Re: bbdb/vm problem

2001-08-04 Thread Robert
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On August 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think I've solved the problem - looking at my .bbbdb file, it has a header ;;; file-version: 6 (( then the records [ ...] )) I assume the round brackets shouldn't be there? I've hand edited

Re: hiding fields from display

2001-08-04 Thread Nix
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Alex Schroeder spake: Doug Alcorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there any way to have an alist of fields to display or fields to ignore? Maybe something with the elided display? How does all that work? Here's an example from my .emacs: (setq bbdb-print-elide

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-04 Thread Nix
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001, David S. Goldberg gibbered: DG I want a full listing, in multiple lines, minus a couple fields. DG Robert's patch does this. bbdb-elided-display does not. Yes, it does... Thanks! Is that new in the 2.3* versions? I don't recall that being possible

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-04 Thread Robert Fenk
On Friday, August 3 2001 10:55:11, Thomas E Deweese wrote: [...] Yes, it does... But not as I thought it should be. I want elided display by default and when I switch to full display I do not want to see some fields. Neither way of setting bbdb-elided-display provides this. whne setting it

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-04 Thread Robert Fenk
On Friday, August 3 2001 21:41:12, Ronan Waide wrote: On August 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: How is this different from `bbdb-elided-display'? DG I want a full listing, in multiple lines, minus a couple fields. DG Robert's patch does this. bbdb-elided-display does not. Yes,

Re: Displaying Xfaces in bbdb buffer

2001-08-04 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Steve == Steve Youngs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve In the last 2 years that I've used BBDB I have seen xfaces in the bbdb Steve buffer *once*. Steve The manual says that it should just happen if you have xface support Steve compiled into your XEmacs. Well, apart from that

bbdb-use-pop-up isn't respected

2001-08-04 Thread Sudish Joseph
I've got bbdb-use-pop-up set to nil and bbdb-pop-up-elided-display set to t. Starting with my upgrade to 2.32, this combination shows me the pop-up window, which is wrong. The patch below fixes. The identation in the function wasn't right. The whitespace changes for the correct indentation

(no subject)

2001-08-04 Thread Sriram Karra
ubsubscribe JanaIv [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/

Re: (no subject)

2001-08-04 Thread Sriram Karra
Sriram Karra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ubsubscribe JanaIv [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry about this mail... argh. -Sriram. -- All's well that ends. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page:

Re: Omitting fields from being displayed and enhanced editing

2001-08-04 Thread Ronan Waide
On August 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It is not exactly the same feature AFAIS, see the other mail I sent. bbdb-elided-display affects the default display mode: whether it is one line or a listing. I would propose to remove the omitting of fields from bbdb-elided-display, but that breaks