Until I have more time to spare, I'll follow Courtney;s advice to
leave the leaves on (I have never had too much activity from a
batch.) and Kolisko's recommendation to go anaerobic.
What I'm trying to find out, I guess, is if it is possible for a 'sun
tea' of equisetum (whatever the term: made
Good grief! Was only making a request. Please accept my apology for seemingly inferring such negativity. It was not my intent.
I have appreciated and supported all the wonderful things that Allan has done in biodynamics in many ways over a number of years and will continue to do so in what e
Dear Hugh Lovel,
Thank you, thank you ,thank you..
Music to my soul...thanks for reminding us all to focus on making our corner of this amazing planet better.
Peace, Sunny
Allan,
It's fine you've apologized, but I wouldn't go overboard with it. Some
people have weak and defiled minds and can't help it, and you aren't
responsible for their state--they are. They will punish themselves
accordingly until they learn better. There is no reason you should shoulder
their b
why cut off your nose to spite yer face Eh? My God, the equisetum was
so beautiful I did not even notice there was a woman in the picture, it was
the ire that broughth it to my attention. Well, if we must lose some
contributors to the list due to this, so be it...life goes on, but your
Regards
TaChung Huang (¶À¤j©¾)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Allan Balliett
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: equisetum
>
One last attempt at explanation.
First off, I didn't make
ant to allow it in my home, or teach
>my son that it's ok . there is nothing natural in that photo. regretfully
>you had better unsubcribe us.:)sharon
>- Original Message -
>From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: M
>
>
>
> Please, I hope this does not happen again. I do find the aforementioned
disrespectul and degrading to the value of the female.
> Mary Ann
>
Most women probably would - however - unsubscribing from this list (as
Sharon did) is certainly a major over reaction to a minor and
uncharacterist
>
One last attempt at explanation.
First off, I didn't make those pictures. The pictures are from a
website called THE WONDERFUL WORLD OF EQUISETUM
http://members.eunet.at/m.matus/ where the botanical content of the
pictures are apparently deemed to be strong enough to offset the
potential
>>allen ,you do what you want in your life , i don't endorse that
>>disrestectful view of women, nor do i want to allow it in my home,
>>or teach
>>my son that it's ok . there is nothing natural in that photo.
>>regretfully
>>you had better unsubcribe us.:)sharon
>
>Sharon - Don't focus on t
It's my obligation as the moderator of this group to inform everyone
that some may find the pictures of equisetum at the link below
offensive. I can't retract the earlier post, but I can say I
apologize to anyone that I inadvertently offended and I hearby warn
the rest that they enter the ques
>allen ,you do what you want in your life , i don't endorse that
>disrestectful view of women, nor do i want to allow it in my home, or teach
>my son that it's ok . there is nothing natural in that photo. regretfully
>you had better unsubcribe us.:)sharon
Sharon - Don't focus on the bad in life,
om: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: equisetum
> >Allen i can't believe you sent that site!
>
> I can't believe I found that site! ;-)
>
> Ah, Nature!!
>
>
>
>Allen i can't believe you sent that site!
I can't believe I found that site! ;-)
Ah, Nature!!
Allen i can't believe you sent that site!
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: equisetum
> There's a good photo display of hyemale at
> http://m
lan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: equisetum
> >At 12:03 PM 10/11/2002 -0400, Sharon wrote:
> >
> >> Equisetium arvense is the recommended one for biodynamics, we had the
other
> >&g
There's a good photo display of hyemale at
http://members.eunet.at/m.matus/e_berkley.html
It appears that the pictures that I mentioned earlier that showed
hyemale with 'leaves' were actually pictures of arvense. It also
appears that hyemale tends to be a much larger plant (over 5 ft at
times)
At 12:03 PM 10/11/2002 -0400, Sharon wrote:
Equisetium arvense is the recommended one for biodynamics, we had the other
hymale growing in our garden and did an experiment, with fermenting it. The
hymale did not have the strong potent smell as does the arvense, although it
is similar. it seems wo
I don't feel I fully understand why equisetum is what it is. I used
to think that the tea was contributing Si but now I think it is much
more subtle than that. I sent in a post a while back about JPI's
analysis showing that the tea has a high S content. And the plant
itself can be described as
19 matches
Mail list logo