>
> awesome! Thank you! Do you know where I can find a good example of using
> shared memory? I am wondering if I might be better off using shared memory
> instead. Does shared memory work both ways so that ARM can access the PRU
> memory and PRU access the ARM memory?
>
There is a DDR
More information is needed.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:28 PM, NOUHA el mehri
wrote:
> hi, i am working in a project i need to configure the usb0 and replace
> the port ttycom0 by usb0 using scilab i used a comand genlib but it didnt
> work if anybody can help me by
;,/* EHRPWM1B */
"P9.21",/* EHRPWM0A */
"P9.22",/* EHRPWM0B */
"P9.23",
"P9.25",
"P9.27",
"P9.28",
"P9.29",
"P9.30",
"P9.31",
By the way, this has been tested consistently on one BBB RevC, and several(
tens ) of BBG's. By me personally, and another person, elsewhere.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:33 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I've been searching the groups here for the last several ho
So I've been searching the groups here for the last several hours. I've
tried several things, even noted that the device tree "binary" file
(compiled file in /lib/firmware) was marked as executable. So I set the
executable bit via chmod -x . . .Anyway, this is a custom device tree
overlay
-bone-rt-r10 dtbs
uEnv.txt vmlinuz-4.4.9-bone-rt-r10
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:46 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you look in /boot, you should also see the same drectories. But since
> module are compiled against a kernel, on a per kernal bas
If you look in /boot, you should also see the same drectories. But since
module are compiled against a kernel, on a per kernal basis. You need new
modules for a new kernel. e.g. you probably have had two different kernels
installed.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:44 PM, David Glaser
The best way I found for myself. Was to simply install ntpdate, run it,
then update the external real clock from system time. Then, if you
*absolutely* need rtc0 updated. You update it from the system time. Or
rtc1. No need to recompile the kernel.
Sure, it's a couple of extra steps, but steps
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvand...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> On 5 October 2016 at 02:43, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So libEGL is Mesa's Wayland extensions.
>>
>
> No.
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EG
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Matthijs van Duin <
matthijsvand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 11:05:50 UTC+2, Matteo Facchinetti wrote:
>>
>> libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
>> libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
>> libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
. It's not
looking likely, but not impossible.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:27 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of deferring until memory is available, or even just proceeding
>> without DMA, the omap_hsmmc driver immediately fails the request with an
>&g
>
> Instead of deferring until memory is available, or even just proceeding
> without DMA, the omap_hsmmc driver immediately fails the request with an
> error, thus pretty much guaranteeing loss of data or even filesystem
> corruption. I personally think this is completely unacceptable behaviour
Everything one needs is right here:
http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian
Including links to the latest images.
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Stephane Charette <
stephanechare...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 1:10:34 PM UTC-7, Wulf Man wrote:
>>
>> try a
Try reading this:
http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#Flashing_eMMC
Suitable images are also listed on that page.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:56 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not all images blink the LEDs. It's not that common, but I've run into at
&g
Not all images blink the LEDs. It's not that common, but I've run into at
least one such image in the last year or so.
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Paul P wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying flash kali linux or debian onto BBB with zero success for some
> reasons.
>
> I did
>
> . . .and the chances you'll need a cross compiler toolchain, and IDE are
> near nil.
>
For your own code. Unless you're one of *those* (them?!) code zombies who
eat's sleeps and breathes caffine. Writing 5M lines of bug ridden code a
day ;)
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Wil
is your imagination.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:41 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, there seems to be a lot of confusion between toolchains, which no
> one really asked or said anything about( I made a passing remark ), Linux
> kernel, and Linux image. My o
Well, there seems to be a lot of confusion between toolchains, which no one
really asked or said anything about( I made a passing remark ), Linux
kernel, and Linux image. My own idea of what makes a Linux image is a
complete "package" that contains bootloader(s), a Linux kernel, and a
rootfs(root
>
> The discoloration in now way affects the operation of the board, it is
> just a side affect of the heat generated by the processor.
>
In no way ?
Just want to be clear. I have overactive fingers sometimes too.
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Gerald Coley
wrote:
>
$ ls .
Would determine if the script is in the current working directory.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:35:57 -0700 (PDT), Lidia Toscano
> declaimed the
> following:
>
> >Hi, I am running
Not only that but if you make a mistake, and render the eMMC unbootable.
How would you fix it without an sdcard ? Short answer is that you can't.
But with an sdcard, you'd insert the "emergency" card, revert the changes
you made, then power cycle the board ater removing the sdcard. viola!
problem
compiler.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:12:56 -0700, William Hermans
> <yyrk...@gmail.com> declaimed the following:
>
> >The hard part would mostly be finding good solid information on how t
the groups here of people having issues
with creating images that work on both . . . again your mileage may vary.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:44 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mzimmers,
>
> Do yourself a favore and get this book: https://www.amazon.com/
> Exp
n than
you absorb in several months. It'll make an excellent reference.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:35 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed answers. Do I really need to use an SD card for
>> transferring the kernel to the beaglebone? See
>
> Thanks for the detailed answers. Do I really need to use an SD card for
> transferring the kernel to the beaglebone? Seems kind of cumbersome, so if
> there's another way to do it, I'd appreciate hearing about it.
>
No you do not. You could create a *deb file, or other package manager file
>
> Dont treat this as an rPI endorsement however. I much prefer the
> beaglebone in most cases, but the rPI, specifically the rPI's has many good
> points too.
>
Raspberry PI 3
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:33 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> O
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Graham Haddock
wrote:
> Hi William:
>
> For an expert, you are totally correct.
>
I would argue the other way around. the rPI's have stuff like 'wiring', and
are a lot like the Arduino's in many ways. Only running Linux. Me, I'm not
a big
n Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:12 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Graham <gra...@flex-radio.com> wrote:
>
>> The Beaglebone is a better choice than say, Raspberry Pi, since Linux is
>> somewhat locked-down
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Graham wrote:
> The Beaglebone is a better choice than say, Raspberry Pi, since Linux is
> somewhat locked-down on the R Pi, which puts limits what you can do with it.
>
This is mostly false. The images provided by the Raspberry PI
By the way the beaglebone comes with a pre-installed Linux demo image
already on it. On the eMMC. So no sdcard is required, but is recommended.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:39 AM, mzimmers <mzimm..
>
> The dtc version on recent images is 1.4.1, but the version used by the
> 3.8.13 kernel is 1.2.0-g37c0b6a0. If I use the dtc from the kernel
> source I can happily load a freshly compiled overlay.
>
It should be 1.4.0 for 3.8.x kernels. As I recall.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Charles
For a USB HID, according to what I've read. You do not need to worry about
all that. You just need to write or have an HID descriptor file.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:21 AM, David Glaser
>
may as well start off with a "bare metal" type
device. Cost, and complexity wise you're life will be a lot simpler. With
the trade-off that you'll have to get your hands dirty writing low level
code( at the register level ).
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gma
on the
beagelbone ).
Then the idea becomes writing client / server app(s) for which the sky is
the limit.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:43 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Searching the internet, you're likely going to find people who say this is
> not possible. At least where USB
Searching the internet, you're likely going to find people who say this is
not possible. At least where USB is concerned. Where the RasberryPI is
concerned the USB ports on it are connected to a hub chip, which then runs
in USB master mode. So . . . using HID USB descriptors is not possible in
>
> The only device tree overlay I needed is what I have below; no need to
> load the BB-ADC overlay.
>
Right, technically, you do not need an overlay, and you do not need any
driver modules either. As directly twiddling the ADC module registers, you
essentially are creating your own driver.
>
> That pretty much mean if file /sys/bus/w1/devices/28-*/w1_slave exists ->
> modprobe
> w1-gpio -> load the BB-W1-P9.12 file into capemanager
> then of course -> sleep for 1 second.
>
If file DOESNT exist. Sorry I missed the exclamation mark there
initially. which is boolean NOT.
On Tue,
9.12 file into capemanager
then of course -> sleep for 1 second.
If you need a different pin for one wire, then you'll have use another
device tree file in place of BB-W1-P9.12
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:10 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It'll load the w1( one wire ) driver
It'll load the w1( one wire ) driver module if not already loaded, then
it'll get the temperature from the device every 5 seconds. It'll also load
the BB-W1-P9.12 device tree file. I'd assume you'd need to edit this file,
or change the overlay file to be loaded if you need to use a different pin.
One more thing. make sure all other cmdline= lines are also commented out.
As the last line will likely override previous lines.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:05 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> cmdline=coherent_pool=1M quiet
>
> *cape_universal=enable*
> Remov
cmdline=coherent_pool=1M quiet
*cape_universal=enable*
Remove, the bolded text. Or better yet, copy that line. Remove that text,
then comment out the original line.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, cory cauvier
wrote:
> just got the newest version now I'm looking to do
err, so in a pinch or just outright one could use that image, and upgrade
the kernel if need be later. Through APT. Assuming that image would work
for the OP here . . .
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> BBB-blank-debian-8.5-console-armhf-2
BBB-blank-debian-8.5-console-armhf-2016-06-19-2gb.img.xz
That's the image I've been using. It's worked on an Element14 RevC, and an
Element14 BBG. I haven't tried on my A5A. . .
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Robert Nelson
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:05 PM,
https://eewiki.net/display/linuxonarm/BeagleBone+Black#BeagleBoneBlack-SetupmicroSDcard
Granted . . .
sudo sfdisk ${DISK} <<-__EOF__
*4M*,,L,*
__EOF__
Thats different form what I remember. I thought that was supposed to be 1M ?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, William Hermans
>
> That image is not working for me either.
>
> If I am following this, there is an issue where the eMMC is being
> partitioned as if it is 4G instead of 2G correct ?
>
> If I just modify the sfdisk portion of the Flash script will that correct
this ?
It's a little more complex than that.
1)
zImage is the old way Robert *used* to build kernels. As in . . .
http://www.embeddedhobbyist.com/2013/07/beaglebone-black-usb-boot/ Look
towards the bottom where I discuss mkimage. But anyway that post I made way
back in july 2013, and it's very outdated. It's not how things are done any
more.
just used that.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Phil <phil.s@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 4:36:19 PM UTC-5, William Hermans wrote:
>>
>> The PRU hads to access the ADC through the L3_interconnect bus too . . .
>> so the control register
If you google "how to linux email command line" You'll see you do not need
anything special to send emails from Linux . . .
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Hồng Quân Nguyễn
wrote:
>
> I use mailgun.com to send email. It provides HTTP API.
>
> Here is a part of my code
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Robert Nelson
wrote:
>
>
> What's odd about those.. When the u-boot.img got too fat, it would
> clober the partition table at 1MB, BUT from the log:
>
> Formatting: /dev/mmcblk1
> sfdisk: [sfdisk from util-linux 2.25.2]
> sfdisk: [sfdisk
, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> . . .
>
> TFTP from server 0.0.0.0; our IP address is 206.223.20.131; sending through
> gateway 206.223.20.1
> Filename 'boot.scr.uimg'.
> Load address: 0x8200
> Loading: * *TFTP error: 'File no
. . .
TFTP from server 0.0.0.0; our IP address is 206.223.20.131; sending
through gateway 206.223.20.1
Filename 'boot.scr.uimg'.
Load address: 0x8200
Loading: * *TFTP error: 'File not found' (1)
Not retrying...*
=>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Robert Nelson
As with anything else computer related. You should be mindful of where you
get your OS images from. Clearly the one the OP is working with is not a
standard "official" image. Since Robert has not built any using a FAT
partition in quite some time. As in more than a year ago.
So in order to get
patch looks interesting. Maybe the same issue?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9005611/
>
>
> Brian
>
>
> On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 6:45:04 AM UTC-7, Mark A. Yoder wrote:
>>
>> William:
>> Thanks for looking into it. It looks like you got a
of these 4 kernel
directory "trees" that I show listed in my last command. simply by editing
the "uname_r" parameter in the /boot.uEnv.txt file.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:07 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Denn
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 21:19:49 -0700 (PDT), Viswadeep Sarangi
> declaimed the
> following:
>
>
> {I was running late getting to work and missed this part}
>
> >The contents of the FAT
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, shewhorn wrote:
> I posted something yesterday but it seems to have vanished. I've run into
> this difficult before where none of the instructions or tutorials for
> getting internet connectivity via ethernet over USB work. Someone MUST have
The PRU hads to access the ADC through the L3_interconnect bus too . . . so
the control register for the L3_interconnect must also be enabled.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Phil <phil.s@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 10:36:02 AM UTC-5, William
in a device tree overlay. But I checked the source
file for the eqep2b overlay, and all that seems to be in place.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:35 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah that probably wont work. It's probably configuring the eQEP module as
> a PWM. I don
>
> I have a BBB connected to Windows via USB. I'm watching the "Device
> Manager" under Windows. The window constantly refreshes every 5 to 10
> seconds with the BBB Serial port showing and then... not showing. The
> port is constantly reconnecting. It does this 90% of the time. There are
>
> device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport
>
> debian@beaglebone:~$ ls /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip5/pwm0/
> duty_cycle enable period polarity power uevent
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:50 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
&g
0/
duty_cycle enable period polarity power uevent
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:50 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *echo bone_eqep1 > $SLOTS*
>>
> -bash: echo: write error: File exists
>>
>
> Yeah, you're going to get this error whenever you
>
> *echo bone_eqep1 > $SLOTS*
>
-bash: echo: write error: File exists
>
Yeah, you're going to get this error whenever you load a device tree file
that attempts to mux pins that have already been muxed in a different
overlay. At minimum, when using config-pin overlay . I'm not
however sure if one
Hi Paul,
I would advise against doing any "production" code using /dev/mem + mmap().
For the simple reason that you'll have latency introduced that will not be
predictable. For your purposes. However, with that said, it would be ok for
"test code" where timing is not too important.
I would also
form the ADC into memory, depending.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:45 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps this will also help ?
>
> http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_PRU_Read_Latencies
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:35 PM, William Hermans <yy
Perhaps this will also help ?
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/AM335x_PRU_Read_Latencies
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:35 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From userland, and using /dev/mem + mmap() it is possible to get
> ~3MB/second worth of samples from the o
>From userland, and using /dev/mem + mmap() it is possible to get
~3MB/second worth of samples from the on die am335x processors ADC.
Granted, many of these samples are redundant, but I wrote a C application
to do this, *just* to see how much such an application could handle.
Theoretically, the
Fist, you would get an sdcard, and flash an image to it.
http://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack_Debian#microSD.2FStandalone:_.28console.29_.28BeagleBone.2FBeagleBone_Black.2FBeagleBone_Green.29
Once you have that image on an sdcard, you boot as normal- with the sdcard
inserted of course.
always read
'0' whether that pin is pulled high, or low - externally.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 8:55 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, and right. I'm still not clear on if SPI can be muxed outside of the
> given board overlay file. While at the same time, it seems
There is an eCAP module in the processor that *perhaps* could be controlled
via a PRU . . . but I have limited knowledge of that peripheral module, and
no hands on . . .
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber
wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 15:04:23 -0700 (PDT),
:45 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this a reason we can't get it working in both?
>>
>
> Are you speaking to me Jason ?
>
> If so I'm not sure what the problem the OP is having. But I can say that
> "we" do not need to to any extra pin muxi
n Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Jason Kridner <jkrid...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this a reason we can't get it working in both?
>
> On Sep 10, 2016, at 2:11 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sure, the work around is don't use those kernels.
>
> will
Sure, the work around is don't use those kernels.
william@beaglebone:~$ uname -r
4.4.14-ti-r34
william@beaglebone:~$ ls /sys/class/gpio
export gpiochip0 gpiochip32 gpiochip64 gpiochip96 unexport
william@beaglebone:~$ sudo sh -c "echo '115' > /sys/class/gpio/export"
[sudo] password for
(GPIO_CLEARDATAOUT)
address.
Ok thats confusing . . .but I guess I read this and understood the opposite
of what it's saying ? e.g. I was thinking DATAOUT would be fast ?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:56 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh...while we're on the subject, there's
the TRM. TO me it seems that the SETDATA(direction) registers
actually write to DATAOUT. did I read that wrong ?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
> On 9/8/2016 3:35 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > On 9/8/2016 12:41 PM, William H
in order
for this 1 pin to be usable ?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:35 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I still do not know what exactly the problem *is*. So for those of you
> who need to use this pin, I guess you, and everyone else who is using a 4.x
> kernel will have t
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
> On 9/7/2016 7:50 PM, William Hermans wrote:
> >
> > SETDATAOUT -> |= BITx
> > CLEARDATAOUT -> &=(~BITx)
> >
> > I gues I'll have to reread the TRM again.
, 2016 at 6:09 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let me rephrase that. The board seems to boot and come up, but I was
> unable to ssh into the board. For whatever reason. Did not care to look why.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:08 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmai
Let me rephrase that. The board seems to boot and come up, but I was unable
to ssh into the board. For whatever reason. Did not care to look why.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:08 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, booting and loading am335x-bonegreen-overlay.dtb on a b
So, booting and loading am335x-bonegreen-overlay.dtb on a beaglebone green
will render the board unbootable.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:24 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just for clarity
>
> *debian@beaglebone:~$* sudo sh -c "echo '1' >
> /sys/class/gp
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
> On 9/7/2016 5:18 PM, William Hermans wrote:
> >
> > I agree with Charles with one exception. I personally prefer to use
> DATAOUT
> > directly instead of using SETDATAOUT /
io/gpio48/value
1
So, I'm not experiencing an "off by 1" issue. But for some reason gpio1_16
*only* works if a universal IO overlay that deals with gpio1_16
appropriately - *somehow*. I'm not sure what I'm missing. Is this a
software bug of some sort ?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Willi
t4_txd_mux2 */
BONE_P9_15 (PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* gpmc_a0.gpio1[16]
*/
*0x088 (PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* gpmc_csn3.gpio2[0] */*
>;
};
That should be the culprit, but do I realy need to create a seperate custom
board file just for this purpose ? Seem
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:
>
> IMHO it works best if you setup the GPIO banks with Linux, then use
> the PRU to twiddle the output bits using the set and clear registers
> in the GPIO bank. That way you don't have to worry about any
without universal io, config pin, or any
of that.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:00 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Additionally, using:
>
> $ sudo config-pin overlay univ-all
> $ sudo config-pin P9.15 hi / low
>
> Seems to work fine on the BBG too. However
, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So as the subject says we're having issues with gpio1_16 and gpio2_0 being
> tied together through r161. We've removed r161 on one beaglebone green,
> then export gpio48(gpio1_16) through sysfs, set the direction to 'in', in
> an att
So as the subject says we're having issues with gpio1_16 and gpio2_0 being
tied together through r161. We've removed r161 on one beaglebone green,
then export gpio48(gpio1_16) through sysfs, set the direction to 'in', in
an attempt to read input to an externally connected sensor. This does not
The only thing I can think of is that you're not enabling the ADC
control register. Below is a code snippet from another post.
//Init ADC CTRL register
MOV r2, 0x44E0D040
MOV r3, 0x0005
SBBO r3, r2, 0, 4
>From this post:
not have the time.
. .
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:03 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah it sound like bonescript, or the newer refactored version may not
> correctly handle the "file does not exist" exception correctly. As it
> currently sits.
>
> I
Yeah it sound like bonescript, or the newer refactored version may not
correctly handle the "file does not exist" exception correctly. As it
currently sits.
Ideally, in code you would check that the file you're about to use exists,
and if it does not then you load the appropriate device tree
If by chance that does not work for you. Use the latest image. Jessie 8.5 I
believe. It works, or at least works for me, with the beaglebone black or
beaglebone green.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:49 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> $ sudo apt-get install acpid
>
> Gi
$ sudo apt-get install acpid
Give that a whirl, it should fix your issue. You changed images didnt you ?
from LXDE image to one of the command line images. Right ?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Steven Hirsch wrote:
> Title says it. After updating to Debian 8.4 I find
regulator/
> tps65217-regulator.c?v=4.4
> The low-level driver you have looked at is used by this.
>
> Cheers
> Christoph
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 4:04 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So I did some searching on this because I am interested in this as we
interestingly:
*william@beaglebone:~$ cat*
/sys/bus/i2c/drivers/tps65217/0-0024/tps65217-charger/power/runtime_enabled
disabled
So is it possible to change this to "enabled" ? If so what are the
consequences ?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com>
uot;twiddle" the register bits.
I would have to experiment with this myself to confirm that anything I
think may be possible. Actually *is* possible.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:52 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Page 41 of the datasheet, looks like registers 3-6. Alt
Page 41 of the datasheet, looks like registers 3-6. Although I have not
read in details what the function of those registers are. This should be
fixable through custom software, but I'd have to read in greater detail to
understand what must be done, and what should be checked for before
manually
>
> Thanks for your answer, Robert. I checked option, but I don't have a
> microSD card right now. Is there a way to install images without using an
> SD card or SD card is the only option?
>
No, not really. Well actually you *could* "boot" off USB, but this should
really be done with the
el versions. And if that
> fails, I'll switch to a new image per Robert's suggestion.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 8:41:58 PM UTC-4, William Hermans wrote:
>>
>> Alexander,
>>
>> Are you just loading the rootfs and kernel from USB ?
Alexander,
Are you just loading the rootfs and kernel from USB ? If this is the case
you should not need a custom
first or second stage bootloader. Granted I have not done this myself
since 3.8.x kernels, but It should just work, Unless uboot has changed in
this regard. Don't see why it should
This, which I'm assuming if your wifi adapter ?
wlo1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 2c:33:7a:80:90:79
*inet addr:10.67.66.49 Bcast:10.67.79.255 Mask:255.255.240.0*
inet6 addr: fe80::5bed:8318:765b:bc41/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500
Heres a quick simple example of command specific sudo usage.
http://www.atrixnet.com/allow-an-unprivileged-user-to-run-a-certain-command-with-sudo/
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd probably consider using groups. Like I briefly dis
701 - 800 of 4107 matches
Mail list logo