Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-09-30 Thread Roland Winkler
On Mon Sep 27 2010 Bruno Tavernier wrote: > >> 2) If there is an accent such as é, è in the name, then it get quoted. > >> > >> , > >> | Rem -> "Rémi Buddy" > >> ` > > Again, I am not sure here. What is the behavior you expect and what is the > > behavior you get? Do you know whether this

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-09-26 Thread Charles Philip Chan
Bruno Tavernier writes: > Currently, I add new entries "by hand". It is fine but automatically > adding peoples whom I correspond with would be even better. http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/emacs/moy-bbdb.el Charles -- "Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The La

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-09-26 Thread Bruno Tavernier
Hello Roland, I pulled the latest version from Savannah. And it is working like a charm! >> 1) The completion format for certain records is strange (with or >> without cycling) I was wondering why, upon completion, in some cases people's name appeared before the email and sometime not. I found t

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-09-26 Thread Roland Winkler
On Thu Aug 12 2010 Bruno Tavernier wrote: > 1) The completion format for certain records is strange (with or > without cycling) > > , > | Brun -> Bruno Tavernier > | press again -> mysecondaddr...@somethingelse > | > | Myfrien -> myfri...@whatever > | > | Myotherfrien -> Myother Friend >

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-16 Thread Uday S Reddy
On 8/16/2010 7:34 PM, Uday S Reddy wrote: > > I still got stuck doing the build (trace below). But, at least, I am a bit > further along than I was last time. > > Symbol's value as variable is void: \ > > make[1]: *** [bbdb-hooks.elc] Error 127 Found a resolution to this problem. In lisp/Makefi

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-16 Thread Uday S Reddy
On 8/11/2010 5:00 PM, Norman Walsh wrote: > The Makefile seems to be broken. It appears to depend on Makefile.in > which isn't in the archive and on .././loadpath.el which...well, I don't > know what that might be. The tar file only has .el files. So, I presume this is the lisp directory of BBD

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-12 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:20:45 -0700 Mark Diekhans wrote: MD> It's great you have revived this essential pieces of software. MD> It would really help if this was packaged distributed like most MD> GNU package MD> - tar file includes version number (e.g. bbdb-3.01.tar.gz) MD> - tar file conta

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-11 Thread Roland Winkler
> It would really help if this was packaged distributed like most > GNU package > > - tar file includes version number (e.g. bbdb-3.01.tar.gz) > - tar file contains a directory with version number > bbdb-3.01/* Makes sense, I had not yet much thought about this. > The Makefile seems

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-11 Thread Mark Diekhans
I assume you are waiting on the source forge site to be handed over before doing more collaborative development. May I suggest checking out some of the other collaborative, as (IMHO) source forge has not only fallen behind, but has gotten worse with their user interface changes. LaunchPad is exc

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-11 Thread Norman Walsh
"Roland Winkler" writes: > > Any feedback is appreciated. The Makefile seems to be broken. It appears to depend on Makefile.in which isn't in the archive and on .././loadpath.el which...well, I don't know what that might be. Be seeing you,

Re: BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-11 Thread Mark Diekhans
It's great you have revived this essential pieces of software. It would really help if this was packaged distributed like most GNU package - tar file includes version number (e.g. bbdb-3.01.tar.gz) - tar file contains a directory with version number bbdb-3.01/* Its frustrating to ex

BBDB version 3.01

2010-08-11 Thread Roland Winkler
A few days ago, I tried to post my new version 3.01 of BBDB here on this list. However, my mail exceeded the maximum allowed size. So now I have posted it on the gnu-emacs-sources mailing list, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-emacs-sources/2010-08/msg00012.html Indeed, since my last post in