17 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded drive 0" command. 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3302 Auto

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 04 November 2005 09:15, Christoph Haas wrote: > Kern, > > thanks for your quick reply. > > On Thursday 03 November 2005 19:33, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, > > which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. Th

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-04 Thread Christoph Haas
Kern, thanks for your quick reply. On Thursday 03 November 2005 19:33, Kern Sibbald wrote: > It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, > which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. The change > prohibits a program from opening a drive in read/write mo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. The change prohibits a program from opening a drive in read/write mode if there is no volume in the drive. If this is what is causing your problem, you can

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-03 Thread Christoph Haas
Evening... I'm repeatedly seeing the following messages cancelling my backup jobs: == 03-Nov 08:11 torf-dir: Start Backup JobId 206, Job=BackupCatalog.2005-11-03_08.10.00 03-Nov 08:13 torf-sd: BackupCatalog.2005-11-03_08.10.00 Fatal error: device.c:317 Unable to ope

[Bacula-users] Bad Response to Append Data Command

2005-08-23 Thread Aaron Summers
This error is appearing more and more. Sometimes the backups run, sometimes I get the following error: We are obviously writing data to a file, other backups are running on the machine. I am perplexed since sometimes it works, other times it fails. 23-Aug 20:36 vortech-dir: Start Backup JobId 2