Looks as though Freescale have made the closed source driver available for
all the GPUs they use (Vivante). Have heard that JavaFX programs will run
via the framebuffer (hardware rendering) just fine with both the closed
(official) and open source (unofficial - reverse engineered) Vivante GPU
Presumably the closed source driver is an installer that is run on any
Freescale imx6 board. If that is the case then TI's GPU support is **ahem,
cough, cough** severely lacking.
On Monday, 1 December 2014 16:35:39 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
Looks as though Freescale have made the closed
I have tested Ti gpu driver on omap5 uevm board based with GLSDK 6.04
The gpu driver crash didn't be fixed for a very long time .
iMX6 GPU will crash also ,if high cpu load and very frequency interrupt
case, you might get kernel panic on imx6-solo
but on fsl QUAD cores , Its more stable ,
Hang on a moment. The version of Yocto that is available for Wandboard
targets the armhf CPU platform. Are the Panda's notoriously unreliable
hardware wise?
On Sunday, 30 November 2014 14:36:05 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
3d: vivante will be reversed engineered before powervr. Freescale
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Hang on a moment. The version of Yocto that is available for Wandboard
targets the armhf CPU platform. Are the Panda's notoriously unreliable
hardware wise?
i.mx6 builtin sata: wand - sata drive
panda no sata: panda -
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:38 PM, John Syn john3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed?
Have some fantastic news
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:38 PM, John Syn john3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can't
On 11/29/14, 7:50 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:38 PM, John Syn john3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can't see the
Robert - What is the performance like with a Dual Core Cortex A9 compared
to a Quad Core Cortex A9?
On Sunday, 30 November 2014 04:51:10 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
omap5_uevm: (i was also building cloud9 during week, let's say 95% of
the time was openjdk)
Build needed 38:19:47, 6215244k
On Nov 29, 2014 6:21 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert - What is the performance like with a Dual Core Cortex A9 compared
to a Quad Core Cortex A9?
With the quad wand, you also get 2gb of ram over the dual which only has
1gb.. That alone is worth the price delta. For the
Robert - thanks for the advise. Would it make sense economically to go for
the Wandboard Quad over the upcoming Beagleboard X15 when it comes to
running GUI programs?
On Sunday, 30 November 2014 13:32:01 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2014 6:21 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
On Nov 29, 2014 7:22 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert - thanks for the advise. Would it make sense economically to go
for the Wandboard Quad over the upcoming Beagleboard X15 when it comes to
running GUI programs?
3d: vivante will be reversed engineered before powervr.
http://www.freescale.com/lgfiles/NMG/MAD/YOCTO/gpu-viv-bin-mx6q-3.10.17-1.0.0-hfp.bin
Do you mean this ?
2014-11-30 9:35 GMT+08:00 Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com:
On Nov 29, 2014 7:22 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert - thanks for the advise. Would it make sense
Do be aware with OpenJFX that JavaFX programs on the BBB will only run in
X11 with DirectFB being specified as the renderer. DirectFB on the BBB with
the current revision of OpenJFX that I was using had the bizarre GTK
requirement, which prevents the framebuffer (no X11) from being used. Also
Some very useful info on changing JRE/JVMs with Debian/Ubuntu
http://askubuntu.com/questions/107278/changing-jvm-in-java.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
BeagleBoard group.
To unsubscribe
Basic overview of setting up a BBB running Ubuntu 14.04 to run a JavaFX
program (*rough draft*):
1. Add unofficial OpenJDK 8 PPA
2. Update package list
3. Install OpenJDK 8 JamVM package
4. Make sure OpenJDK is installed by running *java -version* in a terminal
(should see OpenJDK 1.8 being
FYI OpenJFX 1.8u40 includes Dialog/Alert API
http://code.makery.ch/blog/javafx-dialogs-official/. If you use the
Oracle JDK then you will have to wait until around March 2015 to take
advantage of the new API.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this
By default OpenJDK 8 uses the Zero JVM which doesn't provide a high level
of performance. Highly recommended to use the high performance JamVM JVM
instead, which is comparable performance wise to the JVM used in Oracle's
Java SE Embedded 8. JamVM was originally designed to perform well on
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed?
Have some fantastic news on the Ubuntu front. Various OpenJDK 8 packages via
an unofficial PPA are available for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) and 14.04
(Trusty).
So
Ah, the guy was talking specifically about the OpenSSL test specifically in
that case. Reading that article today, seems like this person is not very
good at benchmarking. As everything is done willy nilly with unfair
advantages to some hardware. e.g. the Beaglebone was benchmarked @ 720p for
some
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed?
Have some fantastic news on the Ubuntu front. Various OpenJDK 8
packages via
an unofficial
Successfully built OpenJFX from the newest HG revision at the time of this
post. OpenJFX build took just over 3 min on a Linux Mint 17 Intel Core 2
Duo laptop. Not sure why I thought the build was going to take around 30
min.
Must not be much in OpenJFX or the laptop is reasonably fast at
Exact build time is 3 mins 4.834 secs.
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 14:38:44 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
Successfully built OpenJFX from the newest HG revision at the time of this
post. OpenJFX build took just over 3 min on a Linux Mint 17 Intel Core 2
Duo laptop. Not sure why I thought
Curious. Which ARM CPU does the OMAP5 SoC use?
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 09:38:48 UTC+13, john3909 wrote:
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robert...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
javascript:
wrote:
Can't see
Cortex-A15 dual cores
2014-11-27 9:45 GMT+08:00 Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com:
Curious. Which ARM CPU does the OMAP5 SoC use?
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 09:38:48 UTC+13, john3909 wrote:
On 11/26/14, 7:59 AM, Robert Nelson robert...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42
No wonder the OMAP5 is so much more grunty.
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 14:58:51 UTC+13, liyaoshi wrote:
Cortex-A15 dual cores
2014-11-27 9:45 GMT+08:00 Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com javascript::
Curious. Which ARM CPU does the OMAP5 SoC use?
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 09:38:48
Wonder what it would be like to create an OpenJDK 8 build using a lower end
Beagleboard X15 (the one that is currently in the design phase).
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 15:04:46 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
No wonder the OMAP5 is so much more grunty.
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 14:58:51
From: Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com
Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com beagleboard@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 at 6:39 PM
To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com beagleboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: JavaFX 8 on BeagleBone Black (SGX driver
Have uploaded a copy of the OpenJFX 1.8u40 runtime (GPL 2 license with
class path exception). On the BBB Extract the lib directory from the 7z
file and move the directory to the JRE installation directory.
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 14:38:44 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
Successfully built
Google Groups text editor has mysteriously decided to stop working. Here is
the link to the OpenJFX runtime
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5z2pDNB2V1_X2RnbTBfc0RDOGcauthuser=0.
On Thursday, 27 November 2014 18:12:03 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
Have uploaded a copy of the OpenJFX 1.8u40
Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed?
Have some fantastic news on the Ubuntu front. Various OpenJDK 8 packages
https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa via an unofficial PPA
ppa:openjdk-r/ppa are available for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) and 14.04
(Trusty).
On
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't see the OpenJDK 8 build. I take it the build failed?
Have some fantastic news on the Ubuntu front. Various OpenJDK 8 packages via
an unofficial PPA are available for Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise) and 14.04
(Trusty).
OH,
OH, it's still building.. Been at it almost 24 hours...
It's in the middle of the test suite:
compiler/java/jar running ...
Passed: tools/javac/annotations/
repeatingAnnotations/combo/ReflectionTest.java
Passed:
tools/javac/annotations/repeatingAnnotations/combo/RetentionAnnoCombo.java
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:45 PM, William Hermans yyrk...@gmail.com wrote:
OH, it's still building.. Been at it almost 24 hours...
It's in the middle of the test suite:
compiler/java/jar running ...
Passed: tools/javac/annotations/
repeatingAnnotations/combo/ReflectionTest.java
Passed:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:45 PM, William Hermans yyrk...@gmail.com
wrote:
OH, it's still building.. Been at it almost 24 hours...
It's in the middle of the test suite:
compiler/java/jar running ...
Passed:
LOL !!!
*The oddity is the BeagleBone Black (BBB) which can outperform the quad
core i.MX6 in all tests*
I'll have to read that in fuller detail when im 100% sober . . .
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:10 PM,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:18 PM, William Hermans yyrk...@gmail.com wrote:
LOL !!!
*The oddity is the BeagleBone Black (BBB) which can outperform the quad
core i.MX6 in all tests*
I'll have to read that in fuller detail when im 100% sober . . .
Since that was 2013, i wouldn't be
Below are some handy links for creating custom builds of OpenJDK and
OpenJFX.
- Building OpenJFX
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Building+OpenJFX
- Building OpenJFX For ARM
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Cross+Building+for+ARM+Hard+Float
- Official Debian GIT For
Wonder if the OpenJFX package (package name?) has been uploaded to the
Debian Unstable repository yet.
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 10:02:35 UTC+13, Nick Apperley wrote:
Below are some handy links for creating custom builds of OpenJDK and
OpenJFX.
- Building OpenJFX
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Wonder if the OpenJFX package (package name?) has been uploaded to the
Debian Unstable repository yet.
It's there:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openjfx.html
Just a few build errors:
Thanks for the update. Damm, oh well there is the option to do a custom
OpenJFX build. Hardest part is to do a custom build of OpenJDK 8 for ARM.
Having great difficulty in tracking down good documentation in this area,
specifically for the ARM side. Might be worth looking at the CACAO and
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. Damm, oh well there is the option to do a custom
OpenJFX build. Hardest part is to do a custom build of OpenJDK 8 for ARM.
Having great difficulty in tracking down good documentation in this area,
Is there a successful build of OpenJDK 8u20 for armhf?
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 10:35:43 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Thanks for the update. Damm, oh well there is the option to do a custom
OpenJFX
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a successful build of OpenJDK 8u20 for armhf?
I'll fire up a build and see. ;)
Regards,
--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this
Thanks for that. Discovered that JamVM isn't an actual JRE since it relies
on the class libraries which are available in OpenJDK. JamVM is only a JVM
(Java Virtual Machine). From the outset JamVM *might* be able to run JavaFX
programs since it is compatible with OpenJDK 8. IcedTea (OpenJDK
Hopefully if the custom build of OpenJDK 8 works then that can be adjusted
to work on the stable Debian/Ubuntu images for the BBB.
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 10:59:26 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Is
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Hopefully if the custom build of OpenJDK 8 works then that can be adjusted
to work on the stable Debian/Ubuntu images for the BBB.
If the test build goes thru, i'll just add it to:
https://github.com/rcn-ee/repos
So
Excellent, highly appreciated :)
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 11:23:20 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hopefully if the custom build of OpenJDK 8 works then that can be
adjusted
to work on the stable
Managed to get OpenJFX https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Main
(open source version of JavaFX) working on the BBB, however it is running
on Ubuntu. Got a sample JavaFX program (Ensemble) working by accident on
X11 by specifying a renderer that isn't supported by OpenJFX. Key part
You're not going to like this suggestion. Far better option to get JavaFX
and OpenJFX working and performing well is to run JavaFX programs on a
Wandboard http://www.wandboard.org/ (eg the Dual version) since all the
Vivante GPUs are supported, even graphics acceleration via both GPUs. Sadly
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Managed to get OpenJFX (open source version of JavaFX) working on the BBB,
however it is running on Ubuntu. Got a sample JavaFX program (Ensemble)
working by accident on X11 by specifying a renderer that isn't supported
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
You're not going to like this suggestion. Far better option to get JavaFX
and OpenJFX working and performing well is to run JavaFX programs on a
Wandboard (eg the Dual version) since all the Vivante GPUs are supported,
Found a closed source Vivante GPU driver package
https://community.freescale.com/thread/302726 (gpu-viv-bin-mx6q) however
it is heavily tied into a Freescale ARM CPU. Will see if I can the name of
the open source one. Saw it somewhere on the Phoenix (Linux
gamer/performance website).
On
Open source GPU driver is called etna_viv. Phoronix have an article
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTI3MjU covering
etna_viv. No package for the open source driver yet. Momentarily got
confused with the gpu-viv-acc-fb package which only contains the closed
source Vivante GPU
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
Open source GPU driver is called etna_viv. Phoronix have an article covering
etna_viv. No package for the open source driver yet. Momentarily got
confused with the gpu-viv-acc-fb package which only contains the closed
@Robert - Are you referring to OpenJFX for a Deb package. See that there is
still no OpenJDK 8 package for Ubuntu/Debian, how annoying. OpenJFX (ARM)
is reported to work on OpenJDK 8 (ARM).
Building OpenJDK is not for the faint of heart. Attempting to do so would
likely result in a brain dump.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nick Apperley napper...@gmail.com wrote:
@Robert - Are you referring to OpenJFX for a Deb package. See that there is
still no OpenJDK 8 package for Ubuntu/Debian, how annoying. OpenJFX (ARM) is
reported to work on OpenJDK 8 (ARM).
Building OpenJDK is not for
Sounds as crazy like building DirectFB 1.6 on the BBB running Debian.
Amazing considering the BBB only has 512 MB of RAM and swap isn't enabled.
On Monday, 24 November 2014 10:32:19 UTC+13, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Nick Apperley napp...@gmail.com
javascript:
Can any one post some updated info on getting JavaFX running on BBB with
the latest Debian. I'm new building kernels in Linux. I'm trying to get
JavaFX running on a BBB through the HDMI port and if possible a touchscreen
like the BB-VIEW or 4D. Any help would be greatly appreciated, even if
Hi littlf...
Did you find how to get jdk8 and javafx running on BBB?
I'm trying to do the same (RasPi was to slow, so I want to see if BBB does
better).
Also, how do you use sound in JavaFx+ RPi ??? (AudioClip and all media
doesnt work on RPi)
Thanks
(It's been 2 days fighting with BBB, any
at 8:11 AM
To: beagl...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Subject: [beagleboard] Re: JavaFX 8 on BeagleBone Black (SGX driver
problem?)
Sorry I can't help you but maybe you can help me.
I'm using your exact configuration...
But I still read
*root@arm:/opt
Do you need the JavaFX 8 graphics capabilities? If not, can you run it
with graphics disabled?
I do need the graphics capabilities (otherwise I wouldn't use FX ;-) so I
cannot disable the graphics.
On the chance that there might be useful information in them, here are
two links for java I
Sorry I can't help you but maybe you can help me.
I'm using your exact configuration...
But I still read
*root@arm:/opt/Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_5_00_00_01/gfxsdkdemos/ogles2#
./OGLES2ChameleonMan PVRShell: EGL 1.4 initializedExit message has been set
to: PVRShell: Unable to create
From: Giuseppe Iellamo pepp...@gmail.com
Reply-To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2014 at 8:11 AM
To: beagleboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: [beagleboard] Re: JavaFX 8 on BeagleBone Black (SGX driver
problem?)
Sorry I can't help you but maybe you can help me.
I'm
...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Subject: [beagleboard] Re: JavaFX 8 on BeagleBone Black (SGX driver
problem?)
Sorry I can't help you but maybe you can help me.
I'm using your exact configuration...
But I still read
*root@arm:/opt/Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_5_00_00_01/gfxsdkdemos/ogles2
65 matches
Mail list logo
