> "PSH" == Peter S Housel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PSH> It might be nice if BBDB could reap these [vcards] when they
PSH> do appear, but people still should be discouraged from
PSH> sending them.
They should? Why?
Cheers, Jody
--
Jody Klymak APL/
Peter S. Housel wrote :
> "Ed L Cashin" <> wrote:
>
> > Here's some interesting anti-vcard sentiment:
>
> This isn't really relevant to the merits of vcard itself. It's just
> a backlash against people who configure their MUAs to automatically
> MIME-attach their personal vcards to outgoing ma
> "DD" == Dinesh Dutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DD> Thomas E Deweese writes:
>> > "RB" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: current
>> thinking is that along with the Pilot record-id it should track
>> which fields from BBDB went to what fields in Pilot. This would
>> allow much
Thomas E Deweese writes:
> > "RB" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> current thinking is that along with the Pilot record-id it should
> track which fields from BBDB went to what fields in Pilot. This would
> allow much more targeted and correct updates.
Why do you want to do t
First, I think that it is a good idea to move everything to
sourceforge.
However, for those of you who don't realize, your email is public
knowledge -- available to robots that know sourceforge.
Go to the following page:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/roster/bbdb-info
Then click your nam
> Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On April 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>
>> I'd like to se alist of "unacceptable addresses" as well, to handle
>> ever changing no-spam addresses, and old addresses in folders holding
>> old messages without prompting, and without risking expand of these
> "Kai" == Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jack> That leading 'to' does to, bcc, cc, and sender, according to the
Jack> docs.
Kai> (Side note:) The `b' in bcc means blind. This means that the
Kai> header is removed before the mail is actually sent. Thus, you
Kai> will never rece
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That leading 'to' does to, bcc, cc, and sender, according to the docs.
^
> (Side note:) The `b' in bcc means blind. This means th
"Ed L Cashin" <> wrote:
> Here's some interesting anti-vcard sentiment:
This isn't really relevant to the merits of vcard itself. It's just a
backlash against people who configure their MUAs to automatically
MIME-attach their personal vcards to outgoing mail and news postings. MS
Outlook expre
Here's some interesting anti-vcard sentiment:
I know that, for most of you, this is probably about as newsworthy as
"ANNOUNCE: humans are mammals" or "ANNOUNCE: numbers greater than ten are
larger than numbers smaller than ten".
However, *I WILL BOUNCE POSTS THAT HAVE VCARDS IN THEM*.
Real S
> "RB" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> By the same token, BBDB could take such multiple records and merge
RW> them when importing from the pilot. Or not. There's unfortunately
RW> a disconnect here that's hard to paper over "correctly". Perhaps
RW> snagging the pilot's record
Frank Morawietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - If I do get an email not caught by that list I want to be _asked_
> whether to create an entry or not. Additionally, I want to be asked
> whether to add a mail alias.
> What do other people think? Is this a feature anybody else would use?
One
12 matches
Mail list logo
