On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 00:21, Sean Alphonse wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Are you continuing to work on blackbox?
>
> Thank-you for your time.
>
> Sean.
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
Hello.
Are you continuing to work on blackbox?
Thank-you for your time.
Sean.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
Actually, this happens with netscape as well. If you pass netscape the
-remote parameter so that it doesn't think it has to start a session
from scratch, and netscape is on a different workspace, you'll hit the
same problem. I do not believe it has anything to do with opera not
doing things righ
On 12-Dec-2001 Christian Dysthe wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2001 14:32:15 -0500
> "Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I believe that I've fixed this, actually. WOOT.
>
> Does this mean that this is not really an Opera issue, or something
> that Opera should fix?
>
Sounds like sho
On 12 Dec 2001 14:32:15 -0500
"Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that I've fixed this, actually. WOOT.
Does this mean that this is not really an Opera issue, or something
that Opera should fix?
--
Christian Dysthe
http://www.dysthe.net
ICQ: 3945810
Registered Lin
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 22:27:35 -0500
Marco Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I saw someone mention something about a patch to fix adobe
> acrobat hanging blackbox. Anyone know where I could get this?
First I've heard of this issue & I've been using their pdf reader pretty much forev
>
> Slightly different. I've not had a chance to look at what exactly the
> difference in results is =:)
>
wmaker unmaps the frame after the client which should not really matter. The
piece of suspect code in my mind is the event mask bb uses. Notice how wmaker
is careful to preserve th
Actually, wmaker's code looks like this
/* prevent window withdrawal when getting UnmapNotify */
XSelectInput(dpy, wwin->client_win,
wwin->event_mask & ~StructureNotifyMask);
XUnmapWindow(dpy, wwin->client_win);
XSelectInput(dpy, wwin->client_win, wwin->event
>
> Shaleh, please take a gander at this and see if you have any objections
> to putting it in 61.2. The affect that this has (at least with this
> opera situation) is that opera's state hasn't changed to Withdrawn and
> he's now able to receive the "open a new link" message. Now, granted,
> op
I believe that I've fixed this, actually. WOOT. This has annoyed me to
no end. The problem as I see it is that blackbox sets the window state
for any window not currently on the current workspace to "withdrawn". I
believe this causes opera to behave differently and not know that it
already has
On 12-Dec-2001 Bill Beal wrote:
> Imad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jan Schaumann wrote:
>>
>> > [could you trim your lines to something <80 chars/line
>> > please? thanks]
>> >
>> > David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Bug 1: Right-click on any win
Imad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jan Schaumann wrote:
>
> > [could you trim your lines to something <80 chars/line
> > please? thanks]
> >
> > David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Bug 1: Right-click on any window's titlebar to get
> > > the titlebar m
>
> Big window, titlebar menu, "shade" -> big window shades
> Now, right click titlebar menu, "maximize" (ie unmaximize) -> window
> gets small, but stays shaded, as it should. However, right-clicking on
> the titlebar shows that the "Shade" part in the menu is _de_selected.
> That is, even thou
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> [could you trim your lines to something <80 chars/line please? thanks]
>
> David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bug 1: Right-click on any window's titlebar to get the titlebar menu,
> > and maximize or unmaximize the window. The title
definately a bug, I'm currently staring at a blackbox desktop allowing no
input. BBkeys isn't taking any input, bbpager isn't listening, neither is
my eterm. Interesting bug.
>From: Chris Gilbreth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: window resizing bug?
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 20
>From: Chris Gilbreth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: window resizing bug?
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:52:11 -0800
>
>When I am resizing a windows with alt+rightmousebutton, if I click the
>left mouse button as I am doing it and drag some more I encounter some
>wierd behaviour.
--- "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bug 1: Right-click on any window's titlebar to get the titlebar menu, and
>> maximize or unmaximize the window. The titlebar menu will not be removed
>> (but it should be). This is easier to see when unmaximizing the window; when
>> maximiz
[could you trim your lines to something <80 chars/line please? thanks]
David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bug 1: Right-click on any window's titlebar to get the titlebar menu,
> and maximize or unmaximize the window. The titlebar menu will not be
> removed (but it should be). T
Personally I like the focus as it stands. If say I'm working in a text
editor (not mentioning any to avoid a favorites war) I don't always leave
the pointer over the window when I'm typing. Also would this maybe disrupt
bbkeys? Course I guess this could just be a new focus model too. just m
On 12-Dec-2001 Bill Beal wrote:
> David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Bug 2: Maximize a window, shade it, and unmaximize it.
>> The window will unmaximize, unshade for a split second
>> (which it shouldn't do), and then reshade.
>
> Addendum:
>
> Just tried this out and not
On 12-Dec-2001 Christian Dysthe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I asked about this a while back, but got no answer. Maybe someone
> now knows why Blackbox allows several instanses of Opera (the web
> browser) as long as each instance is opened on different desktops?
>
> For instance, if I click on a link in m
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 07:49:09 -0800 (PST)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Knuth started with TeX 78, then TeX 80, with many versions. TeX 3 is
basically the final version with only bugfixes extending the precision.
Jeffrey
> On 12-Dec-2001 Mads Martin J_rgensen wrote:
> > *
> Bug 1: Right-click on any window's titlebar to get the titlebar menu, and
> maximize or unmaximize the window. The titlebar menu will not be removed
> (but it should be). This is easier to see when unmaximizing the window; when
> maximizing it, the only hint that the menu still exists is that
David Lawrence Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bug 2: Maximize a window, shade it, and unmaximize it.
> The window will unmaximize, unshade for a split second
> (which it shouldn't do), and then reshade.
Addendum:
Just tried this out and noticed that following the
unmax-unshade-reshade,
* Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 12. 2001 16:58]:
> It sure has, but the upcoming version should be numbered according to
> what it is. And it's not a 1.0. I'd suggest calling this version
> whatever you like, release it, get feedback, update the code, fix bugs,
> NOT add feeatures or an
Hi,
I asked about this a while back, but got no answer. Maybe someone
now knows why Blackbox allows several instanses of Opera (the web
browser) as long as each instance is opened on different desktops?
For instance, if I click on a link in my mailer an Opera instance is
opened even though anot
On 12-Dec-2001 David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> I stumbled across a few very minor bugs in blackbox 0.61.1 a while ago. (In
> hindsight, I should have sent the emails about them to this list instead of
> to Raven directly, since they're fixed in his unreleased CVS version.)
> Unfortunately, I do n
I stumbled across a few very minor bugs in blackbox 0.61.1 a while ago. (In
hindsight, I should have sent the emails about them to this list instead of to Raven
directly, since they're fixed in his unreleased CVS version.) Unfortunately, I do not
have patches for these, because (a) my Xlib pr
Mads Martin Jørgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about calling the upcoming release Blackbox 1.0?
>
> There are some aspects of that:
>
> o The masses think a 1.0 release is better, and more people would
>probably use BB now it's out in a 1.0 release, therefore bugs will be
>disc
On 12-Dec-2001 Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
> * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 11. 2001 17:37]:
>> So, 0.61.2 is almost ready to be released screaming into the world. If
>> anyone
>> has a patch floating around that fixes some problem I would love to hear
>> about
>> it. The recent
* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Dec 11. 2001 17:37]:
> So, 0.61.2 is almost ready to be released screaming into the world. If anyone
> has a patch floating around that fixes some problem I would love to hear about
> it. The recent open file descriptor bug shows how much the community
On Tue, Dec11,01 16:16, Kyle Donaldson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > Now, if blackbox receives any of SIGSEGV,SIGFPE, SIGINT or SIGTERM, it
> > calls this shtudonw-function, just as if "exit" had been selected from
> > the menu. It would therefore stand to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If i remember correctly, there's already an applet called something
like BlackStatusBox linked off of
http://bbtools.thelinuxcommunity.org/
check it out... and since you piqued my interest, i'm trying to get
it myself to try it out (but it seems the
Hi,
i just thought about a news-ticker in the bb-toolbar.
Who needs the name of the current window?
Maybe a good idea?
regards
sascha
34 matches
Mail list logo
