Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

Minimal SciFinder support will be in the next nightly build. We'll need tag and type mappings as discussed previously to make it more full-featured, but it should be a good start. -- Adam - This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

On Wednesday, August 15, 2007, at 09:28AM, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 15 Aug 2007, at 5:21 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote: >> So, if I understand this correctly: the entries would have to be of >> the form >> >> BibTeXFieldNamesForSciFinderTags = { >> "FIELD

Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

On 15 Aug 2007, at 5:21 PM, Holger Frauenrath wrote: > Hi Adam, > >> Thanks, that's nice to hear! It's also a good way to preface a >> feature request :). > > Shit! How did you notice? ;-) > >> This looks like it would be really easy to parse. Christiaan, >> post if >> you start working on it

Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

On 15 Aug 2007, at 4:41 PM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > Hello Holger, > > On Aug 15, 2007, at 01:30, Holger Frauenrath wrote: > >> after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started >> with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since, >> and I am more than happy

Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

Hi Adam, > Thanks, that's nice to hear! It's also a good way to preface a > feature request :). Shit! How did you notice? ;-) > This looks like it would be really easy to parse. Christiaan, post if > you start working on it; otherwise I'll take a look at it later > today. No point in duplicat

Re: [Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

Hello Holger, On Aug 15, 2007, at 01:30, Holger Frauenrath wrote: > after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started > with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since, > and I am more than happy with it. As I think it is possible that > software developers

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Z39.50 at DDB/DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek)

Christian and Simon, It seems indeed that DDB only returns SUTRS. And as in Simon's quotes from me, that unfortunately ends it. So I'll have to cope with this. Thanks for the information! Regards, Hanjo. -- http://www.ats20.de ---

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Z39.50 at DDB/DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek)

It seems indeed that DDB only returns SUTRS. And as in Simon's quotes from me, that unfortunately ends it. Christiaan On 15 Aug 2007, at 1:48 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote: > > On 15.08.2007, at 12:41, Hanjo Iwanowitsch wrote: > >> Ladies and gentlemen, >> >> I would like to import information from

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Z39.50 at DDB/DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek)

On 15.08.2007, at 12:41, Hanjo Iwanowitsch wrote: > Ladies and gentlemen, > > I would like to import information from DDB (German Bibliography) by > BibDesk's Search. > > For this I use the access described on z39_50.htm>. Target profile is provided on

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Z39.50 at DDB/DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek)

AFAICS, the encoding is no problem. We just don't get any record, and we don't use the encoding to download records, only to interpret them. Also the syntax should not be a problem, as it should be able to return USMARC according to the PDF you link to. So I don't know what goes wrong. Chr

[Bibdesk-users] Z39.50 at DDB/DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek)

Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to import information from DDB (German Bibliography) by BibDesk's Search. For this I use the access described on . Target profile is provided on . I filled in th

[Bibdesk-users] SciFinder Import

Hello everybody, after a number of people here on this list helped me to get started with BibDesk a couple of months ago, I have been using it ever since, and I am more than happy with it. As I think it is possible that software developers more often hear complaints from users about the th