The frivolous use of block space - ie. to increase the demand for block space -
is not encouraged. Although it is possible you may write chess moves on a wrap
of dollar bills and send them to your friends, nowhere that I know of has this
been recorded in a ledger as a valid past time.
KING
Wasn't this already not a problem because you can check if it was confirmed?
The transaction is not finalised in the mempool it is just speculation of a
transaction, so it makes sense to emit when the transaction is confirmed. Just
already check..
> It appears that the ZeroMQ topic I'm
Good Afternoon,
No. This has been discussed previously and eliminated as there is no proof that
the transaction can exist without population through the mempool. As a method
of payment not hearing about a transaction until it is possibly mined three
months later as I have experienced is
Good Afternoon,
Further, if it is entirely necessary to prevent the creation of utxo's that are
considered dust, and I am not by any means convinced, then it is simple to
provide the most circumspect solution to transfer the value of any dust utxo
that would be created in a transaction to the
Good Afternoon,
The underlying consideration is the same concerning the handling of 1c and 2c
coins in an economy. Although you may argue the cost of counting those coins
throughout the course of minting, drafting to banks, paying to bank customers,
including in change, and at every handling
Good Afternoon,
Returning to this subject, there should be no restriction to the value of
utxo's that keep in one's own wallet as change can be created in any value.
With obvious intent, the wallet should avoid creating utxo's below the current
dust limit at the time the transaction is created
Good Afternoon,
It is worth reconsidering the value accumulated in dust. Speculatively, when
the value of 1 BTC reaches US$ 1,000,000.00 then the value of one satoshi will
be US$ 0.01 so, for 1 satoshi to be of any substantial value the value of
Bitcoin will have to rise substantially higher.
Good Afternoon,
Proof-of-stake sounds like an altcoin fork. There is no consideration that
proof-of-work is insufficient or that it can be improved upon, only that it
should be regulated. Imagine, you are a gold miner with larger hands so you
start a mining race and mine plenty more than
Good afternoon,
That is not desirable since yourself and I cannot prove the property of the
UTXO when it is further spent unless we can ourselves scrutinize it.
We have had this conversation before where you approach your reply to resolve
that I have offered disagreement and I try to explain I
Good Afternoon,
If you actually believe the operation of consensus and the discussion relevant
to that is a mundane or philosophical dissection of people's ability to grasp a
humorous while on-topic but obligatorily unnecessary conversation you may
prefer if you enquire how Bitcoin is
Good Afternoon,
It is obvious that something needs to be done to curtail the current cost of
mining in kWh per block. I understand proposals are rejected because it is
considered censorship and Bitcoin has a consensus to allow anyone to mine but,
since mining requires specific hardware and
Good Afternoon,
Since this is on the list I will open without my thank-you. You will
kindly be advised that my title are recorded in both Scotland and with
England, also provided by record in Australia's account with names
recorded. If you wonder than am I Wills it is because a long time
before
v on behalf of
Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
bitcoin-dev wrote:
> My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfusca
tatute abiding) person should
have privacy, and not against the state, and/or that mixers are sufficient
privacy?
Personally, I’m not moved by such an argument. What do you think is the value
proposition of Bitcoin?
e
On Mar 1, 2021, at 14:21, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoi
upport
gold-like privacy to accumulate more dragnet surveillance coins. I wish you
success with that.
[0]: https://taaalk.co/t/bitcoin-maxima-other-crypto-things
On Mar 2, 2021, at 9:54 PM, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>>
wrot
more complex scripts to be done more
efficiently - using less ledger space.
so any objections you can have should be leveled at bitcoin, not at taproot.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:39 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> "Today I spent approximately $5 at a chip shop
rgument. What do you think is the value
> proposition of Bitcoin?
>
> e
>
>> On Mar 1, 2021, at 14:21, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Good Afternoon,
>>
>> I am going to take tough terms with much of your rep
ent
privacy?
Personally, I’m not moved by such an argument. What do you think is the value
proposition of Bitcoin?
e
On Mar 1, 2021, at 14:21, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
Good Afternoon,
I am going to take tough terms with much of your reply and do appreciate
acy, and not against the state, and/or that mixers are
> sufficient privacy?
>
> Personally, I’m not moved by such an argument. What do you think is the
> value proposition of Bitcoin?
>
> e
>
> > On Mar 1, 2021, at 14:21, LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
> > wr
ource on your reporting?
You may wish to rescind your nack.
--
@JeremyRubin<https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin><https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin>
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 5:46 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>>
w
Good Afternoon,
It has been reported that Taproot will enable some Monero like features
including the ability to hide transactions.
If that is the case I offer a full NACK and let me explain.
A part of the benefit of using Bitcoin is its honesty. The full transaction is
published on the
Good Afternoon,
Does anybody have a consensus list of the existing consensus items? i.e. to
itemise the operation of consensus into a list.
KING JAMES HRMH
Great British Empire
Regards,
The Australian
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)
of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire
MR. Damian
Good Afternoon,
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Floating-Point Nakamoto Consensus
I note that the discussion thread for this proposal has previously received
HARD_NAK
I note in the whitepaper the following basic introduction of need:
>As a result anode will simply adopt the first solution seen, creating a
There seems to be the real possibility that miners are simply trying to
optimise mining profit by limiting the average hash rate during the
retargeting, saving some electricity but poorly considering the overall
situation where they give opportunity to other miners probably raising the
The Tor team encourages active participating Tor nodes, preferably exit/
middle/guard nodes and not only client nodes, which is actually a significant
part of the reason that the documentation I put together in Bitcoin.SE does not
deal much with configuration tweaking Tor; as out of the box Tor
For those perhaps not so well versed in the operation of Bitcoin (and Bitcoin
Core) with Tor, connectivity through the outgoing connection to other nodes is
all accomplished via the socks5 proxy which enables all current gossip and the
distribution of the nodes own transactions to other nodes.
It goes without saying in that all privately known CVE should be handled so
professionally but, that is, well done team.
Regards,
LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH
From: bitcoin-dev-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org
on behalf of Luke Dashjr via
bitcoin-dev
I have but one point to make in a brief catch-up read over.
With the current protocol the fix to a network split is simple, the longest
chain win. But with the moving checkpoint I'm proposing we have a problem if
both chains began to differ more than N blocks ago, the forks are permanent. So
Is anybody keeping a list of the solid proposals > BIP's to be included in any
actual future consensus-driven fork? Perhaps pre-consensus voting of what to
include in the fork packages?
Surely not every or each proposal ever scouted is on for consideration.
This may actually help to build
It is April 1st. Nonetheless, I am agreed that the first part to track the
exchange rate in USD (why not use Gold $/oz?) has merit if properly
implemented. Voluntary data is notoriously difficult to enforce for accuracy.
Regards,
From:
the UTXO's not valid to be
>spent until n height/time? We should.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:55 AM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via bitcoin-dev
mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>>
wrote:
Opinion: Lock in a blockheight to get rid of it 10 years in the future. Use it
as pre
Opinion: Lock in a blockheight to get rid of it 10 years in the future. Use it
as press that Bitcoin is going to lose $1,000,000 if some mystery person does
not put their transaction through by then, try for global presses. Use the
opportunity to get rid of it while you are able. Once gazetted
32 matches
Mail list logo
