Hi! Merla,
I think you are trying to change the world single handed and to understand
all in a short time.
The first step is to make the changes you would like to see made generally,
to your own patch.
When you have made a marked improvement to your patch, others will notice
and in time ask.
In a message dated 3/24/02 1:01:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve and Peter - I take your point about stirring with intention, but I
hand-pump the water/prep through my flowform cascade, projecting my
intention into the flow just as I would into the bucket if hand-stirring. I
hesitate
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: The Wide World and Testing Preps
In a message dated 3/23/02 1:00:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan and Steve - why not avoid altogether the controversy between
'tedious'
hand stirring
In a message dated 3/24/02 6:20:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One challenge with a stiring machine or flow form is imprinting the
intent.
This is the reason that my stirring machine is manual, you must be there to
control direction and speed. I have the technology to do this
In a message dated 3/24/02 3:18:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just what is your water implosion device, Steve? Is it based on
Schauberger's work?
Stephen Barrow
No, it is based on Storch's work, inspired by Steiner and Schauberger and
Pfieffer. SStorch
In a message dated 3/22/02 11:26:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hmmm. In the commentaries, Steve, RS is pretty emphatic about not
using machines to stir. At best, isn't using a stirring like having a
robot eat your buttery cookie for you?
Just asking, of course.
Steiner was not emphatic
Allan and Steve - why not avoid altogether the controversy between 'tedious'
hand stirring and contentious mechanical stirring by using a flowform
cascade? Tony N-S.
If I get
the invitation I will bring the latest prototype to your conference this fall
and you can see the future of agriculture...SStorch
Steve - dunno if it didn't post, or what, but I invited you, your
stirring machine(s) and your tea brewer to the conference this year,
October 4-6.
Do you
In a message dated 3/23/02 1:00:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan and Steve - why not avoid altogether the controversy between
'tedious'
hand stirring and contentious mechanical stirring by using a flowform
cascade? Tony N-S.
Flowforms work to some degree but without the
In a message dated 3/21/02 1:05:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But at the end of it all
you would have remedies that you could pour into a spray tank full of water
and directly go out and spray instead of doing all the tedious stirring.
Stirring is only tedious to those who have not come
Darn, Merla!
$100 each to register biodynamic "amendments" for use in Idaho? What if they were potentized in water and you had something like 8x or 8c potencies? The active ingredient is the water which has been patterned. Does water have to be registered before it can be used as a soil
BD AND THE WIDE WORLD: Last night was at an organizational meeting of
the Sandpoint Farmers Market where the State Inspector, who is an
outrageous creative thinker and gardener, spoke on changes in organic
certification, etc. I spoke to her afterwards and it turns out that she
was consulted
12 matches
Mail list logo
