AIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey Andrew:
>
> Knowing you as someone who is soft spoken and who wouldn't hurt a fly...
> all I have to say is: Very well said!
>
> Cheers!
> Reza.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s someone who is soft spoken and who wouldn't hurt a fly...
> all I have to say is: Very well said!
>
> Cheers!
> Reza.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 3:12 P
ou as someone who is soft spoken and who wouldn't hurt a fly...
> all I have to say is: Very well said!
>
> Cheers!
> Reza.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007
ique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser
immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2007 3:43 PM
To: D. Hugh Redelmeier; biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
r; biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
So can we consider this closed now? Raise your hands if you agree that
we should move on.
-Original Message-
From: D. Hugh Redelmeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2007 2:32 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool
Communications: http://www.fonality.com/hud
Latest Review of PBXtra: http://www.fonality.com/press
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dancy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2007 12:43 PM
To: D. Hugh Redelmeier; biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
So can we consider this closed
So can we consider this closed now? Raise your hands if you agree that
we should move on.
-Original Message-
From: D. Hugh Redelmeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2007 2:32 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
[Note: I'm speaking only as a subsc
(cc'ing you directly in case you've unsubscribed)
On Thursday 12 July 2007 3:06:33 pm Justin Sweeney wrote:
> I saw other e-mails saying "I have some stuff for sale etc." so I
> thought cool. I'll post the new product. Another big mistake.
That isn't what you did. Please have the courtesy of bei
[Note: I'm speaking only as a subscriber (because that is all I am).]
| From: Justin Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| First, I had know that my e-mail would create such a problem.
I, for one, got the impression from the original posting that you were
a disinterested party. Note: the word "disinter
ustin
-Original Message-
From: Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:41 PM
To: Andrew Kohlsmith; biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
Hey Andrew:
Knowing you as someone who is soft spoken and who wouldn't hurt a fly...
al
Hey Andrew:
Knowing you as someone who is soft spoken and who wouldn't hurt a fly...
all I have to say is: Very well said!
Cheers!
Reza.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Kohlsmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [
ow industry.
-Original Message-
From: Richard (Rogers @ work) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
I thought the same thing too after I looked at the back of their
device...
http://www.neware.ca
If anyone here owns Nortel, Cisco, or any other type of stock you have a
stake in that company's product. There is no need to indicate that you
own it when you say 'the Sipura 1001 is a good product.' try it out.
Which is all I am saying.
You work at this company, you own the domain for this com
tent.
I have been a member of this list for quite a while and have enjoyed all
the information and help.
Does anyone out there support me?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 3:12 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very coo
Amen.
Good for you Andrew.
Cam
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 2:49 pm, Justin Sweeney wrote:
In a court of law I must answer...yes.
I am the 'inventor' of the concept.
Ok, so instead of hiding behind a pretty shoddy grassroots marketing attempt
("hey man I just found a coo
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 2:49 pm, Justin Sweeney wrote:
> In a court of law I must answer...yes.
> I am the 'inventor' of the concept.
Ok, so instead of hiding behind a pretty shoddy grassroots marketing attempt
("hey man I just found a cool device"), why not come out and state clearly
that you'r
ly as an AP that other devices can
connect to.
Can it communicate SIP via WiFi and output a standard analog dial-tone?
-Original Message-
From: philip mullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Justin Sweeney
Cc: biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool li
dache and last two years of
> my life trying to build something.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: philip mullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:50 PM
> To: Justin Sweeney
> Cc: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
>
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Justin Sweeney
Cc: biz@taug.ca
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
899 for these devices is way over the top, there are other devices in
the us I saw at the trade show in Chicago that are 120us retail.
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:41
evice
> useful?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shidan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:26 PM
> To: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
>
> Hi Justin,
>
> just to clarify something when you say "The
10, 2007 2:43 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 2:41 pm, Justin Sweeney wrote:
> As for me...Justin...what's in a name? The question is...is the device
> useful?
Do you work for, or profit from neware.ca's success, outside of it bein
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 2:41 pm, Justin Sweeney wrote:
> As for me...Justin...what's in a name? The question is...is the device
> useful?
Do you work for, or profit from neware.ca's success, outside of it being a
useful gadget for your specific needs?
-A.
ame? The question is...is the device
useful?
-Original Message-
From: Shidan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:26 PM
To: biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
Hi Justin,
just to clarify something when you say "They are a Toronto company"
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 2:26 pm, Shidan wrote:
> just to clarify something when you say "They are a Toronto company"
> shouldn't you be saying "We are a Toronto company". Your price is
> unreasonably expensive. You almost sold me on it though in your first
> post and even when I called you at "the
is awesome anyway because we charge $250 each phone line. So we
make our money very quickly in the trade and consumer show industry.
-Original Message-
From: Richard (Rogers @ work) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biz@taug.ca
Subject:
very quickly in the trade and consumer show industry.
-Original Message-
From: Richard (Rogers @ work) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; biz@taug.ca
Subject: Re: [biz] Very cool little box.
I thought the same thing too after I looked at the
I thought the same thing too after I looked at the back of their device...
http://www.neware.ca/specs.html
Richard
- Original Message -
From: "Nabeel Jafferali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: [biz] Very cool little box.
>
Wouldn't a WBP54G + PAP2T do the same thing for a FRACTION of the cost? I
have a customer doing that at a convention centre in the GTA.
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Sweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: July 10, 2007 10:52 AM
> To: biz@taug.ca
> Subject: [b
28 matches
Mail list logo
